logo
50 years of Emergency: How George Fernandes' arrest in Lucknow ignited railway strike; united fractured opposition against Indira Gandhi's govt

50 years of Emergency: How George Fernandes' arrest in Lucknow ignited railway strike; united fractured opposition against Indira Gandhi's govt

Time of India29-06-2025
As the country observes 50th anniversary of Emergency, Arvind Chauhan finds out how an arrest in Lucknow led to a movement, and to curb it, the then PM suspended civil rights and cracked downed on the opposition
May 2, 1974.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
It was well past midnight. After a hectic day at Labour Day celebrations, George Fernandes, a 44-year-old charismatic and fiery socialist leader, was about to retire for the day at Lucknow's Charbagh railway station retiring room.
He had a late dinner and his last request to the volunteers attending to him was a glass of hot milk. A young railway apprentice, Shiva Gopal Mishra, 23, promptly delivered it to Fernandes, who had just been elected president of the All India Railwaymen's Federation (AIRF).
'I had no inkling what was going to happen moments later,' Mishra now recalls. As the clock struck 2 am, there was a frantic knock on Fernandes' door. Still trying to sleep, as he opened the door, the unwanted guests swooped down on him. It was a team from Delhi Police. Fernandes was under arrest.
This arrest went on to ignite one of the most significant labour movements in the history of India — the nationwide railway strike of 1974.
Mishra, now 74, who is the general secretary of AIRF, vividly recounts that night, a memory etched in his mind from his long career with Indian Railways, from which he retired in 2010.
His story aligns seamlessly with Rahul Ramagundam's biography, 'The Life and Times of George Fernandes', which recounts the chain of events with striking clarity.
According to Ramagundam, the Delhi police team escorted Fernandes from his first-floor retiring room to the Amausi airport, where a govt plane was waiting for them.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
He was transported to Delhi just after the break of dawn.
Simultaneously, in Delhi, the driver of the then Union railway minister Lalit Narayan Mishra delivered a letter to Fernandes' wife, Leila, blaming Fernandes for the breakdown of negotiations — a move Fernandes later called a 'treacherous act'.
The backdrop to this dramatic arrest was the AIRF's planned indefinite nationwide strike, proposed from May 8, 1974.
The railway workers, under Fernandes, demanded better wages comparable to public sector employees, full trade union rights, reclassification of railway jobs, an eight-hour workday, adjustments in dearness allowance, bonuses, and shops to provide subsidized grain.
These demands reflected the economic hardships faced by workers amid an oil crisis, rising inflation, and global economic depression. Fernandes, who was elected AIRF president in Oct 1973 at the federation's Secunderabad convention, had defeated Peter Alvares, a soft-spoken Goan freedom fighter, by securing 277 as compared to Alvares' 210 votes.
At 43, Fernandes brought a new vigour to the union, galvanizing workers across the country.
The arrest on May 2, however, accelerated the strike's momentum. The news of his arrest triggered spontaneous protests across India. By May 5, workers at railway centres from Gorakhpur to Guwahati and Mumbai abandoned their posts and took to the streets in processions.
'The arrest of George Fernandes cemented the opposition's unity against Indira Gandhi's regime,' says Ramagundam, an associate professor of history and culture at Jamia Millia Islamia.
The strike, originally planned for May 8, erupted prematurely as workers rallied in solidarity with their leader. The arrest of this former parliamentarian was no small matter as it sparked outrage even among political opponents.
Jan Sangh leader Atal Bihari Vajpayee moved a no-confidence motion in Parliament, while CPI leaders like Shripad Amrit Dange, who supported Indira Gandhi's govt, also criticized the arrest.
From Tihar Jail, Fernandes penned letters to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and railway minister Lalit Narayan Mishra, urging them to address the workers' economic demands to avert the strike.
'You can still avert the catastrophe, if you wish. But if the idea is to have a trial of strength, then, this time, I hope, the railway men will not be found wanting in providing their mettle,' he wrote, as quoted in Ramagundam's biography.
Both the govt and the unions were apprehensive of the economic fallout of a railway strike, as it could paralyze India's economy. The govt, citing the oil crisis and global recession, urged workers to call off the strike and help the govt stabilize the economy.
The unions, led by Fernandes, sought a 'negotiated settlement' to address their grievances, warning that a prolonged strike would be catastrophic. Yet, despite shared concerns, the strike proceeded.
The govt, alarmed that Fernandes' letters were reaching the press before their intended recipients, secured a court injunction barring him from interviews, telephone communication, or sending letters without clearance.
Fernandes' leadership was remarkable not just for its intensity but for its reach.
'George captured the heart of the railway workers,' Ramagundam told TOI. 'He could connect with workers across the country, from small stations to factories producing railway equipment.
He lowered himself from a former MP to a union leader, projecting the workers' demands with zeal and honesty.'
Fernandes traveled tirelessly, addressing workers at far-flung stations and industrial units, embodying the spirit of socialist leader Ram Manohar Lohia, who believed in fighting injustice regardless of time or place.
The strike, deemed illegal by the govt, ended on May 28, 1974, after internal discord within the AIRF's action committee led to its withdrawal.
Fernandes, however, faced further trials. During the Emergency, he was arrested again on June 10, 1976 for his alleged role in the Baroda Dynamite Case, an alleged plot to destabilize the govt.
He remained in jail until March 22, 1977, when the Janata Party's victory secured his release. The legacy of George Fernandes as a maverick socialist endures. Later serving as defence minister in the Vajpayee govt, he remained a symbol of resistance and solidarity.
'His ability to unite railway workers in 1974, despite overwhelming odds, showcased his unique leadership — a blend of fiery oratory, grassroots connection, and unwavering commitment to workers' rights. The 1974 strike, though short-lived, left an indelible mark on India's labour movement, proving that even in the face of repression, the spirit of collective action could challenge the might of the state,' said Rahul Ramagundam.
As Shiva Gopal Mishra reflects on that fateful night in Lucknow, he recalls not just the arrest but the man who inspired a generation of workers. His arrest may have sparked the strike, but it was his vision and courage that fueled its fire, making him a towering figure in India's struggle for workers' dignity.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delhi rolls out 'Delhi Mitra' mobile app for unified grievance redressal
Delhi rolls out 'Delhi Mitra' mobile app for unified grievance redressal

Business Standard

time28 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Delhi rolls out 'Delhi Mitra' mobile app for unified grievance redressal

Delhi government on Tuesday announced the launch of the "Delhi Mitra" app, enabling people across the city to register their grievances with various departments and agencies. The decision was made in a cabinet meeting chaired by Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta. After the meeting, Gupta posted on X that for a more effective redressal of public grievances, a single-window system will now be implemented, bringing the Delhi government, Delhi Police, DDA, MCD, NDMC, and Delhi Cantt on a single platform. "Delhi Mitra is not only a platform for complaints but also a digital bridge of trust between the public and the government," the chief minister stated. The app will enable the residents of the national capital to register their complaints with the government through mobile phones and WhatsApp as well. "They will receive updates on every stage of their complaint via messages. Moreover, it will also be possible to file complaints through WhatsApp," Gupta noted. Nodal officers will be appointed in every department to speed up the process and make it more accountable. Additionally, public grievance redressal officers from various departments will hold public hearings every Wednesday from 10 am to 12 pm, she said in the post. The chief minister emphasised that the initiative is not just a technological innovation but a commitment to ushering in a new era of public hearing culture, so that the voice of citizens are heard and solutions to their problems are guaranteed.

INDIA's VP Nominee Justice B. Sudershan Reddy Has a Long History of Batting For Democratic Values
INDIA's VP Nominee Justice B. Sudershan Reddy Has a Long History of Batting For Democratic Values

The Wire

time7 hours ago

  • The Wire

INDIA's VP Nominee Justice B. Sudershan Reddy Has a Long History of Batting For Democratic Values

Hyderabad: The choice of Justice (retired) B. Sudershan Reddy as the INDIA bloc candidate for the vice-presidential election can be seen as a recognition for his long association with landmark judgments upholding principles of the Constitution and social justice, wherein he always stood for democratic values. The 79-year-old Justice Reddy, an eminent jurist, was appointed as a permanent judge of the high court in combined Andhra Pradesh on May 2, 1995, and promoted as the Chief Justice of Gauhati high court in 2005. He was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court in 2007 and served on its bench till 2011. After his retirement in 2011, he was appointed as the first Lokayukta of Goa in 2013. However, he quit the post for personal reasons within seven months of the appointment. Justice Reddy belongs to the rare breed of jurists who saw the Constitution as a document providing a blueprint for the upliftment of India's poorest and most deprived, and how the State should use its powers best to attain that goal. His judgements mark a sharp departure from pedantic legalism towards a transformative constitutionalism, according to MLC and Telangana Jana Samiti (TJS) president M. Kodandaram. Influenced by socialist thinkers including Lohia Born on July 8, 1946, in an agricultural family in Akula Mylaram village of Ranga Reddy district, Justice Reddy did his primary education in the neighbouring villages as there was no school in his native village. He graduated in Arts and Law from Osmania University in Hyderabad and enrolled as an advocate with the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh in 1971. He practiced in writ and civil matters in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and was Government Pleader in the High Court in 1988-90. He also worked as an additional standing counsel for the Union Government for a short period in 1990. The Osmania University utilised his services as its Legal Advisor and Standing Counsel from 1992 till Justice Reddy's elevation as the high court judge. He also served as secretary and president of the Andhra Pradesh high court advocates association before his appointment as high court judge. Justice Reddy came under the influence of socialist thinkers, more particularly Rammanohar Lohia, at a very early stage in his life. He actively participated in the total revolution movement led by Jayaprakash Narayan during the Emergency. Apart from being one of the most articulate and erudite judges of the Supreme Court, Justice Reddy was also one of those exceptional judges whose judgements are replete with references to works on regulatory theory, political science, economics, international trade and, of course, twentieth century classic literature. The erudition and depth of research in his judgments are typical of him as a well read and thoughtful intellectual. Justice Reddy maintained a judicial demeanor which is always with equanimity. He listened patiently and attentively, interjecting purposefully, said Kodandaram. He has not only made immense contributions to law but also stirred serious debate about where the Indian polity is heading and where it should go. During his tenure in the high courts as well as the Supreme Court, Justice Reddy rendered several landmark judgements on various branches of law, in particular on issues of criminal jurisprudence, Constitution, taxation, service law and human rights. 'The whole idea of distributive justice is to empower the weaker sections of the society' In one of his judgements, Justice Reddy, while dealing with the question as to whether the assignees of government land are entitled to payment of compensation equivalent to full market value of the land and other benefits on par with other land holders in the event of resumption for a public purpose, said "in the matter of distribution of material resources of the community to the vulnerable sections of the society by the State in furtherance of its constitutional obligations, no argument can be heard from the State contending that the recipient of the benefit may either accept with the restrictions or not to accept the benefit at all. The whole idea of distributive justice is to empower the weaker sections of the society and to provide them their share of cake in the material resources of the community of which they were deprived from times immemorial for no fault of theirs." "Having resolved to extend the benefits as a welfare measure, no unconstitutional condition can be imposed depriving the recipients of the benefits of their legitimate right to get compensation in case of taking over the benefit even for a valid public purpose. The recipients cannot be at the mercy of the State forever". In yet another important judgement dealing with the power of the government to deal with the public property, Justice Reddy observed that "there is nothing like a government property. It is a public property of which the government as a day is only a trustee. The public properties cannot be parted away by the government in its discretion as it pleases". As a Supreme Court judge, in his landmark judgment on Salwa Judum, which was floated in Chhattisgarh as an anti-Maoist force, Justice Reddy highlighted the importance of human rights and declared the appointment of tribal youth as special police officers by the Chhattisgarh government as illegal and unconstitutional . His judgement was widely hailed as a landmark restatement of constitutional values, demonstrating Justice Reddy's enormous moral strength to uphold social justice. In another significant judgement, he criticised the Union government for its slackness in probing black money cases. He observed "from mining mafias to political operators who, all too willingly, bend policies of the State to suit particular individuals or groups in the social and economic sphere, the raison d'etre for weakening the capacities and intent to enforce the laws is the lure of lucre. Even as the state provides violent support to those who benefit from such predatory capitalism, often violating the human rights of its citizens, particularly its poor, the market begin to function like a bureaucratic machine dominated by big business and the State begins to function like the market where everything is available for sale at a price". Headed panel on caste survey in Telangana Expressing his strong reservations about the government's efforts to deal with the black money issue, Justice Reddy had constituted a special investigation team (SIT) to investigate unaccounted money unlawfully kept in bank accounts abroad. While dealing with a dispute between Ambani brothers concerning the supply of gas from KG basin, he raised a question in Supreme Court as to whose gas it is. He stated that "a small portion of our population, over the past two decades has been chanting incessantly for increased privatisation of the material resources of the community, and some of them even doubt whether the goals of equality and social justice are capable of being addressed directly". Justice Reddy had become the obvious choice as the head of an additional bench announced by then Supreme Court Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia to hear cases related to environment and mining. He participated in various national and international conferences and delivered keynote addresses on interconnectivity between law, economic and social sciences. He was a strong votary of the agitation for a separate Telangana prior to the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh in 2014. He provided inputs to the Andhra Pradesh State Reorganisation Bill, 2014. He was also the chairman of a committee constituted by Telangana government to conduct the caste survey and suggest measures to improve the living condition of the poor. The other members of the panel had included noted economists Sukhdeo Thorat and Thomas Pickety, among others.

Over 1.07 cr sterilised during Emergency, exceeding target of 67.4 lakh: Govt
Over 1.07 cr sterilised during Emergency, exceeding target of 67.4 lakh: Govt

News18

time10 hours ago

  • News18

Over 1.07 cr sterilised during Emergency, exceeding target of 67.4 lakh: Govt

Agency: New Delhi, Aug 19 (PTI) Over 1.07 crore people were sterilised during the Emergency period from 1975-77, exceeding the targets of 67.40 lakh set by the then Indira Gandhi Government as part of vigorous population control measures, Lok Sabha was informed Tuesday. In response to a written question, Minister of State for Home Affairs Nityanand Rai presented the data from the Justice JC Shah Commission report, which was set up on May 28, 1977, to inquire into, inter alia, excesses, malpractices and misdeeds during the Emergency, including the use of force in the implementation of the family planning programme. 'Further, a total of 548 complaints of sterilisation of unmarried persons and 1774 cases of death linked to sterilisation during the Emergency period were also reported to the Shah Commission. The Shah Commission Report was tabled in Parliament on August 31, 1978," the minister said. The data showed that in 1975-76, the government set the goal of conducting 24,85,000 sterilisation procedures and surpassed the target by accomplishing 26,24,755 surgeries across the country. These substantial figures were dwarfed in the subsequent year, 1976-77, when targets soared to 42,55,500, and the sterilisation procedures performed skyrocketed to 81,32,209, it showed. The data shows that the sterilisation procedures exceeded the targets by over 59 per cent during 1975-77. 'Between 25 June 1975 and 21 March 1977, India was placed under a state of Emergency under Article 352 of the Constitution…On 25 June 1975, the then President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed had issued the Emergency proclamation under Article 352, citing threats from internal disturbance," a fact sheet issued by the PIB had said. The Shah Commission had collected evidence through public hearings, testimonies and official records, and submitted three reports between 1978 and 1979, it had said. PTI ABS ABS KSS KSS view comments First Published: August 19, 2025, 15:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store