Doc Talk In Cannes: Deadline Podcast Hosts American Pavilion Panel On Challenged State Of Documentary Industry
Stars of documentaries also turned up: Shia LaBeouf, whose exploits as founder of a free theater company in L.A. are chronicled in Slauson Rec, and Julian Assange, focus of the documentary The Six Billion Dollar Man. The latter film, directed by Eugene Jarecki, won a Special Jury Prize, marking the 10th anniversary of the L'Oeil d'or award, which goes to the top documentary at Cannes. Imago, directed by Chechen filmmaker Déni Oumar Pitsaev, took the 2025 L'Oeil d'or prize.
More from Deadline
Doc Talk Podcast Goes International, Reporting From Poland's Millennium Docs Against Gravity
Cannes Film Festival 2025: Read All Of Deadline's Movie Reviews Including Palme D'Or Winner 'It Was Just An Accident'
Sony Pictures Classics Takes North America & Multiple Territories For Cannes Caméra D'Or Winner 'The President's Cake'
For the first time, Deadline's Doc Talk podcast traveled to Cannes to record interviews and to moderate a panel at the American Pavilion. Today's episode of the show is built around our AmPav discussion on the state of the documentary industry, which featured panelists Vanessa Hope, director of Invisible Nation; Joe Tufano, VP Distribution at Submarine Entertainment; and Catherine Quantschnigg, Noah Media Group's Producer, Sales.
Tufano explains how documentary filmmakers increasingly are moving to a territory-by-territory approach to sell their features in the absence of acquisitions for worldwide distribution. Hope tells us why she considered going the self-distribution route in the U.S. for her award-winning film that explores Taiwan as it contends with almost daily threats from mainland China. And Quantschnigg reveals how the distribution landscape has changed dramatically in only a few years since Netflix acquired Noah Media Group's acclaimed film 14 Peaks: Nothing Is Impossible.
That's on the latest edition of the Doc Talk podcast, hosted by Oscar winner John Ridley (12 Years a Slave, Shirley) and Matt Carey, Deadline's documentary editor. The pod is a production of Deadline and Ridley's Nō Studios.
Listen to the episode above or on major podcast platforms including Spotify, iHeart and Apple.
Best of Deadline
'Hacks' Season 4 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out?
Everything We Know About 'Hacks' Season 4 So Far
'The Last Of Us': Differences Between HBO Series & Video Game Across Seasons 1 And 2
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dear Tesla Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for September 30
Few events on the calendar carry as much weight for U.S. electric vehicle buyers — and Tesla (TSLA) investors — as Sept. 30, 2025. That date marks the end of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit under U.S. President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' signed into law in July. The move effectively shortens what was, under the President Joe Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, a generous incentive slated to run through 2032. Now, with the clock ticking, the U.S. EV market is bracing for a major shift. In this article, we'll explore what the Sept. 30 deadline means for Tesla, how it could reshape U.S. EV demand, and why investors should mark their calendars for what may be one of the most pivotal dates for TSLA stock in 2025. More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Warns Investing At 'Too-High Purchase Price' Even for 'an Excellent Company' Can Undo a Decade of Smart Investing Why Archer Aviation's (ACHR) Post-Earnings Tailspin Looks Like a Favorably Mispriced Opportunity BitMine Immersion Now Holds 1.15 Million Ethereum Tokens. Should You Buy BMNR Stock Here? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. About Tesla Stock Tesla is a prominent innovator dedicated to accelerating the global transition to sustainable energy. The Elon Musk-led powerhouse designs, develops, manufactures, leases, and sells high-performance fully electric vehicles, solar energy generation systems, and energy storage products. It also offers maintenance, installation, operation, charging, insurance, financial, and various other services related to its products. In addition, the company is increasingly focusing on products and services centered around AI, robotics, and automation. TSLA's market cap currently stands at $1.1 trillion. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! The Insurance Savings You Expect Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You Great Rates and Award-Winning Service Shares of the EV maker have dropped 15.8% on a year-to-date basis. Tesla shares have been on a steady upward trend since Aug. 5. Several factors have supported the stock's gains. First of all, there's risk-on sentiment across markets, driven by Federal Reserve rate-cut expectations, easing global trade tensions, and a strong Q2 earnings season in the U.S. U.S. EV demand also appears strong in the third quarter, though this is likely driven by the impending loss of the $7,500 federal tax credit in September. Tesla Rides Sales Surge Ahead of Tax Credit Expiration The third-quarter EV buying frenzy is underway. The main reason is that consumers are rushing to purchase EVs ahead of a looming deadline to claim tax credits of up to $7,500. As a reminder, U.S. President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' signed in July, eliminates the tax credits for new, used, and leased EVs after Sept. 30. The tax credits, worth up to $7,500 for new EVs and $4,000 for used ones, are designed to make EV purchases more financially appealing to consumers. The EV tax incentives were among several policies implemented by the Biden administration to help reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, with the transportation sector being the nation's largest emitter. Notably, under the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, the tax credits were initially set to be available to consumers through 2032. 'We're expecting Q3 may be [a] record for EV sales because of the tax incentives going away,' said Stephanie Valdez Streaty, a senior analyst at Cox Automotive. The firm's data revealed that consumers bought nearly 130,100 new EVs in July, marking the second-highest monthly sales on record, trailing only roughly 136,000 sold in December. Streaty said that July's figures represent a 26.4% jump from June and an increase of nearly 20% compared to the same month last year. In addition, EVs made up roughly 9.1% of total passenger vehicle sales in July, the highest monthly share on record. All of this indicates that the impending expiration of the federal tax credit is fueling a surge in demand this quarter. Analysts noted that dealers are leveraging the upcoming deadline to create a sense of urgency among consumers and drive sales. Tesla's homepage now displays the message '$7,500 Federal Tax Credit Ending' in bold lettering. Beneath it, the automaker added, 'Limited Inventory — Take Delivery Now.' Meanwhile, Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja stated during the Q2 earnings call that the company is prioritizing building and delivering as many vehicles as possible in the U.S. before the tax credits expire. The company has recently extended the estimated wait time for its best-selling Model Y to four to six weeks, up from the previous one-to-three-week range. It's an indication of increased order activity. On the back of higher U.S. demand, Wall Street projects Tesla will deliver 430,000 vehicles globally in the third quarter. That represents an increase from the 384,000 vehicles delivered in the second quarter but remains below the 463,000 sold in Q3 2024. How Could EV Tax Credit Elimination Impact Tesla? The federal electric vehicle tax credit program has played a major role in boosting Tesla's U.S. sales. With the expiration of these credits approaching, Tesla could soon be selling vehicles at effectively higher prices for consumers. And this applies not only to Tesla, but also to other automakers selling EVs, with analysts warning it could trigger a sharp drop in U.S. EV sales in the fourth quarter and beyond. Notably, there are already precedents for how similar policy changes have impacted EV adoption, as seen in Germany, where EV sales dropped sharply following the end of subsidies in late 2023. So, the first obvious implication is a decline in consumer demand. Of course, automakers could lower prices to help offset the loss of tax subsidies. For instance, Ford (F) cut prices on its Mustang Mach-E after it lost a $3,750 tax credit in January 2024, while General Motors (GM) provided a $7,500 incentive on models that lost the credits at that time. In Tesla's case, this would impact its unit gross profits, as average vehicle selling prices would have to drop substantially to offset the loss of the EV tax credit. And this comes at a time when its average selling prices have already been under pressure in recent quarters due to intense competition. With that, regardless of Tesla's response, the elimination of EV tax credits represents a significant headwind for the company. Tesla CEO Elon Musk, during the Q2 earnings call, warned of tough times ahead for the company as incentives such as the EV tax credit phase out in the U.S. 'We probably could have a few rough quarters,' Musk said. Meanwhile, the company is expected to launch its more affordable vehicle, which Musk described as resembling a Model Y, to the public in the fourth quarter. On the one hand, the vehicle is likely to provide some support to delivery volumes. On the other hand, the affordable model could cannibalize Model Y sales since it is essentially a stripped-down version of the latter. With that, monitoring delivery figures will be key to assessing the potential impact of cannibalization. Anyway, I expect a decline in deliveries, both sequentially and year-over-year, in Q4. Over the past few months, analysts have gradually reduced their estimates for Tesla's fourth-quarter top and bottom lines. They currently expect Tesla's adjusted EPS for Q4 to fall 45.5% year-over-year to $0.36, while revenue is projected to remain largely unchanged at $25.81 billion. What Do Analysts Expect for TSLA Stock? Wall Street analysts remain split on Tesla, with the stock carrying a consensus 'Hold' rating. Among the 41 analysts covering the stock, 12 rate it as a 'Strong Buy,' two as a 'Moderate Buy,' 17 recommend holding, and 10 assign a 'Strong Sell' rating. TSLA stock is currently trading above its average price target of $299.28. On the date of publication, Oleksandr Pylypenko did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Russians At War' Director & Producer Talk Backlash & Direct-To-Audience Release: 'The Best Counter To The Protests & Hate Is For People To See The Film'
Director Anastasia Trofimova and producer Cornelia Principe are launching a direct-to-audience release this week of the former's controversial documentary Russians at War, in a bid to get it seen after a year of protests and cancellations. The two-hour work gives sobering insight into the futility and carnage of armed conflict through the lives of Russia-aligned soldiers on the front of the country's unprovoked war against Ukraine, with whom Trofimova embedded over a period of seven months. More from Deadline Idris Elba's 'Dust To Dreams' Starring Seal Set To Premiere In TIFF Shorts + Full Lineup TIFF Primetime Lineup: 'The Lowdown', 'Wayward' & 'Black Rabbit' Set To Premiere in Toronto's Series Showcase 'Damned If You Do' Trailer: Gianni Di Gregorio's Comedic Reflection On Love & Family Closes Venice's Giornate Degli Autori After an incident-free world premiere at the Venice Film Festival last year, the doc met with protests in Canada from pro-Ukraine groups ahead of its North American premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF), with the former deputy prime minister Chrystia Freeland, who is of Ukrainian descent, leading the charge. The protestors accused the film of being Russian propaganda – in a war of Russia's instigation in which more than 13,500 Ukrainian civilians and between 60,000 to 100,000 military personal have been killed and another 10 million people have been displaced – although none of them had seen the film at that point. At least 250,000 Russian troops have died in the conflict. TIFF canceled the festival screening, instead playing the film in the TIFF Lightbox Theatre on the first Tuesday after its 2024 edition ended, using security staff who were still on site to ensure the safety of Trofimova, her producers and the spectators in the room. 'Anastasia had her very own security detail. I had someone following me around even when I went to the bathroom. When we were on stage for the Q&A, there was a line of security in front of us. People who came had to be security scanned. It was a quite a production, but the festival had to make sure everybody was safe,' recounts Principe. The Oscar-nominated Canadian producer (To Kill A Tiger) produced the documentary under her Raja Pictures banner with Sally Blake and Philippe Levasseur at Paris-based Capa Presse. The fallout would continue throughout the year with Athens and Zurich among festivals which pulled the film due to protests and security concerns. Principe also reveals that the International Film Festival Amsterdam (IDFA) rescinded an invitation issued in August 2024 for its Best of Fests sidebar saying they could not create a constructive dialog around the work. 'That was surprising,' she says of the disinvite, which occurred under the radar before the festival unveiled its lineup. In the meantime, the push back has only strengthened the film team's resolve to get the film seen, with the producers opting for a direct-to-audience strategy. 'The best counter to the protests and the anger is for people to see the film,' says Principe. '99% of the protests came from people who hadn't seen the film… I totally agree that peaceful protest is a great and constructive way to voice one's opinion, but it would be nice also to see the film.' Principe cites documentaries such as Brett Story and Stephen Maing's Union, following Amazon workers as they attempt to unionize, and Oscar-winning documentary No Other Land, which also released direct-to-audience, as inspirations for going down the self-distribution route. 'For films that are potentially controversial for some communities or some groups or corporations, going direct-to-audience seems to be the way to go,' says Principe. 'Getting it out there as far and wide as possible was really our plan and it seemed more and more after things happened in Canada and TIFF, that doing it ourselves was the way to go.' Working with the direct-to-audience platform of tech entertainment company Gathr, the producers have created the website, where spectators will be able to gain paid access to the film from August 12. 'It took months and months to get our website together. It's a very fulsome website with lots of content to give people background on the making of the film, frequently asked questions, criticisms that we address, all that is there,' says Principe. The release is worldwide but excludes Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, with the production planning to make it available in those territories for free at a later date. 'That's going to be a separate release because it will be free and we need to make sure that it can actually be accessed in Russia, says Principe. An experienced TV producer and documentarian, who has also worked in Syria and Iraq, Trofimova knew the film would receive pushback from some quarters for the human light in which it portrayed the Russia-aligned soldiers but was not prepared for the full-out backlash it sparked as it embarked on its festival tour last year. 'I think it was easier to go to the front and to be in the war than to deal with what happened afterwards because it was so unexpected. The documentary community has been very supportive overall and very understanding, but what was a shock to me is, how easy it is to be accused of something that people say you did, not that you actually did or said yourself,' she says. 'Most of the people who have been attacking this film, and the most vicious attacks, of course, have been happening online, have not seen the film… In Toronto, where we were the top news story for at least a week, journalists asked the protesters, 'Have you seen the film?' They would reply, 'No, we have not, and we refuse to.' What was surprising for me was, why this anger directed at the film? Why this anger directed at me? Because it's like I became their personal enemy, or the film became their personal enemy.' The fallout has also raised questions for Trofimova around the power of coordinated deplatforming campaigns. 'It has been quite interesting to realize how easy it is for anyone in the documentary community to be attacked and silenced by some sort of interest group, because it didn't take that much to be honest. A lot of the stuff is online. It's quite organized. There's been quite a coordinated defamation deplatforming campaign against this film,' she says. 'It's left quite a bit of damage. I'm not talking about our emotional state, but rather the fact that it started off so well. It was receiving invitations from the world's top festivals and the attacks on it made it so much more difficult for people to program it and to see it. That was the shocking thing.' She also questions the implications of what happened to her for other documentarians who want to tackle controversial and complex topics in the future 'It made me wonder how do we make complex films? It's a question for anyone who wants to take on a big, controversial problem in the world, and we have a lot of them. Now more than ever, documentaries have this huge responsibility to try to explain, to tackle them, to analyze them, to get in there. What do we have to be prepared for as filmmakers next time we go in?,' she says. Trofimova is not certain it is safe for her return to Russia any time soon given the unflattering light in which Russians at War portrays conditions at the front for the country's soldiers, but she hopes to able to return one day to continue a personal mission to capture Russian stories that are told neither in the local media, or internationally. 'The thing about war documentaries is that if you're just faithfully observing and recording this reality, you cannot make anything but an anti -war film, because the longer you stay and the longer you see the futility and how people who are very dear to someone back home, they're just gone. And the same thing goes for both sides… it becomes very, very tragic.' Principe notes how this time last year, she and Trofimova were iin Paris finishing post-production on the work ahead of the Venice premiere. 'A year ago, we were looking forward to Venice. A year later, we're looking forward to releasing the film online, so that people can see it and judge for themselves,' she says. 'They don't have to love the film. They have to don't agree with the film, but watch it and then, we'd love to hear what you think.' Best of Deadline Sean 'Diddy' Combs Sex-Trafficking Trial Updates: Cassie Ventura's Testimony, $10M Hotel Settlement, Drugs, Violence, & The Feds A Full Timeline Of Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni's 'It Ends With Us' Feud In Court, Online & In The Media 'The Boys' Season 5: Everything We Know So Far
Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
Why Blockchain Is Needed Now That AI Is Predicted To Kill The Internet
The time is coming when most people will not believe anything that lands in their inbox or shows up in a social feed. That is why some experts are warning AI could kill the Internet. I have always liked listening to Neil deGrasse Tyson because he can take something complex and make it feel easy to understand. Some of his predictions feel so far away they are less disturbing, like when he talks about the Earth and Sun being destroyed millions of years from now. His comment that AI could be the 'nail in the coffin' for the Internet is different. That is close enough to impact business in the near future. Think about how Tom Cruise imitators who look so much like him, or those obvious fake videos of world leaders dancing together that everyone knows are a joke. When the imitation is obvious, it can be entertaining. When it is not, that is when it becomes a problem. If customers cannot tell what is real online, the way companies market, sell, and communicate will have to change immediately. Blockchain could become the only way to prove a person or company is real and that their message is authentic. Why Blockchain Could Take Over If Online Trust Disappears For many people, blockchain still means cryptocurrency. In my conversation with Wolfgang Koester, who has decades of experience in currency markets, he explained how blockchain's real potential is much broader. Blockchain is simply a secure, transparent way to prove that something is genuine, whether it is a payment, a contract, or a message. If people stop trusting what they see online, they will stop opening emails, clicking ads, and buying from websites. Scams will blend in so well that they are impossible to spot. Blockchain can fix that by creating a permanent record that cannot be changed without detection. That kind of certainty will be essential before anyone buys, subscribes, or signs up for anything online. How Marketing Would Change With Blockchain If AI-generated fakes take over, blockchain-backed marketing will not be optional. Imagine an ad with a QR code that lets someone confirm in seconds that it came from the actual brand. Influencers will need to link every post to a verified identity, which will remove fake accounts and deepfakes from the picture. Brands may also move their communities into smaller, verified networks where every member is authenticated. Loyalty programs could be stored in blockchain-secured digital wallets so customers know their rewards and discounts are real. How Buying Would Change With Blockchain Right now, buying online depends on trust. People trust the site, the seller, and the payment processor. AI can create perfect copies of all three, making it nearly impossible to know if a purchase is safe. Blockchain marketplaces would ensure every product listing, payment, and delivery confirmation is verified and recorded permanently. Only verified brands could sell products, and reviews would be tied to verified buyers. Payments would confirm both sides of the transaction in real time. The Companies Building Blockchain And Verification Technology There is a small group of companies already working on this. One of them could easily become the next Amazon or Google. They are building the foundation for a verified Internet, and if they succeed, every business and individual will depend on them. Humanity Protocol, valued at over a billion dollars, uses palm scans to confirm identity so impersonation becomes almost impossible. Proof of Humanity combines video verification with community vouching to create permanent identity records that could eliminate bot-driven social media accounts. is a coalition of news organizations that uses blockchain to certify the authenticity of articles and press releases. The New York Times has experimented with verifying photo metadata to slow the spread of misinformation. If any one company becomes the go-to source for verifying every message, document, and transaction, it could control the trust layer of the Internet, which is trillion-dollar territory. When Blockchain Could Go Mainstream I wrote about QR codes almost 20 years ago when few people cared. Then the pandemic made them essential, and suddenly they were everywhere. Blockchain verification could follow that same pattern. If AI-driven misinformation keeps growing, blockchain could be the norm in five to seven years. That timeline could shrink if a massive fraud wipes out public confidence in the Internet. What It Could Cost To Deal With A Blockchain Future And Why To Start Now Costs will vary widely. A smaller business might be able to integrate blockchain verification for tens of thousands of dollars. Larger companies could spend millions to update marketing systems, e-commerce sites, and customer databases. Waiting until the crisis hits will drive costs even higher because everyone will be trying to get it done at the same time. Testing blockchain tools now, within the next year or two, gives time to adapt, train employees, and help customers get used to verification before it becomes urgent. What HR Leaders And Consultants Should Be Doing To Prepare For Blockchain HR leaders and consultants will need to prepare entire workforces for blockchain-based verification. This starts by explaining why it matters and linking it to brand reputation, recruiting, and customer trust. Employees need to understand the risks of deepfakes, impersonation scams, and AI-generated misinformation. Consultants can help identify the areas most vulnerable if trust in digital communication collapses. That might include hiring processes where AI could fake résumés or interviews, or ensuring onboarding and training materials come from verified sources. HR can also test adding verification tags to job postings, candidate communications, and internal announcements. Building partnerships with blockchain identity and security providers right now makes sense. Running a small pilot in one or two areas, such as recruiting or internal communications, will make the transition easier when verification becomes standard. The Future Of A Blockchain-Verified Internet Neil deGrasse Tyson's warning should make every organization think about how to maintain credibility in a world where seeing is no longer believing. Blockchain offers a path to rebuilding trust, but it will change how marketing, sales, and customer relationships work. Companies that prepare now by finding the right partners, training teams, and helping customers get used to verification will be the ones people turn to when authenticity becomes the most valuable currency on the Internet.
