
An Afghan interpreter evaded death during the war but met a grim fate in Texas
It was March 26, nearly the end of Ramadan, and his wife wanted to know when to expect her husband, a former U.S. military interpreter who lost both legs in a bomb blast in Afghanistan and became one of Houston's most well-known advocates for new Afghan migrants.
It was almost time to break the day's fast, recalled Niazi's cousin, but he hadn't returned home. So she called his cellphone.
'I'm not your husband,' the man on the other end of the line said, according to Rizwanullah Niazi, Niazi's cousin. 'I killed your husband.'
The shock of that call intensified when his family learned what authorities later alleged in bail documents filed in Harris County District Court: An Afghan national who'd sought help from Niazi was accused of stabbing him more than a dozen times over frustration with the slow pace of the U.S. immigration system.
The 34-year-old's death left the Marines he served with reeling and a hole in Houston's sizable Afghan community.
'I still don't believe that he is not with us anymore,' said Nisar Momand, who met Niazi more than a decade ago and, like his friend, helps recently resettled Afghans obtain services and navigate the immigration bureaucracy.
'Abdul was like the backbone of the community,' Momand said. 'Without a backbone, we are totally disabled.'
'It's an unspeakable tragedy,' said Brandon Remington, a former U.S. Marine Corps platoon commander who worked with Niazi in Afghanistan and helped him flee to the United States amid death threats from the Taliban. 'Given how much he escaped death and to die in that way — it's insane. It feels like the universe is crazy.'
Masiullah Sahil, 37, is accused of first-degree murder in Niazi's death and, until last month, was being held in lieu of $750,000 bond. After prosecutors failed to indict him within three months, as Texas law requires, a judge ordered him released on a personal recognizance bond that required no payment, court records show.
'It just didn't get done,' a prosecutor said during a July 10 hearing about the failure to obtain that indictment, according to NBC affiliate KPRC of Houston.
Sahil remains jailed, however. The same day Harris County District Court Judge Emily Detoto ordered him released, the district attorney's office filed a witness tampering charge. He's being held on $25,000 bond, jail records show. Sahil is scheduled to be arraigned on both charges Aug. 12.
Still, the prosecution's apparent failure infuriated Niazi's friends and family, who are calling for an investigation into the district attorney's office.
'What if he'd gotten out and came and killed his wife and kids?' said Niazi's close friend Mohammad Bayan, referring to Niazi's family. 'I was completely heartbroken and outraged.'
A spokesperson for the Harris County District Attorney's Office said the situation is under review with prosecutors assigned to the case. Sahil's lawyer did not respond to a request for comment.
A fearless interpreter
Niazi was raised in Jalalabad, east of Kabul, and worked as an English teacher before he got a job as a translator with the U.S. Marines in Afghanistan in 2011, said Rizwanullah Niazi, a cousin who also worked as a military translator.
Michael Egan, a Marine who led a unit that Abdul Niazi was attached to for several months in Helmand province, described him as one of the best combat interpreters he worked with — always levelheaded and alert, comfortable in potentially lethal situations and driven by a desire to protect his home.
'He was one of the more courageous and fearless people out there,' said Egan, 36. 'You knew if Niazi was with you, you were set.'
That mission ended in May 2012, during what Egan described as a routine foot patrol through a village. Egan stepped on an improvised explosive device and instantly lost both legs.
Minutes later, as Marines desperately tried to stabilize Egan, he said he heard another blast.
Niazi had been ordered to take cover, and when he did, there was a second detonation, said Remington, the former platoon commander, citing an after-action report.
'It was complete and utter chaos,' Egan said.
Niazi was severely wounded. He lost both legs and suffered so much damage to one arm that it would be difficult for him to use a manual wheelchair in the future, Egan said.
A new life in Houston
Niazi underwent months of surgery in India before he returned to Afghanistan, Rizwanullah Niazi said. While there, he started receiving letters from the Taliban threatening his family, said Remington, who by then was attending law school in the United States.
Remington said he helped Niazi apply for a special immigrant visa, designated for people who assisted the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan. Niazi obtained that visa a little over a decade ago and moved to Houston, Remington recalled.
He was one of the thousands of Afghans who worked with the U.S. military and relocated to Texas in the years that followed the U.S. invasion. According to U.S. State Department data, nearly 20,000 Afghans with special visas moved to the state between 2012 and 2023, with a sharp rise after the United States military left the country in 2021.
When Momand first met Niazi at a local clinic in 2014, he wasn't sure how his countryman would fare in the United States.
'How will he survive in this country with no legs, with a disability and a wheelchair?' he recalled wondering.
Initially, Niazi worked as a sales clerk at a cellphone store, said Bayan, who became best friends with Niazi after he settled in Houston. He eventually had five children — four boys and one girl, the oldest of whom is 10, Bayan said.
He started working for a nonprofit that provided assistance to refugees, Bayan said, and the pair attended college together, earning bachelor's degrees in business administration from the University of Houston and enrolling in an online master's program for national security policy at Liberty University in Virginia.
Their goal, Bayan said, was to obtain Ph.D.s and return to Afghanistan to help improve the country's national security. After the nonprofit Niazi worked for shuttered last year, Bayan said, Niazi established his own business providing services to recent transplants and quickly amassed hundreds of clients.
'Pay me when you can' was Niazi's business model, Bayan said. When he reminded his friend that he had rent and two assistants to pay, Bayan recalled Niazi responding: 'All these refugee families, they're struggling, and it's hard for me to ask them for money. Whenever they give it to me, I will accept it.'
An argument and a fatal stabbing
One of those people was Sahil, Bayan said.
Bayan knew Sahil before he went to see Niazi. He said Sahil had sought help from him and others to get the necessary documentation to return to Afghanistan. Bayan said Niazi told him that Sahil kept calling and visiting, wanting to know how to get back to his home country as soon as possible.
But the documentation Sahil needed was 'not in my hands,' Bayan recalled Niazi saying.
A client found Niazi dead in his office on March 26. Sahil was seen on video coming and going from the office several times before he was captured leaving with blood on his clothes, according to the bail document.
When authorities found Sahil, he had Niazi's phone and said that he'd been frustrated with how long it was taking for his refugee status to be approved, according to the document. He admitted to arguing with Niazi, then getting a knife from his car and repeatedly striking him with it.
Niazi's body was found with 20 deep stab wounds and lacerations, according to the document.
After Niazi's wife learned of his death through the phone call, Bayan said, the suspect continued calling her. She was screaming and crying, recalled Bayan, who by that point had gone to his friend's home.
Amid the swirl of grief and confusion, Bayan said he asked for her phone.
Then, he said, he called the man back and asked him about what he had done. After a few vague answers, Bayan said, the man told him Niazi 'was not listening to me.'
Immediately after that call, Bayan said, he and a relative of Niazi's reported what they learned to authorities.
If he could question the suspect again, Bayan said he'd ask him a simple question: 'Is it worth taking an innocent life over immigration paperwork?'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Pakistan launches new security operation against militants near Afghan border
KHAR, Pakistan (AP) — Pakistani security forces have launched a 'targeted operation' against militants in a restive northwestern district bordering Afghanistan, displacing tens of thousands of residents who have fled to safer areas, officials said Tuesday. There was no formal announcement of the launch of the offensive in Bajaur, a former stronghold of the Pakistani Taliban in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, but a government administrator, Saeed Ullah, said it was not a large-scale operation and only insurgent hideouts were being hit to avoid civilian casualties. Another government administrator, Shahhid Ali, said the number of displaced people had rapidly increased to nearly 100,000. Residents reported that security forces, backed by helicopters, struck militant hideouts in the mountainous areas along the Afghan border. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa police chief Zulfiqar Hameed said the operation was ongoing. Pakistani Taliban, known as Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan or TTP, are a separate group but a close ally of the Afghan Taliban, who seized power in Afghanistan in August 2021, as U.S. and NATO troops were in the final stages of their pullout from the country after 20 years of war. Many TTP leaders and fighters have found sanctuary in Afghanistan and have been living there openly since the Taliban takeover, and some have crossed the border back into Bajaur and carried out attacks.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's DC takeover sends national shock waves
In today's issue: ▪ Trump: Cities beyond DC could see federal policing ▪ US extends China tariff deadline ▪ Democrats allege DOJ, FBI weaponization ▪ Zelensky vies for influence at Trump-Putin summit President Trump is looking beyond the nation's capital to deploy federal crime-fighting muscle and the National Guard to prominent cities run by Democrats, he said on Monday. 'Other cities are hopefully watching,' the president said after declaring a public safety emergency in Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) and members of the D.C. City Council in a separate statement disputed Trump's descriptions of out-of-control violent crime while arguing the president's actions are unprecedented and unnecessary. 'I'm going to work every day to make sure it's not a complete disaster. Let me put it that way,' the mayor told reporters on Monday. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schume r (D-N.Y.) called Trump's scathing crime narrative a 'political ploy.' Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D) said the president is ' testing the limits of his power.' The Democratic Mayors Association accused Trump of a 'charade,' arguing that 'crime is down in most major cities.' During a lengthy press conference, Trump said the Justice Department is now in charge of the Metropolitan Police Department in the nation's capital and he vowed to deploy 800 National Guard members within a city he called 'dirty, disgusting' and full of 'drugged-out maniacs.' D.C. residents number just 700,000, but the city played host to a record 27 million visitors last year. The president, reprising his longtime narrative that cities and states governed by Democrats are poorly served and in danger, called out Chicago and Los Angeles, while also mentioning New York City, his hometown. All are led by Democratic mayors in states with prominent Democratic governors, several of whom are sizing up potential presidential bids in 2028. Trump says federal crime fighting in Washington could be a model for his administration to take similar action elsewhere. He previously deployed federal troops to Los Angeles in June to bolster immigration enforcement before removing them last month. His decision at the time to ignore California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom 's objections to active-duty Marines mobilized on domestic soil is the subject of a federal appeals court trial this week in San Francisco as part of a challenge filed by the state. Newsom, who is term-limited and taking a leadership role for Democrats, has said a race for the White House in 2028 could ' unfold.' sc Trump argues he has the presidential authority to declare public safety emergencies tied to assertions of crime and other hazards that permit him to temporarily empower federal law enforcement to direct and assist city policing. The president, who criticized Democrats in 2020 for backing proposals to defund police in reaction to the murder of George Floyd, says he has broad public support for his crime-fighting moves. In the summer of 2020, Trump deployed more than 5,000 National Guard troops to Washington to crack down on mostly peaceful demonstrators pushing for racial justice and some looters. Democratic candidates largely retreated from antipolice rhetoric by 2022 as unpopular with voters and a political boost to the GOP. Trump favors more arrests in major urban settings and tougher prosecutions while also urging cities to remove homeless encampments on public property. 'This dire public safety crisis stems directly from the abject failures of the city's local leadership. The radical-left City Council adopted no-cash bail,' Trump said Monday, referring to criminal justice reforms in Washington, Illinois and New York City adopted years ago to reduce jail populations among some defendants who would otherwise remain behind bars because they could not afford to post a bond. 'We're going to change no-cash bail. We're going to change the statute and get rid of some of the other things, and we'll count on the Republicans in Congress and Senate to vote,' Trump said. ' We have the majority, so we'll vote.' Washington, however, has a unique and complicated status in the United States as a congressionally established federal district with a thin legal shield for home rule, calling into question the president's assertion that a federal crackdown in the nation's capital can serve as a template for crime fighting in other major cities. 'One of the most important bulwarks against authoritarian rule in the United States is the fact that we have a federalist system with shared sovereignty, so that the president or the federal government generally can't simply take over states,' said Paul Schiff Berman, a former dean of the George Washington University Law School. 'D.C. is not a state. And so it gives the president more leeway. And that's really dangerous,' Berman told The Hill. ▪ The Hill: Extending Trump's 30-day control of the city's police department requires congressional action following the administration's official notification Monday of relevant leaders in Congress. Trump offered no details Monday about tackling the causes of homelessness, drug abuse and violent crimes, particularly gun crimes. Although the president described Washington's public safety condition as an emergency, the city's murder rate fell following a postpandemic spike in 2023. 👉 Check out today's edition of The Movement: 'President Trump's effort to lessen crime in Washington, D.C. and launch a 'beautification' effort is clashing with a long tradition of Republicans criticizing and outright writing off the nation's cities.' Click here to sign up & get it in your inbox. 3 Things to Know Today The president will nominate Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Trump last week ousted the Labor Department's data expert after the government issued a disappointing jobs report. The Trump administration is ' looking at ' reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug, Trump said Monday. How much is the president pocketing off the presidency? An estimated $3.5 billion, according to one detailed tally. Leading the Day CHIPS: The two largest chipmakers in the U.S., Nvidia and AMD, have struck an unusual agreement with the federal government to share some of their revenue from chip sales to China — a deal that experts say raises constitutional questions and may create a new precedent for company trade negotiations. The two firms have agreed to share 15 percent of the revenue generated from selling advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips to China in order to secure export licenses after a months-long pause, a U.S. official confirmed to The Hill's Julia Shapero. 'I said, 'I want 20 percent if I'm going to approve this for you,'' Trump told reporters Monday during a White House press conference. 'For the country, for our country. I don't want it myself. …. And he said, 'Would you make it 15?' So we negotiate a little deal.' Under the agreement, Nvidia will share 15 percent of its revenue from H20 chip sales to China, while AMD will share the same portion of its MI308 chip sales. The new revenue-sharing agreement comes after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang met with Trump at the White House last week. Huang has found himself in a tricky situation, balancing Washington's and Beijing's interests as both countries vie for AI dominance. The deal sparked backlash from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, as well as former trade officials, who questioned its legality. 'It's bizarre in many respects and pretty troubling because Congress didn't have anything to say about this,' Gary Hufbauer, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told The Hill. ' It's just the president's own negotiating with the individual companies. That's not how historically we've done business in this country.' ▪ Bloomberg News: China urged local companies to avoid using Nvidia's H20 processors, complicating the company's attempts to recoup billions in revenue as well as the Trump administration's unprecedented push for a deal. TARIFFS: Trump on Monday extended by 90 days the tariff deadline for China, which was set to take effect today. During the latest negotiations, the U.S. reduced its China tariffs to 30 percent while China lowered its tariffs on U.S. goods to 10 percent and agreed to export rare earth minerals. Monday's extension is the latest example of Trump's changing positions on tariffs, which have made U.S. trade policy unpredictable for many businesses. ▪ NPR: Trump's tariff revenue has skyrocketed. But how big is it, really? ▪ The New York Times: Small businesses brace for the punishing side effects of Trump's tariffs. ▪ Bloomberg News: Gold will not be tariffed, Trump said Monday on social media. COURTS: A federal judge on Monday refused the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury materials used to charge Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime accomplice of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The Trump administration sought to break the normal secrecy of grand jury proceedings amid mounting public pressure, including from much of the president's political base, to release more files on the case. The judge's rebuke of the government's ask was pointed; for weeks, the White House has faced steady pressure to release more information about Epstein, including from members of the president's base. 'Contrary to the Government's depiction, the Maxwell grand jury testimony is not a matter of significant historical or public interest. Far from it,' U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer wrote in his 31-page ruling. 'It consists of garden-variety summary testimony by two law enforcement agents. And the information it contains is already almost entirely a matter of longstanding public record.' When and Where The president has no public schedule. The White House daily press briefing is scheduled at 1 p.m. The House will hold a pro forma session at 9 a.m. and will return to work in Washington on Sept. 2. The Senate will hold a pro forma session at 8 a.m. Economic indicator: The Consumer Price Index for July will be released at 8:30 a.m. It's a closely watched report for inflation. Zoom In GOVERNMENT WEAPONIZATION? Lawmakers and advocates are sounding the alarm over a series of actions taken by the Justice Department and intelligence community that they say are both abuses of power and threats to the traditional independence held by both organizations. The FBI agreed to aid the Texas government last week in tracking down Democratic members of the state Legislature who fled in an effort to block a redistricting plan that would net the GOP five seats in the midterms. The commitment came as the FBI fired a series of agents, including those who had worked on controversial matters related to Trump. Meanwhile, the Justice Department subpoenaed New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) for documents related to court victories against the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association. The same day, the department tapped Ed Martin to investigate James as well as Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) on allegations of mortgage fraud. Democrats sent a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for the legal basis on which the bureau could be involved in tracking down the Texas lawmakers. 'These reports suggest that the FBI is diverting federal law enforcement away from fighting terrorism, drug trafficking, and other federal crimes to instead harass and target Texans' duly elected representatives, and thus raise urgent questions about the legal basis, scale, and appropriateness of federal law enforcement involvement in a state-level political matter,' Reps. Robert Garcia (Calif.) and Jamie Raskin (Md.), the top Democrats on the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, respectively, wrote in a letter also signed by Texas Democratic Reps. Greg Casar and Jasmine Crockett. The group of about 50 Texas Democratic lawmakers remain in several blue states — most in Illinois — to block a quorum in the state Legislature. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) reconvened the legislative chamber on Monday but was four members short of reaching the quorum to proceed to redistricting, flood relief and other issues. 'Those runaway Democrats are required to act on that agenda. They're failing to do their duty,' Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) told CNN's Jake Tapper on Monday. 'They can remain in hiding for literally years, tying the hands of the state of Texas from performing essential government needs. That cannot be allowed.' BLUE STATES FIGHT BACK: Newsom warned Trump and Republican governors in a Monday letter that if they push forward with their redistricting proposals, he will also implement mid-decade redistricting efforts in his state. In a letter to the president, Newsom said California 'cannot stand idly by' as Texas attempts to create Republican-favored congressional maps. 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' Newsom said. 'But if the other states call off their redistricting efforts, we will happily do the same. And American democracy will be better for it.' The Hill's Julia Mueller breaks down Newsom's possible next steps. ▪ Axios: Former Attorney General Eric Holder will meet virtually with House Democrats this week to discuss how to fight Republicans' mid-decade redistricting. Elsewhere UKRAINE: Ahead of Friday's summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump on Monday criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky over the leader's resistance to cede territory to Russia, saying he disagrees 'very, very severely' with Zelensky. 'I get along with Zelensky, but, you know, I disagree with what he's done, very, very severely disagree,' Trump told reporters at the White House, referring to Russia's more than three-year war in Ukraine. 'This is a war that should have never happened.' Zelensky on Monday said intelligence and military officials had briefed him 'on what Putin is counting on and what he is actually preparing for,' as the summit approaches, saying 'this includes military preparations.' 'He is certainly not preparing to cease fire or end the war,' Zelensky said. 'Putin's sole aim is to present a meeting with America as his personal victory and then continue acting as before, putting pressure on Ukraine as before.' Trump has said the meeting with Putin in Alaska will touch on some territorial swapping for 'the betterment of both' countries, a proposal Zelensky on Saturday staunchly opposed. His criticism of the war shifted from Putin to Zelensky and back again. Trump on Monday declared that when he meets with Putin, 'probably in the first two minutes I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can get done,' and insisted he would be ready to walk away from negotiations and continue to let Russia and Ukraine battle it out. Trump says he will call Ukrainian and European leaders ahead of the meeting and suggested there could be another possible meeting down the line involving Ukrainian and Russian leaders. 'It's clear Putin wants a photo with the most influential people on Earth, which is President Trump, and he wants sanctions to be postponed, which he'll probably get,' the European Union's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, told the BBC. 'The question is, what is success for the U.S. in the meeting? If President Zelensky is there, it would be a clear success.' ▪ NPR: What's at stake as Trump prepares to meet Putin in Alaska? ▪ The Hill: Amid the upcoming talks, one of Kyiv's priorities is securing the release of Ukrainian soldiers captured on the battlefield. ▪ CNN: Panic in eastern Ukraine as Trump entertains idea of giving parts of it to Russia. GAZA: Outrage is growing In Israel and abroad over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's planned new Gaza offensive, even as Palestinians reported the heaviest bombardments in weeks on Monday. Netanyahu said he expected to complete the new expanded offensive against Hamas 'fairly quickly.' Trump stopped short of directly endorsing Israel's plans in an interview with Axios on Monday, but he said he didn't believe Hamas would release the hostages unless the situation changed. Trump said Israel has to decide what to do next and also whether to allow Hamas to remain in Gaza, but that in his opinion 'they can't stay there.' 'I have one thing to say: Remember October 7, remember October 7,' Trump emphasized, referring to the Hamas attack. An association of Israel air force reserve and retired pilots issued a statement calling for an 'immediate end to the futile war and urgent action to bring the hostages home.' 'The war being waged in Gaza is exacting an unbearable toll from hostages who have languished in captivity for 676 days, is risking our soldiers' lives in vain, is causing unnecessary harm to innumerable innocent civilians, and is degrading Israel's standing in the world to an unprecedented low,' it said on Sunday. ▪ The New York Times: An Israeli airstrike that deliberately killed several Al Jazeera journalists aggravated tensions between Israel and Qatar, which funds the television network and is also a central mediator in Gaza peace talks. ▪ The Hill: Australia will recognize a Palestinian state in September. ▪ The Hill: Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the assassination of Colombian senator and presidential hopeful Miguel Uribe Turbay, who died Monday after being shot during a June campaign rally. Opinion The Closer © The Associated Press | Bill Ingalls, NASA And finally … 🌠 Look up! The visibility of the ongoing Perseid meteor shower, considered one of the best shows in space, will peak in the predawn hours into Wednesday, according to experts. Meteor hunters searching for fireballs need a dark sky location to catch a glimpse in optimal conditions of up to 100 shooting stars per hour. 'The average person under dark skies could see somewhere between 40 and 50 Perseids per hour,' said Bill Cooke, lead for NASA's Meteoroid Environments Office. 'Instead, you're probably going to see 10 to 20 per hour or fewer, and that's because we have a bright moon in the sky washing out the fainter meteors.'


NBC News
12 hours ago
- NBC News
Legality of Trump's deployment of National Guard in L.A. is argued in federal court
Just hours after President Donald Trump said he would deploy the National Guard to Washington, D.C., a federal judge in San Francisco heard arguments Monday about whether the administration violated federal law when it mobilized troops to Los Angeles this summer. California is asking U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer to order the Trump administration to return control of the remaining troops to Gov. Gavin Newsom and to stop using the military 'to execute or assist in the execution of federal law.' The federal government is arguing that the deployment of the National Guard and Marines was solely to support immigration officials, who were impeded by large-scale protests across the city in early June. In response, the Department of Defense ordered some 4,000 California National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles as thousands of immigration activists and supporters marched in the streets and outside federal buildings to show their opposition to Trump's mass deportation effort. Trump characterized the demonstrators as violent mobs, but Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom maintained that local law enforcement was equipped to handle the protests. Trump said the troops would protect federal personnel and property and would not engage in law enforcement activities. About 250 National Guard members remain on duty in Los Angeles, according to the Pentagon. The state sued the Trump administration for what it called an unwarranted deployment and won an early victory from Breyer, who found the federal government had violated the Tenth Amendment clarifying the balance of power between federal and state governments. The Trump administration appealed the decision, arguing that courts cannot second-guess the president's orders. The U.S. Department of Justice secured a temporary halt to Breyer's ruling, which allowed control of the California National Guard to remain with Trump. Central to the trial is the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the president from using the military as a domestic police force. The case, which is expected to continue through Wednesday, could set a precedent for how the Trump administration handles future deployments of federal troops in D.C, Baltimore and other cities led by Democratic mayors. 'The factual question, which the court must address, is whether the military was used to enforce domestic law, and if so, whether there continues to be a threat that will be done again,' Breyer told the court. Three witnesses testified, starting with William Harrington, the former deputy chief of staff for the Army task force overseeing the Los Angeles operation. Harrington, who did not participate in or witness field work, said he raised concerns about the Posse Comitatus Act on June 7 during a task force briefing before federal forces arrived in Los Angeles. During questioning by state Deputy Attorney General Jane Reilley, Harrington said he worried that if the California National Guard was deployed, it would lose law enforcement authority because of the statute and be reduced to a supportive role. That was the case when federal forces accompanied immigration agents to separate operations at Los Angeles' MacArthur Park and a cannabis cultivation center in Camarillo, north of L.A., Harrington said. 'They were asked to provide force protection for the agents while they were performing their federal functions,' he said under cross examination. 'The soldiers actually did not engage in any activity.' Prior to deploying at MacArthur Park on July 7, when federal officers and National Guard troops fanned out across the mostly empty space, Harrington received an intelligence report that did 'not indicate a high-value target or threat to federal functions at this location,' he said. Still, some 90 Guard members were among the forces seen plodding through the popular park where children with a day camp played. 'What I saw in the park today looked like a city under siege, under armed occupation,' Bass said at the time. Army Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, commander of the Los Angeles task force, conceded in court that federal forces have outnumbered local police officers on some occasions. During an immigration enforcement action in Mecca, a desert community about 142 miles east of Los Angeles, approximately 300 task force soldiers were present, compared to 200 federal law enforcement agents, Sherman said. Breyer appeared to bristle on multiple occasions, at one point arguing with both Sherman and DOJ attorneys about whether federal forces can intervene any time people protest a law they dislike. 'What about tax law?' he asked Sherman. 'We've never had a situation like that, your Honor,' Sherman replied. 'I'm trying to figure out really what boundaries are established,' by law, Breyer tersely responded. Ernesto Santacruz Jr., field office director for the Department of Homeland Security in Los Angeles, testified that federal intervention was necessary because local law enforcement was slow to respond when a crowd of some 1,500 demonstrators gathered outside the federal building on June 6 to protest immigration arrests. The unruly crowds made it difficult for his agents to do their work, including entering the federal building where detained immigrants are held, he said. 'We had to pivot, and we had to pretty much condense teams to have a larger footprint,' Santacruz said in court. 'That impacted our ability to conduct our missions.' Lawyers with the DOJ asked Breyer for a quick judgement at the end of the day, arguing that the state had failed to make its case. Trial resumes Tuesday morning.