BRICS+ Series: SPIEF 2025 Showcases Russia's Multipolar Vision
The 2025 St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), now in its 28th year, opens at a time of deep geopolitical flux and economic recalibration. With the theme Shared Values as a Foundation for Growth in a Multipolar World, this year's forum underscores Russia's evolving global posture, moving decisively away from Western-centric models of engagement and toward a new architecture of international cooperation defined by strategic partnerships, economic sovereignty, and multipolar governance.
Historically, SPIEF was conceived as a bridge between Russia and the West, a high-level platform for promoting trade, attracting foreign investment, and integrating into global markets. However, since the 2014 Ukraine crisis and more acutely after the 2022 conflict escalation, Russia has reoriented its external strategy. The forum has transformed from a forum of Western corporate courtship to one of alternative economic diplomacy, positioning itself as a cornerstone in the reconfiguration of global economic power.
2025 SPIEF
This year's SPIEF, coordinated by the Roscongress Foundation under presidential patronage, drew tens of thousands of delegates from over 140 countries. Among them were not only government representatives, entrepreneurs, and investors but also institutions committed to restructuring the international trade and financial systems. Key themes that dominated the forum included the expanded role of BRICS, development of new trade corridors, restructuring of energy markets, and increased cooperation with the Global South, particularly in Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East.
One of the most anticipated aspects of the forum was the ongoing evolution of BRICS. Following its expansion at the 2024 Kazan Summit, the group has now introduced a flexible partner country format. This allows countries such as Belarus, Nigeria, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Cuba, and Uzbekistan to actively engage with BRICS' platforms without needing full membership. This strategic move reflects Moscow's attempt to create a broader coalition of like-minded states seeking to de-dollarise trade, foster technological self-sufficiency, and share a vision of multipolar cooperation free from Western ideological constraints.
As Moscow deepens these ties, SPIEF 2025 is becoming a space to facilitate new forms of South-South cooperation. Leaders and delegations from Latin America, ASEAN, and Africa have taken part in panels ranging from agricultural supply chain restructuring to joint development of digital platforms and artificial intelligence infrastructure. This is not mere rhetoric. Countries such as Brazil, Cuba, Indonesia, and the UAE are already engaged in concrete trade, energy, and investment initiatives with Russia, many of which were formalised or advanced at SPIEF.
Strategic Realignment
Amidst this realignment, Russia is also repositioning its energy strategy. The decoupling from European markets has prompted Moscow to look East and South, forging long-term contracts with buyers in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This reorientation is not just a matter of necessity—it is a foundational element of a broader doctrine of energy sovereignty. SPIEF discussions have focused heavily on supply diversification, infrastructure financing, and national energy security frameworks, with an eye toward insulating Russia's energy exports from Western sanctions and environmental conditions. Parallel conversations about the global energy transition are also taking place, particularly on the sidelines, where experts and state officials debate how to reconcile decarbonisation ambitions with the realities of industrial development in the Global South.
Russia's traditional sphere of influence
Meanwhile, SPIEF is also being used as a vehicle to reinforce Russia's influence in its traditional sphere of interest, the post-Soviet space. Business forums with Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and other members of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) remain central to Russia's strategy of regional leadership. These economic ties often function as proxies for deeper political influence, particularly in moments when diplomatic relations fluctuate. Even Moldova, whose Western aspirations have grown is included in proposed economic talks, indicating that Moscow continues to leverage trade and investment as tools for geopolitical alignment.
On the broader stage, the forum has witnessed notable diplomatic gestures. Indonesia's decision to deepen bilateral cooperation, and the UAE's growing $10 billion trade relationship with Russia, signal a shift in global power balances. Thailand's potential free trade agreement under BRICS, and Brazil's increasing alignment with multipolar economic values, all point to a future where Russia is more deeply embedded in a web of global partnerships that bypass traditional Western frameworks.
SPIEF 2025, is far more than a trade expo. It is a demonstration of intent—a statement that Russia, despite sanctions, isolation, and war, is not retreating from the global stage but rather repositioning itself to lead in a world where power is distributed, values are plural, and alliances are diverse. It is an affirmation that the age of unipolar dominance is over, and that a new, more contested, and more balanced global order is beginning to take shape with Russia at its centre.
Written by:
*Dr Iqbal Survé
Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN
*Chloe Maluleke
Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group
Russian & Middle Eastern Specialist
**The Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL.
** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE https://bricscg.com/
** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump and Putin end summit without Ukraine deal
ALASKA - Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin made no breakthrough on Ukraine at their high-stakes summit on Friday, pointing to areas of agreement and rekindling a friendship but offering no news on a ceasefire. After an abrupt ending to three hours of talks with aides, Trump and Putin offered warm words but took no questions from reporters - highly unusual for the media-savvy US president. "We're not there yet, but we've made progress. There's no deal until there's a deal," Trump said. He called the meeting "extremely productive" with "many points" agreed, although he did not offer specifics. "There are just a very few that are left, some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant," Trump said without elaborating. Putin also spoke in general terms of cooperation in a joint press appearance that lasted just 12 minutes. AFP | ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS "We hope that the understanding we have reached will... pave the way for peace in Ukraine," Putin said. As Trump mused about a second meeting, Putin smiled and said in English: "Next time in Moscow." The former KGB agent quickly tried to flatter Trump, who has voiced admiration for the Russian leader in the past. Putin told Trump he agreed with him that the Ukraine war, which Putin ordered, would not have happened if Trump were president instead of Joe Biden. Trump for his part again complained of a "hoax" that Russia intervened to help him the 2016 election -- a finding backed by US intelligence. AFP | Andrew CABALLERO-REYNOLDS Before the summit, Trump had warned of "severe consequences" if Russia did not accept a ceasefire. But when asked about those consequences during a Fox News interview with Sean Hannity after the talks, Trump said that "because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now." Putin warns Western allies The friendly reception contrasted with Trump's berating of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky when he met him at the White House in February. Trump earlier said he sought a three-way meeting with Zelensky but did not announce one at the summit. Trump said he would now consult Zelensky as well as NATO leaders, who have voiced unease about the US leader's outreach to Putin. "Now it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump said in the Fox News interview after the summit. Putin warned Ukraine and European countries to "not create any obstacles" and not "make attempts to disrupt this emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigues." Trump invited Putin just a week ago and ensured there was some carefully choreographed drama for their first in-person meeting since 2019. The two leaders arrived in their respective presidential jets and descended on the tarmac of an air base, with Trump clapping as Putin appeared. US military might was on display with a B-2 stealth bomber flying overhead, as a reporter shouted audibly to Putin, "Will you stop killing civilians?" AFP | Drew ANGERER Putin, undaunted, grinned widely as Trump took the unusual step of escorting him into "The Beast," the secure US presidential limousine, before a meeting in a room before a screen that said -- in English only -- "Pursuing Peace." Putin smiled and joked with Russian reporters on the visit, a landmark for a leader who is facing an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court related to the Ukraine war, which has killed tens of thousands of people. Battlefield gains Russia in recent days has made battlefield gains that could strengthen Putin's hand in any ceasefire negotiations, although Ukraine announced as Putin was flying in that it had retaken several villages. Trump had insisted he would be firm with Putin, after coming under heated criticism for appearing cowed during a 2018 summit in Helsinki. While he was traveling to Alaska, the White House announced that Trump had scrapped a plan to see Putin alone and he instead held the talks alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his roving envoy Steve Witkoff. AFP | Gianrigo MARLETTA "It is time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America," Zelensky said in a social media post. By Shaun Tandon
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
India's bold economic play: Adapt or lose!
Director of the National Gandhi Libray from New Delhi,India Professor Annamalai Alagan addresses guests at the 132nd anniversary of Mohandas Gandhi forcibly ejected at the Pietermaritburg railway station. New Delhi has chosen a different path: swift recalibration, strategic diversification, and an unflinching focus on long-term resilience. Image: Rajesh Jantilal / File IN THE grand theatre of global economics, protectionism and Trump's Economic Nationalism, which have reshaped global trade, India has once again demonstrated why it remains one of the most adaptive players in the Global South and BRICS+ nations. The recent tariff shocks unleashed by the Trump administration, which have been boisterous, sudden, and strategically disruptive, have sent weaker economies into a spiral of retaliatory rhetoric or defensive stagnation. But India, true to form, responded with the quiet pragmatism of a nation that understands the oldest rule of economic survival: adapt or perish. As the Greek philosopher Heraclitus once declared: 'The only constant in life is change.' India, a cornerstone of the BRICS Plus bloc, seems to have internalised this wisdom better than most. While Washington's nationalist and protectionist trade policies have forced many nations into reactive posturing, New Delhi has chosen a different path: swift recalibration, strategic diversification, and an unflinching focus on long-term resilience. For Africa, a continent still wrestling with the ghosts of colonial era resource dependency and sluggish industrialisation, India's playbook offers not just inspiration, but an urgent blueprint. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ When the US government under Donald Trump announced aggressive tariffs on Indian exports, the immediate reaction in some quarters was one of outrage. After all, India and the US have enjoyed a steadily deepening trade relationship, with bilateral exchanges exceeding $100 billion (about R18 trillion) in recent years. Yet, rather than succumbing to knee-jerk protectionism or hollow threats, India's policymakers went to work quietly, methodically, and with the precision of a chess grandmaster anticipating the next move. Reports from *Economic Times* reveal that New Delhi is already crafting a multipronged response to counter stiff US tariffs through enhanced export incentives, tax rebates for manufacturers, and a renewed push to deepen trade ties with Europe, Africa, and Southeast Asia while continuing trade negotiations with Washington. This is not the behaviour of an economy caught off guard; it is the hallmark of a leadership that sees crisis as an opportunity for growth and its national interest in guarding its every move. Compare this to the trajectory of many African economies, where trade policy often remains shackled to raw material exports and reactive rather than proactive adjustments. South Africa, once the continent's undisputed industrial powerhouse, has seen its manufacturing base erode over decades, leaving it overly reliant on mineral exports even as global demand patterns shift, while still beholden to Cold War slogans. The lesson? Economic resilience is not about the absence of shocks, but the capacity to diversification as an end and not a means to an end. India's agility in the face of US trade pressures is not happening in a vacuum. As a key member of BRICS+, New Delhi has not only diversified its trade partnerships but has also made strategic inroads into Africa's critical industries. Indian firms now dominate the continent's steel sector, control vast iron ore mining operations, and have positioned themselves as leading suppliers of lab-grown diamonds. This shift has sent shockwaves through traditional diamond producers like Botswana, which failed to anticipate the global consumer shift away from organic diamonds. While Botswana struggles to adjust to the reality that 'diamonds are not forever', India's lab-grown diamond exports are booming, proving once again that foresight and adaptability define economic survival. This is not just about circumventing tariffs; it's about rewriting the rules of engagement in a world where economic power is no longer monopolised by a handful of Western capitals. For Africa, the implications are profound. The continent remains the world's last great frontier of consumer market growth, yet too many of its economies remain trapped in the colonial era role of raw material suppliers. If India, a fellow developing economy, can reposition itself as a global manufacturing and services hub while navigating US protectionism, why can't Africa's industrial bases do the same? Africa's struggle with diversification is not for lack of opportunity. The African Continental Free Trade Area promises to be the world's largest single market, yet progress remains frustratingly slow. South Africa, despite its historical industrial advantages, has seen its manufacturing sector shrink from 20% of GDP in the 1990s to just 12% today. Instead of leveraging its early lead into sustained value-added production, the economy remains tethered to mining exports, a vulnerability starkly exposed whenever commodity prices fluctuate. India, meanwhile, has spent decades building economic shock absorbers. When the 1991 balance of payments crisis struck, it responded with sweeping reforms that unleashed its private sector. When the 2008 financial meltdown hit, it doubled down on domestic consumption. Now, faced with Trump's tariffs, it is accelerating its shift toward alternative markets and high-value exports. The difference is not just policy, but mindset. India operates with the understanding that global economic conditions are perpetually in flux, and survival belongs to the agile. Africa, by contrast, has often treated diversification as an academic ideal rather than an immediate imperative. The result? While India's GDP has multiplied fivefold since 2000, too many African economies remain hostage to the same commodity cycles that have dictated their fortunes for a century. The message for Africa is clear: The time for passive reliance on raw material exports is over. India's response to US tariffs proves that economic sovereignty is not about defiance, as we have seen with Advanced Economies such as Japan and Singapore, but about diversification, options and adaptability. If New Delhi can cultivate new trade alliances, incentivise value-added production, and navigate geopolitical headwinds without losing momentum, so too can Africa if it chooses to. As the world moves toward multipolar trade blocs and competing spheres of influence, India's example offers a masterclass in strategic adaptation. Trump's tariffs may have been designed to force concessions, but New Delhi's response has been something far more powerful: a demonstration of resilience that Africa would do well to emulate. In the end, Heraclitus was right: change is the only constant. But the real question is: In the Global South, who will change or perish? India, it seems, already has its answer. Africa must now find its own. * Phapano Phasha is the chairperson of The Centre for Alternative Political and Economic Thought. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, IOL, or Independent Media. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
SA caught in East-West tug-of-war after military chief's Iran visit
Pretoria's foreign policy under scrutiny amid Iran relations Image: GCIS The South African government's distancing from recent Iran–RSA military cooperation has intensified diplomatic and economic headwinds, just as Western capitals press Pretoria to realign away from Eastern partners. The controversy hinges on remarks by South African National Defence Force (SANDF) chief General Rudzani Maphwanya during a visit to Iran, and the government's current posture on the broader foreign policy balance between East and West. The episode began to unfold after General Maphwanya's trip to Iran, a move that has since been disavowed by both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) and the Department of Defence and Military Veterans. The government maintained that President Cyril Ramaphosa, with DIRCO's guidance, remains the architect of South Africa's foreign policy. 'President Cyril Ramaphosa confirmed he would meet the general to discuss his 'ill-advised' trip,' a government source said, signalling that the visit has become a political flashpoint rather than a simple military exchange. DIRCO spokesperson Chrispin Phiri declined to comment on potential disciplinary steps against those who disregarded international protocol, noting the department's role in policy implementation rather than battlefield diplomacy. The political weather has grown even cloudier as Western powers press Pretoria to clarify its stance amid fears of mixed messages on the country's alignment. The US Congress has repeatedly questioned South Africa's closeness to BRICS partners and - by extension - its relationships with China, Russia, and Iran. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Political analyst Joe Mhlanga offered a stark assessment: Maphwanya's public remarks about potential military cooperation indicated a broader 'evidence that the country's foreign policy is not solid.' He warned that a pattern of swinging toward the East or West - 'going to the East to do something when they want to go to the West they just do' - could undermine confidence in South Africa's policy coherence. 'What we're saying is that countries seem to be taking positions when it comes to certain issues, so we cannot state that we are a country that is neutral,' Mhlanga said in paraphrase of his analysis. 'We need to have a clear foreign policy stance… You cannot be standing on both legs and stating that you support both Iran and the US.' The domestic response has been swift and pointed. The Democratic Alliance (DA) criticised Maphwanya's remarks as stepping beyond military-to-military dialogue into foreign policy. DA Defence spokesperson Chris Hattingh said: 'This is not the role of a military chief. Foreign policy is the domain of the elected Government of National Unity and must be conducted through DIRCO, not by an unelected general freelancing on the world stage.' The broader concern is that the public dispute over the Iran/RSA relationship comes at a sensitive juncture.
