
‘Vindication of law': Relief as Delhi HC quashes charges against 70 in Tablighi Jamaat Covid case
On Thursday evening, as scores of tourists and visitors flocked to the dargah for its famous Qawwali performance, a smaller, more somber group of men assembled in front of the tall white building, awaiting the time for the evening prayers.
This is the Nizamuddin Markaz, also known as the Banglewali Masjid Markaz.
Five years ago, the building was at the centre of a storm after the Tablighi Jamaat was accused of spreading Covid by organising an international congregation in Delhi. On Thursday, the Delhi High Court quashed charges in 16 FIRs and chargesheets filed in related cases involving 70 Indian citizens.
The atmosphere at the Markaz remained almost nonchalant after the verdict. 'We are God's people. We don't bother with what happens on this earthly plane, we only care about what happens before life and after death,' said one person who wished to remain unidentified.
In March 2020, a series of gatherings had been organised at the Markaz by the Jamaat. Over 3,000-odd people gathered at the mosque for the month-long events, with people coming from across the country and the world.
However, on March 13, the Delhi government passed an order saying that gatherings of over 200 people for sports events, conferences and seminars will not be allowed due to the growing fears of the Covid-19 pandemic. By then, hundreds of people had already reached the Markaz and were accommodated inside.
By the time the Janata Curfew was declared on March 22, the Markaz was in utter chaos over where to move the hundreds of people stuck inside.
However, a day prior to the Janata Curfew being declared, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) had already drawn up a list of 800 foreigners associated with Tablighi activities across the country. According to the MHA, it had received information of a Tablighi-associated Covid patient in Telangana by March 18.
What followed was a rush to track all those who had congregated at Nizamuddin and spread out into the country. Medical screening of those at the Markaz started only on March 26, after the death of a Tablighi-associated Covid patient in Telangana.
When the Delhi government eventually released its Covid health bulletin, it made a separate section indicating how many participants of the Tablighi gathering had tested positive.
By March 30, the then Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal had ordered an FIR against the organisers.
The 70 named as accused across 16 FIRs were charged primarily under sections of the IPC, including criminal conspiracy, for allegedly accommodating foreign nationals in mosques and their homes during the pandemic from March 24-30, 2020.
The FIRs had also listed 195 foreign nationals but they were not named as accused in most chargesheets — the magistrate court did not take cognizance of the remaining chargesheets on the principle of double jeopardy.
Fuzail Ayyubi, who represented 44 attendants of the Tablighi in the Supreme Court, said, 'When amidst a pandemic that no one understood, an entire body of individuals was criminalised as being 'super-spreaders' and prosecuted criminally, we were able to see through the facade and know that no criminality could be attached at all. Today's judgment is a vindication of that belief in law and courts' adjudicatory role…'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Punjab LoP Pratap Bajwa condemns threats to Golden Temple, slams AAP govt's ‘inaction'
Punjab Leader of the Opposition Partap Singh Bajwa has condemned the recent bomb threat e-mails to the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC), threatening to blow up the Harmandir Sahib (Golden Temple) in Amritsar, and expressed disappointment over the 'inaction' by the Punjab government. Between July 14 and 16, the SGPC reportedly received five separate threat e-mails. Calling these threats 'cowardly attempts to destabilise Punjab's hard-won peace,' Bajwa demanded that central and state agencies act swiftly to identify and bring the culprits to justice. 'The Golden Temple is not merely a religious structure. It is the spiritual heartbeat of Sikhism, revered worldwide for its message of equality, service and universal brotherhood. It welcomes devotees of all faiths and stands as a powerful symbol of Punjab's inclusive culture,' the LoP said. Calling Punjab a land of shared heritage and harmony, Bajwa said, 'From the teachings of the Sikh Gurus to the melodies of Sufi saints, from temples and gurdwaras to mosques and churches, this soil has always breathed unity. Any effort to inject fear and hatred into this spiritual landscape must be confronted with resolve and clarity.' Bajwa, however, expressed disappointment over the 'inaction' by the Punjab government. 'Despite the seriousness of the threats, neither Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann nor the Director General of Police (DGP) have visited Amritsar to assess the situation and reassure the public. Even four days after the initial threats, the absence of top officials on the ground is alarming,' Bajwa said. He said, 'In today's age of instant communication and rapid response, such silence and absence of leadership raise serious concerns. The chief minister, the chief secretary and the DGP should have personally visited Amritsar, demonstrated sensitivity and stood by the people during this critical time. This was a moment to show leadership. Unfortunately, the government appears disengaged and indifferent.' Taking strong exception to the 'double standards' of the AAP, Bajwa noted, 'On the one hand, Arvind Kejriwal and Bhagwant Mann are pushing a sacrilege prevention Bill in the Assembly to claim religious sensitivity, while on the other, they are completely absent during a moment of actual crisis.'


News18
an hour ago
- News18
With Fans 121 Arrests Manchester United Tops List Unwanted List; City 2nd with 94
Last Updated: A total of 121 United fans were arrested, followed by 94 for United's crosstown rival Man City and 77 at West Ham. Manchester United fans have topped the list of Premier League sides with the most number of fan arrests as the Red Devils dethroned West Ham from the unflattering list. A total of 121 United fans were arrested, followed by 94 for United's crosstown rival Man City and 77 at West Ham. The Hammers occupied the top spot in the list for the past three years. There was also a notable spike in the number of arrests during United's home games at Old Trafford. 'Forty-nine per cent of the arrests of United fans occurred at home games, with 34 of them for public or violent disorder," a report read. Dethroning West Ham The most recent season of the PL marked the first instance of a decline in football-related arrests since fans returned to stadiums following the Covid suspension. According to the report, the most common type of arrest was for public disorder, accounting for 32 per cent. Arrests for possession of Class A drugs saw the highest percentage since it became a Schedule 1 offence in November 2022, rising to 19 per cent from an initial nine per cent in the 2022-23 season. The report also highlighted an overall increase in the number of banning orders. As of June 1, 2025, 2,435 fans were banned from entering stadiums in England and Wales, which is 12 per cent more than the same time in 2024. This figure represents the highest number of bans since the 2012-13 season. Fans banned from stadiums in the UK may, in some cases, be required to hand over their passports to the police before their club's overseas fixtures. West Ham had the highest number of supporters with banning orders, totalling 112, which is 19 more than at the end of the 2024 season. Manchester United ranked second with 108 banned fans, up from 89, while Chelsea moved from eighth to third place, increasing their banned supporters from 54 to 80. The most commonly reported incidents were hate crimes. Out of 1,583 matches, there were 420 fixtures where at least one hate crime was reported. Of these, 287 incidents were related to race, 140 to sexual orientation, 20 to religion, 19 to disability, and three to gender identity. view comments First Published: July 18, 2025, 08:11 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Court Junks FIR Against 70 Who Hosted Tablighi Jamaat Attendees During Covid
The Delhi High Court on Thursday quashed 16 cases against 70 Indian nationals for housing foreign attendees of Tablighi Jamaat congregation in March 2020 allegedly in violation of COVID-19 norms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna said, "Chargesheets quashed." The court passed the judgment on 16 petitions relating to 70 Indians, who were represented by advocate Ashima Mandla, seeking quashing of FIRs registered against them. A detailed verdict is awaited. Delhi Police previously opposed the pleas for quashing of the FIRs registered for hosting foreign attendees of the congregation of March 2020 and said the accused local residents sheltered the attendees who had come to Nizamuddin Markaz in violation of the prohibitory orders on movement to contain the spread of COVID-19. The foreign nationals, named in some of the FIRs, either pleaded guilty to go back to their country or were discharged or acquitted previously. The petitioners contended there was no documentation on record in either the FIR or chargesheet to indicate that they had been infected by COVID-19 and, therefore, they could not have been accused of spreading the disease under the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897. The pleas alleged that the instant case was a classic example in which unsubstantiated allegations were "embellished and exaggerated". Their counsel argued that while the prohibitory orders issued by the Delhi Government specifically prohibited religious congregations and religious gatherings, the attendees who were found inside mosques or in houses were merely provided shelter. The petitioners further claimed the FIR showed the only allegation against them was their alleged presence inside the mosque along with foreign nationals. However, there was no whisper of either any religious or social gathering being held inside the mosque or of the petitioners being COVID-19 positive, they argued. The petitioners were booked under Section 188 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant), Section 269 (negligent act likely to spread infection) and other offences of IPC. The police alleged numerous inspections were carried out in Nizamuddin Markaz from March 26-31, 2020 in connection with another FIR and several foreign nationals were found to be residing there. However, in early April 2020, it received information that several foreign nationals were residing in Chandni Mahal area and after investigation, "it became clear that the members of the Jamaat had moved from the Markaz in Nizamuddin" which was in derogation of the prohibitory orders by the local authorities, the police had claimed. Police said on March 24, 2020, the Centre also imposed a nationwide lockdown. By accepting and allowing them to reside in the local mosque without any social distancing, it alleged, the accused also breached the Delhi government order closing religious places.