Learning Support Funding Welcomed But Something's Got To Give For ECE
'If you're an ECE provider struggling to stay viable, you're asking 'what will help me keep the doors open? The lack of investment today confirms providers' worst fears - that the Government does not have confidence to invest in ECE because of the broken funding system,' said Simon Laube, Early Childhood Council CEO.
ECC, who've campaigned for a comprehensive funding review over many years, takes the funding allocated to an ECE funding review in Budget 2025 as a big win for the entire sector, but says an announcement with the details can't come soon enough.
'After Budget 2024 we were told there would be real cost relief through the ECE Regulatory Review, but any changes are still unclear and 14-18 months away,' said Early Childhood Council CEO Simon Laube.
Further evidence of the broken funding system was revealed today, with the government having to find $334.5 million to fund higher than expected early childhood payments to providers this year, likely caused by the costly Pay Parity policies combined with questionable population projections. One ECC member alone had a $60,000 shortfall this year due to Pay Parity's teacher salary progression requirements, which give all teachers 4% salary increments, unfunded by government - shortfalls of that size are enough to sink a vulnerable business or community group.
This year's ECE cost adjustment of 0.5% is a record low. Over the last six years, successive government's lowballing adds up to a massive 12.7% shortfall against inflation over the period.
'The Government is allowing these cost pressures to mount up - ECE funding in 2026 will be 12.7% less valuable than it was to providers in 2020, that's the equivalent of a massive funding cut in today's dollars,' said Simon Laube.
ECC celebrates the Learning Support investment in the Budget, as it has the potential to make a massive difference for learners who need additional support. Supporting these learners shows that New Zealanders truly care for all children, and it's about time. In ECE, additional funds for the Early Intervention Service and an expansion of that service into Year 1 of school will massively help address the well-known problems with children's transition out of ECE into school, when the Early Intervention Service used to get cut off. Now it won't get cut off and children who need additional support can experience a more seamless education.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
KiwiSaver hardship reveals hidden cost of this economic downturn
We had news last week that KiwiSaver members withdrew more than $470 million for hardship reasons in the past 12 months amid continuing economic stress. Inland Revenue figures showed $470.7m was taken out of KiwiSaver in the June financial year, up 56.6% from $300.5m over the prior period. Looking back through the figures, there has certainly been a big spike in withdrawals in the past two years, but they have been on the rise for several years. Since Covid, both the number of people withdrawing funds and the amount withdrawn have risen steadily. As a barometer of the general economic situation, that isn't great. But the bigger problem with these hardship withdrawals is that the ultimate cost is (quite literally) compounded through the years. More than $1.3 billion of KiwiSaver funds has been withdrawn for hardship reasons in the past five years. If we do some back-of-the-envelope calculations and assume this money could have earned around 7% returns for the next 20 years, then we get a figure of more than $5b that will be missing from the nation's pool of retirement funds by 2045. Given the current trend of withdrawals, I suspect this is a conservative estimate. I understand why we allow withdrawals for hardship. It doesn't make sense for people to lose their homes or to go hungry when they have thousands of dollars sitting in a KiwiSaver account, so I'm not advocating that we stop allowing the withdrawals. However, there is a hidden cost and the situation highlights just how crucial it is for the Government to put more focus on retirement savings. There is a lot more money coming out of the KiwiSaver scheme to fund people into their first homes. Since Covid hit, an average of about $1.2b a year has been withdrawn from KiwiSaver for first home purchases. A home is an asset at least, and home ownership is an important step on the path to financial independence. I suspect we just have to accept the first home buyer withdrawals as a feature of the KiwiSaver scheme. If young people are in the scheme from the start of their working life and have $10,000 or $20,000 to put towards a house deposit, they are probably ahead of where many in my generation were at the same age. But the reality is that as a nation, we're well behind on where we need to be with our retirement savings. According to Stats NZ projections, the percentage of the population aged 65+ will increase from roughly 16-17% in the early 2020s to about 19-20% by 2030. By 2050, around 24-26% of New Zealanders are expected to be 65+. The old-age dependency ratio (ratio of elderly to working-age population) is expected to nearly double between 2020 and 2050. Our annual superannuation bill already comes in at more than $20b, and Treasury has projected that to rise to about $45b by 2037. According to Budget 2025 data, New Zealand Superannuation costs $4352 per person per year, making it the third-largest area of government spending after welfare ($6181 per person) and health ($5804 per person). From the Treasury's long-term fiscal projections, spending on NZ Super is projected to grow from 4.3% of GDP in 2010 to 7.9% in 2060, an increase of 3.6 percentage points. It is also rising as a percentage of the Government's total tax revenue – from about 17% now, it is projected to rise above 21% by 2037. So we know we have a problem. It seems almost certain that the age of superannuation will have to be raised to 67 in the coming years – despite the current opposition of NZ First and Labour. Future governments will almost certainly come under more pressure to means-test. KiwiSaver, which currently has total funds of $122b, is one of our great hopes. But the total figure is flattering. There are more than three million KiwiSaver members so the average fund size is just $37,000. Hopefully, that will be skewed by a lot of young people who will see their savings grow dramatically in the next decades. That brings us back to the downside of withdrawing funds early for hardship, though. We need to be saving more, not less. Moves by the Government to lift the default contribution rate for both employees and employers to 4% from April 2028 were a step in the right direction. However, they pale in comparison to Australia's compulsory scheme, which requires 12% employer contributions. The scheme has the equivalent of $4.5 trillion invested, making Australia the fifth-largest holder of pension fund assets in the world, not per capita but in nominal terms. Australia, for the record, also allows people to withdraw funds for hardship, but one suspects fewer people there need to. If we want to make the most of the KiwiSaver scheme we have, we need to look more closely at who is withdrawing their money and why. Meanwhile, young Kiwis are voting with their feet and joining the Australian Superannuation scheme ... by virtue of moving to work there. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
MoE Advice Reveals Cost-Cutting Takes Priority Over Quality In ECE
Newly released advice from the Ministry of Education to Minister David Seymour shows the Government is more focused on helping ECE providers cut costs than on making sure young children get high-quality, safe accessible early learning. In the document Options to reduce ECE service staffing costs, four options were provided (three of which remain redacted), all aimed at cutting the most significant cost for providers: staff wages. One of those options which has recently been implemented, allows employers to pay new teachers the minimum starting rate, regardless of their qualifications or experience. 'This advice confirms what we feared, that cost savings for providers are being prioritised over children's learning and wellbeing,' says Kathy Wolfe, Chief Executive of Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand. 'Reducing pay for qualified teachers not only undermines professional standards, but it also risks deterring future teachers from joining the sector. Is this really what the Minister and Associate Minister of Education want? We were told their goal was to lift education outcomes and that journey begins in early childhood.' The Ministry's advice, requested by Minister Seymour, states that this cost-cutting measure is expected to save providers up to $22 million over two years. It also acknowledges the serious risks associated with this approach. 'The Ministry's own words say it all, this move makes ECE teaching 'less attractive for those considering studying and entering the workforce',' says Cathy Wilson, Chief Executive of Montessori Aotearoa New Zealand. 'We're already in a teacher workforce shortage and need to attract more teachers and retain a higher number of teachers. How can we expect to maintain a high-quality system when we devalue the people who deliver it? This short-term thinking will only create bigger problems, with fewer qualified teachers, more instability in the workforce, and a greater risk to children's safety and well-being. How does that help prepare tamariki for school?' Even more concerning is the Government's apparent intention to abandon the Pay Parity scheme. This initiative links the pay of ECE teachers in education and care centres to that of kindergarten teachers, who are funded directly by the government and have pay parity with primary teachers. The system was designed to ensure fairness across the teaching profession, recognising experience and qualifications whether a teacher is in ECE, primary, or secondary education. 'Teachers are teachers, whether they're working with infants, children, or teenagers,' says Mrs Wilson. 'Undermining the pay and conditions of ECE teachers sends a clear message that their work is valued less. That's not only short-sighted, but it's also damaging for teachers, tamariki, and whānau alike.' The implications are serious. In wealthier communities, providers may simply pass increased costs on to parents who can pay. In lower-income communities, however, providers will be more likely to cut wages, reduce qualified staff, or take advantage of any future changes that lower the minimum qualification requirements, effectively creating a two-tier ECE system. 'We're staring down the barrel of deepening inequity in early childhood education,' says Mrs Wolfe. 'If qualification requirements are relaxed and pay is suppressed, the quality of teaching in some demographic areas will decline, and with it, outcomes for tamariki.' This direction, Mrs Wolfe warns, will increase teacher turnover, shrink the future workforce, and accelerate the decline of New Zealand's globally recognised high-quality ECE. 'It is horrifying to see our world-leading early childhood education undermined in the name of short-term savings,' she says. 'Our tamariki deserve qualified, well-supported teachers. They deserve safe, rich learning environments. And parents deserve to know that their children are safe and getting the best possible start in life, no matter their postcode.' Te Rito Maioha and Montessori Aotearoa New Zealand are calling on the Government to reverse this direction and invest in quality, not cuts. 'The funding review is underway; however it already seems to have been undermined, and the Minister's outcome predetermined. We urge the Government to properly fund ECE, not by slashing teacher pay or lowering standards, but recognising the vital role teachers play and committing to equity and excellence for every child,' Mrs Wolfe says. Notes: The advice requested by Minister Seymour was based on the knowledge that the ECE sector would receive only a 0.5% funding increase in Budget 2025, well below the 2.5% rate of inflation. The Ministry's paper acknowledges this shortfall would place significant financial pressure on providers. In response, the Minister specifically asked for advice on how to reduce the sector's largest cost: teachers. The ECE sector has already experienced a multi-year funding freeze prior to 2017 under the then National government leaving the sector approximately 11% behind CPI over the last 10 to 15 years. ECE is considered a public good with investment outweighing the costs. For more information on the need to sufficiently fund ECE services About Te Rito Maioha: Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand is a leader in early childhood and primary education – growing teachers, leaders, knowledge and bicultural practice so every child learns and thrives. As a membership organisation we are a strong voice for young children and quality education, advocating for the ECE sector and connecting our members with the latest sector-related issues, policy and professional development. As a specialist tertiary provider, we grow valued teachers, educators, leaders and experts with diploma, degree and postgraduate qualifications in early childhood and primary education.
RNZ News
6 days ago
- RNZ News
Ministry for Culture and Heritage confirms 80 percent cut in senior historian roles
Secretary Leauanae Laulu Mac Leauanae. Photo: Ministry for Culture and Heritage / supplied The Ministry for Culture and Heritage / Manatū Taonga is going ahead with cutting the jobs of most of its historians. The disestablishment of four out of five senior historian jobs has been confirmed, among a total of 30 or so job cuts proposed last month to save money after the ministry's funding was reduced in Budget 2025. The proposal has been amended, to cut about 26 roles in all. One senior historian role is being retained. Also, two others will stay on till the end of the school year, "recognising that the ministry has made commitments to schools" and that this would "allow for the completion of the already scheduled programming and exploration of alternatives for the future of the education programme". Websites on New Zealand history the ministry runs also won a partial reprieve. Secretary Leauanae Laulu Mac Leauanae said he changed the proposals to ensure Te Ara online encyclopedia was still accessible and to complete the work on a Dawn Raids history, as well as "finding a way forward" for Te Tai Whakaea Treaty Settlement Stories. "I have... heard your strong feedback on the importance of our heritage content and production team and the taonga they have created and added to over the past three decades," he told staff in a confidential 'decision' document released to them on Thursday. "I agreed that Te Ara Taonga, Taonga Tūturu, Treaty settlements and Matariki are critical ministry outputs that must continue to operate with as little disruption as possible." It looked "like a slower version of shutting down websites", said a staffer who RNZ agreed not to name. The PSA union called it "cultural vandalism". "What we should be doing is employing even more historians because there's a lot of work to be done in preserving our culture," said national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons, calling them "senseless cuts". Fleur Fitzsimons. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone "We're concerned that the Te Ara encyclopedia won't be able to be maintained." Te Ara was established in 2001. The pressure remained on at the ministry, the document made clear. Leauanae calculated it needed to find $3m in savings this year. "To enable Manatū Taonga to adjust to our new financial position, I have made decisions to disestablish a number of positions. Decisions in this document confirm our functional shift away from content creation and programme delivery. "My preferred option will be the transfer of products or programmes, but alternatives may include the decommissioning or stopping of these programmes as a last resort." The reduced budget left the ministry unable to keep specialised positions in digital production and editing. As for cutting historians, "feedback received was not in support of removing any historian roles noting the uniqueness of the positions and their importance in maintaining and developing the taonga". But it was not feasible to keep them all on. However, a U-turn was made on proposal to cut the role of solicitor, which would now be retained. "Feedback was clear that demands on the legal team will only increase with the impacts of the Regulatory Standards Bill on our legislative modernisation work programme" among other things. The aim was to have the new structure in place by the middle of September. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
