
Pune court rejects plea to compel Rahul Gandhi to submit book in Savarkar defamation case
'No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. The burden of proof lies entirely on the complainant. Hence, the application filed by the complainant is liable to be rejected and is accordingly rejected,' judicial magistrate Amol Shinde said in the order pronounced in open court on July 3.
Advocate Sangram Kolhatkar, appearing for Satyaki Savarkar – Veer Savarkar's grand-nephew who filed the defamation complaint under section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) last year – had argued that Gandhi's lawyer was deliberately delaying proceedings which are currently at the stage of recording the plea. Advocate Kolhatkar maintained that the book in question is essential to ensuring a fair trial.
In response, Gandhi's lawyer, advocate Milind Pawar, strongly opposed the plea, stating that the trial had not yet commenced and therefore Gandhi could not be compelled to disclose any part of his defence or supporting documents. Advocate Pawar argued that the burden of proof lies solely on the complainant and compelling the accused to produce material at this stage would violate the accused's constitutional protection under Article 20(3) which safeguards against self-incrimination.
Advocate Pawar submitted, 'The complainant is required to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt. The accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Forcing the defence to prematurely disclose material is not permitted under criminal law and violates constitutional guarantees.'
Advocate Pawar further argued, 'There is no legal obligation on the defence to provide any document or material to the complainant. Such a direction would seriously prejudice the accused's right to a fair trial and his ability to defend himself effectively.'
After hearing the arguments from both sides, the court noted that the case is still at the stage of recording the accused's plea, and that it arises from a private complaint. The court held that the burden of proving the allegations lies entirely on the complainant.
The court observed: 'Gandhi cannot be compelled to disclose or submit any part of his defence before the trial formally begins. He is entitled to present relevant documents at the defence stage as per the law. Forcing the accused to produce material at this preliminary stage would infringe upon his constitutional protection under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, which protects against compelled self-incrimination.'
The complaint alleged that Rahul Gandhi had made false and defamatory statements during his 2023 London speech, including a claim that Savarkar had written about enjoying assaulting a Muslim man in his book. Gandhi had earlier been exempted from appearing before the MP-MLA court presided over by magistrate Shinde and was granted bail on a bond of ₹25,000. He was also granted permanent exemption from personal court appearances, citing his public responsibilities and security considerations

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump reveals his secret nickname for Melania, and even he says ‘It's terrible'
Donald Trump gave a speech in Iowa during a 'Salute to America' event before July 4th. He was celebrating because Congress passed his 'Big, Beautiful Bill'. During the speech, he was talking about many topics, and then started speaking about military recruitment. Trump said, 'I remember saying to our great First Lady...', then stopped and joked, 'I call her 'First Lady,' isn't it terrible?', as per the reports. He admitted it sounds weird, but he calls her that because it reminds him he's the president. Trump added he says, 'Good night, First Lady, my darling,' when talking to Melania. He then complained that 'nobody wants to join our military force', as reported by Independent. ALSO READ: Ex-Trump aide Katie Miller joins Elon Musk's xAI after leaving White House by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ingin Tahu Tentang Diagnosis Limfoma? Dapatkan Info Selengkapnya Limfoma Baca Undo Trump's parade and Melania's public appearances Trump recently held a big military parade on June 14, which was also his 79th birthday. But he never served in the army and in the past has made rude comments about U.S. troops. Melania has been seen rarely in public since Trump returned to the White House in January, as stated by the reports. But she did show up for the military parade and the Kennedy Center reopening. On July 4th, she visited Children's National Hospital in Washington. She told the kids: 'It's a very special day. We will have a big party at the White House… maybe next year you come and we'll celebrate together', according to the report by Independent. Live Events Melania and Trump's marriage rumors Melania bonded with the children over Taylor Swift and Sabrina Carpenter. Trump doesn't like Taylor Swift and said he 'hated' her last year because she didn't support him politically. Rumors about their marriage are always in the news. Author Michael Wolff said in May that they are basically 'separated'. ALSO READ: Trump may arm Israel with B-2 bombers, bunker busters if Iran restarts nuclear program He claimed they don't live like a normal married couple and seem to have separate lives. In the rest of Trump's Iowa speech, he said, he hates Democrats for blocking his bill. He mocked Iran and said farmers might be excused from raids on undocumented workers. Attacked NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. And used an antisemitic slur, which caused backlash, according to the report by Independent. FAQs Q1. What nickname does Donald Trump use for Melania? Trump jokingly calls Melania 'First Lady' as a pet name, saying it reminds him that he's president. Q2. Are Trump and Melania still living together? According to author Michael Wolff, they live separate lives and are basically 'separated,' though still married publicly.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Make J&K dry like Gujarat: Hurriyat leader Mirwaiz
SRINAGAR: Hurriyat Conference chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq called Friday for J&K to be made a 'dry state like Gujarat' as he opposed authorities' move to open more liquor shops, claiming such steps were 'a deliberate attempt to push our youths further into addiction'. 'J&K is a Muslim-majority region and sale and consumption of liquor is against Islam's tenets,' Mirwaiz said during Friday prayers at Srinagar's Jamia Masjid. The trigger was a protest the previous day by locals in Srinagar's Batmaloo against the opening of a liquor shop in the area that had not seen such outlets for decades. 'If Gujarat can be declared a dry state, there is no reason why J&K should be exempted,' Mirwaiz said. This was the first call to protest in recent months on any issue from Mirwaiz, who is also chief cleric of Kashmir and has been put in home detention ahead of Friday prayers on many occasions in the past few months. Mirwaiz urged the state's Omar Abdullah-led National Conference govt and lieutenant-governor Manoj Sinha to check the trend. 'If govt does not act, we will be forced to protest. This isn't a minor issue,' Mirwaiz said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo Authorities have linked the new liquor licences and shops to a spurt in tourism since the 2019 abrogation of J&K's special status under Article 370. In the case of Batmaloo, excise officials claimed the shop, now shut after the agitation, was not a new one and had been only relocated from another area. Despite such opposition, J&K's alcohol sales are on the rise. The Omar-led govt's economic survey earlier this year estimated excise revenues at Rs 2,000 crore in 2024-25, up 4% over the previous year. Mirwaiz rejected the argument that liquor sales were necessary for tourism, pointing out that J&K had welcomed visitors for centuries without promoting alcohol. 'Has J&K become a tourist spot only after 2019 (Article 370 abrogation)? For hundreds of years, tourists have visited us but liquor was never promoted on this scale in every locality,' Mirwaiz said. Drawing a comparison with Gujarat, Mirwaiz stressed that alcohol was banned there due to its impact on society and asked why similar concerns were not valid for J&K. 'Don't we have a society? Don't we have to live here, too,' Mirwaiz said. According to him, over 1 lakh people in J&K are already affected by drug addiction and govt's fillip to alcohol sales will only aggravate the crisis. Some local Kashmiri Pandits led by an activist, Sandeep Mawa, had recently demanded a ban on liquor sales in the Valley. In March this year, PDP MLA Fayaz Ahmad Mir had introduced a private member's bill seeking such a ban across J&K. But the bill was not taken up for discussion or voting in the assembly. BJP, too, has expressed support for the ban, with former J&K party chief Ravinder Raina having led protests on the issue earlier.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Removing Cong corporator: Divisional commissioner seeks report from collector, police commissioner
Indore: Indore divisional commissioner, acting on Mayor's request to remove corporator Anwar Qadri from his post, has sought comprehensive information from district collector and commissioner of police about Congress leader who has been booked in a criminal case and NSA. Mayor Pushyamitra Bhargav had written to Divisional Commissioner Deepak Singh on June 20 requesting action regarding Qadri's removal. To this, Singh has written to Indore collector and commissioner of police, seeking a detailed investigation into the corporator's case, including specifics of previous incidents, and a report or opinion on necessary action under Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. Divisional Commissioner holds direct authority to remove a corporator. As per Section 19(2) of MP Municipal Corporation Act, Qadri will first be issued a show-cause notice. His response will be considered, and if deemed unsatisfactory, he would be removed from post of corporator. Recently, Collector Asheesh Singh had issued an order booking Qadri under National Security Act (NSA). This development followed a prior announcement by Indore police of offering Rs 10,000 cash reward for information leading to arrest of Qadri. He is wanted in a case of allegedly funding two youths accused of luring girls from majority community by changing their identities and subsequently forcing them into religious conversion. Congress has come to Qadri's defence, with Leader of Opposition in Municipal Corporation, Chintu Chokse, branding the move as a 'BJP conspiracy.' Congress spokesperson Pramod Dwivedi questioned the Mayor's demand for Qadri's removal, stating that Qadri has not yet been convicted by a court, and the Mayor, being a legal expert himself, should not make such demands. The Congress also highlighted case of BJP corporator and MIC Member Jeetu Jatav alias Yadav, questioning why similar action was not sought against him despite the BJP itself expelling him from the party following a controversy.