Anna Wintour's Net Worth to Undergo Major Transformation After 'Vogue' Exit
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Anna Wintour's net worth may actually increase after stepping down as editor-in-chief of Vogue, according to experts who have spoken with Newsweek.
Last month, the 75-year-old announced her departure from the fashion magazine's day-to-day operations, while remaining chief content officer for Condé Nast and global editorial director of Vogue, the Associated Press reported.
What Is Anna Wintour's Net Worth?
While Wintour's net worth has not been confirmed, she amassed her fortune in the magazine industry.
The London-born fashion icon began her career as an editorial assistant at Harpers & Queen magazine, now Harper's Bazaar UK, before landing roles at Viva and British Vogue.
In 1988, Wintour was named editor-in-chief of American Vogue and helped to revive the brand.
"I want Vogue to be pacy, sharp and sexy, I'm not interested in the super rich or infinitely leisured," the media executive previously said, per the Daily Mail. "I want our readers to be energetic, executive women, with money of their own and a wide range of interests."
She continued: "There is a new kind of woman out there. She's interested in business and money. She doesn't have time to shop anymore. She wants to know what and why and where and how."
Anna Wintour's net worth may actually increase after stepping down as editor-in-chief of "Vogue," experts tell Newsweek.
Anna Wintour's net worth may actually increase after stepping down as editor-in-chief of "Vogue," experts tell Newsweek.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva
Financial Gain
Professor Martha M. Steffens, who teaches business and financial journalism at the University of Missouri, told Newsweek that Wintour "could actually benefit financially" after relinquishing her editor-in-chief duties.
"She still will receive a salary for her continued role at Condé Nast," Steffens said, noting that "she might have time to pursue other creative projects, like a book or movie/video deal, or even a public speaking contract. I doubt Wintour is really worried about her overall net worth. It's at least $50 million now, and that's not likely to disappear anytime soon."
Kirsty Fairclough, a Manchester Metropolitan University professor who specializes in pop culture and celebrity culture, agreed.
"Contrary to speculation about financial diminishment, Wintour's net worth—estimated at approximately $50 million—is unlikely to suffer," she told Newsweek. "She retains considerable influence through her continued position as global chief content officer at Condé Nast and global editorial director for Vogue. These roles ensure her presence remains embedded in the strategic direction of the brand, even as day-to-day editorial oversight transitions to a new generation."
Wintour became chair of the Met Gala in 1995. The Metropolitan Museum of Art's Costume Institute Gala is a star-studded yearly fundraising event in New York City.
Fairclough added: "Wintour's enduring association with global tentpole events such as the Met Gala and Vogue World further secures her public and institutional authority within the fashion ecosystem."
Dr. Rosie Findlay, senior lecturer at City St George's, University of London, whose research focuses on 20th and 21st century fashion media and communication, said: "I imagine that Ms. Wintour would have a specific negotiated salary that included her work as editor-in-chief of Vogue U.S. as well as her roles as global editorial director of Vogue and chief content officer at Condé Nast. The portion of her salary that was predicated on her role as editor-in-chief may be deducted, but we can only speculate."
She noted, however, that Wintour won't need to worry about her finances.
"It is widely reported that she is independently wealthy, with an estimated net worth of $50 million, so I think she'll be OK!"
Anna Wintour attends The 2024 Met Gala Celebrating "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion" at The Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 6, 2024, in New York City.
Anna Wintour attends The 2024 Met Gala Celebrating "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion" at The Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 6, 2024, in New York City.
Jeff Kravitz/FilmMagic
New Opportunities
Wintour's exit provides opportunities for her as well as Vogue.
"Unlike celebrity influencers who plaster their names on everything, Wintour has never lent her name to any product. If she wanted, she could build a brand on exclusivity, precision, and cool control—the exact qualities she represents," Steffens said. "Of course, sunglasses or a signature fragrance would be top sellers. She also could write a memoir or book on finding your style. These would be practically guaranteed bestsellers."
As for Vogue, "the moment represents a pivotal juncture in the evolution" of the publication, Fairclough shared.
"As publishing continues its digital transformation and legacy brands contend with the demands of younger, more diverse audiences, the departure of an iconic figure such as Wintour offers both a challenge and an opportunity: to reimagine authority, aesthetic, and engagement in the post-print, post-personality era of fashion media."
"It's an opportunity for a fresh editorial perspective after Wintour's long tenure as editor-in-chief," Findlay added.
The Devil Wears Prada Effect
The Devil Wears Prada was released in 2006, and Wintour has widely been considered the inspiration behind Meryl Streep's character Miranda Priestly. The Devil Wears Prada 2 is currently in production and will be released next year.
"With the sequel to The Devil Wears Prada coming out in spring 2026, it will only increase Wintour's marketability," Steffens told Newsweek. "The original movie rocketed her to more widespread fame, and this second movie will likely raise her profile once again."
"The musical version of The Devil Wears Prada has been a hit in London. Any Broadway debut of that show would only enhance her marketability. Of course, the movie and musical are based on a fictionalized version of her, but it's no secret that Wintour was the inspiration."
In an interview with the BBC last year, Wintour was asked about her influence on the iconic film.
"I don't really think about it," she said, noting that it's "for the audience and for the people I work with to decide if there are any similarities between me and Miranda Priestly."
"What I'm really interested in is the creative aspect of my job," she added.
Wintour's Legacy
Steffens said that if Wintour "were to cash in on her name, she'd be sitting on a brand potentially worth between $50 million and $150 million, depending on how she chose to play it."
"This is because she's been a curator—someone with a keen eye—so her recommendations in the fashion and beauty sphere are valuable."
"If she wanted to, Anna Wintour could become a brand unto herself—less like a passing trend and more like a fashion institution," Steffens suggested. "Think of it as Martha Stewart-meets-Karl Lagerfeld: a figure whose name evokes timeless taste and who profits by curating, not chasing the latest trend."
Fairclough added: "Wintour's legacy is defined not only by her editorial decisions—famously blending celebrity and couture—but also by the consolidation of Vogue as a lifestyle authority in the convergent space between fashion, politics, and celebrity culture."
"In this sense, Wintour has not exited so much as evolved—her influence repositioned rather than diminished. The question is not whether Vogue can survive without Anna Wintour, but how it will redefine itself in the space she has vacated."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Social Security COLA for 2026 and Beyond: What Seniors Want
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. American seniors are frustrated with how Social Security adjusts for inflation, and they want change. A new report from The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) shows a clear demand among retirees to improve the way the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) is calculated. According to the group's latest survey of 1,92 individuals over the age of 62, 34 percent of respondents identified updating the COLA formula as their top policy priority for enhancing Social Security benefits. And when presented with specific policy options to raise future COLAs, seniors overwhelmingly supported a shift to a more targeted inflation measure. Currently, the Social Security Administration (SSA) calculates COLA based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). This index tracks inflation using the spending habits of younger, urban workers, not retirees. Since 1975, COLAs have been applied annually based on CPI-W data gathered during the third quarter of the year (July through September), with the goal of ensuring benefits rise in line with everyday costs, such as housing, food, and medical care. This year, benefits rose by 2.5 percent. The TSCL, based on current CPI-W readings, expects the 2026 COLA to increase slightly to 2.6 percent. However, regardless of the boost, for many retirees, that formula no longer works. According to the TSCL survey, 68 percent of seniors support replacing the current CPI-W model with the CPI-E, or Consumer Price Index for the Elderly. Developed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the CPI-E is an index that tracks the spending habits of Americans aged 62 and older, focusing on the types of goods and services seniors typically use, such as health care, housing, and prescription drugs. "CPI-E is designed to better reflect the spending habits of people aged 62 and older," Colin Ruggiero, co-founder at told Newsweek. "It gives more weight to health care and housing costs which are two of the fastest-growing expenses for seniors. Switching to CPI-E would make COLAs more relevant and responsive to the real financial pressures seniors face." Chris Motola, a financial analyst at told Newsweek: "The main advantage of CPI-E would be to more heavily weight health care and housing costs in COLA calculations, both of which tend to disproportionately eat into seniors' budgets." Another popular idea is making up for what's already been lost. The TSCL survey found that 57 percent of respondents support a one-time "catch-up" COLA payment to compensate for years when benefits failed to keep pace with actual living costs. Composite image created by Newsweek. Composite image created by Newsweek. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva "A catch-up COLA would be a recognition that past adjustments haven't kept pace with reality," Ruggiero said. "While it's feasible, it would require congressional approval and carry a hefty budgetary cost. Politically, it could gain traction as a way to restore fairness, especially if framed as a correction rather than a new ongoing expense." Still, the limits of these proposals are clear. While COLA reforms could help stabilize seniors' purchasing power, experts caution that they won't fix everything. "Adjusting the COLA is a great start, but it's not the cure-all," said Ruggiero. "We also need broader reforms to strengthen the entire retirement system, including benefit adequacy, solvency, and support for low-income seniors." Motola agreed: "It would go a long way, but again, a major problem is that Social Security isn't really meant to carry the burden alone. We've made it very difficult for people to save money for retirement, and the loss of pensions has placed enormous stress on the system."
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump's 'Largest Deal Ever' Faces Japan Diet in Crisis
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. When President Donald Trump revealed that his administration had struck a "massive" trade and investment deal with Japan, he described it as "completed"—but it must still pass the Japanese parliament, called the Diet, which is riven with political turmoil. The deal will likely require—at least in part, if not in full—approval by the Diet, where Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's coalition government very recently lost its majority in the upper chamber, having already become the minority in the lower chamber in 2024. A Japanese lawmaker in the lower house, who chairs a key policy committee of the left-leaning Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDP), the main opposition, told Newsweek they are closely scrutinizing the Trump deal to assess whether they are satisfied with it. They will then decide how to proceed. Ishiba, of the right-wing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), still the largest party in the Diet, said he would stay on to see through the implementation of the U.S. trade deal, rather than cave to calls for his immediate resignation and create a political vacuum. Analysts said that opposition parties may seek to criticize Ishiba and the deal, but the alternative of blocking it in the Diet could backfire and lead to higher tariffs. Newsweek has contacted the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative for comment. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in the East Room at the White House on February 7, 2025 in Washington, DC. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in the East Room at the White House on February 7, 2025 in Washington, It Matters Trump has said he will make deals that benefit both sides, hailing his unique abilities to do so. But the intense "America First" messaging surrounding Trump's deals poses a challenge for U.S. trading partners. They must balance Trump's demands against their own national interests, economic needs, and views of voters, while projecting a degree of strength and independence to show they are securing gains and not merely surrendering to Washington. The Japanese deal, whose advantages to the U.S. Trump has heavily emphasized, highlights the potential vulnerability of these agreements to domestic politics. Trump's Japan Trade Deal The deal was struck ahead of Trump's August 1 deadline, when, in a letter to Ishiba, he had said Japanese imports would face a 25 percent tariff in the U.S. if negotiations failed to bear fruit. Trump had previously questioned the strategic U.S.-Japan partnership, including a long-standing security agreement with its key East Asian ally, citing what he said was an unfair set of trading terms because the Japanese market was too closed off to Americans. Trade talks between the two sides had been stuck on imports of American rice in particular. But negotiations continued, and Trump revealed the deal in a post on his Truth Social platform on Tuesday, July 22. Trump said Japan had agreed "at my direction" to invest $550 billion into the U.S.—spanning energy, semiconductors, critical minerals, pharmaceuticals, and shipbuilding—but that 90 percent of the profits from these would be kept by the U.S. He also said Japan would open up to American car and truck exports, rice and other agricultural products, and more goods. Japan would still face a 15 percent tariff, Trump said, but U.S. businesses will have a zero tariff. Among the specific measures in the deal are a Japanese commitment to immediately increase rice imports from the U.S. by 75 percent and a Japanese purchase of 100 Boeing aircraft, according to a White House fact sheet. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba attends a press conference at the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) headquarters on July 21, 2025 in Tokyo, Japan. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba attends a press conference at the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) headquarters on July 21, 2025 in Tokyo, Japan. Philip Fong - Pool/ Getty Images Japan's CDP Will 'Carefully Scrutinize' Trump Deal Kazuhiko Shigetoku, a lawmaker in the Diet's lower house from the opposition CDP, told Newsweek that the deal means "the uncertainty of the economic outlook has eased." "However, in terms of the perspective of the national interest, we need to carefully scrutinize the content of the agreement to determine whether it is satisfactory and how it will affect the Japanese economy," Shigetoku said. "We will determine our future actions based on explanations from the government at the Diet and other meetings. Although the need for congressional approval is unclear at this stage, we believe that it is important to maintain and expand free trade." Mixed Reactions in Japan Ishiba's recent election loss was driven in large part by voter frustration with rising prices while wage growth is slow. His weakened minority government must now push through a hard-fought trade agreement, one that Trump has touted as a major win for the U.S. "Early reactions among Japanese lawmakers have been mixed, with the Ishiba administration touting the deal as a success and members of the opposition claiming it is bad for the Japanese economy," Kristi Govella, Associate Professor at the University of Oxford and Japan Chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), told Newsweek. "For Japanese people, trade negotiations with the U.S. have been seen as a litmus test of the current government's leadership ability, so politicians are currently fighting to control the narrative about how good this deal really is for Japan." Kazuto Suzuki, professor at the Graduate School of Public Policy at the University of Tokyo, Japan, and director of the Institute of Geoeconomics at International House of Japan, said the Trump deal was "well received by both the ruling and opposition parties." "Given that many lawmakers did not expect the Ishiba administration to succeed in reaching an agreement, the fact that it was achieved came as a surprise," Suzuki told Newsweek. "Moreover, while it was considered difficult to lower tariffs on automobiles and automobile parts, the fact that they were reduced to 15 percent is highly regarded. "However, this does not compensate for the major defeat in the Upper House election on July 20, and criticism of Prime Minister Ishiba is growing." He added: "It is unlikely that the Diet will reject this agreement. If it were to reject it, higher tariffs would inevitably be imposed, which would benefit no one." Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba delivers his policy speech during a plenary session at the lower house of parliament on January 24, 2025, in Tokyo, Japan. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba delivers his policy speech during a plenary session at the lower house of parliament on January 24, 2025, in Tokyo, National Interest Govella said opposition parties "have a great deal of incentive to criticize the trade deal and to capitalize on the weakness of the Ishiba government," but "actually blocking the deal's approval could backfire badly." Higher tariffs "would have significantly worse impacts on the Japanese economy and on Japanese people who are already feeling the effects of inflation," she said. Japanese voters have "generally been skeptical about the opposition's ability to lead" after their experience with the Democratic Party of Japan from 2009 to 2012, she continued. "So if the current opposition parties are perceived to be acting against Japan's national interest by blocking this deal, they could lose the supporters they've recently gained," Govella said. What People Are Saying President Trump posted to Truth Social: "We just completed a massive Deal with Japan, perhaps the largest Deal ever made … This is a very exciting time for the United States of America, and especially for the fact that we will continue to always have a great relationship with the Country of Japan." Prime Minister Ishiba told reporters, per The Wall Street Journal: "The government was determined to protect national interests," adding that the deal "will lead to Japan and the U.S. working together to create jobs, produce high-quality goods, and contribute to fulfilling various roles in the world going forward." What's Next Japanese lawmakers are scrutinizing the trade deal with the U.S.. They are unlikely to block it should they be called to vote on some or all of its components, though the Ishiba government no longer has a majority in either house of the Diet, complicating its passage.
Newsweek
8 hours ago
- Newsweek
China's Xi Makes Trump Wait for Leader Talks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The White House has been optimistic about the prospects for an in-person summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping—the first of President Donald Trump's second term. Yet analysts say the Chinese leader is likely holding out for concrete deliverables before agreeing to the high-profile meeting. All Eyes on Sweden Trump dramatically escalated the trade war with the world's second-largest economy in April, rolling out sweeping new tariffs that prompted China to respond with its own export duties and other measures. While Trump has said that "the confines of a deal" are in place ahead of a third round of talks between U.S. and Chinese negotiators, set for Sweden next week, several contentious issues remain unresolved. These include ongoing U.S. curbs on advanced chip exports to China and persistent geopolitical friction over influence in Asia and Beijing's threats toward Taiwan. Newsweek reached out to the White House and Chinese embassy in the U.S. via email for comment. Europe's Role Patrick Cronin, Asia-Pacific security chair at the Hudson Institute, told Newsweek: "A Xi-Trump summit is highly probable, but withholding final approval until Beijing can button down more information and as many concessions as possible is no doubt part of Xi's calculus." "What China and the United States can each negotiate with the EU will also help inform the China-US trade bargain that will be at the heart of any Xi-Trump summit," Cronin said. After months of efforts with dozens of countries, the White House recently secured a handful of deals with Japan, Vietnam, the Philippines and Indonesia, Cronin added. In a picture combination created on May 14, 2020, Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump are shown. In a picture combination created on May 14, 2020, Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump are shown. Dan Kitwood, Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images Among the deals Trump hopes to achieve is with the EU—a traditionally U.S.-aligned bloc that has become increasingly alienated by Trump's unpredictable trade moves and controversial domestic policies. Analysts say China has been seeking to exploit this rift and achieve a thaw in ties with Brussels that has deteriorated over issues like alleged Chinese market flooding with state-subsidized electric vehicles, human rights concerns and Beijing's support for Russia amid the war in Ukraine. Sean King, an Asia scholar and senior vice president at Park Strategies, told Newsweek: "PRC [People's Republic of China] leaders have long seen Europe as a comparatively easier mark, as the continent doesn't have America's Asian security concerns and obligations." He added, "It's probably better for Trump to first line up what he says are trade deals with friends and allies before going for the big one with Beijing." While European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's visit to Beijing this week yielded a memorandum of understanding on climate change and an agreement to facilitate rare-earth exports, analysts note that a fundamental shift in EU-China ties remains elusive. Timetable Uncertain U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, visiting Malaysia earlier this month for meetings with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi, said that "the odds are high" a Trump-Xi summit will take place by the end of the year. Rosemary Foot, professor and senior research fellow at the University of Oxford's Department of Politics and International Relations, told Newsweek it's unlikely Xi is counting on Europe as leverage in his dealings with the White House. "I think that it is to do with China's more general approach to the Trump administration which is to wait for some intention to offer a serious deliverable from the meeting and perhaps also to paint President Trump as supplicant," she said. Trump and Xi last met in 2019 at the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan.
