Omoda is adding another compact SUV to its line-up
Following on from the recent Omoda 7 news story, the Chinese car maker is also about to unveil a smaller crossover. It will take aim at MG4 and Kia EV3. It was previewed recently in Wuhu, China.
Known as Omoda 3, it will officially launch in October and go on sale next year as an EV, a plug-in hybrid or ICE power vehicle.
Designed like a compacted Urus, the 4420mm Omoda 3 features angular styling and a sharknose grille. That makes it similar in size to Omoda 5 which will grow in its next generation.
Omoda 3 rides on the same T1X platform as the 5, 7 and 9 large SUV. Also sharing the platform are the Jaecoo SUVs, including the 7 compact and new smaller Jaecoo 5.
Chery, the company's owner, is aiming for Omoda products to appeal more to younger customers. Omoda 3 features futuristic dashboard digital graphics, a 'starship' noise option and the ability to sync a Nintendo Switch console with the large, portrait touchscreen.
Omoda also promises an 'official racing pack' and body wraps.
Omoda and Jaecoo are making waves in many parts of the world. In the UK for the first quarter, they outsold Fiat, Citroen, Jeep and Lexus. That happened despite there being only two models on the market to date.
More models are coming from the company, with three Chery Tiggo SUVs inbound.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Autocar
5 hours ago
- NZ Autocar
Chery Tiggo 4 will land with a very sharp price
Chery New Zealand has confirmed pricing and specifications for its compact SUV, the Chery Tiggo 4, ahead of its official local launch in July 2025. With prices starting from just $24,990 plus on-road costs, the new model aims to shake up the value end of the small SUV segment. Two trim levels will be offered: the entry-level Urban and the better-equipped Ultimate, both powered by a 1.5-litre turbocharged petrol engine producing 108kW and 210Nm. The Tiggo 4 has already made waves across the Tasman since launching in Australia in late 2024, winning accolades such as Wheels' Best Small SUV: Best Value and Drive's Best Urban Car Under $30k . The Urban model features 17-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights and taillights, a dual 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster and multimedia touchscreen, and wired/wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. It also includes a six-speaker sound system, voice command system ('Hello Chery'), seven airbags, a reverse camera, and Chery's full suite of ADAS safety systems. Read more Chery announces Tiggo SUV models for New Zealand Priced at $29,990 plus ORCs, the Ultimate adds 18-inch alloys, a 360-degree camera system, heated artificial leather seats, a power sunroof, 15W wireless charging, ambient lighting, and power folding mirrors, among other enhancements. 'We're excited to bring the Tiggo 4 to New Zealand – a smart, stylish SUV that has already proven its value in Australia,' said Lucas Harris, COO of Chery ANZ. 'With modern features, outstanding ownership benefits and an unbeatable value proposition, the Tiggo 4 will hit the mark for Kiwi families and first-time SUV buyers alike.' Backing the local launch is a network of 10 dealerships nationwide, offering full sales and aftersales support. With a five-star ANCAP safety rating and sharp pricing, the Chery Tiggo 4 looks set to be a compelling new player in New Zealand's compact SUV market.
NZ Autocar
5 hours ago
- NZ Autocar
Another ship up in smoke with EVs blamed
A ship carrying a mix of cars has been abandoned in the Pacific Ocean, after fire broke out. It has burnt out of control for at least a week, with authorities unable to rescue the stricken vessel. The Morning Midas was carrying 3000 cars from China to Mexico when it caught fire about 450km southwest of Alaska. On board were 70 fully electric cars and 861 hybrids. Evidently, the fire broke out on one of the decks carrying the EVs. The US Coast Guard Alaska Division received a distress call at around 3.15pm last Tuesday. The crew of the Morning Midas were unable to get the fire under control so the US Coast Guard advised them to abandon ship. All 22 crew were flown to safety after being rescued by a nearby ship. Salvage operators appointed by the ship's owner, Zodiac Marine, are not expected to reach the vessel until today, almost a week after the fire took hold. Zodiac Marine said a tug heading to the ship 'will assess the vessel's condition and provide necessary support. An additional fire-fighting tug, capable of ocean towage, is also being arranged.' The incident has underlined the safety issues with transporting electric vehicles whose lithium-ion batteries can catch fire. Such fires are hard to extinguish, sometimes burning for a fortnight. All of the ship's fire suppression systems were 'fully operational' at the time of the incident. However the crew were unable to bring the fire under control. They were rescued by the nearby vessel Cosco Hellas after taking to lifeboats. The current status of the ship is unknown. Vehicles aboard the ship were bound for Mexico. The 46,800 tonne Morning Midas left the Chinese port of Yantai on May 6. This isn't the first time a car-carrying ship has burnt down with EVs on board. In 2023 the Fremantle Highway, a car-carrying ship, caught fire with about 3000 cars on board near the Netherlands. It followed the 2022 Felicity Ace disaster, a ship that caught fire in the Atlantic with around 4000 vehicles on board. That vessel capsized and sank with a full load of luxury vehicles aboard, including 1100 Porsches. Electric vehicle fires are notoriously difficult to put out. Thermal runaway fires involving electric cars cannot be stopped by conventional means. Following the Felicity Ace fire, Australian vehicle importer Neville Crichton said he had no doubt the incidents would drive up the retail price of vehicles, as insurance companies had dramatically increased the cost of coverage for cars at sea.
Techday NZ
2 days ago
- Techday NZ
US-China chip export debate highlights risks for AI leadership
DeepSeek. TikTok. Taiwan. And a White House shake-up on AI rules. The spiralling US-China technology rivalry landed at the heart of Johns Hopkins University last week, as a panel of top experts and policymakers took to the stage to debate whether restricting exports of advanced semiconductors to China can help the US maintain its edge in the race for artificial intelligence. The discussion, hosted by Open to Debate in partnership with the SNF Agora Institute, comes at a critical time. In Washington, the Trump administration has announced plans to roll back the Biden-era AI Diffusion Rule and introduce new chip export controls targeting China – a move seen by many as a signal that the technology contest between the two superpowers is only intensifying. On one side of the Johns Hopkins debate were Lindsay Gorman, managing director at the German Marshall Fund's Technology Program, and former CIA officer and congressman Will Hurd. They argued the answer is yes: semiconductor controls can give the US a real advantage in the AI race. Gorman pointed to DeepSeek, a Chinese AI model whose CEO has publicly lamented the impact of advanced chip bans. "Money has never been the problem for us. Bans on shipments of advanced chips are the problem. And they have to consume twice the power to achieve the same results," she quoted, highlighting how China's AI advances still depend heavily on imported hardware. "The United States has significant hard computing power advantages – the ability to produce high-end chips, designed specifically for training AI models," Gorman told the audience. She argued that, together with its allies, the US controls a "strategic choke point" on computing power. "Properly implemented controls can have an effect and also have an increasing and compounding effect over time in retarding China's AI advantages and giving the United States a head start," she explained. Will Hurd, who also served on OpenAI's board before running for US president, compared the AI contest to the nuclear arms race. "Artificial intelligence is the equivalent of nuclear fission. Nuclear fission controlled gives you nuclear power… uncontrolled, nuclear weapons can kill everybody," he said. Hurd emphasised the importance of first-mover advantage, warning that the US cannot afford to lose its technological lead. He also highlighted a lack of reciprocity in the tech relationship between the two countries. "Chinese companies like Baidu, DJI, and TikTok operate freely in the US, but American companies are not allowed to operate in China," Hurd pointed out. "If there was a level of reciprocity between our two countries, we wouldn't be here having this debate about chip controls." Yet, on the opposing side, former senior US diplomat Susan Thornton and technology strategist Paul Triolo insisted the US could not outpace China in AI simply by tightening export controls. Triolo argued that the controls are "not working and will not lead to US dominance in AI", describing them as a blunt instrument that creates confusion for industry and disrupts global supply chains. "Most experts believe that Chinese companies are only three months behind US leaders in developing advanced AI models," Triolo said, suggesting any technological gap is vanishingly slim. Thornton, who spent decades at the heart of US-China diplomacy, warned of unintended consequences. "The main thing we should be asking ourselves about this question… is what is the cost benefit of US policy actions?" she said. "We have to face the reality that China is already building AI… a third of the world's top AI scientists are Chinese. China is one third of the entire global technology market. So it's clearly a player." She cautioned that blocking China from critical technology could backfire, hurting US companies, alienating allies and raising the risks around Taiwan, the global centre of advanced chip manufacturing. "Certainly, the one thing we need to do is avoid going to war," Thornton warned. "Taiwan, the most sensitive issue in US-China relations, has now been dragged right into the middle of this AI issue because they're the place that produces all the cutting-edge chips that we're trying to control." Audience members pressed the panel on whether international collaboration on AI safety was possible, and whether the US could ever match China's data advantage, given the size of the Chinese population and its permissive data environment. Hurd conceded that "the US will always have less data because we have a little thing called civil liberties," but argued that superior algorithms and privacy-protective machine learning could level the playing field. For Triolo, the dynamic nature of the technology means that attempts to wall off China are self-defeating. "There are many ways to get to different ends. The controls have forced Chinese companies to work together, develop innovations, and become more competitive both domestically and globally," he said. Gorman, in closing, rejected what she called "a defeatism that says America can't out-compete China or slow its progress". "Our companies are doing well. There isn't an issue here with demand, it's with supply. Doing better means that we have to throw what we can at this problem now with a smart application of tools," she argued. But Thornton had the last word, urging caution. "Making the AI competition with China a zero-sum game, not only will not work, it is dangerous," she said. "We should focus on the things that are going to matter to our children and their children, which is the long-term AI competition, which if not constrained and bounded by international agreements and by cooperation among countries… it'll be a very dangerous world."
