
Soaring rice prices are stirring political trouble in Japan
Gaffes are by no means uncommon in Japanese politics. Controversial remarks by one former prime minister, Taro Aso, were routinely followed by retractions – and the ruling Liberal Democratic party (LDP) even distributed a gaffe-prevention manual to its members in 2019.
But amid a severe rice shortage, which has seen prices surge to 90% higher than they were a year ago, Eto's quip was seen by the Japanese public as more than just an offhand comment.
Rice has been a significant part of life in Japan for nearly 3,000 years. This deep connection is reflected in the Japanese word gohan, which means 'cooked rice' but is often used simply to refer to a meal. Rice has also shaped the foundations of Japanese cuisine and farming culture.
Such is the importance of rice to Japanese people that a spike in prices in 1918 led to a nationwide wave of protest. The so-called rice riots forced then-Prime Minister Terauchi Masatake,to resign.
However, despite the grain's obvious importance, Japanese government policy in recent decades has been focused on tightly controlling and regulating the production of rice. It has endeavoured to keep prices high, partly to reward farmers – who are an important support base for the LDP.
This means consumers have paid a premium, contributing to a downward trend in rice consumption alongside other factors such as dietary diversification. By 2022, annual rice consumption in Japan had fallen to 51kg per person, less than half of what it was at its 1962 peak. In this context, the public reaction to Eto's comment was understandable.
Japan's current prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, initially seemed prepared to weather the storm, advising Eto to retract his 'problematic' remarks and remain in his post. But with elections approaching in July and Ishiba's approval rating sinking to a record low of 21%, his administration was left with little choice and Eto ultimately resigned.
The rice crisis has emerged as one of the defining issues of the upcoming election, which will determine whether Ishiba's ruling coalition can secure a majority in the upper house of parliament. Having already lost its majority in the lower house in October 2024, the government may be set for another crushing defeat at the polls.
Japan's rice crisis
A few factors have combined over the past year to cause rice prices to increase unexpectedly. Japan's hottest September in 125 years resulted in poor harvests, while government warnings that a major earthquake off the country's Pacific coast could be imminent triggered panic buying. The agriculture ministry also says that a surge in inbound tourism contributed to a sudden rise in rice consumption.
However, the rice crisis is not fundamentally the result of climate volatility or increased demand. It is the product of decades of self-defeating agricultural policy that has prioritized institutional interests over national food security.
Rice production caps, which were introduced in 1971 to control supply and prices, have never been fully dismantled even as domestic consumption has changed and the farming population decreased. This artificial control of output has left the country ill-prepared for demand surges.
Compounding these issues are entrenched protectionist measures designed to shield small-scale rice farmers through high tariffs and rigid distribution systems. These distortions have prioritized institutional stability and political patronage over food security reform, leaving Japan increasingly vulnerable in an era of climate disruption and supply chain instability.
Having struggled with low wages for years, many sectors of Japan's population are now grappling with inflation. The government has dug into its emergency rice reserves in an attempt to alleviate the problem, but the grain has been slow to reach supermarket shelves. And some farmers, increasingly frustrated by regulations limiting how much rice they can grow, have even organized demonstrations.
Under current conditions, imported rice is becoming an unavoidable fallback. Japan is importing rice from South Korea for the first time in over 25 years, while Japanese tourists are reportedly filling their suitcases with Korean rice – despite deep-seated skepticism toward anything not domestically grown.
Political change looming?
With rice prices soaring and public discontent mounting, this beloved everyday grain is once again at the center of Japanese politics – just as it was more than a century ago during the 1918 rice riots.
Despite the complexities of modern economies, connected to global systems of market exchange, Japanese consumers understand that government policies have played an oversized role in creating the current crisis. It is largely policy that has kept their wages low and failed to rein in inflation.
Consumers are also keenly aware that the LDP's rice policy has worked to protect its critical agricultural support base, a situation strongly reflected in Eto's joke.
As the government scrambles to get its house in order and put more affordable rice back on the table, a deeper reflection of the past seems advisable. Historical precedents, such as the 1918 riots, suggest that strong public distrust of a government's rice policy results in profound political change.
Ming Gao is a research scholar of East Asia studies, Lund University; and Timothy Amos is a senior lecturer in Japanese studies, University of Sydney.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTHK
4 hours ago
- RTHK
Privacy office raps retailers over data breaches
Privacy office raps retailers over data breaches Ada Chung said system breaches often result in the illegal sale of personal data for profit and the use of this information by fraudsters. Photo: RTHK The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data has issued enforcement notices to three retail organisations following cybersecurity incidents that compromised the personal data of more than 130,000 customers and employees. The first breach involved Japanese fashion retailer Adastria, with the office reporting that a hacker used an employee's administrator credentials to access its platforms, which is provided by a third-party vendor, from an unknown overseas IP address, downloading order information and leaking the data of 59,205 Hong Kong customers. The compromised information included names, telephone numbers, and order details. During its investigation, Adastria discovered that the affected data had been disclosed on the Dark Web two months after the incident and was made available for download. Privacy Commissioner Ada Chung said the investigation found deficiencies within the organisation that contributed to the incident, including weak password management, failure to enable multi-factor authentication, insufficient awareness regarding personal data security and a lack of proper security reviews for the retailer's platforms. The other breach involved a server shared by My Jewelry and its parent company, Kwong's Art Jewellery, in which the data of 79,400 individuals were exposed. The compromised records belonged to customers and current and former employees and included highly sensitive information such as names, Hong Kong identity card numbers, dates of birth, telephone numbers, addresses, email addresses, membership numbers and employee commencement dates. Chung said the investigation revealed a hacker had performed a brute-force attack to obtain the credentials of an administrator account, which provided access to the two companies' information systems. Both breaches, she noted, involved retail organisations, which typically hold significant amounts of customer personal data. She noted that such incidents highlight the connection between data breaches and the illegal sale of personal data for profit, as well as the use of this information by fraudsters for various schemes. "In light of escalating cybersecurity threats, organisations should recognise that the personal data in their possession are valuable assets and they should allocate sufficient resources on cybersecurity and data security in order to safeguard the personal data in their possession," Chung said. She called on individuals affected by the data breaches to remain vigilant. "If they receive any unknown calls or unknown emails, they should be careful not to provide their personal data, including in particular, their banking account details, and they should also verify the identity of the caller if they are in doubt," she said. "If they receive any emails with suspicious attachments or links, they should not open the links or the attachments."


RTHK
5 hours ago
- RTHK
CS lauds opening of patriotic education base
CS lauds opening of patriotic education base Eric Chan expressed gratitude to the central government for supporting Hong Kong's national education efforts. Photo: RTHK Chief Secretary Eric Chan said on Thursday that the opening of a patriotic education base for Hong Kong and Macau students in Beijing marks an important milestone for the promotion of national education in the SAR. The facility is inside the Museum of the War of Chinese People's Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, which is located near Marco Polo, or Lugou, Bridge, where the second Sino-Japanese war broke out in 1937. Attending a ceremony to mark the opening of the base, Chan thanked the central government for its long-standing support for the SAR government's promotion of national education. He expressed belief the base would become an important platform in raising patriotic sentiments and the understanding of national history among young people from Hong Kong and Macau. "The history of the war of resistance is the most vivid kind of patriotic education material," Chan said in his speech. "I strongly believe and hope that everyone who visits the museum and the patriotic education base, especially students and teachers from Hong Kong, will experience first hand the awakening of patriotic sentiment." Chan added he hopes visitors can draw strength from the experience to strive for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. Chan went on to say that he looks forward to having more similar patriotic education facilities across the country, adding that would strengthen the national and ethnic identities of young people from Hong Kong and Macau.


AllAfrica
11 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Why President Lee Jae Myung will stop in Tokyo before Washington
Great attention in South Korea is rightfully focused on the high-stakes visit later this month of President Lee Jae Myung to Washington, DC. Worries about the future of alliance relations with the United States are growing, fed by the apparent readiness of President Donald Trump to abandon Ukraine and subordinate relations with Europe to those with Russian President Vladimir Putin. All this, however, also serves to underscore the strategic importance of President Lee's decision to stop in Tokyo on his way to Washington. Aside from the unprecedented decision to visit Japan before the United States, the August 23–24 visit allows the two Asian neighbors and allies of the United States to tightly coordinate their response to the Trump administration. South Korea and Japan face an overlapping set of challenges in managing relations with the United States under the second Trump administration. Both are under pressure to vastly increase defense spending, fork over much larger amounts of money to support US force presence, deal with high tariffs on vital exports such as automobiles and electronics, and subordinate their handling of economic and diplomatic ties with China to the Trump administration's policy. The South Korean government has closely followed the progress – and lack thereof – of Japan's trade and diplomatic talks with the United States. And to a large extent, South Korea's policy responses, from increasing direct investment to easing non-tariff barriers, have mirrored those of Japan. But Lee's upcoming meeting with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in Tokyo implies more than just policy coordination. As the South Korean leader indicated in his Liberation Day speech on August 15, there is a growing emphasis on deepening the bilateral partnership to effectively hedge against the United States' retreat from global leadership and security commitments. Lee avoided the anti-Japanese rhetoric often pushed by previous South Korean progressive administrations. Instead, his sophisticated address took note of the 'polycrisis' facing South Korea – from realigned supply chains, the collapse of the global trade order, industrial and technological transformation and climate change. In that context, he gave special emphasis to the role of the South Korea-Japan relationship: Korea and Japan have achieved industrial development in tandem. As such, we will be able to overcome the challenges of the artificial intelligence era, which is marked by competition to secure a commanding lead, when our two countries pursue future-oriented cooperation based on mutual trust. Guided by the principle of pragmatic, national interest-focused diplomacy, we will seek forward-looking, mutually beneficial cooperation with Japan while holding frequent meetings and frank dialogues through shuttle diplomacy. The stronger the trust, the higher the quality of cooperation. Unlike last year's address by then-President Yoon Suk Yeol, President Lee's speech confronted the thorny issue of history – the painful past of Japanese colonialism and ongoing issues over wartime justice and acknowledgement of South Korean victims of Japanese rule. 'I hope that the Japanese government will squarely face up to our painful history and strive to maintain trust between our two countries,' Lee added in his speech. 'I believe that such efforts will bring greater shared benefits and a brighter future for both sides.' South Korean reactions were broadly supportive, from both conservative and progressive circles, reflecting the popular support for improving South Korea-Japan relations. Ishiba's willingness to acknowledge Japan's wartime past and responsibility is widely known, particularly in contrast to the views of the right-wing faction in his Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). He signaled a desire to utilize the eightieth anniversary of the end of World War II to issue his own statement on the nature and lessons of the war. But leading up to August 15, the Japanese leader was under great pressure from within his own party, particularly following their loss in the July election for Japan's legislative upper house. The right-wing Japanese daily Sankei Shimbun issued a warning to Ishiba on August 11 that he should not express his 'one-sided, masochistic view of history, viewing Japan as the aggressor in the conflict. If the prime minister goes ahead and expresses such views, regardless of the timing or format, it could lend momentum to anti-Japan propaganda by China, South Korea and North Korea and risk injury to Japanese citizens.' Ishiba has tried to maneuver between these pressures and his own desire to draw lessons from Japan's mistakes that led to war. He issued a short address on August 15 at an official memorial ceremony for the war dead. 'Eighty years have now passed since the war ended,' Ishiba said in his address. 'Today, generations with no firsthand experience of war make up the great majority. We must never again repeat the horrors of war. We must never again lose our way. We must now take deeply into our hearts once again our remorse and also the lessons learned from that war.' It marked the first time in thirteen years that a Japanese leader used the word hansei , which is sometimes translated as remorse but can also be understood as self-reflection. In its Japanese usage, it implies not just acknowledging one's mistakes but also pledging to avoid such mistakes in the future. Importantly, it was first used by Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama, the Socialist leader who issued the standard-setting statement in 1994 on the fiftieth anniversary of the war's end, expressing not only 'deep remorse' but also referring to Japan's responsibility for 'aggression and colonial rule.' Ishiba, however, stopped short of repeating those words. While praising his nod toward facing the past, both South Korean and liberal Japanese media faulted him for bowing to pressures and not explicitly confronting history. The Asahi Shimbun pointed to the prime minister's failure to confront the strong opposition within the LDP that seeks to draw a line on any further expressions of 'apology diplomacy.' The contrast between Ishiba and the powerful right-wing LDP elements was made clear on August 15, when prominent leaders of the party, including some vying to replace Ishiba as prime minister, honored Japan's war dead at Yasukuni Shrine. The visitors included members of the Ishiba cabinet, notably Minister of Finance Katsunobu Kato and Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Shinjiro Koizumi. Also visiting were close followers of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, such as Sanae Takaichi, Takayuki Kobayashi and Koichi Hagiuda. Visits by senior officials and political leaders to the shrine evoke memories of Japanese imperialism. In particular, the visit of Koizumi, considered to be the leader of reformist elements of the ruling party, drew comments. His visit 'appeared to reaffirm his alignment with Japan's nationalist right,' said the Korea Times . 'The move drew inevitable comparisons to his father, whose frequent shrine visits during his premiership strained Tokyo's relations with Seoul and Beijing.' The Lee administration was clearly encouraged by Ishiba's statement but also concerned by the Yasukuni visits. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a pro forma statement that 'strongly urges the leaders of Japan to squarely face history and demonstrate through action their humble reflection and sincere remorse for Japan's past history, and stresses that this is an important foundation for the development of future-oriented relations between the two countries based on mutual trust.' Ishiba has opened the possibility that he may issue a fuller and franker statement of his views on September 2, the eightieth anniversary of the signing of Japan's surrender. The right wing continues to raise alarms about this option. But 'Lee's first visit to Tokyo might create a more interesting opportunity' for Ishiba to make his views clear, a senior correspondent at the Asahi Shimbun told this writer. 'Tokyo and Seoul share so much in common in coping with Trump,' the veteran Japanese journalist observed. 'Lee has sealed off his populist approach, and is sending Tokyo multiple signals that the Korean progressive president is ready for a pragmatic and future-oriented relationship. Let's see how it plays out.' It is unlikely the Trump administration is even aware of these developments or understands the importance of this 'Japan First' stopover. It will be watched closely, however, not only in South Korea and Japan but in the broader region. Daniel C. Sneider is a non-resident distinguished fellow at the Korea Economic Institute of America and a lecturer in East Asian Studies at Stanford University. This article, first published by KEI, is republished with permission.