Centre finds death penalty clause in Aparajita Bill 'excessively harsh', Guv sends it back to state
Aparajita Bill
back to the state government for consideration of the serious objections raised by the Centre over the proposed changes to the
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
that the legislation seeks, a highly placed source in the Raj Bhavan said.
The Centre, in its observation, found that the Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill, passed in the assembly in September 2024, seeks changes in
punishment for rape
under multiple sections of the BNS that are "excessively harsh and disproportionate," the source said.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
others
Digital Marketing
Data Science
Leadership
Artificial Intelligence
Data Analytics
Data Science
MBA
Project Management
Healthcare
Technology
CXO
Public Policy
Finance
MCA
PGDM
Cybersecurity
Design Thinking
Product Management
Operations Management
Degree
Management
healthcare
Others
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
16 Weeks
Indian School of Business
CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
The state government, however, maintained it has no intimation so far from the central government or the governor's office regarding their "observations" on certain provisions in the Bill.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
The Bill proposes enhancement of punishment for rape from the existing minimum of 10 years under the BNS to life imprisonment for the remainder of one's life or death.
"The
Ministry of Home Affairs
(MHA) has flagged multiple provisions in the Bill as problematic. After taking note of the MHA observation, the Governor has referred those for appropriate consideration to the state government," the source told PTI.
Live Events
"The Centre has described the proposal of amendment to Section 64 of the BNS to increase the punishment for rape from a minimum of 10 years to life imprisonment for the remainder of the convict's life or the
death penalty
as excessively harsh and disproportionate," he said, referring to the MHA's observation.
The other controversial change is the proposed deletion of Section 65, which currently provides stricter penalties for rape of girls aged under 16 and 12.
"The removal of this classification undermines the principle of
proportionality in sentencing
and could reduce legal protections for the most vulnerable victims," he said.
However, the clause drawing the sharpest criticism is the one under Section 66, which seeks to make the death penalty mandatory in rape cases where the victim either dies or is left in a persistent vegetative state.
"The ministry has raised constitutional concerns, arguing that removing judicial discretion in sentencing violates established legal norms and Supreme Court rulings," the source said.
The Bil was recently reserved by Governor Bose for the consideration of the President of India.
"As of now, there is no communication from anyone with regard to the Aparajita Bill. We will consider taking suitable measures, as per requirements in the matter, if and when we receive such intimation," a senior bureaucrat of the state said.
The West Bengal assembly had unanimously passed the Bill nearly a month after the alleged rape and murder of a postgraduate trainee doctor at Kolkata's RG Kar Medical College and Hospital on August 9, 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Kerala govt moves SC seeking rejection of Presidential reference, calls it 'misuse of power'
"A reference under Article 143 cannot be used to overrule findings of law and fact in earlier judgments," the Kerala government stated. It further pointed out that the Union government has not filed any review or curative petition against the April 8 ruling, making it binding under Article 141. "The President and the council of ministers must act in aid of the Supreme Court under Article 144," the plea added. The state also accused the reference of misinterpreting Article 200 by falsely claiming that no timeline exists for governors to act on Bills. "The foundational issues in queries 1 to 11 have already been settled in the Tamil Nadu, Punjab, and Telangana cases," Kerala argued, urging the court to reject the reference as "misleading." The Supreme Court, meanwhile, has agreed to examine the Presidential reference and has sought responses from the Centre and all states by July 29. A five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai, will hear the matter on August 29, with the assistance of Attorney General R Venkataramani. The court will determine whether judicially enforceable timelines can be imposed on Governors and the President regarding pending Bills. The controversy stems from the April 8 ruling by a two-judge bench, which held that Governors must act within three months if withholding assent to a bill and within one month if a bill is re-enacted. The court had invoked Article 142 to declare Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi's inaction as "illegal" and deemed 10 pending Bills as approved. President Murmu's reference challenges this verdict, raising questions on whether Governors are bound by ministerial advice and if their discretion under Article 200 is subject to judicial review. With Kerala now accusing the reference of being a "backdoor attempt" to undo settled law, the Supreme Court's upcoming decision could have far-reaching implications on Centre-state relations and the powers of constitutional authorities. Out of 14 crucial questions, the majority and important were as follows: 1) What are the constitutional options before a Governor when a Bill is presented under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 2) Is the Governor bound by the aid & advice tendered by the Council of Ministers while exercising all options available with him when a Bill is presented before him under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 3) Is the exercise of constitutional discretion by the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India justiciable? 4) Is Article 361 of the Constitution of India an absolute bar to the judicial review in relation to the actions of a Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 5) In the absence of a constitutionally prescribed time limit, and the manner of exercise of powers by the Governor, can timelines be imposed and the manner of exercise be prescribed through judicial orders for the exercise of all powers under Article 200 of the Constitution of India by the Governor?
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sectoral divergence growing, markets watching both macros and micro moves: Rajeev Agrawal
"What we have to do now is see where India comes in because really there is not a lot of talk that is happening about India deal and that is to some extent a little bit of a concern at this stage," says Rajeev Agrawal , DoorDarshi India Fund. There is definitely some progress which seems to be made on the tariff deals that Trump has been signing and this time around it is EU. While we are of course awaiting when is going to be India's turn, but it seems that negotiations are pretty hard, but how is it that you are reading into the market construct both US and of course India? Rajeev Agrawal: So, in terms of how I am reading the market, it is quite clear that Trump is in the deal making mode, but he is really getting a lot of investments for the US which is interesting that EU had to actually go back and look at investing in the US which is really surprising to me that they are putting $750 billion in the US, that is quite surprising given their own investments that they have to do in the economy, but they are ultimately able to get 15%. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Science others Project Management Technology Design Thinking Others healthcare Degree MCA Operations Management Digital Marketing Data Science Finance Management Data Analytics MBA CXO Public Policy Product Management Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Leadership PGDM Cybersecurity Skills you'll gain: Strategic Data-Analysis, including Data Mining & Preparation Predictive Modeling & Advanced Clustering Techniques Machine Learning Concepts & Regression Analysis Cutting-edge applications of AI, like NLP & Generative AI Duration: 8 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Interpretation Programming Proficiency Problem-Solving Skills Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT MSc in Data Science Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next Tips and Tricks What we have to do now is see where India comes in because really there is not a lot of talk that is happening about India deal and that is to some extent a little bit of a concern at this stage. I just want to take that point ahead, it is a little bit of a concern now that the US has announced deals with major global economies and 15% for UK, 15% for EU, you have this 15% number that is gaining centre stage right now. Where do you think Indian tariffs could come down to? We at 26% right now. Do you think 15 could be a possibility for us? Rajeev Agrawal: I am sure India is looking at that. India has been trying to have a favourable term. I do not think given some of the negotiations and the deal making that has happened. It looks that earlier India was shooting for 10%, clearly that does not seem like it is anywhere close at this stage, so that 10% to 20% is the range and the lower is obviously good. But the given the sort of deals that are happening, 15% looks like a nice round number at this stage and that is what India will end up. Very frankly at this stage the negotiations have to be, rather than at the official level it has to be at the top level between the leaders of both the nations, that is really what it will take to get the deal done. Live Events Just wanted to have your take on the auto sector as a whole because it was Japan for which the 15% tariff has been announced and in the latest it is EU that will be going ahead with a 15% tariff on the cars itself. How do you see the sentiment shaping up for autos because 15% is indeed very less versus what was anticipated earlier. So, do you believe good times for the global automotive sector? Rajeev Agrawal: Auto sector in my view is a little bit struggling especially in the new space, in the EV space, because in the US especially the EV industry has not picked up as much. And given the desire to not have as much subsidies, so in the US for example the federal subsidies are going to go away after September. So, in the new vehicle space, in the new technology space in autos, there will be struggle there. But in other areas, maybe in the traditional ice technology, maybe there will be a little bit more of a pickup, but overall autos will frankly not necessarily do as well unless and until we see the economies start picking up in a major manner. So, where does that leave equity markets like India because it is pretty reflective in the price? We have been just range bound. Of course, the big concern is softness in earnings and we can see that clearly play out at least with, of course, it which was much expected, but individual cases within banks too now. Rajeev Agrawal: So, as you pointed out earlier in the show, clearly it is not industrywide. It is player by player and some players are doing better than others and so it is quite interesting how different players are looking to grow but really struggling either on the credit side or in the particular segments that they are in. Looking more at the overall Indian macro, I would think and the Indian markets, the big news for this week will definitely be the deal or no deal that we were discussing earlier and that could have a very sharp reaction either way depending on what happens. Apart from that as you have also said there are a lot of earnings that are coming out and those earnings will drive the market.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Maunvrat, maunvrat': How Shashi Tharoor deflected a question on Operation Sindoor; watch video
Shashi Tharoor (PTI photo) NEW DELHI: Senior Congress leader and MP Shashi Tharoor avoided media questions on Operation Sindoor on Monday, responding with just one word -- "Maunvrat, Maunvrat" -- as he entered Parliament, signalling his refusal to comment. His reaction came ahead of a scheduled 16-hour-long Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor, as announced by the parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju . Tharoor's silence carries weight. The Thiruvananthapuram MP was selected by the BJP-led Centre to represent India's position on terrorism and counterterrorism in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack , which killed 26 people. Under Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, India struck key terror camps in Pakistan. Tharoor led the diplomatic delegation to the United States and several countries across the Americas to garner international support. However, Tharoor's strong backing of the government's stance sparked friction within the Congress party . His public alignment with Operation Sindoor led to internal criticism and pushback from the party high command, further intensified by his cryptic social media posts seen as indirect jabs. Now, questions linger over whether the Congress will allow Tharoor to speak in today's debate. His outspoken endorsement of the Centre's action post-Pahalgam has deepened the rift with party leadership, casting uncertainty on his role in the discussion.
