Fight against SIR is to protect people's right to vote, Congress president says
Mallikarjun Kharge
on Monday said the protest against '
vote chori
' and SIR is a fight to protect people's
right to vote
and a struggle to save democracy, and asserted the
INDIA alliance
will expose BJP's "conspiracy".
His remarks came as top opposition leaders were stopped from taking out a march to the
Election Commission
office to protest against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
In a post on X, he said, "BJP's cowardly dictatorship will not work!".
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Option Trading: Mr. Gopal Reveals His Powerful Laxman Rekha Strategy For Free
TradeWise
Learn More
Undo
by Taboola
by Taboola
"This is a fight to protect the people's right to vote. This is a struggle to save democracy," he said.
"The allies of the INDIA coalition will surely expose this
BJP conspiracy
to shred the Constitution," Kharge said in his post in Hindi.
Live Events
Kharge was among those who participated in the
Opposition MPs protest
march from Parliament to the Election Commission office.
The protesting MPs were prevented by the police from moving forward and were detained and taken away in buses.
Kharge and Rahul Gandhi were among the top leaders detained by police while taking out the march.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bihar SIR process is ‘voter-friendly, not exclusionary': SC says ECI now allowing 11 documents as identity proof
The Supreme Court Wednesday said that the Election Commission of India (ECI) permitting to present 11 documents as proof of identity for the latest Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voters list in Bihar, compared to only seven documents for the summary revision carried out in the state in 2003, showed that the process is 'in fact voter-friendly.' A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said this while hearing petitions challenging the SIR process. 'They are expanding the number of documents of identity… We understand your exclusionary argument may be with regard to Aadhaar, but the expansion of number of documents from what was followed in a summary revision to an intensive revision is, in fact, voter-friendly and not voter-exclusionary. It gives you more options,' Justice Bagchi said. 'See, it was seven items (in 2003). And now there are 11 items from which you can identify yourself as a citizen,' the judge added. The court said this as Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, contended that the process was exclusionary. Singhvi, however, continued to insist that it was. On Monday, the Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction with the norm of prospective voters merely having to furnish a declaration that they are citizens for inclusion in the list, while holding that the ECI can decide to include a citizen in the voter list or exclude a non-citizen from it. The top court said self-declaration of citizenship may lead to legal complications. The remarks were in response to Singhvi's argument that it was not within the remit of the ECI to decide on citizenship.
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Supreme Court finds Bihar's SIR ‘actually inclusive' and ‘voter friendly' despite exclusion of Aadhaar — Here's why
The Supreme Court said on Wednesday that Bihar's special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral roll was 'voter friendly' given that the 11 documents required to be submitted by an elector as opposed to only seven documents in summary revision conducted previously. (This is a developing story. Check back for updates)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
‘When Paris removed stray dogs': What happened in the French capital in the 1880s?
The Supreme Court's order to remove stray dogs from the streets of Delhi and NCR has sparked major outrage in the country. BJP leader and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi has called the directive 'impractical' and claimed that when Paris got rid of its strays in the 1880s, it had to face a rodent problem. Here's what happened A local resident walks her dogs past War propoganda posters in the Montmarte district in Paris on March 25, 2020. File Photo/Reuters The Supreme Court's recent ruling on the immediate removal of stray dogs from Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) has sparked a huge debate in the country. It has pitted public safety advocates against dog lovers who see the order as 'cruel'. The directive has garnered reactions from various quarters, including politicians. While some have hailed the top court's directive, others found it 'inhumane'. Former Union minister and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi has described the order as 'impractical', 'financially unviable' and 'potentially harmful' to the region's ecological balance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD She also brought up the example of Paris, which she said faced a rat problem after getting rid of the canines from its streets in the 1880s. Let's take a closer look. Supreme Court's stray dogs order The Supreme Court on Monday (August 11) ordered the Delhi government, civic bodies and authorities of Noida, Gurgaon, and Ghaziabad to start picking up stray dogs and relocate them to shelters. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan said that dog shelters have to be set up to accommodate around 5,000 stray dogs, which should be sterilised and immunised. The apex court gave authorities eight weeks to create the facilities and install CCTV monitoring to ensure no animals are released back onto the streets. It also warned that any person or organisation that obstructs the move will face strict action. The bench also refused to consider petitions from dog lovers or any other party on the issue. The order came amid a rise in dog bites and cases of rabies. However, it has divided the country, with many animal lovers criticising the ruling. Both Gandhi families have spoken against the Supreme Court's directive to remove the stray dogs. 'The SC's directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR is a step back from decades of humane, science-backed policy. These voiceless souls are not 'problems' to be erased. Shelters, sterilisation, vaccination & community care can keep streets safe - without cruelty. Blanket removals are cruel, shortsighted, and strip us of compassion,' Congress MP Rahul Gandhi wrote in a post on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He added, 'We can ensure public safety and animal welfare go hand in hand.' The SC's directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR is a step back from decades of humane, science-backed policy. These voiceless souls are not 'problems' to be erased. Shelters, sterilisation, vaccination & community care can keep streets safe - without cruelty. Blanket… — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) August 12, 2025 Animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi warned that removing stray dogs from the streets will create new problems. 'Within 48 hours, three lakh dogs will come from Ghaziabad, Faridabad, because there's food here in Delhi. And once you remove the dogs, monkeys will come on the ground… I've seen this happen at my own house,' she reportedly said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Referring to 1880s Paris, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader stated, 'When they removed dogs and cats, the city was overrun with rats.' She said dogs were 'rodent control animals'. What happened in the 1800s Paris? In the 1800s, stray dogs were frowned upon in Paris, seen as transmitters of rabies, fleas, and dirt. Paris had a large number of strays at the time, with the administration considering them a threat to cleanliness, health, and safety. According to a research paper titled Stray Dogs and the Making of Modern Paris, shared by The University of Liverpool Repository, in 1883, pharmacist Emile Capron backed the removal of stray dogs from the streets of Paris, claiming that 'the infinite number of these awful mutts' spread rabies. She also blamed them for scaring horses and pedestrians, which resulted in traffic accidents. 'As Capron's remarks suggest, many commentators treated strays as dangerously mobile nuisances that hindered the movement, and threatened the health, of the city's productive human and nonhuman inhabitants. Strays contributed to the sense that Paris was a pathological city plagued by crime, filth, and insecurity, and elite commentators treated them as members of the city's criminal, dirty and uprooted 'dangerous classes,'" Chris Pearson wrote in the paper. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD To ensure 'public safety', many stray dogs were allegedly culled. As Paris moved towards becoming modern, 'Parisian public hygienists and authorities turned strays into a problem that they would solve to make the city safe, clean and modern,' Pearson wrote. As per some accounts, the killing of strays led to a surge in the population of rats in the French city. ALSO READ: With nearly 10 lakh stray dogs, how will Delhi implement the Supreme Court order? When Parisians ate dogs, cats, rats During the Siege of Paris (the Franco-Prussian War between 1870-1871), the allied German forces surrounded Paris and cut off most of the food shipments to the French capital. Amid food shortages, Parisians resorted to eating rats, cats, dogs, and even horses. On November 12, 1870, a stall on the Rue Rochechouart street sold several animals. 'On the right side of the stall was several large dogs, neatly dressed … next to these are several large cats, also very neatly dressed … On the left of the stall there is a dozen or more of rats stretched upon a tray, and a young woman, half veiled, is timidly approaching them with a little girl at her side. She wishes to inquire the price of the rats, and, if she has money enough, to purchase one,' Robert Lowry Sibbet, an American doctor who was trapped in Paris during the siege, wrote in the book The Siege of Paris by an American Eye-Witness, published in 1892. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
