Honda's new electric is the one
ROAD TEST
What's new?
It may have come late to the party, but Honda now has its first fully electric new car on sale in New Zealand, the strangely familiar but distinctively named e:N1.
Strangely familiar because, at a glance, one might easily be forgiven for labelling the new e:N1 as the all-electric variant of the latest HR-V. But the e:N1 sits on a new pure-electric platform, and that's what the "e:N" part of its name signals. The number "1", meanwhile, indicates that it's the first model on this platform.
What comes as standard?
Standard features on the e:N1 include all-round LED lights, keyless entry, dual zone climate, an eight-way driver's power seat, artificial leather upholstery, a six-speaker audio, wireless charge pad, front and rear parking cameras, a reversing camera and heated mirrors. There's a fully digital main instrument cluster and the literal centre piece of the dashboard, a 38.3cm portrait-format touchscreen. Smartphone mirroring to the centre screen is provided, wireless for Apple devices and by cable for Android phones.
Ancap safety testing has not yet been carried out on the e:N1, but it is fairly well provisioned with passive and active safety equipment. Key items include adaptive radar cruise control, lane departure and collision warning and assist systems, auto-dipping headlights, rear cross traffic alert, blind spot monitoring and road departure warning.
What's it like inside?
Up front, there are some visual similarities to the HR-V, but overall, the e:N1 goes its own way and departs from some Honda staples, including the traditional hooded instrument panel.
Though presenting as an impressively large single display, the centre touchscreen is in fact divided into three separate sub-screens, with the climate controls at the bottom, main menu and information displays (including battery use information) in the middle, and smartphone mirroring at the top (or an oversized clock when a device is not connected).
What's it like to drive?
In how it drives the e:N1 feels purposefully designed to ease the transition to electric-vehicle motoring for those not yet experienced with such machines.
As a prime example, floor the accelerator from rest, and it gathers pace modestly, rather than with the shove-in-the-back force that is a common EV characteristic. Honda has intentionally engineered the e:N1 to behave in this way to mimic the accelerative feel of a petrol car, in part it says for reasons of passenger comfort.
That said, the car is no slouch, with a quoted 0-100kmh time of 7.6 seconds and, once off the mark, it picks up the pace in a typically responsive and linear EV way.
Whether round town or out on the highway, the e:N1 is an easy car to drive smoothly, and it is comfortable, quiet (aside from the whine of its electric motor) and generally quite refined. Ride quality tends to the firmer side for a vehicle of this type, meaning the e:N1 doesn't sponge surface imperfections away as deftly as some of its rivals, but maintains balance better through medium-to-slow bends.
It's great that a paddle-shift activated multi-mode regenerative braking system is fitted to the e:N1. It's entertaining to use and can contribute usefully to economy, especially when activated in sport mode, which is the only way to make it hold the braking intensity you have chosen for more than a few seconds before reverting to the mildest setting. I'd love to see more difference in braking force between the modes, and a more aggressive "maximum regen" mode, which is something the likes of Kia does very well.
The matter of real world economy and ease of recharging is one that needs to be carefully traversed. The headline figure of "range up to 500km" that Honda quotes for the e:N1 is generous even beyond the optimism of the vehicle's standard WLTP range figure of 412km; even that latter figure is only likely to be achievable in relatively mild weather urban driving, in a city that is reasonably flat.
When I picked up the test car with the battery fully charged, the range estimator was showing just over 300km available. At the same time, the trip computer revealed that this car's first 739km of driving had been achieved with an efficiency of 3.7km/kWh. I'll do the math for you and reveal that equates to range of around 230km from fully charged.
As Drivesouth has noted before, hilly terrain and cold weather dramatically increase energy use on any vehicle, and it's patently obvious with EVs as their range is a point of focus.
Some careful assessment on test suggests a realistic real-world range on an extended highway haul will be in the order of 250-320km; that's not stellar for an EV in 2025, but nor is it unusual for a vehicle of this approximate size with a standard rather than extended range battery pack.
A further point is that by the latest standards, the e:N1 is not a fast charger, being restricted to a maximum 78kW charge rate on a modern DC rapid charger. Some obvious rivals are similarly restricted, but the emerging standard — accessible with the rollout of superchargers across the country — is well over 100kW, and premium models can charge at double that. What this means is that when you use one of those faster chargers your e:N1 won't be able to make use of its full potential; at best, it will take around 45 minutes to charge the battery from 10-80% of capacity.
Home charging, though, is industry-standard, at rates of around 7kW with a single phase wall box (which Honda is offering with the e:N1 at present). With this facility, overnight charging is all you'll need unless venturing out of town. It's both cheaper and easier on an EV's battery than a commercial rapid charger, and most likely you'll only need to hook the car up every few days.
Verdict
The new e:N1 is a solid first effort for Honda in this country, especially suited to those customers seeking a capable day-to-day urban EV with decent capacity to venture away from home when required.
[abridged]
By David Thomson
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
12 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Honda's new electric is the one
Photo: David Thomson ROAD TEST What's new? It may have come late to the party, but Honda now has its first fully electric new car on sale in New Zealand, the strangely familiar but distinctively named e:N1. Strangely familiar because, at a glance, one might easily be forgiven for labelling the new e:N1 as the all-electric variant of the latest HR-V. But the e:N1 sits on a new pure-electric platform, and that's what the "e:N" part of its name signals. The number "1", meanwhile, indicates that it's the first model on this platform. What comes as standard? Standard features on the e:N1 include all-round LED lights, keyless entry, dual zone climate, an eight-way driver's power seat, artificial leather upholstery, a six-speaker audio, wireless charge pad, front and rear parking cameras, a reversing camera and heated mirrors. There's a fully digital main instrument cluster and the literal centre piece of the dashboard, a 38.3cm portrait-format touchscreen. Smartphone mirroring to the centre screen is provided, wireless for Apple devices and by cable for Android phones. Ancap safety testing has not yet been carried out on the e:N1, but it is fairly well provisioned with passive and active safety equipment. Key items include adaptive radar cruise control, lane departure and collision warning and assist systems, auto-dipping headlights, rear cross traffic alert, blind spot monitoring and road departure warning. What's it like inside? Up front, there are some visual similarities to the HR-V, but overall, the e:N1 goes its own way and departs from some Honda staples, including the traditional hooded instrument panel. Though presenting as an impressively large single display, the centre touchscreen is in fact divided into three separate sub-screens, with the climate controls at the bottom, main menu and information displays (including battery use information) in the middle, and smartphone mirroring at the top (or an oversized clock when a device is not connected). What's it like to drive? In how it drives the e:N1 feels purposefully designed to ease the transition to electric-vehicle motoring for those not yet experienced with such machines. As a prime example, floor the accelerator from rest, and it gathers pace modestly, rather than with the shove-in-the-back force that is a common EV characteristic. Honda has intentionally engineered the e:N1 to behave in this way to mimic the accelerative feel of a petrol car, in part it says for reasons of passenger comfort. That said, the car is no slouch, with a quoted 0-100kmh time of 7.6 seconds and, once off the mark, it picks up the pace in a typically responsive and linear EV way. Whether round town or out on the highway, the e:N1 is an easy car to drive smoothly, and it is comfortable, quiet (aside from the whine of its electric motor) and generally quite refined. Ride quality tends to the firmer side for a vehicle of this type, meaning the e:N1 doesn't sponge surface imperfections away as deftly as some of its rivals, but maintains balance better through medium-to-slow bends. It's great that a paddle-shift activated multi-mode regenerative braking system is fitted to the e:N1. It's entertaining to use and can contribute usefully to economy, especially when activated in sport mode, which is the only way to make it hold the braking intensity you have chosen for more than a few seconds before reverting to the mildest setting. I'd love to see more difference in braking force between the modes, and a more aggressive "maximum regen" mode, which is something the likes of Kia does very well. The matter of real world economy and ease of recharging is one that needs to be carefully traversed. The headline figure of "range up to 500km" that Honda quotes for the e:N1 is generous even beyond the optimism of the vehicle's standard WLTP range figure of 412km; even that latter figure is only likely to be achievable in relatively mild weather urban driving, in a city that is reasonably flat. When I picked up the test car with the battery fully charged, the range estimator was showing just over 300km available. At the same time, the trip computer revealed that this car's first 739km of driving had been achieved with an efficiency of 3.7km/kWh. I'll do the math for you and reveal that equates to range of around 230km from fully charged. As Drivesouth has noted before, hilly terrain and cold weather dramatically increase energy use on any vehicle, and it's patently obvious with EVs as their range is a point of focus. Some careful assessment on test suggests a realistic real-world range on an extended highway haul will be in the order of 250-320km; that's not stellar for an EV in 2025, but nor is it unusual for a vehicle of this approximate size with a standard rather than extended range battery pack. A further point is that by the latest standards, the e:N1 is not a fast charger, being restricted to a maximum 78kW charge rate on a modern DC rapid charger. Some obvious rivals are similarly restricted, but the emerging standard — accessible with the rollout of superchargers across the country — is well over 100kW, and premium models can charge at double that. What this means is that when you use one of those faster chargers your e:N1 won't be able to make use of its full potential; at best, it will take around 45 minutes to charge the battery from 10-80% of capacity. Home charging, though, is industry-standard, at rates of around 7kW with a single phase wall box (which Honda is offering with the e:N1 at present). With this facility, overnight charging is all you'll need unless venturing out of town. It's both cheaper and easier on an EV's battery than a commercial rapid charger, and most likely you'll only need to hook the car up every few days. Verdict The new e:N1 is a solid first effort for Honda in this country, especially suited to those customers seeking a capable day-to-day urban EV with decent capacity to venture away from home when required. [abridged] By David Thomson
Otago Daily Times
14 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
UK drops 'backdoor' mandate for Apple: spy chief
Britain has dropped its demand for iPhone maker Apple to provide a "backdoor" that would have enabled access to protected encrypted data of American citizens, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says. Gabbard issued the statement on X on Monday in the United States, saying she had worked for months with Britain, along with President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, to arrive at a deal. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer was in Washington on Monday along with other European leaders to meet Trump and discuss Russia's war in Ukraine. A spokesperson for the British government said on Tuesday that, while they would not comment on any agreement, Britain had long worked with the US to tackle security threats while seeking to protect the privacy of citizens in both countries. "We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe," the spokesperson added. Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Gabbard's statement. US lawmakers said in May this year that the United Kingdom's order to Apple to create a backdoor to its encrypted user data could be exploited by cybercriminals and authoritarian governments. Apple, which has said it would never build such access into its encrypted services or devices, had challenged the order at the UK's Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT). The iPhone maker withdrew its Advanced Data Protection feature for British users in February following the UK order. Users of Apple's iPhones, Macs and other devices can enable the feature to ensure that only they - and not even Apple - can unlock data stored on its cloud. US officials said earlier this year they were examining whether Britain broke a bilateral agreement by demanding that Apple build a backdoor allowing the British government to access backups of data in the company's encrypted cloud storage systems. In a letter dated February 25 to US lawmakers, Gabbard said the US was examining whether the UK government had violated the CLOUD Act, which bars it from issuing demands for the data of US citizens and vice versa. Cybersecurity experts told Reuters that if Apple chose to build a backdoor for a government, that backdoor would eventually be found and exploited by hackers. Apple has sparred with regulators over encryption as far back as 2016 when the US government tried to compel it to build a tool to unlock the iPhone of a suspected extremist.
Techday NZ
2 days ago
- Techday NZ
Exclusive: CIO says AI breaks the cycle of forced ERP upgrades
CIOs are no longer bound to the treadmill of forced ERP upgrades. That was the message from Joe Locandro, Executive Vice President and Global CIO at Rimini Street, who argued that artificial intelligence and third-party support are reshaping the economics and strategy of enterprise software. "We're going to keep our Snowflake data warehouse intact. I'm not putting any more in," Locandro said. "Any other data I need, I just go to the source system. The financial system is always up to date. It's going to be more up to date than whatever I put in a data warehouse." He explained that the rise of agentic AI has changed how companies can work with their systems. "Why do you need to pull all the data into one place if you can get an agent to go every day, every hour, and pick what you need?" he asked. "Technical debt used to mean, if you're three versions out of date, it's not supportable and it hinders innovation. That's no longer true." At Rimini Street, Locandro said, old systems are not liabilities but assets to be preserved and supported. "All these ERPs we support, we patch them, we keep them current, ECC6 for example, all the way to 2040," he explained. Supporting the ageing workforce A key challenge is the loss of specialist knowledge as experienced IT professionals retire. "Those old manufacturing systems are really maintained by my age group in the 60s and beyond," Locandro said. "You've got three or four people in each company who only know it, and they're really critical. It's not about the systems so much as the ageing workforce to support them." To address this, Rimini Street provides custom support alongside its work with standard ERPs. "Now people like me and other CIOs, we have alternatives," Locandro said. "Why don't you self-fund your innovation through third-party support?" Savings are significant, he argued. "For example, in ECC6 the support from the database is usually around about 40 per cent cheaper, and then you move up the stack to managed services and applications. If you had a $2 million bill for maintenance on Oracle, we can get it done for far less," he said. Innovation without compromise Locandro rejected the idea that cost savings come at the expense of innovation. "The beauty is the way AI innovation works nowadays, the agents go through what we call a data fabric layer. It builds up like a data dictionary," he explained. This means AI can connect to disparate systems without requiring costly migrations. "Just as it trolls the internet, it trolls internally," he said. "In the future, CIOs will just get plug-and-play apps for what they need. Payment gateways, CRMs, stock inventory - everything's getting more granular." He likened the shift to the app revolution in consumer technology. "In the old days, there was no such thing as an Apple app. Now look how many apps there are. It's the same thing with enterprise systems," he said. Security and cost pressures Rimini Street has also launched Remedy Protect, a wrapper that secures legacy systems without changing their core. "We've got a smart group of engineers. They're like a special ops company," Locandro said. "When you go to the board and they ask about technical debt, you can say not only is it supported, but security exposure is going down too. It's a double whammy." With corporate IT budgets under intense pressure, cost control is driving decision-making. "My budget couldn't cope with 20 per cent increases on Microsoft licences and 300 per cent increases on VMware," he said. "So I went to Rimini Street as a customer. That's where I got my cost relief and kept my budget flat." The company's global footprint, with centres in Brazil, India, the US and soon Malaysia, supports 24/7 monitoring. "We have a response time of less than 10 minutes for priority issues," Locandro said. "If something goes bang in the night, your internal teams can't answer it in 10 minutes because they're asleep. We're always watching." The vendor squeeze Locandro criticised major ERP vendors for restrictive upgrade policies. "The upgrade is never a customer choice. It's a vendor imperative," he said. "They say 2027 you're unsupported, so you have to upgrade." He pointed to SAP's Rise programme, which requires companies to strip out customisations and surrender perpetual licences. "I've spent 50 million making this system regulatory compliant. Now you're telling me I can't take it across? I've got to strip it and redevelop it?" he said. "Boards see it as a one-way bet. There's no optionality." Even some system integrators, he noted, are partnering with Rimini Street despite conflicting strategies. "They told us, if we introduce you to keep the landscape afloat until the customer's ready, maybe they'll give us the big project later," he said. Choice, not compulsion For Locandro, the bigger picture is about shifting power back to customers. "AI is now breaking the nexus with forced upgrades. The traditional path versus the smart path - that's the paradigm shift," he said. Companies can now decide whether to sweat assets, build new functionality on top, or adopt new modules only when needed. "It's like a banking system. It works fine. Leave it be. If you want new functionality, do what the banks do - put a new mobile app on top. It's cheaper, quicker, and avoids endless audits and regression tests," he explained. He said boards are now weighing IT investments against core business priorities more sharply than ever. "If I had $100 million, would I put it in a plant that needs to produce more, or would I give it to you for an IT system and wait five years?" he asked. Locandro concluded with a warning for software vendors: "I never had a choice before. Now I do. I'm not forced to a vendor timetable or road map anymore. I get choice, and that's the game-changer."
