Britain to build $2.6b in weapons factories as Starmer calls for war readiness
British Pirme Minister Keir Starmer's warning came a day before he publishes a major review of Britain's military capabilities. PHOTO: EPA-EFE
Britain to build $2.6b in weapons factories as Starmer calls for war readiness
LONDON – Britain must be ready to fight and win a war against states with advanced military forces, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said as his government announced a £1.5 billion (S$2.6 billion) plan to build at least six new weapons and explosives factories.
Mr Starmer's warning came a day before he publishes a major review of Britain's military capabilities.
Britain and countries across Europe are rapidly trying to boost their defence industries after US President Donald Trump said the continent has to take more responsibility for its own security.
'We are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, so we must be ready to fight and win,' Mr Starmer wrote in an article for The Sun on Sunday newspaper, citing as examples Russia's invasion of Ukraine and its cooperation with Iran and North Korea.
Defence Minister John Healey announced the munitions investment programme in a BBC interview on June 1, describing it as 'a message to Moscow', as well as a way to stimulate Britain's sluggish economy.
The Defence Ministry said it would procure up to 7,000 long-range weapons, built in Britain. The extra investment means Britain will spend around £6 billion on munitions in the current Parliament, the ministry said.
The Sunday Times reported the government wanted to purchase US-made fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons.
The Strategic Defence Review, commissioned by Mr Starmer's Labour government shortly after it won power in July 2024, will set out the threats Britain faces and the military equipment and services needed to meet them.
Mr Starmer has already committed to raise defence spending to 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product by 2027 and target a 3 per cent level over the longer term.
The government has already announced a £1 billion plan to invest in artificial intelligence that can be used to enhance battlefield decision-making, and has separately committed to spend an extra £1.5 billion to tackle the poor state of housing for the country's armed forces. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Business Times
UK economic team looks beyond Europe
THIS week marks the 50th anniversary of the United Kingdom's June 1975 referendum of its membership of the European Common Market, the precursor of the European Union (EU). Yet, some five decades later, the trade policy of the UK is increasingly looking beyond Europe, post-Brexit. In the last few weeks alone, the UK government has agreed a new trade deal with India, plus also a tariff agreement with the United States. UK ministers, including Chancellor Rachel Reeves, have said that this further deal could be finalised swiftly in the form of a new trade agreement with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) comprising Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Oman, Qatar and Kuwait. While the GCC economy is, collectively, not nearly as large as that of the United States or even India, the deal would be a significant prize with the Middle Eastern bloc's total GDP of around US$2 trillion in 2022. According to the World Bank, if the GCC continues to grow at a business-as-usual rate, combined GDP would grow to about US$6 trillion by 2050. A second reason why the UK government would celebrate a deal is that the GCC has signed relatively few such agreements to date, including a pact with South Korea. A further big prize for London of a GCC deal could be further, open access to investment from Gulf sovereign wealth funds which tend to be cross-sector investors who often take a long-term multi-decade economic perspective. Total UK-GCC bilateral trade is currently worth around £60 billion (S$104.5 billion). This makes the GCC bloc as a whole equivalent to the UK's fourth largest non-EU export market behind the US, China and Switzerland. A UK deal with the GCC is forecast to add as much as £1.6 billion to this existing bilateral trade in the short term. The UK government hopes that the value will rise by an additional £8.6 billion a year by 2035. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Wider developments It is possible that wider developments could reinforce this dynamic of closer UK-GCC economic cooperation. This includes potential steps toward implementation of a proposed India-Middle East-Europe Corridor to foster connectivity and integration with Asia via a proposed route from India and into Europe. The corridor – which would comprise vast road, railroad and shipping networks – was given new impetus in September 2023 at the G20 summit in New Delhi. A memorandum of understanding was signed to try to develop the project by the governments of India, United States, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and several key European nations. The potentially imminent new UK-GCC deal underlines, yet again, the emphasis London is putting on consolidating ties with key non-European Union nations, post-Brexit. One of the key ideas of some leavers in the 2016 EU referendum was rediscovering the UK's heritage as a formerly strongly-focused global trading nation. This includes former parts of the British Empire and now-Commonwealth, such as India and Singapore; plus other key emerging markets like the GCC states; and key industrialised countries such as Australia, Canada and the US. However, ambitious as much of this agenda is, some of it is a long way from being fully realised. Perhaps the best example is the apparently remote possibility of any UK trade deal with either of the two world's biggest economies: China and the US. For instance, while there has been much fanfare over a potential new UK-US trade deal, any such agreement looks unlikely. This even under the pro-Brexit Trump administration in the period to early-2029. Multiple challenges Equally, while London and Beijing have both been impacted by the disruptive diplomacy of the Trump administration, there are multiple political and economic challenges that appear likely to prevent any deal in the short to medium term. Certainly, a UK-China accord is not one of the deals closest to the finish line compared to potential others like South Korea, Switzerland, Canada, and Mexico, a number of which may potentially be concluded during the current UK parliament ending probably in 2028 or 2029. There are also human rights concerns about some of the agreements, including the GCC and India ones. The UK Trade Union Council has recently slammed such economic agreements with 'countries that abuse human rights and workers' rights, and violate international law'. It also welcomes the recent UK's decision to suspend trade talks with Israel because of the accelerated military offensive in Gaza and the country's decision to limit the amount of aid allowed into the Palestinian territory. A wider critique of the UK's post-Brexit trade deal strategy came last month in a report from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. It argues that the UK government's hyper focus on traditional broad-based trade agreements is misaligned with the country's service-based economy. The think tank, which is chaired by former UK prime minister Blair, asserts that time-consuming, goods-focused trade agreements offer diminishing returns on investment and are poorly matched to the UK's core strengths in services and digital trade. So, rather than doubling down on such slow-moving, broad trade pacts, it advocates instead a movement towards more targeted services-orientated, market access deals that can be negotiated faster and deliver bigger economic impact. The Blair Institute report highlights that, between 2020 and 2024, London inked only three new trade agreements, which are expected to boost exports by a comparatively small £9.5 billion in the long run. In contrast, over the same period, successive UK administrations resolved some 640 market access barriers, whose strategic bilateral market gains increasingly have the potential to deliver higher value, faster. One example cited as good practice is the UK's digital economic agreement with Singapore. This was negotiated relatively quickly in 2022, and leverages UK strengths as a tech and services leader. With the GCC agreement almost finalised, the Blair Institute recommendations are unlikely to significantly influence the end game of that negotiation. However, there could be scope for bringing the insights into wider negotiations with countries including South Korea, Switzerland, South Korea, Canada, and Mexico. This may require the UK Department for Business and Trade to reallocate resources and focus efforts on areas with the greatest potential return with a clearer strategic framework for driving new deals. Taken overall, Brexit is therefore offering new opportunities for the UK to reinvent its world role, especially in the context of trade relations. However, despite the flurry of recent deals, it will probably not be clear for some time exactly how successful this ambitious agenda proves to be, not least given the services orientation of the UK economy. The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics
Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Business Times
Vanguard files for new ex-China emerging markets ETF
ASSET management giant Vanguard Group plans to launch a new exchange-traded fund (ETF) that will target emerging markets while excluding China, joining a growing niche shaped by investor debate over China's role in global portfolios. The Vanguard Emerging Markets ex-China ETF will make its debut later this summer. Many investors have been unsettled by turmoil surrounding China's trade relationship with the United States, even as better performance from Chinese stocks means some are reluctant to remove them from funds altogether. The Vanguard offering would bring to 13 the number of emerging markets ETFs that exclude Chinese stocks, according to Morningstar data. Two-thirds of those have been launched since 2023, a year that saw China's CSI300 index record its third straight year of losses. The growing interest in rolling out these ex-China funds is logical, said Bryan Armour, ETF strategist at Morningstar. 'Investors may be worried about geopolitical risk, state intervention in private markets, or just want to manage their China allocation separately from broader emerging markets,' he said. Even so, in the last month or two, flows into most broad emerging markets have begun to look stronger than those into ex-China alternatives, he said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Sammy Suzuki, head of emerging markets equities at AllianceBernstein, said he believes that interest in ex-China emerging markets funds is dwindling as Chinese stocks stage a recovery. In the last 12 months, the iShares China Large-Cap ETF has gained 35.34 per cent, and the returns on Chinese stocks contributed to the 9.7 per cent gain by the broad iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF. The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China ETF is up only 4.8 per cent. 'China is both too large and too controversial to not be its own allocation,' said Jason Hsu, chief investment officer of Rayliant Global Advisors, adding both dedicated China ETFs and emerging markets ex-China products will coexist. Vanguard, which has US$10.1 trillion in total assets, submitted the new filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission last Friday. It already offers investors the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF, which has about US$85.9 billion in assets, with 30 per cent invested in Chinese stocks, according to estimates from Jeff DeMaso, editor of the Independent Vanguard Adviser, who analyses the firm's fund offerings. DeMaso said that investors who buy the new ETF when it launches will swap an outsize position in China for hefty exposure to companies in Taiwan and India, which account for nearly 60 per cent of the underlying index. A spokesman for Vanguard said the new ETF will offer additional choice for investors who want to avoid Chinese stocks with a fee of only 0.07 per cent, compared to 0.25 per cent for BlackRock's offering. REUTERS
Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Business Times
Asean increasingly pulled in opposite directions
ALL eyes are on US trade talks, but for the Asean countries, visibility on progress remains poor. This partly reflects the US administration's priority to strike deals with other larger economies including India, Japan, and China. For Asean, only preliminary talks have taken place and formal discussions are yet to happen. In the case of Thailand, it is yet to get a schedule for its first-round talks with high-level officials. Big ask from the US There are other fundamental factors at play. Where some preliminary talks have already occurred, it is unclear what the US wants exactly and officials have been trying to figure out the specific demands. Once they have a sense, a framework to pursue formal negotiations will be put together along with possible proposals. The US has made it unequivocally clear to its trading partners to clamp down on transshipments from China aiming to circumvent US tariffs. This demand is most relevant for Asean countries, but compliance will also likely be challenging. A few of them, especially Vietnam and Thailand, have benefited from these trade diversion effects since the first round of the US-China trade war and these will be difficult to reverse in the short run. Even in Singapore, where we did not see much re-routing in Trump 1.0, a surge in re-exports boosted its trade surplus to a record high in April. The concern is that this demand seems to be a hard constraint from the US. In Thailand's case, ahead of talks with the US, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra reportedly ordered a tightening of the issuance of certificates of origin. But by her own admission, it will take time to resolve, likely longer than the 90-day reprieve period for tariffs which expires in early July. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The US administration is likely bent on using negotiations with other countries to keep the pressure on China by preventing a re-routing of exports to the US via these third countries. China's calculated charm offensive At the same time, China is making its move to strengthen ties with the region, indicated by no less than President Xi Jinping's visit to Vietnam, Malaysia and Cambodia in April. Greater cooperation is the big buzzword from official statements. Key proposals from China include building an economic community and deepening supply chains with the region via the creation of industrial parks, special economic zones and technological corridors. Under China's Belt and Road Initiative, it also proposes fast-tracking the construction of infrastructure projects, particularly railways and an 'Air Silk Road' to improve regional connectivity. While the timeline for implementation of these initiatives remains unclear, the consistent theme across Asean to enhance trade and investment relations with China suggests these have likely been shaped by the desire for a common response to rising US protectionism. Follow-up action from China has also been swift, sending an even clearer signal to Asean leaders that its larger northern neighbour is serious in its intent. Before the Asean Summit in Kuala Lumpur last week, negotiations had already been completed to implement version 3.0 of the Asean-China Free Trade Area, an initiative that President Xi was encouraging as recently as his visit. This upgrade covers new sectors such as the green and digital economy and puts greater emphasis on developing regional supply chains. The inaugural Asean-China-GCC Summit also took place last week, attended by Premier Li Qiang. Malaysia can claim the unique distinction of hosting President Xi and Premier Li back-to-back within a month. In contrast, progress among Asean countries on trade talks with the US have been slow. A pivot adds to the uncertainty In addition to the complex nature of these trade negotiations with the US and the difficulties that Asean countries face in removing non-tariff barriers and reducing transshipments, being caught in the crossfire between the US and China will likely present more challenges for the region. The difficulty in coming up with a deal with the US could encourage a pivot by these countries to trade more with China and try to substitute exports to the US. China's share in Asean's total trade is already nearly twice that of the US, so this is not inconceivable, especially with China's initiatives that could bring benefits such as more investment inflows and assistance in infrastructure roll-out. On the flip side, signs of greater economic cooperation with China could prompt the Trump administration to keep US tariffs high against the Asean countries. The upshot is that uncertainty will likely remain elevated and tariffs may go back up after July, posing more downside risks for the region's growth outlook. The writer is chief Asean economist at Nomura
