Most successful people share these 2 simple traits, and you can learn them too: Bestselling author reveals
Tim Ferriss
. After spending more than a decade interviewing some of the most successful people in the world, Ferriss has identified two habits that consistently stand out. They may sound simple, but they hold the power to transform lives. According to Ferriss, the traits most successful people share are regular meditation and the ability to say 'no.'
According to Ferriss' conversation with
CNBC Make It
, these two habits are not just popular, they are also powerful. Ferriss, who rose to fame with his bestselling book
The 4-Hour Workweek
, has interviewed hundreds of top performers on his podcast
The Tim Ferriss Show
. From elite investors and Silicon Valley founders to world-class athletes and mental health experts, many of them attribute their sustained success to these core practices.
Meditation: The unseen mental workout
Ferriss estimates that over 70 percent of the successful individuals he has spoken to follow a meditation practice of some kind. This doesn't always mean sitting cross-legged in silence. It can include a wide range of calming and reflective activities that sharpen the mind and restore focus.
For Ferriss himself, the preferred method is Transcendental Meditation, a technique that involves silently repeating a mantra for 20 minutes twice a day. This practice has attracted an impressive list of followers, including Oprah Winfrey, Jack Dorsey, Lady Gaga, and hedge fund billionaire Ray Dalio. Even Bill Gates, who once dismissed meditation as mystical nonsense, eventually adopted it in his 60s. He now practices it for about 10 minutes a few times a week and credits it for improving his ability to concentrate.
For those who find traditional meditation difficult, Ferriss suggests rhythmic activities like running or swimming. These forms of movement can serve as a gateway to mindfulness, offering many of the same cognitive benefits by helping the mind settle and stay present.
You Might Also Like:
How to build a successful brand? Mamaearth's Ghazal Alagh shares the secret. 'Have an enemy'
iStock
Ferriss estimates that over 70 percent of the successful individuals he has spoken to follow a meditation practice of some kind. (Representational image: iStock)
The discipline of saying 'no'
While meditation strengthens the internal ability to focus, the second trait helps manage the external world. Ferriss points out that most high achievers are skilled at saying 'no.' In a world full of distractions, this ability can make or break a person's ability to stay on track.
He cites Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, who believed that innovation often comes from knowing what to eliminate. Jobs famously said, 'Focusing is about saying no.' Ferriss agrees, explaining that successful people protect their time fiercely and make deliberate choices about what gets their attention.
Warren Buffett echoes this sentiment. In the book
Atomic Habits
, Buffett is quoted saying, 'The difference between successful people and really successful people is that really successful people say no to almost everything.'
iStock
In a world full of distractions, the ability to say 'no' can make or break a person's ability to stay on track. (Representational Image: iStock)
How you can apply these habits
The good news is that both of these traits are not exclusive to celebrities or billionaires. They are skills anyone can build with time and practice. Ferriss emphasizes that setting boundaries does not have to be harsh. Simple phrases like 'Can I get back to you tomorrow?' or even a polite 'No, thank you' can help maintain focus without causing friction.
You Might Also Like:
Fancy degrees, qualifications don't matter. Shark Tank's Anupam Mittal says you need just 2 skills to be a successful entrepreneur
In a time where constant connectivity and competing priorities dominate our lives, these two habits offer a roadmap to clarity and calm. They may seem basic, but they are often the difference between busy and truly productive.
So whether you are climbing the corporate ladder or building something of your own, learning to sit in stillness and stand firm in your boundaries could be your key to success.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
8 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump tariffs: Small businesses in America need to pay an extra $202 billion a year
Synopsis President Trump's tariff policies are negatively impacting small businesses and farms, forcing them to absorb increased costs. While the GOP tax bill offers some relief, uncertainty persists due to the administration's trade approach. iStock According to an estimate by the right-leaning US Chamber of Commerce, Trump's levies mean that small businesses will have to pay an extra $202 billion a year on tariffs. The economic policies passed in the first six months of President Donald Trump's term may yet bring a Golden Age, but so far they haven't for small farms and businesses. According to an estimate by the right-leaning US Chamber of Commerce, Trump's levies mean that small businesses will have to pay an extra $202 billion a year on tariffs, which works out to about $856,000 per company on optimism soared on Trump's victory and plunged when he announced tariffs; the right-leaning NFIB Small Business Optimism Index has recovered somewhat since 'Liberation Day' but has yet to reach the heights of Trump's first term in office, and response rates to the survey have fallen, suggesting some business owners may be too busy struggling to remain solvent to complete surveys. The Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer index has declined for two months in a row. Compared with large companies, smaller enterprises are struggling to wait out the vicissitudes of Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs. Democratic Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear told me recently that he is already seeing the impact across his state on small businesses, small farms and consumers alike. 'We're all paying a hidden tax in the form of widespread tariffs,' he said. 'Look, it's not just me saying this. If Andy Beshear, [former GOP Senate Minority Leader] Mitch McConnell and [GOP Senator] Rand Paul are all saying this is a bad idea, it's because it's a really bad idea.'Companies with fewer than 500 employees contribute 43.5% of the nation's gross domestic product. Small family farms still constitute 86% of all farms, according to federal data. But they lack the leverage and resources of larger enterprises and can find themselves at the mercy of forces over which they have little influence. 'They're what economists call 'price-takers,'' Louis Johnston, an economist and professor at St. John's University in Minnesota told me. 'It means you accept the world as it is. You don't have enough power to affect prices and you don't have much wiggle room on wages. You're stuck.' Big businesses, he said, are price-makers. 'They can eat some costs, pass some to consumers, reduce stockholder dividends or shave a bit off wages,' he said. 'If you're small, all you can do is take the hit.' Investors agree, and publicly traded small companies have seen their stocks become less attractive since Trump unveiled his tariff agenda on 'Liberation Day' in April. Republicans in Congress seem unwilling to place the slightest restraint on a president convinced of his infallibility on tariffs. Many companies are finding themselves in the uncomfortable position of absorbing the increased costs of tariffs, according to Scott Lincicome, director of general economics and trade studies at the Cato Institute. That's not sustainable, especially for smaller businesses, and Lincicome is projecting higher consumer prices this fall. Even before its most recent estimate of tariff costs, the Chamber of Commerce had rung the alarm in a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that warned 'small businesses could suffer irreparable harm' from tariffs. 'The Chamber is hearing from small-business owners every day who are seeing their ability to survive endangered by the recent increase in tariff rates.'The GOP tax bill does grant some benefits to small businesses, such as a permanent extension on deductions. Doug Loon, president of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, told me that those benefits may become a lifeline. 'It would have put a lot of small businesses out of business if those provisions had not happened,' he a longtime Republican, remembers when his party saw free enterprise as an article of faith. He also recalls that the free-trade era carried its own challenges, particularly for smaller businesses that 'didn't always get a fair shake.' Loon believes that targeted tariffs, skillfully applied, 'can be incredibly beneficial.' Trump's broad-based approach 'has created great uncertainty among our businesses. And that is where disparities can occur.' Trump portrays tariffs as free money paid by countries that have 'ripped off' America. His new levies have already begun sending billions to the US Treasury. But the reality is that tariffs are a hidden tax mostly borne by US companies and consumers. According to Goldman Sachs data, US consumers have paid 22% of the cost of Trump's tariffs. Only 14% of the cost has been borne by foreign exporters. The other 64%? Eaten by American businesses. Trump has reset the table on trade. Unfortunately, in his hands, tariffs are a blunt instrument used to punish enemies, reward friends and bully other nations. He substitutes threats and intimidation for negotiations and diplomacy. The deals, such as they are, remain vague, with details often disputed by trading was just seven months ago that the International Monetary Fund declared the US economy would continue to lead the world in 2025. IMF officials said the US was growing at a faster clip than its economic competitors, with more productive workers and a more welcoming business environment, leaving Trump and the GOP well positioned to capitalize politically on those economic several key economic indicators are pointing in the wrong direction — a scenario largely of Trump's own making. Businesses are struggling to adapt to his ever-shifting landscape of tariffs. Farmers are getting clobbered by higher inputs and they've lost markets thanks to an administration that ended foreign food aid and cut nutrition programs. Meanwhile, the president brags about the revenue tariffs are bringing, as if everyone didn't already know who is really footing the bill.
Economic Times
19 hours ago
- Economic Times
Woman sues employer after 20 years of being paid to do absolutely nothing
Laurence Van Wassenhove is suing telecom giant Orange, formerly France Télécom, alleging two decades of paid inactivity severely impacted her well-being. Hired in 1993, her role diminished after developing health issues in 2002. Despite receiving a salary, Van Wassenhove claims the isolation and lack of purpose led to depression and financial struggles. A woman is suing her employer, a telecom giant. She claims the company paid her for 20 years without assigning any work. (Representational image: iStock) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads From valued hire to workplace exile 'I was paid, yes, but I was treated like I didn't exist' Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Company response and ongoing battle In a case that flips the fantasy of 'getting paid to do nothing' on its head, 59-year-old Laurence Van Wassenhove is taking one of Europe's biggest telecom companies, Orange , to court. She alleges that the company left her in a professional void for more than 20 years — full salary intact but with no tasks, no responsibilities, and virtually no human to French outlet FTV, Van Wassenhove described her experience as 'forced inactivity' that left her 'invisible' in the Wassenhove joined Orange in 1993, when it was still France Télécom. After developing epilepsy and hemiplegia — partial paralysis on one side of the body — she was reassigned from her original role to a secretarial position, making use of her HR her career stalled in 2002 when she sought a transfer to another region. An occupational health review deemed her unfit for the proposed post, and she was instead placed on 'standby,' marking the beginning of her decades-long professional limbo Despite her steady income, Van Wassenhove told Mediapart she faced financial struggles, eviction notices, and worsening mental health while caring for her autistic child. The isolation, she says, eroded her sense of purpose and left her battling severe lawyer, David Nabet-Martin, argues that Orange's inaction deprived her of 'having a place in society' as a disabled person, causing long-term psychological speaking to French outlet La Dépêche, insisted it considered Van Wassenhove's 'personal social situation' and maintained the 'best possible conditions' during her absence from active work. The company also claimed it had explored reintegrating her into a new role, though repeated sick leave meant it never Wassenhove first raised her concerns formally in 2015 with both the government and the High Authority for the Fight against Discrimination, but she claims little has changed. Early retirement was eventually suggested due to her disability — a prospect she saw as yet another push out of the working the idea of collecting a paycheck without lifting a finger might sound like the ultimate workplace perk, Van Wassenhove's case paints a more complicated picture — one where prolonged inactivity can be just as damaging as she takes her fight to court, the outcome could spark new conversations about the intersection of disability, workplace inclusion, and what it truly means to 'have a job.'
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Amazon Web Services CEO Matt Garman says he advises his teenager to learn this skill to succeed in AI age: ‘Develop your…'
Representative Image Amazon Web Services (AWS) CEO Matt Garman has said that mastering 'soft skills' like creativity and adaptability, rather than highly technical knowledge, is key to succeeding in the age of artificial intelligence (AI). In a recent CNBC 'Closing Bell Overtime' interview, Garman shared the advice he gave his teenage child, who is in high school, which was: 'Develop your critical thinking skills in college, no matter what subject you study.' Garman believes that as more AI-powered tools become commonplace in the workplace, employers will increasingly value these human-centric skills over machine learning degrees. 'I think part of going to college is building [your] critical thinking. It's less about the development of skills, and it really is [about] how do you become a critical thinker? In some ways, I think that's actually going to be the most important skill going forward,' Garman noted. He added that in the age of AI, most people's top skill for achieving success will be critical thinking. 'You're going to want to be creative. You're going to want to be [good at] critical thinking. And you're going to want to be flexible. I think the ability to learn new things and adapt is going to be just as important as any particular skill that you learn,' Garman continued. How AI may not be able to replace some human jobs The range of skills and administrative tasks AI can perform is expanding rapidly. Garman's employer Amazon, is among several companies planning to shrink corporate staff while increasing the use of AI tools and agents in the coming years. However, research shows that AI still falls short of human intelligence in applying critical thinking and creativity to develop new ideas and make nuanced decisions. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman also called critical thinking 'the most valuable skill of the future' for workers, especially those responsible for curating and refining AI-generated output, during a January 2024 event at Howard University. 'AI can generate lots of great ideas, but you still need a human there to say, 'This is the thing other people want,'' Altman explained. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
