Here's how many millions SA sends to Lesotho each month for water
South Africa pays approximately R230 million monthly in royalties to Lesotho for water from the Lesotho Highlands Water Project, while Lesotho owes R513 million in outstanding value-added tax (VAT) refunds as of February 2024.
These monthly payments drop to around R120 million during periods when water delivery is disrupted.
According to a briefing on Tuesday by the Department of Water and Sanitation to the portfolio committee on Water and Sanitation, the royalty structure operates on a 56-44% split favouring Lesotho.
Teboho Nkhahle, South African Chief Delegate to the Lesotho Highlands Water Commission, confirmed South Africa 'started paying the revised royalties in January 2024' following recalculations using updated methodologies.
'We are currently paying around R230 million a month. But in the last six months, because there was no water being delivered and no electricity being generated, we're paying around R120 million a month.'
The current treaty includes a 12-year review cycle for royalty rates.
Committee members called for external auditing by the Auditor General of South Africa to provide more rigorous oversight.
South Africa's Water and Sanitation Deputy Minister David Mahlobo indicated willingness to explore such arrangements, stating: 'We will mandate our teams that we should find modalities… that are more credible on ensuring that even that institution is on the other side.'
The R513 million VAT debt represents outstanding VAT refunds that Lesotho owes to South Africa.
Nkhahle confirmed that diplomatic efforts are underway to resolve these financial obligations.
Lesotho Highlands Water Project costs escalate to R53.3 billion
The second phase of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project will deliver an additional 490 million cubic meters of water annually to South Africa, supplementing 780 million cubic meters from Phase One.
The water primarily serves Gauteng province.
The project operates under the 1986 treaty between South Africa and Lesotho, with oversight from the Lesotho Highlands Water Commission, comprising six commissioners from each country.
Mahlobo confirmed that the project remains on track for commissioning by 2029, despite recent setbacks, including contractor suspensions due to negligence and concerns over pollution.
'The project is proceeding,' Mahlobo stated, emphasising that different work packages continue simultaneously even when specific components face delays.
The project's budget has escalated significantly from its original estimates, with current projections at R53.3 billion.
Originally estimated to cost R42.06 billion, the project escalated to R53.3 billion. Mahlobo reaffirmed that water delivery is expected by August 2028, with completion scheduled for September 2028.
Construction progress has reached 77% for major components.
Nkahle explained that the R53.3 billion long-term cost plan already includes R6.2 billion in contingencies.
'This escalation and contingencies [are ]already built into this long-term cost plan, and also furthermore, each contract also has built in contingency,' Nkhahle said.
ALSO READ: Completion date for R53 billion Lesotho Highlands Water Project postponed again
Lesotho Highlands Water Project financial structure
Committee members expressed concern about the impact on water tariffs and the need for transparency in cost management.
'All of us who are very worried, very worried around the issues of cost escalation, some of the cost escalation is because of the issues of contingencies,' Mahlobo acknowledged during the briefing.
South Africa bears all cost-related payments through the Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority (TCTA), which borrows from markets and recovers costs through water tariffs.
Water tariffs have been negotiated with end users, such as Randwater, 'over CPI' to account for escalating costs.
The funding strategy incorporates long-term loans to prevent sharp tariff increases.
Additionally, 33% of project costs are allocated to acid mine drainage treatment, a decision made to protect the quality of water being transferred from Lesotho.
Percy Sechemane, TCTA CEO, confirmed the funding arrangements where South Africa receives 'the enduring benefit of water transfer.'
ALSO READ: Full Vaal Dam to the rescue as Lesotho Highlands Water Project takes bad turn
Contractor suspension and pollution issues
A major contractor was temporarily suspended due to negligence, specifically related to pollution in the construction area.
The suspension was triggered by environmental concerns affecting water quality in the Katse Dam reservoir.
'The contractor was indeed actually suspended. That's the report we got,' Mahlobo confirmed, adding that the minister had to intervene after the matter became public through media reports.
Nkhahle confirmed that 'that suspension has been lifted and the 1,300 workers who were temporarily laid off resumed work this morning.'
The engineer accepted interim measures implemented by contractors, along with a comprehensive remedial plan to address environmental concerns.
Nkhahle clarified that the pollution was 'localised and insignificant due to the size of the effluent that was running into the reservoir in relation to the total volume of the reservoir.'
However, he noted it was significant from a construction monitoring perspective.
ALSO READ: Gauteng residents warned to brace for major water disruptions this week
Treaty review and financial management
The current treaty includes a 12-year review cycle for royalty rates, but committee members questioned why reviews don't occur annually to match maintenance and operational cost variations.
Percy Sechemane, CEO of the TCTA, explained that the lengthy review period provides stability for funders.
'The treaty itself is an instrument that a lot of thought went into from both South Africa and Lesotho,' he said, noting that frequent changes would make financiers uncomfortable about their investments.
Sechemane also confirmed that water tariffs have already been negotiated with end users like Randwater to account for the escalated costs, with increases 'over CPI on the South African side so that we can close that gap.'
Lesotho Highlands young professionals' programme
The Lesotho Highlands Development Authority's Young Professionals Programme currently has 60 graduates.
However, only five are from South Africa despite 39 being offered opportunities.
According to project officials, South African graduates declined participation due to low stipends and challenging working conditions in the mountains.
NOW READ: Municipal water crisis 'nothing to do with bulk water supply', says minster at LHWP reopening
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
Urgent steps to enhance water security in Africa: Insights from the G20–AU Summit
Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation David Mahlobo addressed delegates on water infrastructure investment and security during the final day of the G20–AU Africa Water Investment Partnership Summit in Cape Town. Image: File The final day of the G20–AU Africa Water Investment Partnership Summit at the Cape Town International Convention Centre highlighted the urgent need to protect and expand water infrastructure across the continent. Delegates heard that organised criminal networks, funding gaps, and climate-related pressures were threatening access to clean water and sanitation, and that decisive action was required to safeguard communities and support development. Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation, David Mahlobo, warned that critical water infrastructure was increasingly targeted by 'water mafias' through vandalism, illegal connections, and extortion. 'These acts are not petty crimes,' Mahlobo said. 'They undermine the constitutional right to water, threaten public health, disrupt education, and impede economic activity.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He explained that pipelines, pump stations, reservoirs, and treatment plants were being damaged, while contractors faced intimidation and extortion aimed at halting or manipulating projects. Illegal connections were compounding the problem, reducing supply and placing additional strain on already vulnerable systems. 'Communities suffer the most, particularly in rural and informal settlements, where water scarcity and sanitation failures pose serious public health risks,' he said. To address these challenges, Mahlobo outlined reforms aimed at strengthening governance, oversight, and coordination. The government is establishing professionally managed utilities for water services, introducing performance-based contracts for both public and private operators, and implementing monitoring systems to safeguard infrastructure. Law enforcement agencies, including the Hawks and SAPS, are actively involved in dismantling criminal networks and prosecuting offenders. Mahlobo stressed the importance of long-term investment and capacity-building. Sustainable infrastructure projects must combine reliable financing with local training and community engagement to ensure services are maintained over time. 'It is not just about constructing dams or pipelines; it is about ensuring the services are maintained, the communities are empowered, and the infrastructure remains secure for years to come,' he said. He outlined ongoing initiatives to expand South Africa's water supply, including bulk water infrastructure, rehabilitation of treatment plants, and improved rural distribution. He called for collaboration between government, private investors, and communities to ensure water security translates into social and economic development. The summit also provided a platform for African countries to share best practices, align with continental frameworks like the Africa Water Vision 2025, and leverage development partner support. Mahlobo said measurable commitments, clear timelines, and secured funding were essential to turning plans into action. He emphasised the importance of integrating governance reforms, technology, and community engagement to ensure infrastructure is protected and effectively managed while ensuring reliable water and sanitation services for all. Namibia's Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Land Reform, Inge Zaamwani, underscored the importance of regional cooperation in addressing shared water security challenges. She highlighted Namibia's investments in bulk water infrastructure, groundwater management, and rural water supply, stressing that sustainable water management is essential for food security, public health, and economic growth, particularly in arid regions. Zaamwani also emphasised involving communities in governance and using technology to monitor efficiency and water quality. 'The summit has reinforced that water security cannot be addressed by one country alone. We must work together to protect shared resources, attract investment, and ensure that every citizen has access to safe, reliable water and sanitation,' she said.
Mail & Guardian
2 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
How South Africa's Lesotho water project costs ballooned by R45bn
Watershed: The Lesotho Highlands Development Authority building in Maseru. Photo: Sechaba Mokhethi The cost of the second phase of the In 2008, phase two was projected to cost R8 billion. By 2022, this had ballooned to R42 billion. It now stands at R53 billion, raising questions about governance, oversight and accountability. 'Despite Minister [Pemmy Majodina]'s public acknowledgement that a probe into the escalating costs of phase two of the [Lesotho Highlands Water Project] would be conducted, no further details have been shared with parliament or the public,' Democratic Alliance deputy spokesperson on water and sanitation Stephen Moore said last week. Moore has filed a Promotion of Access to Information Act application to the department of water and sanitation. This follows two unanswered letters, the first sent on 8 May. The department's spokesperson Wisane Mavasa said the May letter had not been sent directly to the minister or director general. 'Unfortunately, the letter was not acted upon by the officials that it was sent to,' she said, adding that the minister would respond 'shortly'. The department says the escalation is the result of various factors, including years of delays, treaty complications and market fluctuations. Oversight gaps South Africa's portfolio committee on water and sanitation raised concerns about the cost of the project with the auditor general at a sitting on 6 May. Delays have pushed completion from 2019 to 2028, affecting the delivery schedule and future phases of the project. The committee also noted constraints stemming from the 1986 treaty preventing the auditor general from auditing the LHDA directly, 'leaving South Africa reliant on Lesotho's audit structures'. But, says Mavasa, the Lesotho Highlands Water Commission (LHWC) has equal representation from both governments, had 'full access to the cost records of the LHDA' and had received detailed information about the delays. The committee also criticised the royalty arrangement, which it said obliges South Africa to continue payments to Lesotho even when water deliveries are interrupted. Other concerns included limited local procurement, dominance of foreign contractors and opaque financial flows. Some MPs went as far as calling for an immediate funding suspension, citing mismanagement and treaty flaws. However, the auditor general cautioned against such a drastic move, warning of legal consequences. It recommended treaty reforms, including joint audits, instead. Mavasa says South Africa and Lesotho have agreed to review the treaty, but the 'matters for review' have yet to be decided. Lesotho's Finance Minister Retselisitsoe Matlanyane From R8 billion to R53 billion Mavasa outlined the project's financial journey in detail. The original 2008 feasibility study produced a preliminary R8 billion estimate — excluding inflation, currency shifts, contingency allowances and modern environmental and social safeguards. Construction of the main works was expected to start in 2013 and deliver water to Gauteng by 2019. However, she said, the main contracts were only awarded in 2022 because negotiations with Lesotho took longer than expected. The situation had worsened with years of administrative and procedural delays. 'The phase two agreement was signed in August 2011. It then took 14 months for the [South African] parliament to ratify the phase two agreement and a further seven months for the Lesotho parliament to ratify the agreement after the ratification by the SA parliament,' Mavasa said. After Lesotho's 2013 change of government, the agreement was subjected to fresh scrutiny, adding further delays, according to Mavasa, who also pointed out that, between 2013 and 2022, the department of water and sanitation had five different ministers and 11 directors general, which slowed decision-making. There were also financing complications. Funders raised concerns over procurement processes for the main contracts and requested they be tendered afresh. The Covid pandemic also disrupted preparatory work. In October 2022, the LHDA projected a R42 billion completion cost — incorporating contract prices; social and environmental programmes; foreign exchange effects and administrative costs. More than R20 billion in extra costs was due to inflation linked to the delays, Mavasa said. In October, the figure rose to R53 billion. The department attributed this to: • R4.2 billion from boosting the contingency provision in line with international good practice from R3.3 billion in 2022 to R7.5 billion last year • R5.4 billion for additional social obligations requested by Lesotho, such as rural water supply and road infrastructure • R1.7 billion in price escalations, design changes and contractor claims linked to delays, including work-permit issues. Governance fixes and audits According to Mavasa, the project costs and time overruns have been a major concern for the department of water and sanitation and Minister Majodina. She said the Lesotho Highlands Development Authority has developed a plan to minimise any further delays and cost overruns. The LHWC would appoint a multidisciplinary team of experts to conduct management audits of contracts. Although the project is about half completed, she said two primary contracts are behind schedule. 'However, the LHDA is executing a turnaround plan to avoid further delays and recover lost time.' Last year, Mavasa said the department had established a governance committee comprising the department, the Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority and the South African delegation to the LHWC, which meets monthly to review progress. The director general of the department of water and sanitation and the principal secretary of the relevant department in Lesotho held ad hoc and quarterly meetings to address issues arising from the project. Unresolved issues were escalated to the ministers. Lesotho's Minister of Natural Resources Mohlomi Moleko said he could only respond next week as he was outside the country.
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
How cheap alcohol keeps hurting SA's poorest
The alcohol industry profits while heavy drinking causes widespread harm in poor South African communities. Recent comments by the South African Breweries (SAB) CEO Richard Rivett-Carnac, reported in Business Day, that minimum unit pricing for alcohol will punish the poor and turbocharge the illicit market, harming both the industry and public safety, must be challenged by fact. The fact is that the legal liquor industry is a major contributor to injury, disease and death in South Africa. Alcohol is a factor in about half of all homicides, traffic accidents and gender-based violence in this country. If the results of the SAB study into illicit alcohol are true – that illegal trade represents about a fifth of the total market – that still means that legally manufactured alcohol contributes up to four-fifths of the total alcohol harm in South Africa. The major damage is not occasional death from the wrong chemicals in illicit brews, but widespread harm from heavy drinking of all liquor products – whether they're legal or not. If the upper daily limit of what could be regarded as 'responsible drinking' is two standard drinks per drinker then, on average, drinkers consume 2½ times more than this and most of the excess is manufactured by the companies that now appeal to public safety as a reason not to introduce minimum unit pricing. ALSO READ: Saps probes officers after video shows police offloading beer bottles at liquor store SAB undercuts its words with its actions. Just one of its one-litre bottles of Castle Lager contains enough pure alcohol to push a drinker's blood alcohol content well above the legal driving limit of 0.05%. Those bottles are sold 2½ times cheaper per litre than the equivalent amount in three 330ml containers. This price difference is so large that it cannot be due to cost-savings in the manufacturing process and suggests a deliberate design to promote excessive consumption. There is evidence from South Africa that bigger containers encourage people to drink more. It is the price of these larger containers that will be most affected by the introduction of a minimum price per unit of alcohol. We must challenge the assertion that minimum unit pricing will punish the poor. ALSO READ: KZN woman arrested for R120 000 illicit alcohol A 2018 study of alcohol-related mortality in South Africa found that the death rate from alcohol in poorer communities is 4½ times higher than wealthier ones. Many people in poorer communities drink to escape the hardships of daily life in the absence of recreational alternatives. High rates of misery make it far harder for a person to 'drink responsibly' than someone experiencing the good life. The alcohol industry capitalises on their misery, flooding their communities with large quantities of liquor at lower prices. It is this behaviour that punishes the poor, not the proposed introduction of minimum unit pricing. Where minimum unit pricing has been introduced in other countries like Scotland and Wales, it has achieved its aim of reducing the prevalence of heavy drinking, with positive health benefits for poorer consumers. ALSO READ: Mlindo The Vocalist releases his long-awaited album on Mandela Day as a way of 'giving back' With the introduction of minimum unit pricing, there may be some growth of the illicit market, which could affect tax revenues but that must be dealt with in the same way that illicit cigarettes should be – with effective enforcement of a track-and-trace system from the point of production to the point of sale. However, the liquor industry's claim of massive growth in illicit sales is dubious, given that legal alcohol sales have grown substantially over the past decade. There is no evidence of significant erosion of the market. The role of extra taxation of the liquor and tobacco industries is to make them pay for the damages they cause to society. Government should not be confused by perverse logic. If the liquor industry caused less harm to our society in the first place, Treasury would need less money to pay for its damages. NOW READ: Report reveals 1 in 5 alcoholic drinks are fake: Here's how to spot them
