From 1976 to 2025: is protest culture still relevant to youth?
Mcebo Dlamini, former Witwatersrand SRC and #Feesmustfall activist, still believes that protest culture for young people is as necessary now as it was during the Soweto Uprising because he believes that protest culture in its truest sense is a disruption of the norm. If the norm does not favour young people, that norm must be disrupted. Dlamini emphasised the fact that young people must unite and devise strategies on how to make their protests sustainable and impactful.
'Young people must penetrate all spaces where there is an opportunity to change their conditions for the better, the youth must saturate such a space, at least where there is total freedom and white supremacy, along with capitalism, does not reign.'
Sihle Seleke, who is a prominent anti gender-based violence activist and founder of the Kwanele Foundation, believes protesting is not 100% relevant. While it raises public awareness, Seleke argues that leaders often fail to take meaningful action and young people can protest as much as they want, but implementation on the ground is still lacking.
Seleke said young people must protest through voting and with the local elections coming up, young people need to vote for the change they want to see.
'This thing of voting because our grandmother liked whatever party and it's trendy no longer serves a purpose. The only way we can protest in the right way is to vote, let your vote be your change, let your vote be your voice because femicide is on the rise on a daily basis,' she said
Dlamini said that as long as the hierarchies that existed during apartheid have not been altered, there is always going to be a need to protest and believes it puts local politics in a loop. He said the questions that 'our forefathers were dealing with' were still the same problems that 'we are dealing with in the present.'
'It is almost as if we are trapped in an endless cycle of suffering and the wheel just keeps on turning,' he said.
'A proper diagnosis of this is that we are not dealing with the problems of the youth from a structural level but we are too focused on the symptoms instead of dealing with the root cause. which in this case includes an education that denies black people access to tertiary institutions on the basis that they do not have money. Fees Must Fall was an opportune moment, which did give us certain gains but failure to stretch to society as a whole was the limitation.'
'Our president has signed many beautiful laws and bills into power but we're still to see implementation.
Anti-GBV activist Sihle Seleke
Dlamini said young people must unite and devise strategies on how to make their protests sustainable and impactful. 'Young people must penetrate all spaces where there is an opportunity to change their conditions for the better; the youth must saturate such a space.'
Angela Molepo, a 20-year-old gender-based violence activist who was the first young person to start a national shutdown over the Cwecwe case through an organisation called Justice SA, said if young people limit their activism to hashtags, they are not going to go anywhere. For Molepo, protest doesn't hold the same relevance nor does it help with anything, due to the government studying the new generation.
'People protest on social media, hoping it will be public knowledge to our government, which is never the case. When the government sees a group of youth fighting over something, they try to shut us down. We still have our voice, but we are waiting for people of power to remind us of that because we are conditioned into thinking we don't know ourselves and our belonging,' said Molepo. 'Young people are fighting for job opportunities because those in power, who benefited from apartheid, are holding onto positions and leaving no space for the youth.'
This is a painful reminder to Seleke who continues to highlight a concerns of South African youth. Due to a lack of employment, Seleke says it's not fair that young people still protest over such socioeconomic issues.
'Our president has signed many beautiful laws and bills into power but we're still to see implementation. Our president claims that [alleged perpetrators of] gender-based violence and femicide should not be given bail freely, but we're still seeing them getting bail. Our government is playing with our minds. For example they brought into law the POPI Act, which states you cannot disclose someone's personal details without their permission or else you will be prosecuted. It's a crime but guess what? We are amplifying our voices saying the sexual offenders' list must be made public so we will know who's on that list but the POPI Act is stopping us from making the sexual offenders' list public because we cannot expose their identity so who's fooling who,' said Seleke.
Collen Malatji of the ANC Youth League, who grew up in crime-ridden Thembisa, believes that this Youth Month should be a call to action. He urges young people to unite and fight against the systemic issues that affect them, advocating for liberation for all.
Malatji emphasises the relevance of protesting, noting that its purpose has evolved from fighting against the apartheid system to raising awareness about the prevailing agendas and cultures that perpetuate inequality. He stresses that protesting should be a regular form of expression, whether in good or bad times.
With the advent of new platforms, Malatji acknowledges that young people now have more avenues to make their voices heard. However, he notes that those in power often forget the struggles of the youth, making it necessary for young people to remind them through protest.
Malatji emphasises that addressing gender-based violence requires more male role models in communities, teaching boys how to respect and treat women. He notes that this issue transcends economic status, as even wealthy men abuse women.
Malatji's vision is for South Africa's youth to take ownership of the country's economic activities, becoming responsible leaders who drive positive change. He urges young people to be proactive, responding to economic demands and speaking out against injustices, rather than passively observing wrongdoing. Young people can protest as much as they want, but implementation on the ground is still lacking.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
As G20 host, SA cannot afford to allow whistle-blower protection to remain rhetorical
As South Africa assumed the presidency of the G20 this year, it finds itself at a historic crossroads. Among the many issues on the agenda, none carries greater immediacy for our domestic governance landscape than the protection of whistle-blowers. This issue has been consistently prioritised at the G20 level since the Seoul Summit in 2010, with Japan's 2019 presidency placing particular emphasis on strengthening whistle-blower protection frameworks. Under Japan's leadership, the G20 endorsed the High-Level Principles for the Effective Protection of Whistle-blowers, drawing upon existing standards developed by the United Nations and regional bodies. These principles provide governments with a road map for legislation and policies that safeguard individuals who courageously expose corruption, maladministration and other unlawful conduct. For South Africa, the timing could not be more fortuitous — or more pressing. Our existing whistle-blower ecosystem, anchored in the Protected Disclosures Act of 2000 and related statutes, is manifestly inadequate. While the act sought to create a legal shield for employees who disclose misconduct in good faith, its scope and implementation has fallen short, with glaring gaps in anonymity, physical safety, financial support and legal assistance. Too often, those who step forward in the public interest face intimidation, job losses, harassment and, tragically, even assassination. The euphoria sparked by the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development's 2023 discussion document on strengthening whistle-blower protection quickly dissipated, replaced by characteristic inertia. Draft proposals have not translated into legislative reform, while real lives remain in peril. With South Africa now in the international spotlight as G20 host, the government has both an opportunity and an obligation to demonstrate leadership by urgently overhauling our whistle-blower protection framework in line with the G20 High-Level Principles. The G20's work on this issue is not abstract. The Anti-Corruption Working Group explicitly tasked the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2011 with preparing a 'Study on Whistle-blower Protection Frameworks, Compendium of Best Practices and Guiding Principles for Legislation'. Since then, several G20 presidencies have reinforced the importance of robust protections, culminating in Japan's 2019 High-Level Principles. These principles reaffirm the collective commitment of the world's most powerful economies to ensuring that whistle-blowers are not left to bear the burden of public accountability alone. The principles are not a prescriptive checklist. Instead, they encourage states to: Ensure safe and confidential reporting channels. Provide external avenues for disclosure. Protect whistle-blowers from retaliation, dismissal and blacklisting. Offer remedies such as compensation and reinstatement. Extend protection to contractors, suppliers and witnesses. Foster a culture of integrity where whistleblowing is an ethical duty, not a betrayal. South Africa has endorsed these principles, yet the gap between aspiration and reality remains cavernous. The stakes for our country are extraordinarily high. Corruption continues to siphon billions from public coffers, depriving communities of basic services. The Zondo Commission laid bare the extent of State Capture and the indispensability of whistle-blowers in exposing it. Yet many who bravely came forward continue to face economic ruin, psychological trauma and threats to their lives. The tragic assassinations of whistle-blowers in recent years underscore the urgency of the moment. When witnesses and whistle-blowers are silenced through violence or intimidation, the justice system itself is imperilled. If potential whistle-blowers conclude that silence is safer than speaking truth to power, the fight against corruption collapses at its foundation. Hosting the G20 provides South Africa with a singular opportunity to demonstrate tangible commitment to the principles it has endorsed on the global stage. Aligning our frameworks with the G20 High-Level Principles would send a powerful signal that we are serious about rooting out corruption and protecting those who act in the public interest. Concrete steps are available: Amend and strengthen the Protected Disclosures Act to broaden its scope, enhance anonymity and guarantee remedies and whistleblowing incentives. Implement the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council's recommendation to establish an Office of Public Integrity as part of the legislative overhaul. This office could serve as an independent authority to receive disclosures, ensure follow-up action and provide direct support to whistle-blowers. President Cyril Ramaphosa should act with urgency to translate this recommendation into law. Introduce whistle-blower protection funds to provide financial, legal and psychosocial support. Institutionalise independent reporting channels outside employer structures to guard against retaliation. Prioritise security for high-risk whistle-blowers and witnesses, including relocation or protective services where threats exist. Foster a cultural shift that affirms whistle-blowers as defenders of democracy, not traitors. These measures are neither novel nor unattainable. They are drawn directly from international best practice and from South Africa's own advisory bodies and civil society. What is required is political will, not more deliberation. If South Africa were to emerge from its G20 presidency having taken decisive steps to align its whistle-blower protections with the High-Level Principles and implement the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council's recommendation for an Office of Public Integrity, it would represent a crowning glory for our international engagement. Such a move would not only bolster our credibility abroad, but also strengthen our democratic fabric at home. Conversely, continued inertia risks deepening cynicism among citizens and reinforcing perceptions of state complicity in corruption. The cost of inaction will not be measured merely in reputational terms, but in human lives. South Africa stands at a pivotal juncture. As host of the G20 Summit, it cannot afford to allow the protection of whistle-blowers to remain rhetorical. The time for discussion papers has passed. What is needed now is bold, urgent reform — anchored in the G20 High-Level Principles and complemented by the creation of an Office of Public Integrity. To do less is to betray those who, often at great personal cost, have chosen to serve the public interest by exposing wrongdoing. To act decisively is to affirm the principles of integrity, accountability, and justice at the heart of our democracy. The government must seize this moment with vigour and pace. In doing so, it can make South Africa's G20 presidency not merely a diplomatic exercise, but a milestone in our nation's unfinished journey toward ethical governance. DM
TimesLIVE
9 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Smithsonian focuses too much on 'how bad slavery was': Trump
US President Donald Trump suggested on Tuesday he will pressure the Smithsonian Institution — a premier museum, education and research complex for US history and culture — to accept his demands, as he did with some colleges and universities, by threatening to cut federal funding. In a social media post, Trump complained about what he called excessive focus on 'how bad slavery was.' 'I have instructed my attorneys to go through the museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with colleges and universities, where tremendous progress has been made,' Trump said on Truth Social. The Smithsonian, which was established in 1846 and includes 21 museums and galleries and the National Zoo, had no immediate comment. Most of its museums are in Washington, DC. The White House said last week it will lead an internal review of some Smithsonian museums after Trump earlier this year accused it of spreading 'anti-American ideology' and raised alarm among civil rights advocates. When asked if Trump would threaten funding cuts to the Smithsonian based on the findings, a White House official said 'President Trump will explore all options and avenues to get the Woke out of the Smithsonian and hold them accountable.'
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
‘No different to an EFF rally or Joy of Jazz' – iPhupho L'ka Biko leader after National Dialogue performance
iPhupho L'ka Biko's Ngqaqu doesn't see a difference between the national dialogue and Codesa in the 1990s. Music collective iPhupho L'ka Biko performed on the first day of the National Dialogue at Unisa, despite some critics labelling the dialogue as a PR exercise. 'It was not a difficult decision to make because as iPhupho, we've always made it clear that wherever black people are, we shall be found there,' band founder and leader Nhlanhla Ngqaqu told The Citizen. 'Ultimately [we want] to have a united Africa and an Africa that is completely liberated. That's our end-goal.' On Friday, President Cyril Ramaphosa officially opened the first convention that will lead to the rollout of the National Dialogue to communities. ALSO READ: 'They will find themselves like the PAC': Ramaphosa takes aim at National Dialogue boycotters Another gig for iPhupho 'If we are to choose our gigs based on principles, based on values, ethics, ideology… we would then find ourselves not performing anywhere. So, performing at the National Dialogue is no different to performing at the EFF rally or at the Standard Bank Joy of Jazz,' said Ngqaqu. In 2023, iPhupho L'ka Biko was one of the performers at the EFF's 10th anniversary at the FNB Stadium. He said the band draws the line where there is victimisation of black lives. 'We'd never take a gig, for example, that says Africans are foreigners in our own continent,' shared Ngqaqu. 'We'd never take that stance to go support Operation Dudula, for example. Anything that is anti-black, we wouldn't support to that extent.' ALSO READ: 'It was a black story rather than a political one'- iPhupho L'ka Biko on performing at EFF rally National Dialogue criticism Some political parties, civil society organisations and high-profile foundations chose to boycott the first National Dialogue convention. Former president Thabo Mbeki was the first to float the idea of a National Dialogue; however, before it started, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation pulled out. Other foundations that opted not to be involved include the FW de Klerk Foundation, Kgalema Motlanthe Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation, and Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation. The DA, FF Plus, ActionSA and uMkhonto weSizwe Party are some of the political parties that didn't participate. 'What I found interesting with this entire criticism, if you listen to most politicians when they're responding to this thing, in their disgruntlement or disappointment, at the core of this issue is money, the budget,' said Ngqaqu. 'For other entities to withdraw, most of the civil society groups they withdraw because the budget was cut. A lot of the noise is not a question of principle or the importance, but it's about who is it serving.' 'Where are these people when we're addressing issues of quality education, this year funny enough is 10 years of Fees Must Fall,' Ngqaqu noted. The first song that iPhupho performed was Sixole Kanjani, a song that speaks to the murder of Chris Hani and Mgcineni 'Mambush' Noki and late mineworkers who were shot by police in Marikana. M A R I K A N A nithi sixole kanjani?#marikanamassacre#OurNationOurDialogue …malifezeke… iPhupho L'ka Biko — iPhupho L'ka Biko (@IphuphoLikaBiko) August 16, 2025 'Essentially, we played that song to say that if we're gonna have a dialogue and a genuine one, we can never forget the slain of Marikana and we cannot forget the likes of Chris Hani. We also did uThixo Ukhona, which is also still consistent with our ethos as a band in how we are rooted in spirituality and consciousness. 'We have so much hope in black people… Despite the flaws that our government has, we still have faith. So it was not a difficult decision to make.' ALSO READ: iPhupho L'ka Biko: Unshackling alcohol's grip on society through Amanzi Sessions No 'practical commitment' Ngqaqu also said he doesn't see a difference between the national dialogue and the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa) in the 1990s. 'It has no practical commitment or outcome. For me it would be more effective if whatever the public has raised, it should be implemented and must be binding. So now at this stage, it's just a conversation, I don't see any practical commitment,' he said. Making an example of an area like Bram Fischer, where there have been issues of electricity for several years, he said the government should first address those issues before engaging in dialogues. 'There is nothing to be spoken about that. You must just give people electricity, give people water… there is a lot of work to be done,' Ngqaqu noted. 'If we are to have a dialogue, it should begin after a substantial work has been done. A dialogue should be had when black people have dignified living conditions. What dialogue are you gonna have with a person that is hungry?' asked the musician.
