SC dismisses plea for implementation of three-language formula in TN, Kerala, WB
New Delhi [India], May 9 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a PIL seeking implementation of the three-language formula, proposed by the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, in Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal.
A bench headed by Justice JB Pardiwala refused to entertain the plea, saying the court cannot directly compel a state to adopt a policy like the National Education Policy 2020.
The top court in its order stated, 'It (court) cannot directly compel a state to adopt a policy like the National Education Policy 2020. The court may, however, intervene if a state's action or inaction related to the National Education Policy violates any fundamental rights. We do not propose to examine this issue in this writ petition. We believe that the petitioner has nothing to do with the cause he proposes to espouse. Although he may be from the state of Tamil Nadu, yet on his own admission, he is residing in New Delhi. In such circumstances, this petition stands dismissed.'
The plea was filed by BJP lawyer GS Mani, stating the refusal or failure of the state government to implement the National Educational Policy of the Central government or sign an MOU may harm the public interest or infringe on citizens' rights.
The petition sought direction to the state governments to implement the National Education Policy and sign an MOU which involves fundamental public welfare and rights of Education, constitutional rights, or government obligations that are being neglected or violated is very well maintainable.
'The state government is under a constitutional or legal obligation to implement the National Educational Policy, 2020 of the Central government and to enter into an MOU for the implementation of the said policy, scheme, or project,' the petition stated.
All state governments except Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal have adopted and implemented the Central government's most important national education policy, the tri-language curriculum policy, advocate Mani said.
In the petition, the National Education Policy is a major education policy plan brought by the Central government with the aim of improving the quality of school education for students from all walks of life. 'All Indian languages should be taught free of cost to school children belonging to the poor, scheduled, tribes, backwards, and the most backwards classes,' the petition added.
The petition said that the state governments of Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal are refusing to accept the three-language formula for political reasons, citing the false reason of imposing Hindi.
The Central government's laws, plans and policies are applicable to all state governments, the petition further stated. It is the duty of the state government to implement such a policy and this is a fundamental duty and right given in the Constitution, it added.
'Free education is a fundamental right given by the Constitution. By refusing to accept this plan, the state government is denying the fundamental right of free education to the school children concerned. Therefore, the Supreme Court should intervene in this matter and issue an order to these three state governments to immediately implement the Central government's National Education Policy,' added the PIL.
While the Centre defended the policy as a step towards multilingualism, Tamil Nadu said that it unfairly pressures non-Hindi-speaking states.
The Tamil Nadu government has accused the Central government of trying to push Hindi 'sideways' through the NEP, despite the state's longstanding resistance to such policies.
The government has strongly opposed implementing the NEP, raising concerns over the three-language formula and alleging that the Centre wants to 'impose' Hindi. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
29 minutes ago
- Hans India
SC judge recuses from hearing transfer petition of Congress MLA Rajendra Bharti
New Delhi: A Supreme Court judge on Thursday recused himself from hearing a plea filed by Madhya Pradesh Congress MLA Rajendra Bharti seeking transfer of a criminal case outside the state. After Justice Manmohan withdrew himself from hearing, the bench headed by Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra referred the transfer petition to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), who is the master of roster, for listing the matter before a different bench. In the meantime, the bench ordered extension of the interim order passed in the petition seeking transfer of the alleged cheating case outside Madhya Pradesh. In February this year, the apex court stayed the proceedings pending before the Additional Sessions Judge in Gwalior, observing that there was enough material placed on record before the trial court containing an allegation that the defence witnesses were sought to be intimidated. "The trial court should have also taken appropriate action on the basis of the material. (W)hen we made repeated queries to the learned AAG (Additional Advocate General) and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State (of Madhya Pradesh), they have no answer to the question of what inquiry or investigation the state has made on the basis of the allegations made by the petitioner (Rajendra Bharti)," it said. In its order, the Supreme Court had stressed the duty of the state machinery to ensure that a fair trial is conducted. "We must record that it is the duty of the State to ensure that a fair trial is conducted. Fair trial means that full opportunity is granted in accordance with law to the accused to defend himself," it had said. After the top court's observations, a committee of three police officials was constituted to inquire into the allegations of intimidation of defence witnesses. However, the Supreme Court, in an order passed in April this year, said that "proper investigation has not been made" into the allegations of putting pressure on the defence witnesses. "We expected the officers appointed by the State to look into each and every allegation made by the petitioner as well as by the witnesses and record findings. It is the duty of the State to ensure that there is a fair trial, which is an essential part of the rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India." Listing the matter for further hearing on May 16, the apex court told the state officials to carry out a "better investigation" and called for a report within one month. In the 2023 Madhya Pradesh Assembly polls, Rajendra Bharti won the Datia seat of Gwalior-Chambal region, defeating senior BJP leader Narottam Mishra, who held the portfolio of Home Minister in the Shivraj Singh Chouhan government.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Impeachment Calls Amid Immigration Protests: Can Trump Be Removed As President?
Last Updated: Calls to remove President Trump are growing, but with complex procedures and political roadblocks in place, can these efforts really succeed? Close to 400 individuals have been apprehended amid immigration raid protests in Los Angeles over the past week, particularly following President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops and Marines throughout the city. Trump has mobilised over 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to suppress the protests concerning immigration enforcement. Amid the unrest, a growing chorus—from Democratic lawmakers, activists, and community groups—is calling for President Trump's removal from office. But while removal is legally possible, it faces formidable hurdles. Texas Democratic Congressman Al Green has called for Trump's impeachment, stating that Trump is 'unfit" to hold office given his 34 felony convictions and history of being impeached twice before. Green told reporters that he is in the process of drafting articles of impeachment. Several other Democratic lawmakers, especially from strongly anti-Trump constituencies, have also voiced sharp criticism of Trump's policies and leadership. However, the likelihood of impeachment remains low due to the Republican majority in both the House and the Senate. Several posts on X claim that large-scale protests are erupting in Democrat-led states like New York and California over President Trump's policies on immigration, tariffs and restrictions on foreign students. Some users have even described the situation as 'civil war-like." In California, Trump's immigration measures have sparked widespread anger among immigrant communities and academic institutions, triggering legal action. So far, more than 100 lawsuits and around 50 temporary restraining orders have reportedly been filed challenging various policies introduced by the Trump administration. Although these legal challenges have slowed the implementation of Trump's policies, they are not directly connected to efforts to remove him from office. Impeachment would require significant support in Congress, which is currently lacking. The demand to remove Trump is mostly confined to Democratic strongholds and activist circles. Efforts by lawmakers like Al Green are largely symbolic, with little chance of success given the Republican majority in Congress. While there is significant anger among immigrants, students, and liberal groups, the unrest is not yet widespread enough to pose an immediate threat to Trump's presidency. Can Trump Be Removed From The Post Of President? Yes, Donald Trump can be removed from the post of US President, but this is a complex and extraordinary process that can only happen through the provisions laid down in the US Constitution. This includes impeachment, the 25th Amendment, or pressure from a massive civil movement. In the US, impeachment can be brought against the President through a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives, but this seems unlikely due to the Republican majority. When And How Can The US President Be Removed And Can It Apply To Trump? Under Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution, the President can be removed by impeachment for 'treason, bribery, or other serious crimes and misdemeanours." In the first phase, the impeachment motion must pass by a simple majority in the House of Representatives. In the second phase, a trial is held in the Senate, where a two-thirds majority (67 senators) is required for conviction. The Chief Justice presides over the trial. Trump was impeached twice (in 2019 and 2021), but the Senate did not convict him. At present, impeachment seems unlikely due to the Republican majority in the House, making it difficult to get the two-thirds support required. However, public pressure or new evidence could change the situation. What Is The 25th Amendment By Which The President Can Be Removed? The 25th Amendment of the Constitution allows the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet to declare that the President is unable to perform his duties. After this, the Vice President becomes the acting President. This is unlikely because Vice President JD Vance and most of the Cabinet members are loyal to Trump. A serious reason, such as mental or physical incapacity, is required for this, and there are no clear signs. The 25th Amendment has been used twice in America, but only to temporarily replace the President under Section 3. In 1985, when President Reagan was ill, and later in 2002 and 2007, when President George W. Bush briefly transferred power to the Vice President during medical treatment. In each case, the President resumed his duties afterward. Can The American President Resign Due To Civil Movement Or Pressure? Massive public outrage or political pressure could force Trump to resign, as Richard Nixon did in 1974. top videos View all However, Trump's history shows that he does not easily bow to pressure. His recent controversial decisions, such as the travel ban and the ban on foreign students, have triggered anger among the public and the opposition, but resignation remains unlikely due to his strong support base, especially among Republicans. Cases are ongoing against Trump's decisions. If a major legal violation is proven, impeachment or other actions may begin. Massive protests or electoral pressure (2026 midterm elections) could weaken Trump's position, but they would not directly lead to removal. First Published:
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Germany sees 35% rise in Indian student interest amid global visa issues
As visa hurdles mount in countries like the US and UK, Germany is emerging as a preferred destination for Indian students seeking a secure and transparent academic path. Citing a sharp 35% increase in applications from India, German officials have reiterated their country's commitment to providing a stable, inclusive environment for international a recent press briefing in New Delhi, German Ambassador Dr Philipp Ackermann said, 'In the context of the difficulties Indian students face in other countries, we have seen a sharp rise in interest for German universities and research institutions. Applications have increased by over 35 per cent in the last couple of months.'advertisementCurrently, around 50,000 Indian students are enrolled at German universities, placing the country amongst the top five destinations for Indian learners, after the US, UK, Canada, and Australia. Reinforcing Germany's consistent and transparent approach to education, the ambassador remarked, 'We are a very reliable partner. When it comes to studying or researching in Germany, we don't check your social media before you arrive.' This remark appeared to subtly contrast Germany's stance with the increasingly strict vetting processes being adopted by other nations.A key draw for students is the affordability of education in Germany. Most public universities either charge no tuition fees or have very minimal costs compared to their Western counterparts. 'We believe education is a public good, not a business opportunity,' Ambassador Ackermann Katja Lasch, Director of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Regional Office in New Delhi, also addressed students and urged them not to rely on private agents for applications. 'Most public universities in Germany do not work with agents. Our system is transparent and accessible. Students can get free counselling from DAAD and German university liaison offices in India,' she currently offers more than 2,300 English-taught programmes, covering a wide range of fields including science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), where the country faces a growing demand for skilled Ackermann noted, 'We are looking for the smartest, most dedicated students—those who are eager to contribute and grow. And we see that in Indian students.'He also highlighted post-study benefits, including an 18-month stay-back period for job searching and simplified processes for residence permit extension once employment is itself as a dependable academic partner during a time of uncertainty in global higher education, Germany's message is clear: Indian students are welcome, valued, and supported. "Germany is very eager and happy to welcome Indian students. In these turbulent times, we offer not just world-class education but also a stable, inclusive, and trustworthy system,' Ackermann concluded.(With ANI inputs)Tune InMust Watch
