Physical and verbal abuse at hospitals becoming routine
Photo:
A leading advocate for junior doctors says she is dreading the day when a hospital worker is killed.
After a staff member was
held up at gunpoint outside Palmerston North Hospital in April
, RNZ has heard from many health workers who do not feel safe on the job.
Health New Zealand says it is continuously improving security, and taking on feedback about this, but unions representing hospital workers say problems persist.
New Zealand Resident Doctors' Association national secretary Dr Deborah Powell said junior doctors, who were often on the frontlines at emergency departments, were reporting physical and verbal abuse at work becoming routine.
"The day we have a death is the day the unions dread. We'd all prefer we don't have to face that day and we've kept our people safer than that."
Nurses Organisation delegates have called for beefed up powers for hospital security officers, but Powell said that could be problematic.
She raised the possibility of a police presence in emergency departments, or fast responses to calls from there.
The security boost in some emergency departments was helping, but there were bigger problems behind people's growing frustrations, such as the hospitals themselves.
"If you've got a cramped, crowded ED, if you don't have rooms to put whānau in who are having a rough time with whatever's happening to their family member, or if you've got people who have mental distress and we don't have a quiet place where we can talk with them, it escalates the level of agitation and likelihood of assaults."
Respect towards health workers going about their business also needed to return, she said.
"It's not their fault we're in the constrained environment we're in."
In April a health worker in Palmerston North was held up at gunpoint after she left the hospital on a late shift. Police are still investigating.
On the same night another staff member there was knocked unconscious.
RNZ has since learned of a third incident that night, where police were called when a person threatened staff in the emergency department.
There have also been
assaults of hospital workers reported in Auckland and Christchurch this year
.
NZ Nurses Organisation Palmerston North delegate David Goldstone wanted to see security guards get more powers to intervene when trouble occurs.
They are currently left to calm a situation without force.
"If it did happen it would make the staff feel safer. They'd have security guards with powers that could actually do something.
"Today you've got security guards standing around an abusive, aggressive person waiting for police, because they can't do anything."
Fellow Nurses Organisation delegate Jane Swift said hospital staff were left to deal with situations as best they could until enforcement arrived.
"We need police to respond quickly. We would like to see the security guards have more powers to take action accordingly, and we would like to see the police respond so that staff are not left in those vulnerable positions."
Goldstone said police had sometimes taken up to two hours to arrive when called.
"If you've got somebody going off for two hours that's a long time in a ward, making the other patients vulnerable."
Police Superintendent Kelly Ryan, the director for emergency communications and dispatch, said there were standard procedures for emergency call management anywhere.
"Outside of emergency situations, police has a threshold for what work requires a police response and what doesn't.
"This ensures police is only involved where it's appropriate, due to an offence, violence or immediate risk to life or safety, and other agencies are clear on their roles and responsibilities. It also means police has more time to do the work that only police can, and which the community expects them to do."
Health NZ group director of operations for the MidCentral District Sarah Fenwick said increased security remained in place at Palmerston North Hospital, as did arrangements allowing afternoon and night staff to get to their cars safely.
"We are unable to give more powers to our security guards, who are required to operate within the confines of the law. However, we are doing our best to make sure our staff and patients feel safe and that our security team are supported in this."
Improving security was a continuous process.
"We are constantly reviewing and checking feedback on the solutions we have put and in place and are committed to providing a safe environment for our staff and our community."
A government funding boost had allowed it to provide more than 40 full-time-equivalent security guards across its biggest hospitals and "surge capacity" at the likes of Palmerston North Hospital when there was high need, Health NZ said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 minutes ago
- RNZ News
How to get a medical certificate without a doctor
Photo: 123rf Winter coughs and flu are still doing the rounds - and Covid hasn't gone away - so if you need to call in sick there are a few things to know. Employers can legally ask you for a medical certificate if you need to take sick leave - even for one day. It can be a long wait to see a GP but there are other ways to get a sick note. Part time and full-time employees are entitled to 10 days sick leave for themselves or to look after someone who's sick, but in some circumstances, employers may ask for a proof. Holidays Act states an employer may require an employee to produce proof of sickness or injury for sick leave if the sickness or injury that gave rise to the leave is for a period of three or more consecutive calendar days, and a proof of sickness or injury may include a certificate from a health practitioner. The employer could ask for proof within three consecutive calendar days, but they would have to pay the employee's expenses in obtaining the proof. E tū union national secretary Rachel Mackintosh said while it was legal for employers to ask for a sick note, they urged employers to waive the requirement. "This is the employers' right but it causes hardship to workers who either can't get a GP appointment or have to pay high consultation fees to GPs, including online doctor practices. "Employers don't have to ask for medical certificates and we would encourage them to drop the requirement unless there is some doubt in their minds about the genuineness of the illness." Paul Jarvie, manager of employment relations and safety at the Employers and Manufacturers Association, said there could be an imbalance in the medical certificate process. "One is the employment system, and the second one would be the medical system. Ideally they should work in tandem, but sometimes they appear to be working at odds with each other. The doctor can only hear the employees version of what's going on and there's no real ability for the doctor or whoever it is to contact the employer to find out their story of can the person come back to work, are there alternative duties that kind of stuff. So there's always been a bit of a disconnect." General practitioners The most common way to obtain a sick note is to go through a general practitioner. For enrolled patients, depending on the GP, the cost for an appointment can range from $18 to $90. However, with a GP shortage, it can take weeks to get a GP appointment. An RNZ-Reid Research poll found about 60 percent of respondents were able to get a GP appointment within a week, 30 percent were waiting for more than two weeks with 17 percent waiting three or more. Telehealth services Virtual healthcare businesses and some GP services offer online medical certificates. Patients can often get an on the day video call or phone call and receive a medical certificate for three to five days. An appointment generally costs around $40 to $65. However, buyer beware: a quick search by RNZ found overseas companies marketing sick notes for New Zealanders and asking for personal information including IDs in its application process. The Ministry of Health said only health practitioners registered with a New Zealand authority can issue valid sick notes. Some pharmacies issue medical certificates - but it pays to check first. Photo: RNZ /Dom Thomas Pharmacies Pharmacists are legally allowed to write sick notes. However, not all do. For pharmacists who confirm they are able to provide a medical certificate, an in-person consultation is required and costs between $30 to $40. It is best to call the pharmacy before your visit to confirm that they can write sick notes. Medical staff are seen wearing scrubs, and a stethoscope. Photo: Supplied/ Unsplash - Nap studio Ministry of Health says a health practitioner is defined under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 as a person who is, or is deemed to be, registered with a New Zealand authority as a practitioner of a particular health profession. A list of professions regulated under the Act and their responsible authorities can be found on the Ministry of Health website . The list contains 18 professions with a range that includes from Chinese medicine services to dietetics, nursing, osteopathy to psychotherapy. It is important to differentiate medical certificate and proof of sickness, while only medical practitioners, doctors, can write medical certificates, all health practitioners can certify proof of sickness. Healthline is a free over-the-phone health service available 24/7 and connects the caller to nurses and paramedics. But the service does not issue sick certificates. In an email, a spokesperson said: "That's because the Healthline service involved nurses and paramedics providing triage (assessing symptoms, providing health and treatment advice, developing a plan for next steps for care), not diagnosis. "And to be able to issue a medical certificate would mean being able to verify that someone was unable to work for at least 3 days, which most of the time would require some form of medical diagnosis, which is not part of the service we offer." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
North Shore Hospital has entire ward of people with no medical reason to be there
North Shore Hospital. Photo: rafaelbenari/123RF North Shore Hospital has an entire ward of people stuck in hospital with no medical reason to be there. The 20-bed ward was created in May for patients who were effectively medically discharged but did not have anywhere to go for lower level care, such as an aged care facility. RNZ understands they were not under the direct care of doctors, but were looked after by nurses and allied health staff such as physiotherapists and social workers. Some were there for weeks. Health NZ's Waitematā operations director Brad Healey said started the dedicated ward to help boost capacity in the busy winter period. It had helped improve the flow of patients because people were spending less time in emergency departments and were getting the care they needed sooner, he said. Deborah Powell heads the APEX Union, which includes allied health workers. It was not unusual for the patients to be in the ward for two or three weeks, but sometimes it was longer, she said. It was not ideal but it was a good, practical decision to have them in one place rather than dotted around the hospital, she said. "It would be better to have them in the community but we just don't have that capacity out there at the moment." The head of the senior doctor's union, the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, Sarah Dalton, said it was not good for people to be in hospital when they did not need to be. "You're much better off to be in the community where you can be dressed and walking around and doing your daily things and doing exercise and getting rehab and all of those good things," she said. Having people stuck in hospital, also helped create longer surgical waiting lists, she said. "One of the biggest contributors to cancellations of elective surgeries in hospitals is that there aren't enough staffed beds to put the patients in after their surgery." "It has a domino effect back through the hospital in terms of other people's ability to access care." The government needed to do more to fund public aged residential care and also support services that allowed people to go back to their own homes, rather than the "last resort" of having to stay in hospital, Dalton said. Association of Salaried Medical Specialists chief executive Sarah Dalton. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro Health NZ's Brad Healey said each patient in the ward had a "responsible medical clinician" and could access medical care if their condition changed and a further medical assessment was needed. "The patients have complex discharge pathways, requiring specialist nursing and allied health workforces," he said. Those teams worked closely with the patients and their whānau to get the discharge support they needed, he said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Russian adoptee's PTSD claim denied by ACC over residency rules
By Shannon Pitman, Open Justice reporter of The young man began to suffer PTSD brought on by abuse he suffered as a child in Russia. Photo: Unsplash A Russian child who was adopted by New Zealanders and suffered physical abuse in his home country has had his claim for PTSD as an adult declined. Despite a High Court and District Court ruling that the man was eligible for mental health cover, the Court of Appeal overturned their rulings, stating he was not entitled to cover for a mental injury, because the physical assault occurred when he was not a New Zealand resident. The man, whose name is suppressed, was born in Russia in August 2001 and arrived in New Zealand as a three-year-old. Twenty years later, while living here as a New Zealand citizen, he was diagnosed with PTSD, stemming from abuse he suffered before arriving. ACC declined his claim for mental injury cover, stating the physical injury had occurred when he was not a New Zealand resident and therefore he was not entitled to compensation. Under the Accident Compensation Act 2001, for mental injury to be covered, it must arise out of a physical injury, or be caused by certain criminal acts or a workplace incident. The man challenged ACC's decision, which was overturned by the District Court and - on appeal from ACC - the High Court, which found his mental injury was suffered in New Zealand and therefore he was eligible for cover. ACC took the case to the Court of Appeal, which had the task of determining where the physical injury occurred that triggered the mental injury. The man's lawyers, Beatrix Woodhouse and Mathew McKillop, argued the PTSD diagnosis in 2019 marked the point at which the mental injury was suffered, and because he was living in New Zealand, this qualified him for cover. The lawyers submitted that, although the act specified a physical injury must match the mental injury, it did not specify a location. The Court of Appeal determined that how the personal injury was caused was critical. "Causation is the primary consideration," the court said in its recently released decision. "A mental injury which has arisen because of a physical injury may well be latent - the date the mental injury is triggered or the symptoms manifest is no doubt dependent on a variety of circumstances," . "But it is the physical injury which is the root of the mental injury. It is therefore the date and, in our view, the location of that physical injury which is the key to whether cover is available under the Act." New Zealand's Court of Appeal is the last avenue to appeal ACC decisions. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King The Court of Appeal determined the High Court and District Court erred in their decision-making, as the man was not a resident of New Zealand at the time of the abuse and, therefore, was not covered for ACC. "The Act cannot be interpreted as intending to provide cover for injuries caused overseas to people who are not ordinarily resident in New Zealand. Such an approach would mean the scheme was required to fund the consequences of events outside its jurisdiction and over which it could have no influence. "In our view, it is clear that Parliament intended to provide cover for mental injuries suffered because of physical injuries where the causative physical injuries occurred in New Zealand or, if suffered outside New Zealand, when the person was ordinarily resident in New Zealand when the cause occurred." The parents of the man released a statement to NZME to the effect that they believed the decision was deeply unfair to their son. "He is a New Zealander, adopted by New Zealanders under New Zealand law, and has known no other home," the statement said. "The Adoption Act is clear that an adoptee is to be treated as our natural-born child in every respect. "Yet, due to an injury that occurred before his adoption, he is now denied ACC-funded treatment for a condition that only manifested later in life." Their lawyer, Beatrix Woodhouse, said the Court of Appeal was the end of the road for all ACC claims. "Therefore, this decision represents the definitive legal position on this issue," she said. "It sets a precedent for other cases with comparable facts." ACC deputy chief executive for corporate and finance Stewart McRobie told NZME the organisation was seeking clarification of the law and acknowledged the Court of Appeal's decision. "We also acknowledge the impact of the decision on the claimant, and empathise with them and their family." * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
