
Instagram Maps feature raises privacy concerns among some users
The purpose of the maps feature, according to a press release from Meta, is to provide a 'lightweight' method for users to connect with each other and explore local happenings by allowing people to share where they are in real time. Users can access their 'maps' by going to their DMs.
When users click on the map, it shows the geolocation of users who have opted into sharing their location, based on the last time they opened Instagram or shared an Instagram story. When users first open the map, they are prompted with options of 'who can see your location,' allowing them to choose whether or not they want to share their location.
After the feature was unveiled on Wednesday, users began sharing screenshots of what the map looks like on their pages. A handful of posts criticizing the feature have amassed hundreds of thousands of views as they circulate across X, Threads, TikTok and Instagram itself. Some of the most viral posts were from people like influencer and 'Bachelor' franchise alum Kelley Flanagan, who issued a warning to people online to turn their location-sharing off, suggesting it could be a risk to their privacy and safety.
'Meta has a poor track record when it comes to data privacy,' Lia Haberman, author of the social media newsletter ICYMI, told NBC News in an email interview.
Just this week, Haberman noted that a California jury ruled Meta violated the state's Invasion of Privacy Act in a case involving the period-tracking app Flo. (A Meta spokesperson told CNBC that the company disagreed with the ruling.)
'User data is Meta's golden goose, it's what they've been able to sell to advertisers for years — mostly ethically and legally but not always,' Haberman said.
Meta emphasized that 'location sharing is off unless you opt in. If you do share your location with friends, you have controls to customize this experience.' Users can select specific followers who see their location, or those on their 'close friends' list.
Instagram head Adam Mosseri doubled down on that sentiment, writing in a Threads post that he uses 'the map to share what I'm up to with a handful of my closest friends, and I curate that list carefully.'
Still, Haberman said, she's concerned that users won't realize the full extent of what they've provided Instagram access to, or when their location might show up on the map, through tagging places in their posts or just opening the app.
The platform is not the first to introduce such location-sharing capabilities. Many young social media users have utilized a similar feature on the app Snapchat, where 'Snap Map' has been in place since June 2017. Some social media users also likened Instagram Maps to the once-popular FourSquare Swarm app, which allowed users to 'check-in' to their favorite places, discover new spots and stay connected with friends.
In recent years, Instagram and other social media platforms have faced scrutiny from lawmakers and organizations about online safety, particularly around teen users.
With Maps, Meta says that its supervision features allow parents to be notified when a teen starts sharing their location, and can turn their teen's access off to the feature at any time, if they use Meta's parental controls. (Though many teens maintain accounts hidden from their parents.)
Common Sense Media, a group that studies the impact of media and technology on kids and families, published a report in 2023 that found that location-sharing on social media platforms, which it defined as 'automatic sharing of users' locations,' had two potential negative experiences for young female users. There are 'concerns about safety,' the group wrote, as well as the 'Fear of missing out ('FOMO') or social exclusion' among users. But the positive impact could be 'Social connection.'
Still, 'girls were most likely to say that location-sharing (45%) and public accounts (33%) have had a mostly negative effect on them, compared to other features,' the report found.
In 2024, after news outlets first reported on Instagram's plans to develop a 'Friend Map,' several lawmakers issued concerns about how this type of feature could cause harm to younger users.
'Instagram's proposed feature will require the tracking of young people and their devices' locations,' Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fla., and Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass., wrote in a May 21, 2024 letter to Mosseri, calling geolocation surveillance of minors 'an unnecessary violation of privacy.'
Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., also responded to the 'Friend Map' development reports last year, writing in an X post in March, 'We should be doing all we can to protect our kids' safety on social media — not exposing their real-time location to pedophiles and traffickers.'
Blackburn raised similar concerns about Snap Map in 2019, writing in a letter to CEO Evan Spiegel that 'if location is left in public mode, Snap Map can reveal the location of gullible child users to complete strangers, along with their Snap video feed.'
At a Senate hearing in 2021, Jennifer Stout, vice president of global public policy for Snap Inc., said the app 'makes it intentionally difficult for strangers to find people that they don't know. We do not have open profiles, we do not have browsable pictures. We don't have the ability to understand who people's friends are and where they go to school.'
Representatives from Blackburn, Castor and Trahan's offices did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday regarding Instagram's official launch of their new feature.
Many Instagram users said they worry that the new feature could also put other vulnerable groups at risk — including creators, who have very public personas, and women, who often face harassment online.
'When you're constantly broadcasting where you are in real time, you're sharing your daily routines,' Caitlin Sarian, known to her 1.4 million Instagram followers as cybersecuritygirl, said in a video post on Wednesday. '... where you live, where you work, literally everything about you to potential hackers, stalkers, bad exes, all of the above.'
Another creator, known as Nerdytravelingwriter on TikTok, echoed similar concerns in a video posted on Wednesday, calling it a 'safety issue.'
'Think of how many creators have stalkers,' the creator, who has over 895,000 followers on TikTok said. 'I'm thinking of my followers who just got out of abusive relationships. They're still mutuals with their abusers.'
Instagram's help center does note that users are able to hide their locations in the map feature from specific accounts if they choose, which could help those who know which profiles may want to use the information for malicious purposes.
'If you see that you've shared your location in the past with Instagram via phone settings, it does NOT mean the map feature is turned on automatically or that people can see your location,' the platform wrote in its Instagram story. 'The reason you're seeing your story, post or reel show up on the map is because you've tagged it with a location. It will appear on the map for 24 hours and does not share your real-time or live location.'
When asked for comment on the concerns, a Meta spokesperson reiterated Instagram's policy, stating that the Map feature 'is off by default, and your live location is never shared unless you choose to turn it on. If you do, only people you follow back — or a private, custom list you select — can see your location.'
Haberman, who was among those posting about the recent Instagram news on Threads, suggested one of the main reasons Instagram's feature is being met with some criticism is because it came as a surprise to users.
'That's fine for something with no stakes,' she said. 'but a map of people's locations has a very real world impact. More care should have been taken.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
30 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Meta Says ‘Big Wearable' News Is Coming, but There's Only One Thing I Want to Know
Meta has been on a pretty serious campaign to prove it's at the cutting edge of consumer tech, and AI isn't the only target on the board. AR/XR has also clearly been a priority if the last few weeks are any indication (see this paper in Nature about its wristband tech and drips on groundbreaking VR research for proof), and its vision on that front is starting to actually take shape. According to Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth, the company's annual Connect conference in September, where it showcases the latest VR and XR hardware, is going to be a major one. As noted by UploadVR, Bosworth mentioned in a recent Instagram Q&A that 'big wearable announcements' are incoming, which could mean a lot of things. In the past, that's meant a new Quest that's better or cheaper than the last generation, but this year all signs point to new smart glasses. There are a lot of directions a potential Meta smart glasses announcement could take (new third-gen Ray-Ban AI glasses, for example), but there's only one thing I really want to know about what Meta plans to offer, and it's actually pretty simple: will its glasses have a display or not? If I had to guess, that's likely the biggest question on most people's minds, at least anyone who's at all interested in smart glasses as a category. In my experience, it's been the one thing people want to know about Meta's existing Ray-Ban smart glasses when they find out I'm wearing them. And most of those people who ask, 'Does it have a screen?' are pretty disappointed by my answer. As surprisingly useful as I've found Ray-Bans to be, they still don't make the idea of smart glasses feel truly smart, and 'smart-ish' glasses probably isn't the vibe that Meta is going for. The good news is, for anyone who's hopeful (or expectant) for a pair of Meta-made smart glasses with a screen, it looks like those prayers may be answered. Rumors of a pair of glasses codenamed 'Celeste' have been funneling in, and it looks like those smart glasses might have a HUD (heads-up display) on them. What that HUD will do is just as speculative as the Celeste glasses themselves, but rumors suggest that it will be able to show relatively simple information like weather and notifications. There are also some rumors that those next-gen smart glasses will include Meta's body-reading wristband that allows for hand and finger gestures, but I'm a little skeptical of that side of things given the fact it still seems to be showcasing that accessory as more of an experiment with non-production glasses like Orion. One thing you can count on is that if there is some kind of screen involved, they'll likely reach a new, significantly higher price to go along with it. Rumors suggest that Celeste may end up in the $1,000 range when it's finally available, and that's not the only thing that may balloon either. If Celeste has the capabilities we think it will, it'll definitely be a much chunkier gadget than Meta's Ray-Bans, which are only slightly larger than a regular pair of sunglasses. Either way, in my book, Meta only has one metric for success when Connect rolls around next month, and that's finally giving us smart glasses with a screen.


TechCrunch
an hour ago
- TechCrunch
How to use Instagram Map and protect your privacy
Following Wednesday's launch of Instagram's new Snap Map-like opt-in 'Instagram Map' feature — which lets U.S. users share their most recent active location with others and discover location-based content — Instagram head Adam Mosseri is having to reassure people that their location is only visible to others if they decide to share it. Although Meta has made it clear that location sharing is off by default, there have been numerous posts on social media urging users to turn off location sharing, incorrectly claiming that it's automatically turned on. 'We're double checking everything, but so far it looks mostly like people are confused and assume that, because they can see themselves on the map when they open, other people can see them too,' Mosseri said in a Threads post. 'We're still checking everything though to make sure nobody shares location without explicitly deciding to do so, which, by the way, requires a double consent by design (we ask you to confirm after you say you want to share).' Mosseri also said that some people are 'confused' about how the feature works. For instance, people are accessing the feature and then seeing the map populated with the location information of some users. This is because the feature automatically pulls in location tags from recently posted Stories or Reels that include a tagged location. It's worth noting that this isn't new, as Instagram already had location tags visible to users in its map view. However, the new Instagram Map feature makes this information a lot easier to access. The new feature might make you rethink whether you want to post your Stories and Reels with location tags (especially if you're still at the location). If you turn on your location on Instagram Map, your location only updates when you open the app or have it running in the background, meaning it doesn't provide continuous, real-time location updates. This is different from Snap Map, which lets users choose whether their location is updated only when they open the app or in real time. For those who want to ensure their location is turned off on Instagram Map, we'll walk you through the steps below. How to access Instagram Map Image Credits:Instagram To access the new feature, you need to navigate to your DMs page (direct messages) and tap the new 'Map' option at the top. If it's your first time accessing the feature, you'll likely see a pop-up message notifying you about the new Map. The pop-up will tell you that no one can see your location until you share it with them, and that you can change your settings at any time. How to set your location-sharing preferences Image Credits:Instagram The first time you open Map, you will see a page that reads 'Who can see your location.' From there, you can choose to share it with your Friends (followers you follow back), your Close Friends list, select users, or no one. To change your preferences, you need to click on your profile, tap the settings option in the top-right corner, select the 'Story, live and location' option, and then tap the 'Location sharing' button. Here, you will be able to change your settings. Note that if you have location sharing turned off, others can still share their location with you, which means you'll be able to see them on the Map. How to use Instagram Map When you open the app, you will see the locations of friends who have shared their location with you. You will also see location-based Stories and Reels from people you follow. For example, if your friend attended a nearby music festival and posted a story while there, it will appear on the map. Similarly, if a creator you follow posts a reel about a new restaurant in your city, you'll be able to discover it on Instagram Map. You will still see location-based content on the Map even if you have your location turned off. You also can leave short, ephemeral messages, or 'Notes,' on the map for others to see. Instagram Notes are the short messages that currently appear at the top of your direct messaging feed, but with the launch of Instagram Map, you will now see these posts on the map if they're shared with a location. This story was updated with new information.


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Tech is getting a boost from AI ad tools. Some companies are being left behind
Artificial intelligence has been a shot in the arm for digital advertising. Meta and Alphabet both reported sales and earnings that beat Wall Street's expectations, but the strength in digital ad spend was notable. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said during the earnings call that AI helped imbue "greater efficiency and gains across our ad system," thus contributing to the 22% year-over-year increase of second-quarter sales that hit $47.52 billion. Meta finance chief Susan Li also told analysts during a follow-up earnings call on July 30 that the online ad market appears to have improved since April. In April, Li noted that Asia-based online retailers pulled back on their digital ad spending amid broader macroeconomic uncertainty due to President Donald Trump's tough tariffs and the closing of the de minimis trade loophole. This quarter, Li said there's been a noticeable "improvement" with those Asian-based ecommerce firms, which have increased their digital ad spending on the platform along with small, North American-based advertisers. "We generally expect another quarter of healthy advertising demand," Li said about the advertising pickup. Gil Luria, the head of technology research at D.A. Davidson, said that while there is still broader macroeconomic uncertainty, "today, digital advertising in general, is doing well; It is simply an extension of the fact that the consumer is still strong." "There's optimism that consumer spending will hold up and therefore all the downstream markets will hold up," Luria said. "I think one of the things that its earnings taught us was that you can spend a lot of money on AI when your core business is doing well, and especially when your core business has been already benefiting from the investments that you've made in AI," Jasmine Enberg, a vice president and principal analyst for eMarketer, said about Meta's second quarter. The continued jaw-dropping pace of AI spending also doesn't seem to be slowing any time soon. Alphabet added an extra $10 billion to its 2025 forecast for capital expenditures, now pegged at $85 billion, while Meta raised the low end of its capital expenditures for the year to come in between $66 billion and $72 billion instead of $64 billion and $72 billion. Investors showed no signs of trepidation about Meta and Alphabet's massive AI spend because those companies' overall sales continued to rise. Outside of the tech giants, Reddit reported strong second-quarter sales of $500 million, representing a 78% year-over-year increase that helped lift the company's shares as much as 20%. "They kind of rose back like a phoenix and had some extraordinary results," Luria said about Reddit, which saw its shares plummet over 15% in February after it reported weaker-than-expected user numbers due to a Google search algorithm change. Reddit's blockbuster quarter contrasted with similar-sized peers like Snap and Pinterest, which both reported lukewarm quarterly earnings this week. Snap's second-quarter sales grew only 9% year-over-year and it missed Wall Street's estimates on global average revenue per user, a metric that refers to how much money the company derives from each user. Contributing to the miss was a botched update to Snap's advertising platform that hurt the company's "topline growth," Snap CEO Evan Spiegel said in an investor letter. The Snapchat parent on Wednesday also added Reddit to its list of competitors in its latest 10-Q filing on Wednesday, indicating a potential, burgeoning rivalry. Meanwhile, Pinterest shares sank over 10% on Thursday after it reported second-quarter earnings that missed on earnings per share. Pinterest finance chief Julia Brau Donnelly told analysts during an earnings call that the company is still noticing some tariff-related concerns, "and broader market uncertainty" as it previously indicated in May. Unlike Meta, Donnelly said that "Asia-based e-commerce retailers pulled back spend in the U.S.," underscoring how some advertisers gravitate toward bigger online ad platforms amid any signs of global economic uncertainty. "There's very little room for mistakes or missteps," Engberg said about the quarterly earnings reports from smaller tech firms like Snap and Pinterest. WATCHTech growth rates are remaining robust.