Germany's ex-royals strike deal over family riches – DW – 06/17/2025
An almost century-long dispute in Germany is coming to an end.
The House of Hohenzollern — a German noble family which the last German Emperor, Wilhelm II, also belonged to — had long laid claim to various objects housed in German museums. They had also demanded millions in compensation for expropriated palaces and inventory.
The whole saga went to court — until Georg Friedrich Prince of Prussia, the great-great-grandson of the last German emperor, finally changed the aristocratic house's strategy in 2023. He withdrew the compensation claims and thus cleared the way for out-of-court negotiations. The talks began in late 2024, resulting in the newly-reached agreement.
The new German Minister of State for Culture Wolfram Weimer (CDU) and Georg Friedrich Prince of Prussia had announced the breakthrough back in May 2025.
The federal government and the states of Berlin and Brandenburg had reached an agreement with the former ruling house of Hohenzollern to set up the non-profit "Hohenzollern Art Foundation" to manage the previously reclaimed art and cultural objects.
Now that the supervisory bodies of the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation and the German Historical Museum have also given their approval, the agreement has been signed and sealed.
According to Weimer, the public will be the biggest winner. The collections that include around 3,000 objects will now feature in the German Historical Museum, along with museums run by the Prussian Palaces and Gardens Foundation Berlin-Brandenburg, and the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation.
The new foundation will also manage the inventory — furniture, tableware and paintings — from around 70 palaces, villas and other properties in Berlin and Potsdam that were owned or used by the Hohenzollern family until 1945.
There are also objects belonging to the family that were confiscated as early as 1918, after the end of the monarchy.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
At the end of World War II, Soviet troops conquered the former German territories east of the Elbe River and with them the bulk of the Hohenzollern territories.
The Soviet Union regarded the "Junkers" — the land-owning nobility — as the class enemy and a pillar of the Nazi system. So in 1945, all noble houses in the Soviet occupation zone were expropriated without compensation.
More than four decades later, the Berlin Wall fell and Germany was reunited. From one minute to the next, many former Hohenzollern castles and estates were once again on the Federal Republic's soil.
But the German Unification Treaty in 1990 stated that the land reform of 1945 would not be reversed, meaning the Hohenzollerns had to write off their old properties in the east.
Some 30 years later, the heirs of the last monarch demanded millions in compensation from the German state and the restitution of cultural assets — in vain. So the matter went to court.
This question played a central role in the compensation dispute: Had representatives of the House of Hohenzollern colluded with the National Socialists who ruled Germany between 1933 and 1945? Specifically, had the heirs of the last German Emperor, Wilhelm II, who abdicated in 1918, "significantly supported" National Socialism?
And what role did the son of the last monarch and former Crown Prince Wilhelm of Prussia play between the world wars? Did he help the Nazis come to power in order to re-establish the monarchy?
The so-called "Compensation Act" of 1994, which regulates the compensation of landowners whose property was expropriated in the East in 1945, states that anyone who "significantly aided" Hitler and the Nazis has no right to compensation.
In fact, historical documents prove Wilhelm's ties to Hitler, with photos and films showing the former crown prince with the dictator and other Nazi leaders. However, Wilhelm's hopes that the Nazis would crown him the new emperor were never realized and historians continue to debate Wilhelm's role in the Nazi state.
In their biographies, two German historians Lothar Machtan ("The Crown Prince and the Nazis") and Stephan Malinowski ("The Hohenzollerns and the Nazis") describe the crown prince as a radical anti-democrat who admired Mussolini and sought proximity to Hitler. His mission was to restore the monarchy.
Malinowski and his colleague Peter Brandt concluded that Wilhelm of Prussia's behavior had "considerably aided and abetted" the establishment and consolidation of the National Socialist regime.
In fact, the ex-crown prince called for the election of Hitler in the 1932 German presidential election. He later boasted to Hitler that he had procured him two million votes.
Wilhelm also publicly demonstrated solidarity with the new elites. "The symbolic capital of the Hohenzollerns was very important for the Nazis in 1932/33, even if the crown prince had his own agenda in the process," said Jacco Pekelder, a historian from Münster, in a television interview."
The editors of the anthology "Die Hohenzollerndebatte" (The Hohenzollern Debate), published in 2021, casted their doubt on these fascist ties.
Historian Frank-Lothar Kroll attested to Wilhelm's "rather marginal commitment" to the Nazis. He may have pandered to Hitler, but he did not share his totalitarian ideology.
For decades, hordes of lawyers, politicians and historians dealt with the restitution and compensation claims of the descendants of Wilhelm of Prussia. Now a settlement finally seems to have been reached, and the public could benefit the most.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
8 hours ago
- DW
EU-US deal set to lower car tariffs, no exception for wine – DW – 08/21/2025
Following threats from Washington, the EU agreed to a 15% tariff on most of its exports to the US, including cars. European winemakers, however, are not happy with the trade deal. European Union trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic on Thursday presented a joint EU-US statement outlining a framework trade deal under which some 70% of EU exports face a 15% tariff. "This is a serious, strategic deal, and we are fully behind it. A wide range of sectors, including strategic industries such as cars, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber, stand to benefit," Sefcovic told a press conference in Brussels. The tariff deal was met with both praise and criticism when it was first announced in July. European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said it brought "stability" and "predictability" to transatlantic trade. Conversely, French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said the deal amounted to the EU "resigning itself to submission." The 15% tariff rate could be seen as minor in comparison to the the 30% US President Donald Trump had previously threatened. However, it is still six times higher than the 2.5% that had been in place before Trump returned to the White House in January. The deal also says European Union is expected to purchase $750 billion (€646 million) worth of US liquified natural gas, oil, and nuclear energy products through 2028. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video On European car exports, a sector that is critical specifically to the German economy, the 15% US tariff rate is not over the finish line quite yet. As of now, the US tariff rate for EU cars imported into the US is 27.5%. The US has said it will lower the tariffs on EU cars to 15% after the EU begins a legislative process to facilitate imports of certain US goods. This will include removing EU tariffs on US industrial goods in addition to dismantling barriers to some food imports. According to the deal, the EU will have to lower its restrictions on processed fruits and vegetables, as well as other processed foods from the US. Sefcovic said the Commission was "working very hard" on getting the process completed. The commissioner added that he was assured by his US negotiating counterpart that the lowered rate for cars will apply retroactively from August 1. On Europe's lucrative wine and spirits industry, with exports to the US worth $9 billion in 2024, Sefcovic said the EU "didn't succeed" in getting it exempt from the deal and down to zero tariffs. "But I can tell you that there is clear commitment from the European Commission to put it on the table", Sefcovic said. He added that "doors are not closed forever" on future talks. The EU and the US had previously enjoyed a "zero for zero" tariff regime on wine and spirits and a heavy levy threatens to upend the industry. In March, Trump had threatened a 200% tariff on European wine and spirits. After the Commission admitted it was unable to secure an exemption, the French wine exporters federation said it was "hugely disappointed." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "We are certain that this will create major difficulties for the wines and spirits sector," the head of the wine and spirits federation FEVS Gabriel Picard told the AFP news agency. The Distilled Spirits Council of the United States issued a statement saying "without a permanent return to zero-for-zero tariffs on spirits, American distillers do not have the certainty to plan for future export and job growth without the fear of retaliatory tariffs returning," with the association adding it would petition the Trump administration on an exemption. The EU and the US said document made public Thursday was only "a first step in a process that can be further expanded to cover additional areas."
Local Germany
9 hours ago
- Local Germany
EXPLAINED: What can you buy and when in Bavaria?
The rules around shop opening hours, and which products can be sold at which times, are quite complicated in Germany, and not the least in Bavaria. Here staffed shops have to close from 8pm, but some kiosks are allowed exceptions. Grocery stores are not allowed to open on Sundays, but exceptions can be made for those within a central train station. And the most recent update: potato chips and other salty snacks cannot be sold at kiosks after 8pm . These rules can change from state to state, and often come with a number of seemingly arbitrary exceptions. Bavaria updated its rules this month when the state's new shop closing law ( Ladenschlussgesetz ) took effect on August 1st. So what exactly can you buy and when in the southern Free State? Here's a look at the rules affecting sales in specific types of businesses in Bavaria. Spätis Some late-night kiosks (often called Spätis ) have been able to operate in Bavaria because of a loophole in the shop closing law. Legally, they are neither defined as a retail business or a restaurant and the rules for "mixed businesses" as they are defined, are different. (If a Späti sells alcohol that you can consume on-site then it is subject to the state's Restaurant Act, if it sells bottled beer but does not permit on-site consumption, than it is not.) The bottom line for customers is that Spätis often sell bottled alcohol, but not all of them allow you to drink on the premises. Also the content of what these shops can sell after 8pm is limited. According to the law only "bottled beer, non-alcoholic beverages, tobacco and confectionery" can be sold from then on. So the sale of chips and other salty snacks is effectively banned. READ ALSO: 'Chips-verbot' - Why you can't buy crisps in Bavaria after 8pm A woman stands in front of a kiosk in Schellingstraße with a drink and a bag of chips in her hand. Kiosks in Bavaria are forbidden from selling chips after 8pm. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Felix Hörhager Gas stations Advertisement Gas stations are allowed to be open around the clock, but they are also limited in what they can sell after 8pm. What's allowed here includes: fuel, travel supplies like newspapers, travel reading, food in small quantities, including chips, foreign currencies and spare parts for cars. Pharmacies The Bavarian State Chamber of Pharmacists determines which pharmacy has emergency duty and is open and when. There are no specific limits on what you can buy here to ensure that people can get everything they need immediately, like medicines and other products that are available in a pharmacy. Bakeries Bakeries are an age-old cornerstone of local German economies, and therefore are afforded some exceptions to the rules. Namely they are allowed to open early and partially on Sundays. Bakeries in Bavaria may sell their goods as early as 5:30am on weekdays. On Sundays, bakeries are allowed to be open for three hours. Railway stations This is the tip to know if you ever need groceries on a Sunday: At train stations, stores may also be open beyond regular shop opening hours, including on Sundays and holidays. Note that this doesn't necessarily apply at all railway stations, but is generally the case at major transit hubs and definitely at central train stations ( Hauptbahnhöfe ). This significant exception to the rules is intended to allow travellers to get the essentials they need. Here grocery stores can also stay open later than 8pm. Airports Similar to central train stations, exceptions also apply at airports. Here, everyday goods and gift items may also be sold outside regular opening hours. Advertisement What's changed in the law? Bavaria is actually the last German state to adopt its own closing law. Until now, the state has maintained the rules as set by the federal shops closing act from 1956 – which maintains that shops need to close from 8pm and on Sundays and holidays, among other things. Whereas many other German states have adopted there own shop closing laws to allow shops to stay open to 10pm or later on weekdays, Bavaria's newly adopted law confirms the federal 8pm limit. However, it has also brought a few interesting new exceptions. First, municipalities can now grant permission for shops to stay open until midnight on up to eight working days each year. Presumably this would be to allow shops to stay open during certain festivities or events. Advertisement Also, individual shops can request permission to stay open until midnight on up to four days each year. This would allow a book store to continue selling books during an evening reading event, for example. The other major new exception is made for unstaffed shops, i.e. automated markets or "smart-stores" . Unstaffed supermarkets with a floor space that does not exceed 150 square metres can now stay open 24 hours seven days a week in Bavaria, yes even on Sundays. READ ALSO: 'Smart stores' - The new retail trend disrupting Germany's shop-free Sundays According to the original rules, an exception was made for tourism, excursion and pilgrimage sites which could stay open on up to 40 Sundays and public holidays each year. This rule has been maintained but relaxed slightly, with municipalities being granted more authority to decide where tourism sales are permitted.
DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Central Asian migrants face Russia's cold shoulder – DW – 08/21/2025
Russia draws millions of Central Asian migrant workers every year. But the 2024 attack on Crocus City Hall has sparked xenophobia and now it seems the workers are no longer as welcome. For many residents of central Asian countries, Russia remains the only realistic option to earn a living abroad, given a lack of opportunities back home. A shared language, familiar bureaucracy and established migration networks made this a natural transition following the collapse of the Soviet Union. But is Russia still the safe haven for central Asian migrant workers it once was? Increasingly, the answer seems to be no. From tightened checks to rising xenophobia, migrants from the former Soviet countries say life in Russia has become harder than ever. The turning point came on March 22, 2024, when an attack on Crocus City Hall, a large concert venue near Moscow, killed at least 145 people and injured more than 550. The assault was claimed by ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K), a violent extremist group based in Afghanistan and linked to the extremist "Islamic State" group. The trial involving 19 suspects began on August 4, 2025, in Moscow and is being held behind closed doors. Four individuals, identified as Tajik citizens, were allegedely the gunmen at the event, the other 15 people are charged as accomplices. The attack sparked outrage, feeding anti-migrant sentiment in Russia , with central Asian workers bearing the brunt of public anger. Following the March 2024 attack, Russian authorities began conducting frequent checks on foreign workers from April, scrutinizing their legal status and compliance with migration laws. Minor violations could result in hefty fines or immediate deportation. Many migrants report being stopped on the street for document checks, sometimes for no apparent reason. Even leaving the country briefly could lead to being added to a deportation list without explanation. Since then, in Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other parts of Russia, have introduced bans on migrant workers working in food service, retail, passenger transport and as couriers — the primary sources of employment for immigrants. Over the past year, different types of jobs have been added to the list and employers who violate the bans can be fined large amounts. Deportation rules have been relaxed so that it is easier to send migrants out of the country. Starting in April 2024, Russia conducted large-scale raids targeting "illegal migrants," with the peak in the summer. Over six months, Russian law enforcement detained and expelled around 86,000 foreign citizens, double the number during the same period in 2023, according to Russian human rights organization Memorial. Roughly 17,000 of them were Tajik citizens, compared to 11,000 deported in all of 2023. Some migrants have lost work entirely or have been forced into informal employment. Speaking to DW on the condition of anonymity, one Tajik worker explained, "I used to work in warehouses, drive taxis, and deliver for marketplaces in Russia. I arrived in 2016 after finishing school and found it like a second home, just with more opportunities. The situation has changed abruptly. Now I'm limited to construction. Every day there are new restrictions. It feels like we are no longer wanted here." Nuriya, 23, is finding life in Russia increasingly harsh. "I worked long hours in various low-paid jobs, including at Ozon [a major online retailer], where I went two months without pay," Nuriya, who didn't want to use their full name for privacy reasons, said. "Most of my earnings went to rent and food, leaving almost nothing for my family." Even basic services, like visiting a doctor, were stressful. Through contacts, she moved to Qatar, where she feels more respected and receives her wages on time. With 45% of its GDP coming from Russian remittances in 2024 — the largest proportion anywhere in the world according to the World Bank — Tajikistan is uniquely vulnerable to this kind of pressure. Any tightening of migration rules in Russia threatens not just individual workers but the backbone of Tajikistan's entire economy. Reduced migration and lower remittance flows are expected to slow economic growth, with the World Bank projecting GDP growth to drop from 8.4% in 2024 to 6.5% in 2025. "The large-scale return of labor migrants will inevitably increase unemployment in Tajikistan and strain an already overheated job market," says Maqsud Aripov, a Tajik economist and public policy analyst currently teaching at the Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University in China. "With few employment opportunities available — particularly in rural areas, the influx of returnees will oversupply the labor market, push more people into informal work, and raise the risk of social unrest. This is a big signal for Tajikistan to immediately rethink its migration policy." Aripov Maksud argues that Tajikistan should respond swiftly and comprehensively, focusing on job creation, boosting domestic production, and rethinking its migration flows, as the large-scale return of citizens requires national-level economic and labor planning rather than solely relying on Russia's actions. Parviz Mullodzhanov, a political scientist from Tajikistan, highlights the domestic political dimension behind Russia's tightening of migration policy. He argues that this shift is largely driven by internal political changes and the growing influence of certain populist groups. "The Russian authorities increasingly rely on so-called 'Z-patriots' and nationalists, for whom anti-migrant rhetoric is central. Since these groups are among the most vocal supporters of the war in Ukraine, their political weight has grown, and they are now actively pushing for a complete overhaul of the labor migration system, one that would impose much stricter control over migrants," Mullodzhanov says. However, the expert notes, moving to such a model would likely require the introduction of a visa regime with central Asian countries, something Moscow cannot afford for geopolitical reasons. "While both sides would suffer from such restrictions, in the long run Russia stands to lose more. Cutting labor migration would increase social tensions and risks of instability in central Asia. On the other hand, it could ultimately reduce Moscow's leverage in the region, leaving Russia at risk of losing influence over central Asian states." Mullodzhanov concluded.
