FCA looks to revitalise London's sluggish markets
The framework known as the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (Pisces), will allow the creation of a new type of private stock market, regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), with a much leaner regulatory burden compared to firms on public stock exchanges.
In the FCA's own words, 'Pisces will give the investors more opportunities to buy stakes in growing companies. And private companies can tap into a broader range of investors and asset managers, leading to greater support for future fundraising.'
LSEG (London Stock Exchange Croup) boss David Schwimmer has expressed excitement about the new framework adding that investor interest 'is not just from the UK – it's global.'
A statutory instrument setting out the regulations was put before Parliament last month for it to set out the final rules on the scheme. Industry sources suggested the regulator has some work to do to ensure the scheme's framework fits with market expectations.
A key point of contention is a requirement that Pisces shares be traded intermittently, which the rules define as 'occasional, not frequent, and of limited duration.' That would put it at odds with public stock markets, which allow for continuous daily trading between fixed hours.
Mike McCudden, CEO of liquidity venue JP Jenkins, which hopes to operate its own Pisces exchange later this year, said he was 'surprised' that intermittent trading was the starting point for Pisces.
Dozens of private companies have had their shares admitted for trading to the firm's platform, worth a combined £2bn. The precise form that trading could take could also determine which investors get involved. The FCA says the use of a central securities depository or CSD (known as Crest in the UK) will be optional for Pisces market operators.
Those who elect not to use the system, which facilitates the electronic settlement of share trades, could exclude certain types of funds from participating who require CSD functionality. That would mean some Pisces markets end up with quite different sets of investors, and levels of liquidity, than others.
Another area of concern is on share buybacks. While the manoeuvre is common on the London Stock Exchange, it is thought that the Treasury regards it as a waste of capital resources, so has banned its use on Pisces markets, which are designed to encourage investment into innovation. But there are concerns that the ban could be another dampener on liquidity, which could stunt the market's growth.
'Whilst there are legitimate concerns here in terms of constraining growth potential – something that we believe sits at the heart of Pisces – (the use of buybacks) also affords a flexible capital reorganising mechanism that may be vital especially if a company is looking towards a full IPO,' McCudden said.
There are hopes that these issues and others could be cleared up under a five-year regulatory sandbox (it provides a controlled environment for firms to test new innovations), which will allow the FCA to test the design before finalising permanent regime in 2030. The sandbox environment is designed to enable the FCA to check everything is working as well as it could be and allow the regulator to make refinements more quickly.
The regulatory sandbox system is one that has attracted international praise for its flexibility in the past. But there is no guarantee that regulators will agree with everyone in the industry. McCudden said he was desperate for the sandbox to be used constructively to ensure the outcome addresses real challenges within the London market.
Andy Jalil
The writer is our foreign correspondent based in the UK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
16-07-2025
- Observer
China cuts electricity emissions to record lows in 2025
LITTLETON, Colorado: Surging clean power supplies have allowed China's utilities to reduce their emissions from electricity production to record lows during the opening half of 2025. Carbon dioxide emissions per kilowatt hour (kWh) of electricity averaged 492 grammes during the opening half of 2025, according to data from energy portal That was the first ever reading below 500 grammes per kWh, and is down from 514g/kWh during the same period in 2024 and 539g/kWh from January to June 2023. A nearly 23% rise in clean power generation from January to June 2024 was the main driver behind the reduction in emissions intensity, as higher volumes of clean energy allowed power firms to reduce output from coal and gas power plants. Total power generation from thermal power plants — mainly coal — dropped by 4% from a year ago to just under 7,000 terawatt hours (TWh), data from LSEG shows. Output from clean energy sources from January to June totalled 2,400 TWh, highlighting that fossil fuel power sources still account for a 75% share of China's power generation mix. But the growth of clean energy supplies continues to sharply outpace growth in fossil fuel power generation, suggesting that China's power mix looks set to keep getting cleaner. Total Chinese clean power output during the first half of 2025 was 200% more than during the first half of 2019, according to LSEG. In contrast, total Chinese thermal power output from January to June 2025 was 20% greater than during the same period in 2019. China's power sector emissions from fossil fuel generation have declined in line with the cleaner mix. Total emissions from fossil fuels used in electricity production from January to May were 2.24 billion metric tonnes of CO2, according to data from energy think tank Ember. That total is 60.5 million tonnes less than during the same months of 2024, and is an indication that some progress is being made against Beijing's goals of reducing energy sector pollution. However, the enduring economic drag caused by a lingering property downturn as well as the uncertainty surrounding tariffs charged by the United States on Chinese goods is also impacting China's power needs and emissions totals. The pace of construction in China has slowed sharply so far this decade following a debt crisis among property developers, which in turn has choked off demand for energy-intensive goods such as cement, piping, glass and construction steel. More recently, the fresh tariffs on Chinese goods set by US President Donald Trump this year have hit demand for China-made products, and slowed production lines across several manufactured items. — Reuters
Observer
25-06-2025
- Observer
UK investors must do more to attract tech firms to LSE
The flood of British tech firms dropping London in favour of a New York IPO (Initial Public Offering) is only set to increase, a boss in Allianz's investment arm, Jeremy Gleeson, has warned. Gleeson, technology CIO at Allianz Global Investors, has no UK companies in his global tech fund citing their high price and scarcity. 'One of the problems that we have when we identify a great European company is that we find the equivalent in the US is trading at a discount,' said Gleeson. 'There are fewer high quality technology companies here in Europe, so when one does make a breakthrough, one is acknowledged as being world class, if you're a European fund manager, that's the one you have to own.' The London Stock Exchange (LSE) is upping its campaign to attract more floats, warning IPO candidates that a US listing could prove expensive. In a document shared with bankers and IPO hopefuls, the LSE said underwriting fees for LSE listings can be more than double those levied by advisors in the UK. US fees typically range between 6pc and 7pc, while cost in the UK are normally between 3pc and 5pc, the LSE's analysis found. It added that companies face a 'lower litigation risk' if they are listed in London. The LSE said 3.3pc of all US-listed firms were sued in 2023, with 215 new securities class action lawsuits over the year. In comparison, the LSE found there have been just five UK class actions against London-listed firms since 2008. The pressure for UK and European fund managers to own home-grown tech companies when there are so few means that American competitors often end up being cheaper. Gleeson gave FTSE 100 tech firm Sage as an example, noting that while it trades at a similar pace to US equivalent Intuit, the American competitor 'has a lot more strings in its bow in terms of markets it covers.' 'They're not just products for small and medium businesses, they do tax products for consumers, and they've got other irons in the fire as well', he explained, meaning that Intuit end up always being the favoured pick by global investors. It didn't used to be this way. Gleeson participated in Darktrace's IPO in 2021, noting that from when the tech company floated to when it was taken over by an American private equity firm, 'it only had one small dip below its IPO price, which the company never really got credit for'. 'There was almost like this 'we don't want to have a technology company be successful in the UK,' he said. 'Unfortunately, maybe that has to change a little bit in the UK amongst the investment community, actually be more warm towards technology companies, rather than seeing them with a mistrust to begin with.' The fund manager also pointed to Arm (a British semiconductor and software design company) a former FTSE 100 constituent saying it was 'really sad' that when the company re-listed, it chose to go to the US, as it would 'have helped if UK investors could have had a good experience with Arm, then it might have encouraged them to think a little bit more about other UK tech companies. Gleeson said: 'Increasingly, it's going to make it easier for UK companies to think about listing overseas, and in the US in particular.' He added, he was trying to be 'benchmark aware' rather than simply buy the biggest tech firms. 'You can go back to the mid-to-late 2000s, where the predominant players in the technology benchmark were IBM, Nokia, Intel, HP,' he explained, arguing that the benchmark shows what the more successful tech companies have been, rather than what they will be. Andy Jalil The writer is our foreign correspondent based in the UK
Observer
22-06-2025
- Observer
FCA looks to revitalise London's sluggish markets
New PISCES markets could begin trading before the end of this year, in what the UK government hopes will be a boost for fast-growing companies in search of a stepping stone before reaching IPO (Initial Public Offering). The framework known as the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (Pisces), will allow the creation of a new type of private stock market, regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), with a much leaner regulatory burden compared to firms on public stock exchanges. In the FCA's own words, 'Pisces will give the investors more opportunities to buy stakes in growing companies. And private companies can tap into a broader range of investors and asset managers, leading to greater support for future fundraising.' LSEG (London Stock Exchange Croup) boss David Schwimmer has expressed excitement about the new framework adding that investor interest 'is not just from the UK – it's global.' A statutory instrument setting out the regulations was put before Parliament last month for it to set out the final rules on the scheme. Industry sources suggested the regulator has some work to do to ensure the scheme's framework fits with market expectations. A key point of contention is a requirement that Pisces shares be traded intermittently, which the rules define as 'occasional, not frequent, and of limited duration.' That would put it at odds with public stock markets, which allow for continuous daily trading between fixed hours. Mike McCudden, CEO of liquidity venue JP Jenkins, which hopes to operate its own Pisces exchange later this year, said he was 'surprised' that intermittent trading was the starting point for Pisces. Dozens of private companies have had their shares admitted for trading to the firm's platform, worth a combined £2bn. The precise form that trading could take could also determine which investors get involved. The FCA says the use of a central securities depository or CSD (known as Crest in the UK) will be optional for Pisces market operators. Those who elect not to use the system, which facilitates the electronic settlement of share trades, could exclude certain types of funds from participating who require CSD functionality. That would mean some Pisces markets end up with quite different sets of investors, and levels of liquidity, than others. Another area of concern is on share buybacks. While the manoeuvre is common on the London Stock Exchange, it is thought that the Treasury regards it as a waste of capital resources, so has banned its use on Pisces markets, which are designed to encourage investment into innovation. But there are concerns that the ban could be another dampener on liquidity, which could stunt the market's growth. 'Whilst there are legitimate concerns here in terms of constraining growth potential – something that we believe sits at the heart of Pisces – (the use of buybacks) also affords a flexible capital reorganising mechanism that may be vital especially if a company is looking towards a full IPO,' McCudden said. There are hopes that these issues and others could be cleared up under a five-year regulatory sandbox (it provides a controlled environment for firms to test new innovations), which will allow the FCA to test the design before finalising permanent regime in 2030. The sandbox environment is designed to enable the FCA to check everything is working as well as it could be and allow the regulator to make refinements more quickly. The regulatory sandbox system is one that has attracted international praise for its flexibility in the past. But there is no guarantee that regulators will agree with everyone in the industry. McCudden said he was desperate for the sandbox to be used constructively to ensure the outcome addresses real challenges within the London market. Andy Jalil The writer is our foreign correspondent based in the UK.
