Instagram ‘Map' feature poses ‘significant' safety and privacy risks that could endanger kids, state AGs warn
Instagram Map, launched Aug. 6 with little advance notice, enables users to share their exact location with others on the app. The feature has drawn concerns it could place children and others at risk – especially given Mark Zuckerberg's poor track record on protecting user privacy.
In a Wednesday letter to Instagram chief Adam Mosseri, New Mexico AG Raúl Torrez and others demanded that Meta take several 'urgent' steps to promote safety, including disabling the Map feature entirely for underage users and sending a 'clear alert' on potential safety risks and how Instagram planned to use the location data.
'Unrestricted location-sharing features pose a particular risk for minors as they can be readily
used by sexual predators to identify and geographically target children in the real world,' the letter warned.
'We know that dangerous individuals are already present on Instagram, and we have serious concerns
that this feature will increase the likelihood of hands-on abuse and exploitation.'
4 Instagram's controversial Map feature is drawing scrutiny from state AGs.
Last week's surprise rollout of Instagram Map caused panic among users, with one writing on Meta-owned Threads,'I can't believe Instagram launched a map feature that exposes everyone's location without any warning.'
Mosseri attempted some damage control, writing in a post that 'it looks mostly like people are confused' by the feature. The Instagram boss also noted that users had to consent twice in order to opt in.
'No, no one is confused,' another user shot back. 'My friends were screenshotting my location and sending it to me while we were scrambling trying to remove it. You are NOT listening to your users.'
Instagram claimed that users could 'choose to responsibly share your location with friends you pick using the Instagram map.' The feature is inactive by default, with users needing to opt in to use it.
4 Critics have accused Mark Zuckerberg of having a questionable record on user safety.
AFP via Getty Images
The company also claimed parents would 'have control over their location sharing experience on the map,' including receiving notifications if their child starts sharing their location and the ability to control if they have access to the feature.'
'Real-time location features should of course be intentionally built and give users control, which is why Instagram Map's design already addresses the issues the attorneys general raise: it is off by default, everyone receives a notification explaining what the feature entails and can turn it off whenever they want, and with parental supervision, parents get a notification if their teen starts using it and can block their access to it at any time,' Meta spokesman Andy Stone said in a statement.
Top state prosecutors weren't convinced, demanding that Meta add a 'simple, easy to access feature' allowing Instagram users who had already opted in to disable Map at any time.
On Capitol Hill, Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) have already called on Zuckerberg to get rid of the Map feature.
4 Attorney General of New Mexico Raúl Torrez is pictured.
Getty Images for Accountable Tech
The Wednesday letter's other signers include Republicans Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has frequently taken legal action against Meta and other Big Tech firms, as well as Georgia's Chris Carr, Alabama's Steven Marshall, Arkansas's Tim Griffin, Illinois's Kwame Raoul, Nevada's Aaron Ford and South Dakota's Marty Jackley and others.
'Meta and Instagram have a responsibility to prioritize user safety over product novelty,' the officials said. 'We expect your prompt action and response to prevent Instagram from continuing practices that endanger the safety and privacy of its users.'
Proton, which operates a privacy-focused email service, said Meta's 'past controversies and financial incentives raise questions about the safety of sharing your location data.' It also warned that location-sharing 'creates opportunities for cyberstalking.'
4 Instagram Map is turned off by default, according to Meta.
Meta
The scrutiny is another potential headache for Meta, which faces multiple pending lawsuits at the federal and state level over its failure to protect kids online.
New Mexico is currently suing Meta after uncovering evidence that it had exposed kids to adult sex content and disgusting messages from alleged child predators, including 'pictures and videos of genitalia.'
As The Post reported, Meta's security issues also surfaced at the FTC's antitrust trial seeking a forced selloff of Instagram – with the feds revealing internal documents that showed staffers panicking about so-called 'groomers' targeting kids on the app.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
22 minutes ago
- Engadget
HTC takes on Meta with the Vive Eagle smart glasses
HTC is once again attacking the wearable space with a pair of new smart glasses, the company announced. The Vive Eagle is a rival to Meta's Ray-Ban glasses with a fashion-foward lightweight design, open ear audio, voice-activated AI and an ultra-wide AI-powered camera. They look promising, if a bit expensive, but will only be available in Taiwan to start with. The Taiwanese firm clearly noticed that Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses have been a surprise hit. It's easy to see why — in our Engadget review, we found that they look great and perform admirably. The current model includes in-ear speakers, cameras, microphones and access to Meta's virtual assistant. HTC has used much the same formula for the Vive Eagle, though they have an uphill battle against Ray-Ban's brand brand in terms of consumer awareness and style. "Vive Eagle features a refined aesthetic that conceals its powerful technology in clean, minimalist lines," the company wrote. It managed to fit all the technology into a relatively lightweight frame that weighs just 49 grams, only a gram heavier than Meta's Ray-Bans. HTC takes on Meta with the Vive Eagle smart glasses (HTC) On the camera side, the Vive Eagle comes with a 12MP ultra-wide model with voice-activated AI, offering support for multiple platforms including OpenAI and Gemini. "With a simple voice command like 'Hey VIVE, take a photo,; users can capture what they see — right from their glasses," the company wrote. Voice commands also let you do things like record reminders, take notes, and get restaurant recommendations. You can also get real-time translation in 13 languages: Arabic, Traditional Chinese, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Spanish, Korean, Thai, Turkish. On the audio side, the Vive Eagle has an open-ear setup that "combines large acoustic drivers and virtual bass enhancement to deliver rich, spatial audio while minimizing sound leakage," HTC said. It promised that you'll be able to hear music or voice prompts without others overhearing, while still being aware of your surroundings. HTC promises up to 36 hours of standby time and 4.5 hours of continuous music playback thanks to the 235mAh battery, and you can get to a 50 percent charge (via magnetic fast charging) in just 10 minutes. It also features a "privacy-first" architecture with all video and other data stored exclusively on-device — and that is protected via 256-bit AES encryption, according to HTC. The Vive Eagle will only available in Taiwan at first for NT$15,600, or about $520 — quite a bit more than most of Meta's Ray-Ban models. HTC has yet to say if it will bring the Vive Eagle to other territories including the US — but if it does and at that price, it'll be in tough against its rival.
Time Business News
23 minutes ago
- Time Business News
Junior AI: How a 24-Hour Coding Dare Turned Into a Game-Changing Shopify Photo Editor
Some businesses start with million-dollar funding rounds, massive offices, and fancy launch parties. Junior? Nah… it started with a cup of coffee, a laptop, and a crazy personal dare: 'Can I build a working AI photo editor in 24 hours?' I'm not going to lie; it sounded insane. But in e-commerce, Shopify product images can literally make or break a sale. And most sellers? They don't have the time, budget, or patience to learn Photoshop. So yeah, the idea felt worth losing some sleep over. Day one was pure chaos. No plan, no roadmap, just me and the keyboard. By the next morning, I had a working prototype a basic AI photo editing tool that could: Remove backgrounds cleanly (no more messy edges) Upscale blurry images so they look sharp Add quick AI photo filters for that extra pop It wasn't perfect. In fact, it was a little ugly. But it worked . And honestly, in tech, working beats pretty much any day. One month later, junior – mini ai tools wasn't just a half-baked experiment. It was live on the Shopify App Store, letting sellers do ecommerce image editing directly inside Shopify—no downloads, no complicated settings, no file juggling. Look, there are a ton of online photo editors out there. Most of them try to do everything —from weird meme filters to overly complex AI prompts. Junior? It's laser-focused on what sellers actually need. Think: AI Image Generator for creating extra product shots without hiring a photographer for creating extra product shots without hiring a photographer AI Photo Enhancement to make images sharper and brighter instantly to make images sharper and brighter instantly AI Background Remover that actually understands where your product ends and the background begins that actually understands where your product ends and the background begins AI Image Restoration to bring old or damaged product photos back to life to bring old or damaged product photos back to life AI Image Blending & Combination for creative campaigns or lifestyle shots for creative campaigns or lifestyle shots Batch Editing so you can process hundreds of photos in one go If you're selling online, your product image is your first lighting? Buyer clicks background? You look unprofessional. Low quality? They won't trust you enough to pay. Junior fixes that fast. Even amateur photos can look like they were taken in a studio — all thanks to AI-powered enhancements and background cleanups. We've had Shopify store owners who: Launched an entire seasonal collection in half the time because of batch editing Revived old stock photos instead of paying for a new shoot A/B tested product images made with AI generators and saw conversion rates jump One guy even told me he started using Junior to create custom images for Instagram ads without touching Canva or Photoshop. That's the kind of 'off-label' use I love. In e-commerce, time is money. Junior's Shopify integration means you edit right where your products live — no exporting, no zip files, no nonsense. Upload → Pick an action → Done. You can: Upscale resolution for marketplaces like Amazon Create quick mockups for new products Maintain consistent branding across every listing Junior's not done. We're already working on: Faster AI processing speeds Even cleaner background removal for tricky products (think jewelry or transparent bottles) Direct integration with ad platforms so your edited images can go straight into campaigns Basically — less clicking around, more selling. And if you want to follow updates or my thoughts on content creation tools, you can check my LinkedIn profile. Junior didn't start as a 'startup idea.' It started as a fun challenge. That's why it's so seller-focused — every feature exists to actually solve a pain point. From a one-day caffeine-fueled code sprint to a growing AI tool used by Shopify stores worldwide… it's proof that you don't need 6 months and a giant team to create something that changes the game. Final thought? If you're still editing photos manually in 2025… you're wasting time you could be using to make sales. Let AI handle the boring work — from photo effects online to complete visual content creation — so you can focus on growing your business. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
Mark Zuckerberg's Home School Ran Afoul Of Zoning Regulations, He's Not Alone
Earlier this week, the New York Times reported that Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan were forced to move a small school they were operating out of their home after neighbors alerted Palo Alto's office of planning and development. While everyone loves a bit of millionaire on billionaire neighborhood drama, the issues at stake in the dispute actually have wider implications for education across the country. Increasingly, small schools are popping up in homes and libraries and strip malls and the rules and regulations that assume a school is a place with 30 classrooms branching off of central corridors with 500 students learning within them are increasingly ill suited to govern what is going on. In the Times article, there is debate as to what the Zuckerbergs were actually doing. Is BBS (the name of the outfit) a school? Is it a homeschool co-op? What is the difference between the two? Does that matter? Documents filed with the state describe it as a 'coed day school' with 14 kindergarten through fourth grade students, three full time teachers, a part time teacher, one administrator, and one other staff member. Representatives from the Zuckerbergs dispute calling it a private school, saying that it came out of a homeschool co-op that formed during the pandemic. The lines between homeschooling and formal school have been blurring for some time now. If we imagine a spectrum where full-time five-day-per-week schooling outside of the home in a traditional school setting sits at one end and full-time five-day-per-week schooling inside of the home with only siblings and parents sits at the other end, there are lots of stops in between. Homeschool co-ops, hybrid schools, microschools, all blur the lines and allow students to learn together in varying configurations with varying degrees of structure. What the representatives of the Zuckerbergs describe, a school where students pay no tuition and whose parents teach some subjects, would fall in there. One network of charter schools demonstrates the blending of educational models happening today. Arizona's ASU Preparatory Academy educates more than 7,000 students across a network of charter schools that take quite different forms and approaches. ASU Prep Academies operate in-person classes all week while ASU Prep Digital students work online full time. In between are schools that follow ASU Prep Digital+, like ASU West Valley and ASU Tempe, where students are able to attend school from one to three days per week and work from home for the rest. ASU Prep also operates microschools that they call ASU Prep Learning Pods. It is not just in the charter sector. Research by Albert Cheng and Dan Hamlin used the National Household Education Survey to gauge the prevalence of four kinds of arrangements amongst homeschooling families: fully parent-delivered home education, home education supplemented by online learning, home education supplemented by private tutoring or a homeschool co-op, and home schooling supplemented by part-time enrollment in a brick-and-mortar school. They found that, 'most homeschool families supplement home education with cooperative instructors and private tutors, online education, and brick-and-mortar schooling.' It is, in fact, the distinct minority of homeschooling families that solely operate with parent-directed instruction from home. The majority of homeschooling families are blending together different educational environments and providers to round out their child's education. Some co-op like structures start to get more formal. They meet at regular times in regular places. They have a consistent set of instructors. But are they schools? What about a program that meets for two days per week, but has students learn from home the rest? Is it a school? Or, if a student is learning from home, but through an online course of study, is their home their school? Where do they go every day? This isn't just a 'how many angels can dance on the head of a pin' semantic game. These distinctions matter, because, as the Zuckerbergs found out, once something get the moniker 'school' the rules and regulations start to stack up. In a column earlier this year, I recounted the story of Alison Rini and Starlab in Florida, who attempted to rework a daycare facility in the center of a public housing project into a small learning center for the children of the community. But once more than five school-age children started to attend it, local zoning authorities said it was a school and that it needed the proper fire suppression infrastructure as any other school would. Another column, with direct relevance to the Zuckerberg's zoning issues, referenced a report by Florida's Teach Coalition that outlined all of the different ways in which zoning is affecting new school formation. In some localities, zoning boards are requiring architectural renderings, traffic studies, and engineering reports, and nixing new schools for altering the character of the area or increasing traffic. They are even making requirements that schools cannot be sited on main roads, that all of their classrooms have to be on the ground floor, and have massive lot sizes, all of which makes small school formation prohibitively expensive. There are broader questions as to why schools, and particularly private schools, are singled out by zoning authorities. As the Teach Coalition report uncovered, public schools usually benefit from 'by right' zoning while private schools need special exemptions from planning authorities to gain access to a facility. And, the Zuckerbergs would conceivably be allowed to do many things in their homes, like host large dinner parties that affect parking and traffic, without needing the go ahead from planning authorities. If zoning regulations are not updated to take into account the new forms that schools are taking, it will not just be the Zuckerbergs that run afoul of their local planning offices.
