Reebok Nano X5 review: I'm a personal trainer, and these are my go-to gym trainers
What is the Reebok Nano X5 sneaker?
The Reebok Nano line has been a strong contender in the training shoe market for years now. The latest Nano, which launched in January 2025, is the 15th iteration and continues to compete with the best gym trainers available.
Priced at £125, the Nano X5 sits at the upper end of the market, costing more than highly rated models like the Adidas Dropset 3 and Puma PWR Hybrid.
As a PT and gym-goer, I've been a fan of Reebok Nanos for years. They have been a consistent choice for a range of gym-based workouts. The Reebok Nano X5 includes high-spec features such as the DualResponse EVA midsole, a breathable Flexweave upper and a versatile 7mm heel drop. On paper, they are fantastic.
JUMP TO:
How we test gym trainers
I tested the Nano X5 across a range of gym workouts. Unlike running shoes, gym trainers must work for weightlifting, dynamic activities like HIIT and, in some cases, short treadmill runs.
Versatility was one of my five testing metrics. I used the trainers for varied movements to see how they performed.
To assess stability, I wore them while squatting up to my maximum weight of 65kg, checking for balance. I also tested stability during single-leg exercises under load, such as weighted lunges and step-ups.
Comfort and fit were next. Shoes that pinch or rub can ruin a session. To test the shoes' durability after a few weeks of wear, I inspected the gym trainers' upper, midsole and outsole for signs of breakdown.
Finally, I checked traction and grip by doing plyometric exercises such as squat jumps and lunges on different surfaces, from a lifting platform to a gym mat.
Why you can trust Telegraph Recommended
Our thorough, real-world tests will always help you find the best product. No manufacturer ever sees Telegraph Recommended reviews before publication and we don't accept payment in exchange for favourable reviews, nor do we allow brands to pay for placement in our articles.
From running shoes to exercise bikes, all reviews are based on independent expert opinion and our hands-on testing. Visit our Who We Are page to learn more.
Stability
Score: 10/10
The Reebok Nano X5 deserves full marks for stability as I felt secure and balanced throughout all of my workouts while wearing them. The heel uses a firm foam compound that support heavy lifts while staying responsive, so box jumps and other fast-paced moves felt secure and controlled without making my legs feel heavy.
The roomy toe box allows for natural toe splay, offering even more stability for lifts. I also noticed that the forefoot has plenty of flexibility, making it comfortable for dynamic moves like lunges and burpees. The same goes for the sole of the shoe.
In a nutshell, the Reebok Nano X5s strike a great balance between structure, stability and freedom of movement.
Versatility
Score: 8/10
Thanks to the Reebok Nano X5's stable yet flexible sole and upper, they perform well across a wide range of exercises. Weightlifting, HIIT workouts, gym classes and jumping drills all felt comfortable and supported.
These are also good for seated cardio workouts, such as the rowing machine or exercise bike. For running, I would recommend a dedicated pair of running shoes. While the Reebok Nano X5 handles short runs, such as treadmill intervals within a mixed workout, it lacks the bounce needed for longer distances.
Durability
Score: 9/10
As a long-time Reebok Nano fan, I have always found the shoes to last well. The Nano X5 is no different. After several sessions, they still looked almost as fresh as the day they came out of the box.
Aside from a few minor scuffs, the upper, midsole and outsole showed no signs of wear, and the sole continued to provide study support during weightlifting sessions.
The flexible forefoot area showed minimal creasing, and the toe box remained intact. Some trainers develop visible wear around the toe, but the Reebok Nano X5 stayed in excellent condition even after HIIT workouts and short runs.
Fit and comfort
Score: 10/10
The trainers have enough cushioning to stay comfortable while maintaining the grounded, stable feel needed for strength training.
I never felt pinching or rubbing, and my heel and toes didn't hurt during and after wear. They also felt fine for a short treadmill run, though I expect they could become uncomfortable over longer distances due to the firm sole, which offers limited protection.
Fits runs slightly large. I usually wear a 6.5, but could have gone down half a size, so keep that in mind when ordering.
Traction and grip
Score: 10/10
I have no complaints about the Reebok Nano X5's traction and grip, and by now it should be clear why they earned the Best Buy award in our gym trainer round-up.
I wore these trainers on various surfaces and always had a secure grip with no slipping. Even during single leg moves, which can feel unsteady, the sole held firm. Side-to-side movements such as lateral shuffles also felt stable and controlled.
Technical specifications
The Reebok Nano X5 may have been awarded our Best Buy award, but the Rad One V2 is a firm competitor thanks to a solid, sturdy sole and comfortable fit.
Should you buy the Reebok Nano X5 sneakers?
Extending my all-action testing period has only strengthened my belief that the Reebok Nano X5 is the best gym trainer you can get right now. It's a superb all-rounder, with excellent stability for weightlifting, enough flexibility for jumps and perfectly honed fit and comfort.
Yes, if:
You want a shoe you can wear for intense weightlifting and HIIT workouts
You're after durability and a shoe that lasts
You like to vary your gym activities and need a shoe to suit
No, if:
You spend most of your gym time on the treadmill
You prefer a bouncier sole
You're looking for a budget model
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Is mass surveillance the way forward to police society?
Most sources suggest that Britain, in terms of CCTV cameras and coverage per head in cities, is one of the most surveilled nations in the world, albeit coming some way behind China, where it seems to be even more routine. The trend towards 'snooping' on British folk seems to be accelerating. More live facial recognition vans are to be deployed across seven police forces in England in a mass-surveillance trial. The aim is to identify and locate suspects in some of the crimes that most worry the public, such as sexual offences, violent assaults and murder. Ticket touts are also targets. Crime is a major concern among voters, but so are their civil liberties... How will it work? Quite passively, as has been the case for some years. Just like in films, the police can place vans in crowded places such as high streets and automatically scan the faces of people walking past, checking them against a databank of images of wanted people. If it relies on busy officers spooling through hours of footage, it might not always be worth the effort; they have enough trouble at present trying to find shoplifters. Does it work? Yes. There have been many successes over the years, though it obviously works best in the big cities, where it operates like a fishing boat trawling for a catch. Ministers say that in London over the past year, facial recognition technology has helped to secure 580 arrests, including the detention of 52 registered sex offenders who breached their conditions. At a time of shrivelled police budgets, a shortage of officers and concerns about 'lawless Britain' (it isn't, by the way), facial recognition harnessed to AI could transform police productivity – and cut crime. It could quite conceivably lower the risk of mass murder through terrorism, for example, which tends to take place in urban centres. Win-win? Not quite. There are practical problems. The software can make mistakes, leading to embarrassment for innocent parties. Twins don't like it, for obvious reasons. The system can't work if people change their appearance or wear a face-covering, and if villains steer clear of the big cities. People wearing face-coverings for religious or health reasons could be stigmatised as 'camera dodgers'. What about the human right to a private life? Quite. One glaring issue is that there is no legislation covering this area of police work, and no national debate has taken place about the creeping ubiquity of various types of surveillance – online as well as on the streets. Parliament does need to create some kind of framework, and one that is consistent with existing laws and international commitments on human rights. So are we becoming a 'big brother' society? With 5 million CCTV cameras, plus an unknown number in offices, plus dashcams in cars and doorbell cameras, the British can hardly cough without it being captured in high definition. Civil liberties groups claim that the UK is becoming a 'big brother society', a 'surveillance state' where privacy is at risk. There's certainly the possibility of a 'Coldplay moment', where someone having an affair is caught on camera and the evidence finds its way into the public domain. Former health secretary Matt Hancock springs to mind. Plenty more risks like that... What does the government say? Dame Diana Johnson, the minister responsible, pleads that it is 'a powerful tool for policing' and will only be used in 'a very measured, proportionate way' to find individuals suspected of serious offences. But there's dissent. Shami Chakrabarti, who served as shadow attorney general under Jeremy Corbyn, says the technology is 'incredibly intrusive', remarking: 'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society.' Some would indeed. And the opposition? Well, the present shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, in his role as a Home Office minister a few years ago, oversaw a substantial increase in CCTV use. In October 2023, for example, he suggested that police force leaders in England and Wales should aim to exceed 200,000 searches of still images against the police national database. Predictably, Nigel Farage, despite his summer crime campaign (to clarify, a campaign against crime), simply declared that he 'doesn't want to live in China'.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Professional hacker reveals it takes just 3 MINUTES for cyber criminals to find your password online – is yours safe?
A PROFESSIONAL ethical hacker has revealed how easy it is for cybercriminals to find someone's password online, often taking less than three minutes. Brandyn Murtagh, who uses his skills to help businesses fix and resolve their online vulnerabilities, stunned volunteers during a security assessment by using only publicly available data breaches to find their passwords – including ones being used today. 2 He also revealed personal data including their address, phone number and even places they've recently visited, all information that criminals could look to use to access their other accounts online or defraud them. After successfully revealing the passwords, he then worked with them to safeguard their accounts and offered up his key tips - never re-use the same password, use a minimum of 14 characters and random phrases – and always implement two-factor authentication where possible. Brandyn has been recruited by Virgin Media O2, to help get Brits password secure this summer, after research from the company has revealed more than one in 20 Brits have used the word 'password' as a password. The poll of 2,000 adults also revealed the same number (seven per cent) have also used 'password1' as a login. Murray Mackenzie, director of fraud prevention at the brand said: 'We're seeing a trend where, despite people worrying about online threats, weak and short passwords are putting them at risk. 'That's why we're lifting the lid on how easy it is for cybercriminals with the right know-how to get their hands on your data and passwords online - and providing quick, simple steps to help people protect themselves.' Other particularly basic options to have been used included number combinations such as 123456 and 123456789. Overall, six in 10 adults still admit to using basic passwords online – despite the threat of being scammed higher than ever. While 45 per cent try to hang onto the same old combinations they've always used, despite knowing they shouldn't. With 11 per cent even believing there's no issue sticking to their predictable choices. It also emerged 32 per cent stick to children or pet names as passwords – with 14 per cent even including their own date of birth. The study also found 27 per cent have never changed the password for an email account and 35 per cent haven't bothered refreshing a combination for their bank account. And while 25 per cent use a password manager to help them remember the details, 22 per cent write them down somewhere. Ironically, the main reason for not using a manager for 29 per cent was they're afraid of being locked out. Of the 37 per cent who have been compromised online, 26 per cent only eventually get round to updating it to something else. With the job of changing passwords seen as a worse task than untangling a drawer of charging cables (15 per cent), sitting through a three-hour meeting that could've been in an email (nine per cent) or standing on a plug with bare feet (six per cent). It also emerged that while Boomers are more vigilant than Gen Z when it comes to keeping their accounts safe. Just 20 per cent of the older generation, polled via OnePoll admit to having an easy to guess password, whereas 43 per cent of Gen Zs do. Murray Mackenzie, Virgin Media O2's spokesperson added: 'We're working tirelessly to keep customers safe from cybercriminals – blocking millions of fraudulent texts, malware and spyware, and flagging harmful websites and suspicious calls.' 'But with bad actors stopping at nothing to access your accounts, we all need to take action to stay safe online from fraud. 'That starts with using strong, unique passwords - especially for your email, phone, social media, and online banking.'
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Rolls-Royce aims to become UK's biggest company by market value
Rolls-Royce, Britain's engineering champion, is chasing a target of becoming the country's largest company by market value. The company's chief executive Tufan Erginbilgic said that that could be achieved by a take-off in demand for small modular nuclear reactors for local power stations being commissioned to build to secure the nation's energy sovereignty. The ambition of Erginbilgic, who took over at the Derby-based group in 2023, would need to see Rolls-Royce nearly double its market capitalisation to overtake AstraZeneca, the pharmaceuticals group worth just shy of £172 billion. Rolls-Royce's market capitalisation is £92 billion. If it is to claim the scalp, Rolls-Royce would need to pass several other colossi of the UK corporate scene on the way: HSBC, Europe's biggest bank, is valued on the stock market at £163 billion, oil and gas major Shell has a value of £155 billion and Unilever, the consumer goods group, is at £110 billion. British American Tobacco currently remains marginally ahead of Rolls-Royce at £93 billion. Erginbilgic said Rolls-Royce has the 'potential' to become top dog because of its pivot into civil nuclear, using its technology developed for Britain's nuclear submarine fleet to build out local power stations with small modular reactors (SMRs). It has already signed deals with the UK and Czech governments. 'There is no private company in the world with the nuclear capability we have,' Erginbilgic told the BBC. 'If we are not market leader globally, we did something wrong.' He said Rolls-Royce is chasing a $1 trillion-plus market in SMRs which he reckons will see 400 of them installed worldwide by 2050 at a current cost of £2.2 billion apiece. The Rolls-Royce boss said the need for SMR installations is becoming particularly acute because of the need to power the data centres that will facilitate mass adoption of artificial intelligence. Rolls-Royce shares have already risen tenfold since Erginbilgic took over in January 2023 with the stock rising from 93p to the current £10.82. The chief executive famously called the company a 'burning platform' when he arrived and set about turbocharging the reforms of the company begun under his predecessor Warren East, who had weathered the Covid-19 crisis. Other storms have swept the business, including record fines for bribery and corruption across five continents; and billions of pounds to repair design and durability issues with the Trent 1000 engines for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Erginbilgic swept out much of the previous management and set about creating a regime in which the company would refuse to accept second best on pricing power for its engines for Boeing, Airbus and business jets, or on manufacturing efficiency. Since he took over Erginbilgic has seen Rolls-Royce overtake in market capitalisation terms the likes of his old oil and gas employer BP, fellow defence company BAE Systems, Barclays bank and Rio Tinto the miner.
