Pennsylvania lawmaker wants to make Peeps the official state candy
Sen. Lisa Boscola (D-Northampton) says she will soon introduce legislation to designate Peeps as the official state candy.
Peeps — the iconic, colorful marshmallow treat often shaped as chicks or bunnies — have been manufactured in Bethlehem, Pa., since 1953.
Boscola argues that Peeps have become a culturally important American icon and, locally, manufacturing the treat creates hundreds of jobs and supports charitable initiatives.
'Given Pennsylvania's rich confectionery history, it is fitting that we finally honor one of our own with this unique designation,' Boscola said. 'Peeps are not only a symbol of Pennsylvania's well-earned reputation for satisfying candy cravings, but of our imagination and enduring spirit.'
But, there is competition for state candy designation. A bill passed in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives last March would make Hershey's Kisses the official state candy.
Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
India Suspends Duties on Raw Cotton Imports, Benefitting US Exporters
India will be suspending the 11 percent customs duty and agricultural cess on raw cotton imports in a move that is expected to grant some measure of relief to domestic textile and apparel manufacturers grappling with potential revenue loss from higher U.S. tariffs. The exemption, which will take effect from Aug. 19 to Sept. 30, can also be seen as a temporary concession to American exporters who have been pushing for greater market access to the South Asian nation, whose falling cotton yields have lately turned it from a net exporter to a net importer of the fiber. The United States is India's top supplier of cotton. More from Sourcing Journal India and China: US Tariffs Turn Rivals Toward Friendship in Major Geopolitical Shift No Hint of a Slowdown at Arc'teryx Parent Amer Sports Despite Tariff Impacts EU Tech Regulation Could Be Holding Up Final Trade Agreement With U.S. On Aug. 27, the Trump administration's already-high 25 percent tariff on India is poised to double, ostensibly in protest of the country's purchase of Russian oil. The Indian government was already working to address a previous White House complaint about a nearly $46 billion trade deficit by buying more energy and defense equipment from the United States. The escalated rate—and the existential threat it poses to Indian businesses that risk losing orders to rivals in more favorably tariffed geographies, such as Bangladesh and Vietnam—has further complicated matters. The United States has been India's largest overseas destination, accounting for nearly 29 percent of its textile and apparel exports, or nearly $10.3 billion worth, over the past year. Earlier this month, the Global Trade Research Initiative, a New Delhi-based think tank, said that an additional 50 percent duty could lead to a 40-50 percent decline in America-bound shipments. Rakesh Mehra, chairman of the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry, or CITI, has called the tariff a 'huge setback' to India's competitiveness. CITI has also been calling for the removal of the import duty on cotton to help domestic cotton prices be more in line with international ones. 'It is our fervent appeal to the government to urgently take steps to come to the aid of India's textile and apparel sector during these hugely testing times, given the government's strong commitment to increase the competitiveness of local industry and help our companies become major players on the world stage,' Mehra said in a statement. Mehra praised India's recent free trade agreement with the United Kingdom as a 'huge positive for India's textile and apparel domain,' one that could help the country achieve its goal of reaching $100 billion in textile and apparel exports by 2030. He said he hoped to see a similar deal manifest with the United States. 'A well-rounded [bilateral trade agreement] with the U.S., which takes proper care of India's sovereign interests and is also fair and balanced, could be a win-win proposition for both nations,' Mehra added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
9 minutes ago
Immigrants seeking lawful work and citizenship are now subject to 'anti-Americanism' screening
Immigrants seeking a legal pathway to live and work in the United States will now be subject to screening for 'anti-Americanism',' authorities said Tuesday, raising concerns among critics that it gives officers too much leeway in rejecting foreigners based on a subjective judgment. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said officers will now consider whether an applicant for benefits, such as a green card, 'endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused" anti-American, terrorist or antisemitic views. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,' Matthew Tragesser, USCIS spokesman, said in a statement. 'Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right.' It isn't specified what constitutes anti-Americanism and it isn't clear how and when the directive would be applied. 'The message is that the U.S. and immigration agencies are going to be less tolerant of anti-Americanism or antisemitism when making immigration decisions," Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for immigration restrictions, said on Tuesday. Jacobs said the government is being more explicit in the kind of behaviors and practices officers should consider, but emphasized that discretion is still in place. "The agency cannot tell officers that they have to deny — just to consider it as a negative discretion,' she said. Critics worry the policy update will allow for more subjective views of what is considered anti-American and allow an officer's personal bias to cloud his or her judgment. 'For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome," said Jane Lilly Lopez, associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University. The policy changes follow others recently implemented since the start of the Trump administration including social media vetting and the most recent addition of assessing applicants seeking naturalization for 'good moral character'. That will not only consider 'not simply the absence of misconduct' but also factor the applicant's positive attributes and contributions. 'It means you are going to just do a whole lot more work to provide evidence that you meet our standards,' Lopez said. Experts disagree on the constitutionality of the policy involving people who are not U.S. citizens and their freedom of speech. Jacobs, of the Center for Immigration Studies, said First Amendment rights do not extend to people outside the U.S. or who are not U.S. citizens. Ruby Robinson, senior managing attorney with the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, believes the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution protects all people in the United States, regardless of their immigration status, against government encroachment. 'A lot of this administration's activities infringe on constitutional rights and do need to be resolved, ultimately, in courts,' Robinson added. Attorneys are advising clients to adjust their expectations. 'People need to understand that we have a different system today and a lot more things that apply to U.S. citizens are not going to apply to somebody who's trying to enter the United States," said Jaime Diez, an immigration attorney based in Brownsville, Texas. Jonathan Grode, managing partner of Green and Spiegel immigration law firm, said the policy update was not unexpected considering how the Trump administration approaches immigration. 'This is what was elected. They're allowed to interpret the rules the way they want,' Grode said. 'The policy always to them is to shrink the strike zone. The law is still the same.'
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelensky changed his tactics for Trump this time
During Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's visit to the White House on Monday, he spoke with a familiar figure – a right-wing reporter who had famously called out his choice of attire during Zelensky's contentious meeting with US President Donald Trump earlier in the year. This time, however, the tone – and the clothing – was markedly different. 'You look fabulous in that suit,' said Brian Glenn, a pro-Trump pundit who works for MAGA streaming startup Real America's Voice. 'I said the same thing,' Trump remarked, turning to Zelensky and telling him: 'Isn't that nice? That's the one that attacked you last time.' Zelensky, wearing an all-black jacket, shirt and slacks by Ukrainian fashion designer Viktor Anisimov, quipped to the reporter: 'You are in the same suit. I changed, you did not.' It might seem like an innocuous exchange – but Zelensky's change in wardrobe reflects the shift in tactics he's taken in the months since that disastrous meeting in February, when Trump and Vice President JD Vance excoriated the Ukrainian president, calling him disrespectful and ungrateful in front of the world's cameras. The blowout argument in the Oval Office was over various things: the American leaders accused Zelensky of standing in the way of a peace agreement with Russia, while Zelensky expressed disbelief at the notion of diplomacy with the country that had invaded Ukraine. But before all of that, it was about Zelensky's outfit. Since the war began, Zelensky has become known for his military-style shirts, typically in army green or black, and cargo pants. It's the outfit he's worn in the many televised national addresses and speeches he's delivered throughout the conflict – as if to remind his audience they were looking at a wartime leader. Widely regarded as a gesture of solidarity with Ukrainian troops, the outfit has become synonymous with Zelensky. But when he showed up in his usual minimalist garb to the White House in February, Trump was instantly displeased. 'Oh, you're all dressed up,' he remarked sarcastically, as he greeted Zelensky and shook his hand. It felt particularly pointed from Trump – a showman and former television host who has meticulously cultivated his image over the years, from his customary suit and tie to his love of all things gold (a color that now covers the White House, from gold cherubs in the Oval Office to gold figurines on the mantle). Before the Oval Office meeting devolved into a shouting match, Zelensky was asked by the reporter, Glenn, why he was not wearing a suit in the United States' highest office. 'I will wear a costume after this war will finish, yes,' Zelensky said, responding in English. 'Maybe something like yours, yes, maybe something better. I don't know, we will see. Maybe something cheaper. Thank you.' Things went south from there. But almost immediately afterward, Zelensky went into damage control – publicly thanking Trump and the United States for their support of Ukraine, and working to repair his relationship with the president. During subsequent encounters with Trump this year, Zelensky also opted for more formal clothing, including at the Vatican for Pope Francis' funeral and at a NATO summit in the Netherlands, where he wore another suit by Anisimov. He has been coached by some European leaders on how to better approach his counterpart – with many of those leaders showing up on Monday at the White House in a show of Western unity and support. This time around, Zelensky even tailored his gift-giving to reflect Trump's love of golf. He presented Trump with a particularly special club that had been passed on to him by a wounded Ukrainian soldier who lost his leg in the first months of Russia's full-scale invasion, according to Ukraine's presidential office. Ahead of Monday's meeting, US and Ukrainian officials discussed Zelensky's attire – with the understanding he should not arrive wearing his usual military-style clothing, said a European official. The suit still nods to the military, made from army canvas fabric and with patch pockets across the jacket's chest and vents at the back and sleeves, Anisimov said in an email. 'In every piece, there is a reference to the classic suit – a deliberate step away from uniforms and toward a refined, dignified presence, while still remaining true to the wartime reality,' he wrote. It appears the new look has paid off – with even Glenn taking a conciliatory tone after Trump praised Zelensky's outfit. 'I apologize to you,' Glenn said, referring to their February interaction. 'You look wonderful.' This article was updated with further details on the designer of Zelensky's suit.
