
Democrats eager for Cooper Senate bid in North Carolina
Democrats are eager to see former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) jump into the Tar Heel State's Senate race next year, seeing him as the most formidable challenger to Sen. Thom Tillis (R).
Cooper said at the conclusion of his second term as governor that he would look at running for Senate as one of several options ahead of him, and speculation of him getting into the race has only risen since then, with the head of Senate Democrats' campaign arm reportedly praising him to donors.
A popular two-term governor of the purple state, Cooper would bring name ID to a race in a state where Democrats haven't held a Senate seat in a decade and that President Trump won by 3 points in 2024.
'If Roy Cooper decides to run, it would really make the race one of the most competitive races in the country next year, could be the most of any Senate race in the country,' said Democratic strategist Doug Wilson.
Tillis won reelection in 2020 with a less than 2-point edge in what was the most expensive Senate race in the country that year. Higher up on the ballot, Trump narrowly beat former President Biden in the battleground.
This cycle, Tillis is on track to be one of the most vulnerable Senate incumbents, facing potentially tough competition from both sides of the aisle. He was among several Republican incumbents who faced pressure from the right over Trump's controversial Cabinet nominees — and, now that he's voted to confirm them, Democrats see a more promising pickup opportunity.
A March report from the left-leaning Public Policy Polling found Tillis with a dismal approval rating of 25 percent, compared to a 48 percent approval rating for Trump. And the Republican was trailing Cooper in a hypothetical Senate match-up, 47 percent to 43 percent.
A December poll from the Florida-based firm Victory Insights found Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law, would 'likely crush' Tillis in a GOP primary, though she hasn't expressed formal interest in the role. In a head-to-head with Cooper, Tillis trailed by 1 point.
The map of Senate seats up for grabs in 2026 also will send more eyes to Tillis. Democrats have relatively few serious pickup opportunities next year, making the North Carolina race, along with the one in Maine for Sen. Susan Collins's (R) seat, key to Democratic hopes of cutting into the 53-seat Republican Senate majority.
The Cook Political Report rates the race as 'lean Republican' but notes Cooper is 'Democrats' dream candidate to challenge Sen. Thom Tillis, and were he to run, Tillis would immediately become the most endangered GOP incumbent of the cycle.'
Democrats acknowledged the difficulty Cooper could face in the race. Wilson noted voters in the state recently have tended to vote Republican for federal offices and Democratic for state-level offices.
The Tar Heel State has gone red in every presidential race since 2012, and both its Senate seats have been held by the GOP since Tillis won his first term in 2014.
But Cooper narrowly ousted then-incumbent Gov. Pat McCrory (R) in a tight 2016 race that took a month to call and has become a bright spot for Democrats in the battleground. He bested his Trump-endorsed Republican challenger in 2020 by more than 4 points and, in a sign of his potency in the party, he was floated in the veepstakes to join former Vice President Kamala Harris on the 2024 White House ticket.
He withdrew himself from consideration, though, contending it was 'just not the right time for me or my state.' Now that he's left office, Cooper is set to start an eight-week teaching job at the Harvard School of Public Health in late March.
Wilson pointed to former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan's (R) unsuccessful run for Senate against Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D) last year despite being a widely popular governor in a blue state. But North Carolina is a much more competitive state.
'If anybody could do it, I think [Cooper] would have a good shot,' he said.
Aimy Steele, a former Democratic North Carolina state House candidate who runs the New North Carolina Project, which works to drive Black and brown voter turnout, said she would expect boosted turnout from minority voters based on Cooper's record as governor.
'He's someone that everyone can see themselves supporting not only Black and brown people, but also white people, people who are just a diverse background, regardless of their race,' she said.
Cooper performed particularly well with Black voters in his 2020 reelection campaign, winning 92 percent of their votes, according to a CNN exit poll.
Cynthia Wallace, who leads a nonprofit working to boost rural turnout called the New Rural Project, noted that Cooper is originally from a rural area and demonstrated an 'authentic' connection to rural voters despite Democrats' base of support typically being in cities.
'I don't hear a lot of negative commentary about him out in the countryside,' she said.
North Carolina Republican strategist Jim Blaine took issue with the recent PPP polling showing Cooper ahead of the incumbent, pointing out past criticism of the pollster.
'Tillis' numbers aren't great but, considering the source, are far from fatal,' Blaine said on the social platform X.
The race 'would be tied if Tillis had the level of support with the GOP that Cooper is getting from Dems,' he added, arguing the Republican could get there with another endorsement from Trump, who backed Tillis in the 2020 cycle.
If Cooper doesn't run, Democrats could have another option in former Rep. Wiley Nickel (D-N.C.), who won his House seat in a tight 2022 race.
But after new congressional maps threatened a handful of the state's House Democrats, Nickel decided against seeking reelection and floated a future Senate run.
2024 Election Coverage
Sabato's Crystal Ball said in an analysis last month that Nickel 'would seem to have a head start' in 'a Cooper-less Democratic primary.' The election handicapper rated the race as one of just three 2026 Senate toss-ups.
But if the former governor does get in, he likely 'clears the field,' said Jason Roberts, a professor of political science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. And while Cooper isn't necessarily Democrats' only chance of a flip, Roberts added, he could be their best.
'He's a very formidable candidate if he decides to run. It seems like he's going to run, and I think that sets up a blockbuster race.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nancy Mace said 'due process is for citizens.' Here's who it's really for
In early June 2025, Republican U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina wrote an X post (archived) that read: "Due process is for citizens." Her comment had been viewed more than 2.4 million times as of this writing and had amassed more than 6,500 likes. The same claim has appeared in multiple X posts. In a similar tone, in May 2025, another X user wrote: "Due process is for citizens, not invaders." (X user @NancyMace) In short, due process is the legal principle that the government must follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty or property. It serves as a safeguard against arbitrary actions by the state, ensuring that people are treated justly under the law. For a more detailed explanation, see our full breakdown in this article on former President Bill Clinton's 1996 immigration law. While Mace's post did not explicitly say that due process protections are, or should be, limited to only U.S. citizens, her replies below the post reinforced that interpretation. However, the U.S. Constitution protects all "persons," not just citizens, under the due-process clauses of the Fifth and 14th amendments. The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that these protections apply to anyone physically present in the United States regardless of citizenship or immigration status. An MSNBC article on the topic similarly concluded that Mace's "implication … that noncitizens don't get that protection" was "incorrect." The South Carolina representative doubled down on her stance in the replies below her post, suggesting that noncitizens should not be entitled to due-process protections in the U.S. For example, when one X user wrote, "The Constitution doesn't say 'only citizens.' Due process applies to persons — that includes non-citizens. That's settled law," Mace replied by saying: "Skip due process coming in, don't expect it going out. Citizens first!" Other replies further suggested she believed only U.S. citizens should be entitled to such protections (archived, archived, archived). (X users @FJBIDEN_22 and @NancyMace) These exchanges were not the first time Mace commented on due process. In late May 2025, she weighed in on the principle in response to a federal judge's decision to block the deportation of eight noncitizens convicted of violent crimes. The day before U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued a 17-page order in which he emphasized that "the Court recognizes that the class members at issue here have criminal histories. But that does not change due process," Mace criticized the ruling, telling Fox News (archived): "They didn't want due process on their way in illegally, they shouldn't get due process on their way out." However, the representative's comments about due process contradicted remarks she made about the principle in the past. In February 2023, Mace wrote on X (archived): "Everyone deserves the right to due process. Even those we vehemently oppose." (X user @NancyMace) Snopes has reached out to Mace for comment on whether she maintains that due-process protections should apply only to U.S. citizens and how she reconciles that view with her 2023 statement. We will update this article if we receive a response. The U.S. Constitution's guarantee of due process appears in the Fifth and 14th amendments, both of which state that no person should be deprived "of life, liberty or property, without due process of law." As shown, the language uses "person," not "citizen," with regard to due-process protections. Further, the Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted that due-process protections apply to everyone within U.S. borders regardless of citizenship or immigration status. In Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel Mezei (1953) the Court emphasized (Page 212) that "aliens who have once passed through [U.S.] gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness-encompassed in due process of law." Similarly, in cases such as Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) and earlier decisions dating back more than a century, the Supreme Court made clear that the government cannot detain or deport people arbitrarily. In the 2001 case, the Court underscored that "the Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent." In simple words, noncitizens must be given fair procedures, such as notice or a "credible fear interview," before being deprived of their liberty. The Supreme Court expressed the same view in the case of Reno v. Flores (1993), stating: "It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings." This was not the first time Snopes addressed a claim regarding Mace. For instance, in late May 2025, we investigated a rumor that she ordered staffers to create burner accounts to promote her online. Meanwhile, earlier in June 2025, we also fact-checked a rumor about whether the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, signed by Clinton, allowed deportation without due process. "327K Views · 15K Reactions | Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) Responds to Arguments That Illegal Immigrants Convicted of Heinous Crimes Deserve Due Process after a Judge Blocks a Deportation Flight to South Sudan | 'They Didn't Want Due Process on Their Way in Illegally, They Shouldn't Get Due Process on Their Way Out.' Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) Responds to Arguments... | by Fox News | Facebook." 2022, Accessed 6 June 2025. "U.S. Constitution - Fifth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | | Library of Congress." 15 Dec. 1791, Constitution Annotated. "U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | | Library of Congress." 9 July 1868, Deng, Grace. "Did Nancy Mace Order Staffers to Create Burner Accounts to Promote Her Online? Here's What We Know." Snopes, 30 May 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. Dunbar, Marina. "Court Halts Trump Administration's Effort to Send Eight Men to South Sudan." The Guardian, The Guardian, 23 May 2025, Gabbatt, Adam. "Group Stranded with Ice in Djibouti Shipping Container after Removal from US." The Guardian, The Guardian, 6 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. " 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. "Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)." Justia Law, Rubin, Jordan. "Due Process Is Not Limited to Citizens, Contrary to Nancy Mace's Claim." MSNBC, 4 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. Wrona, Aleksandra. "Bill Clinton Did Not Sign Law in 1996 Allowing Deportation without Due Process." Snopes, 5 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. "Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)." Justia Law,
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Majority of Democrats give thumbs-down to their leaders in Congress
Most Democrats disapprove of how their party's lawmakers in Congress are handling their jobs, according to a new national poll. Fifty-three percent of Democrats questioned in a Quinnipiac University survey released Wednesday gave their party's congressional members a thumbs-down, while 41% approved of their performance. According to the poll, conducted June 5-8, just 21% of all voters approved of the way Democrats in Congress were handing their jobs, with seven in ten disapproving. Head Here For The Latest Fox News Polling The 21% approval is the same as in Quinnipiac's February national poll, matching "an all-time low since Quinnipiac University first asked this question of registered voters in March 2009." The survey indicates 79% of GOP voters approve of the way congressional Republicans are handling their job, with 13% disapproving. Read On The Fox News App Where Trump Stands In Fox News Polling 100 Days Into His Second Term Among all voters, 32% approved of how GOP congressional members were performing their duties, while just over six in ten disapproved. Overall approval for Republicans in Congress has dropped eight points since Quinnipiac's February poll, with disapproval jumping nine points. The Democratic Party has been in the political wilderness since November's elections, when Republicans won back control of the White House and the Senate and defended their fragile House majority. And Republicans made gains among Black, Hispanic and younger voters, all traditional members of the Democratic Party's base. Since President Donald Trump's return to power earlier this year, an increasingly energized base of Democrats is urging party leaders to take a stronger stand in pushing back against the president's sweeping and controversial agenda during the opening months of his second administration. And their anger is directed not only at Republicans, but at Democrats they feel aren't vocal enough in their opposition to Trump. And that's fueled a plunge in the Democratic Party's favorable ratings, which have hit historic lows in several surveys the past couple of months. The new poll from Quinnipiac also indicates a decline in Trump's approval ratings among voters nationwide. Thirty-eight percent of those questioned in the survey said they approve of the way the president is handling his duties, down three points from Quinnipiac's early April poll. Fifty-four percent in the new poll gave Trump a thumbs-down for his handling of his job as president, down one point from the April survey. Trump's approval ratings were mostly above water as he returned to the White House in late January, but his numbers soon slid underwater in many national surveys and remain in negative territory nearly five months into his second article source: Poll: Majority of Democrats give thumbs-down to their leaders in Congress
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senator Markey announces plans to file amendment on AI regulation
BOSTON (WWLP) – State Senator Ed Markey (D-Mass.) has announced that he intends to file an amendment on AI regulation. Senator Markey said he plans to file an amendment to the Senate reconciliation bill to block Republicans' attempt to prevent states from regulating AI in the next ten years. Senators in both parties have expressed an interest in regulating artificial intelligence. Car dealership aids relief at Baystate Children's Hospital 'Despite the overwhelming opposition to their plan to block states from regulating artificial intelligence for the next decade, Republicans are refusing to back down on this irresponsible and short-sighted provision,' said Senator Markey. Last Tuesday, the senator delivered remarks on the Senate floor opposing the reconciliation bill passed in the House. He also took part in a virtual roundtable last week with advocates to discuss the ban's impact on communities throughout the United States. 'I plan to file an amendment to strip this dangerous provision from Republicans' 'Big Beautiful Bill,'' Markey said. 'Republicans should be prepared to vote on this outrageous policy and explain to their constituents why they are preventing their state leaders from responding to the harms caused by this new and evolving technology.' WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.