Cash still holds a place in Singapore amid cashless shift
Mobile apps like DBS PayLah!, GrabPay, and NETS, plus contactless cards and PayNow, have made digital payments easy. And alternatives like XAPO which allow users to directly pay from Bitcoin.
Research firm Research and Markets predicts that Singapore's prepaid card and digital wallet market was worth S$12.37 billion (US$9.66 billion) in 2024. This is set to reach S$19.86 billion (US$15.51 billion) by 2029.
However, despite Singapore's growth in digital payments, a week-long cash-only experiment by CNA in June 2025 shows the strong presence of cashless systems while also highlighting the ongoing need for cash. And it also raises questions about the costs and benefits of the digital shift.
The advantages of going cashless are clear. Transactions are fast, saving Singaporeans the trouble of carrying cash or counting change in a busy city. Digital payments permit accurate financial tracking, with tools like DBS NAV Planner providing insights into spending habits.
Government support via the Smart Nation scheme and widespread tools like PayNow amplify the benefits of going cashless. Singapore's efficient infrastructure and tech-savvy population make convenience, cost savings, and efficiency particularly impactful.
Businesses and the government also save a lot of money. In 2016, KPMG estimated that cash and cheque handling cost Singapore S$2 billion each year. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) reports e-payments doubled from S$627 billion in 2018 to S$1.25 trillion in 2023, showing efficiency gains.
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this. Businesses like Decathlon (cashless since June 2020, offering 15 payment options) and 39 Starbucks outlets are going entirely cashless to reduce contact and simplify operations. Environmentally? Fewer banknotes decrease the ecological cost of printing and disposing of currency.
However, the cash-only experiment revealed some challenges. Higher bus fares (S$1.90 compared to S$1.19 for cards) and MRT's card-only payment systems exposed the inefficiencies of cash. Long lines at cash counters at Don Don Donki contrasted with quick digital self-checkouts.
Singapore's small businesses must also deal with payment processor fees that cut into profits. Meanwhile, cross-border digital transactions can result in delays and higher costs. Accessibility is another major issue—elderly citizens, low-income groups, and tourists often depend on cash.
A survey by CNA at 50 shops at Parkway Parade and 42 hawker stalls found most still accept cash. Other small businesses remain cash-only because the owners are not familiar with technology.
Security and privacy risks are also signs of concern. While Singapore's digital infrastructure is strong, the rise of online scams reveals vulnerabilities. Digital payments can reduce anonymity, unlike cash.
Another challenge is technological dependence and financial inclusion of at-risk groups. A system outage like what DBS payment channels went through in 2023 can disrupt transactions. This is despite MAS requiring banks to ensure systems recover within four hours.
A balanced approach is required that leverages Singapore's strengths while tackling weaknesses to maximise the benefits. This ensures an inclusive cashless future. The most practical way forward? Maintaining support for both cash and digital payments in daily life.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Commentary: Indonesia's jobs boom is a story of quantity, not quality
YOGYAKARTA: Indonesia is creating jobs at an unprecedented rate. In 2024 alone, the country added 4.8 million new jobs, pushing the unemployment rate below 5 per cent as gross domestic product growth rebounded to 5 per cent. While this appears groundbreaking on paper, national sentiment and statistics tell a different story. Workers are anxious, households feel stuck, and young graduates are scrambling for jobs to match their qualifications. Despite consistent job growth, social mobility remains difficult, with the number of Indonesians in the middle class falling since 2018. The core problem is not employment itself, but the nature of employment. According to Indonesia's National Labour Force Survey, the country created around 18 million jobs between 2018 and 2024. But more than 80 per cent were in household enterprises, while just 2.6 million jobs came from corporations and large factories, with fewer than a million jobs created in government-related roles. Household enterprises like street vendors, home-based workers and family-run shops may offer flexibility, but they are deeply informal and poorly paid. In 2023, nearly 59 per cent of Indonesia's workers were employed informally without insurance and earning below the minimum wage. In most cases, employees in household enterprises face a persistent wage penalty. In their first year, they earn on average 9.6 per cent less than government employees and 57.6 per cent less than corporate employees. With an average starting wage of just 1.6 million rupiah (US$96.50) per month, these jobs fall short of what it takes to join the middle class. UNDEREMPLOYMENT CRISIS This divide is pronounced across sectors. Sectors with the lowest wages and job quality such as agriculture and food services led job creation, with agriculture alone adding over 4.2 million jobs. But sectors that offer stable, better-paying work like finance, health and public administration added far fewer jobs. Most new manufacturing jobs are found in micro-scale, low-tech operations with low product complexity like food and beverage processing. Real wage data also reveals a troubling trend – adjusted for inflation, real wages have not grown since 2018. At the same time, between 2018 and 2024, the average number of hours worked fell across almost every sector, from agriculture to finance. This rise in low-hour employment has driven a surge in underemployment – around 30 per cent of Indonesia's workforce work under 35 hours per week. Although millions of Indonesians are technically employed, they are often stuck in jobs without enough hours or sufficient income to sustain a good life. This quiet epidemic of underutilisation erodes productivity and strains household budgets, pushing many workers into a loop of part-time labour and full-time insecurity. Indonesia's underemployment crisis is even more concerning when considering worker aspirations. In 2024, nearly 16 million Indonesian workers reported wanting to work more hours, an increase of almost 80 per cent from 2018. Over 83 per cent of these underemployed workers were concentrated in household enterprises. The institutions most capable of offering stable, full-time employment are shrinking, while the informal sector balloons with workers who want but cannot find enough hours. POLICIES FOR QUALITY EMPLOYMENT Indonesia must reorient its policy towards quality employment, including by incentivising employers to hire formally and pay fairly. Indonesia can learn from Chile's Subsidio al Empleo Joven (Youth Employment Subsidy), which offers wage subsidies to enterprises hiring vulnerable young workers, while linking social security benefits and access to credit to formal employment status. OECD evaluations show that this program has raised the probability of formal employment by 3 per cent and led to higher earnings for beneficiaries. Adopting similar targeted incentives can encourage more businesses to provide decent and secure employment. Improving job quality is not solely the responsibility of the government. The Central Bank also has a role to play by recognising the economic slack created by underemployment. Indonesia should rely on a comprehensive dashboard of labour market indicators to set monetary policy, rather than a single headline unemployment figure. An economy may boast record-low unemployment and strong job creation, yet persistent underemployment or weak labour force participation signals that substantial slack remains beneath the surface. In these cases, central banks may be wise to hold back from aggressive tightening to avoid stifling a still-fragile economic recovery. By embracing broader labour measures, monetary and fiscal policy can be calibrated more precisely, uncovering hidden slack or overheating pressures that the official employment growth rate alone fails to reveal. Indonesia also needs to strike a bold national conversation on job quality standards, while employers must provide a decent minimum wage, stronger job security, increased social protections and self-development opportunities. Good jobs are not luxuries, but preconditions for a healthy and inclusive economy. Indonesia's economic engine continues to grow. But if the jobs it produces are low-wage, informal and dead-end, the country risks building a future where work does not deliver dignity. Indonesia's economy will not be measured by how fast it grows, but by how many people rise with it.
Independent Singapore
4 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Perplexity AI's value jumps to US$18B after fresh US$100M funding
Photo: LinkedIn/Perplexity AI INTERNATIONAL: Perplexity AI, the artificial intelligence-powered search engine startup taking on Google, has raised another US$100 million in fresh funding, pushing its valuation up to US$18 billion (S$23 billion). The Edge Singapore reported, citing a person familiar with the matter, that the fresh funding is an extension of a previous funding round from earlier this year, which valued the company at US$14 billion. Perplexity declined to comment on the funding. Some details of the deal were earlier reported by the Financial Times. Perplexity, founded in 2022, has quickly become one of the leading names in generative AI. Its valuation jumped from US$1 billion to US$3 billion last year and then tripled again just months later. In March, Bloomberg News reported that the startup aimed to raise up to US$1 billion at a valuation of US$18 billion but later settled for a smaller investment at US$14 billion. With this latest funding, it's now back at its original valuation target. /TISG Read also: Nvidia CEO to sell more advanced chips to China after H20 ban, warns of 'tremendous loss' for firms in potential US$50B AI market () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
CNA
8 hours ago
- CNA
Chinese automakers should pursue 'rational competition' in EV industry, official says
BEIJING :Major automakers should push for "rational competition" in the electric vehicle industry, a senior Chinese official said on Thursday (Jul 17), according to a statement from the industry ministry published on Friday. The comments from Che Jun, head of a Communist Party central leading group, came a day after China's cabinet pledged to regulate what it called "irrational" competition in the EV market and vowed to strengthen price-monitoring. Che Jun spoke at a meeting attended by officials from the industry ministry and representatives from automakers BYD and BAIC Group. Authorities in China have urged companies to stop excessive competition in the auto industry and in more recent regulatory comments, described such competition as "irrational." On Friday, China's industry ministry, market regulator and state planner jointly held a separate meeting on the EV industry's development with representatives from 17 key auto enterprises, automobile industry association and local officials.
