10 Must-Watch Action Movies on Amazon Prime Video Right Now (June 2025)
Ready to start throwing punches? Maybe you're yearning for an explosion or a death-defying stunt?
If you're a (theatrical) adrenaline junkie, then you need to choose a streaming service that has an extensive library of action movies.
Watch With Us recommends you check out Amazon Prime Video.
In June, we're highlighting some of the classic, groundbreaking movies that have been added to the platform, including one of Tom Cruise's most memorable roles and a 1988 flick starring Bruce Willis that completely changed the game. Buckle your seatbelt, because the action is about to begin.
Need more recommendations? Then check out the Best New Movies on Netflix, (HBO) Max, Hulu, Amazon Prime and More, the Best Movies on Amazon Prime Video Right Now, the Best Rom-Com Movies on Netflix Right Now and the 4 Underrated Movies on Netflix in April 2025.Pete "Maverick" Mitchell (Tom Cruise) is a cocky Navy pilot with a chip on his shoulder and something to prove. He and his radar intercept officer, Lieutenant Nick "Goose" Bradshaw (Anthony Edwards), get the chance to attend the elite Navy Fighter Weapons School, known as "Top Gun." Together, Maverick and Goose compete to be the best in a class of (equally cocky) pilots, including Lieutenant Tom "Iceman" Kazansky (Val Kilmer). Rivalry, romance, and action rule the day in this high-octane film. Filled with gripping aerial combat sequences, the story captures Maverick's journey of personal growth, camaraderie, and facing the ultimate challenges in the sky, making it a thrilling experience for viewers.
In addition to incredible action sequences, Top Gun features a killer soundtrack, including Kenny Loggins' "Danger Zone" and the Oscar-winning "Take My Breath Away" by Berlin. It's a staple for action fans everywhere.
Bruce Willis' 1988 action movie (which also doubles as a Christmas movie, for when that season comes around) is one of his most beloved, and with good reason. Directed by John McTiernan and based on a novel by Roderick Thorp, the film follows NYPD detective John McClane (Willis), who becomes embroiled in a terrorist takeover of Nakatomi Plaza in Los Angeles during a Christmas party. As the terrorists, led by the charismatic and ruthless Hans Gruber (Alan Rickman), take hostages and orchestrate their plan, McClane uses his wit, tenacity, and cunning to thwart their efforts single-handedly.
It's one (relatively) ordinary man against a powerful terrorist organization in this groundbreaking thriller, and McClane takes plenty of hits as he attempts to save the civilians. But his resilience and determination to beat the odds are what make him such an exciting protagonist. Die Hard blends suspense, comedy ("Welcome to the party, pal") and explosive action. Willis performed many of his own stunts in this thrilling movie, so if you're a fan of the actor, don't miss him in the role he's still best remembered for.
Among the James Bond movies, Spectre is an anomaly. It's not quite as beloved as Casino Royale or Skyfall, but it's not nearly as divisive as Quantum of Solace or No Time to Die. Instead, it's just very good — a Bond movie that's fun and a bit funny, with Craig channeling Roger Moore instead of Jason Bourne.
After getting kicked out of MI6 for not following orders, Bond goes on a mission to infiltrate a secret terrorist organization known only as Spectre. But the secrets that Bond uncovers may be too big for even him, and he'll need the help of his old spy pals Q (Ben Whishaw), Monneypenny (Naomie Harris) and a new M (Ralph Fiennes, taking over from Judi Dench) to stop Spectre and its mysterious leader, Blofeld (Christoph Waltz), from taking over the world.
The Mission: Impossible franchise is almost 30 years old, and each subsequent entry still can't match the original's irresistible combination of paranoid thriller and action spectacle. The Brian De Palma-directed movie remains the series' best due to a stacked international cast, still-impressive special effects and a fun story that doesn't make a lick of sense.
After most of his team is killed during a botched mission and all the blame is pinned on him, Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) goes into hiding and recruits other disreputable spies to help him clear his tarnished name. That's easier said than done, as whoever engineered the plot to frame Ethan also wants him dead. Can Ethan's rogue IMF team find the culprit and restore his reputation?
Any reputable action movie list has to have a Liam Neeson film, and fortunately, In the Land of Saints and Sinners is one of the actor's best. Neeson stars as Finbar Murphy, a veteran contract killer who is looking to quit. His retirement is on hold when he discovers that a young girl in his Irish village is being sexually abused by her uncle. He kills him, but that man belonged to the IRA and one of its leaders, Doireanne (Kerry Condon), doesn't like it when someone kills one of her boys.
In the Land of Saints and Sinners could've been a cheesy Assassins knockoff, but because it's set during the Troubles, the film has a more serious tone than its action movie brethren. Finbar loathes what he's done for a living, and Neeson expertly conveys the man's disgust with himself and others like him.
After seeing his village burned down and his mother killed by corrupt police chief Rana (Sikandar Kher), Kid (Jatin Malik as Young Kid, Dev Patel as the older version) vows revenge. Years later, Kid works as an underground fighter to get closer to Rana, but after his failed assassination attempt, he'll have to ally himself with the criminal underworld to avenge his mother and stop Rana for good.
Although Monkey Man's plot is your stock revenge tale, the film's visual style and on-location shooting in Indonesia sets it apart from the others. The movie embraces vibrant color and loud, thumping beats, and Patel, who also cowrote and directed the film, is an unexpectedly effective action hero.
Christian Wolff (Ben Affleck) is a forensic accountant for criminals who uncovers suspected theft by examining their financial records. When he's hired by Lamar and Rita Blackburn (John Lithgow and Jean Smart) to investigate potential fraud in their robotics company, he soon encounters various hitmen trying to prevent him from finding the culprit. Fortunately for Christian, and to the detriment of everyone else, this accountant also knows his way around a gun and will find the truth no matter what.
Released in 2016, The Accountant was a big enough hit to warrant a long-delayed sequel in 2025. Affleck is good as the autistic Christian, who doesn't want to use violence unless it's absolutely necessary. Anna Kendrick shows up as a peppy fellow accountant unaware of Christian's extracurricular activities, and Lithgow is appropriately shady as the CEO who knows more than he's letting on.
Kate Carter (Daisy Edgar-Jones) is a meteorologist who used to chase tornadoes before a traumatic incident forced her to quit. Five years later, she's persuaded by her friend Javi (Anthony Ramos) to do what she does best: cover dangerous storm systems and potentially save lives. But this time, she'll have to team up with charismatic YouTuber Tyler Owens (Glen Powell) to overcome her past trauma and somehow make it out alive.
Twisters is a quasi-sequel to 1996's Twister (none of the original actors make an appearance), but it has the same qualities that made that movie so appealing: two charismatic lead actors, a straightforward narrative and realistic special effects. The movie is good old-fashioned summer blockbuster fun, and it doesn't pretend to be anything else.
Colt Seavers (Ryan Gosling) is a veteran Hollywood stuntman desperate for work. When his ex-girlfriend, film director Gail Meyer (Emily Blunt), hires him for her new action movie, Colt thinks his fortunes have improved. But when the film's lead star, Tom Ryder (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), mysteriously disappears, it's up to Colt to find out what happened to him to save Gail's movie — and maybe rekindle their romance.
Based on a 1980s TV series few people remember, The Fall Guy is a breezy, lightweight action-comedy that is like Romancing the Stone but with a little more violence. Gosling and Blunt have indelible chemistry together, and the stunts are legitimately impressive. It's the rare movie that will please both rom-com fans and action movie bros alike.
Before there was Alan Ritchson in Reacher, there was Tom Cruise in the two Jack Reacher movies. Those films were modest hits, but because the 5 '7 Cruise wasn't as tall or big as the book version of the character, they were dismissed by some as not worthy. But Cruise excels at action, and he's really good in the Jack Reacher sequel, Never Go Back.
When Major Susan Turner (Cobie Smulders) is charged with the murder of two Army soldiers, Reacher believes she's innocent and the victim of a cover-up. When Reacher is himself framed for the murder of Turner's lawyer, he teams up with her to escape prison and find whoever is behind the conspiracy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WWE vs. AEW: Who's winning 2025's wrestling war?
If there's one thing that titillates wrestling obsessives, it's when one of the major promotions — WWE or AEW — makes an explicit reference to the other. These days the digs and attacks tend to be much rarer than in the past, but that doesn't stop them from being thrilling when they happen. Witness the social-media flutter this past May when an enterprising journalist used AEW's Double or Nothing press huddle to ask Tony Khan his opinions on WWE's none-too-subtle tactic of booking NXT premium live events against AEW's most important pay-per-view shows — one of the most aggressive competitive moves WWE has made against Khan's company. Advertisement That the AEW founder delivered an impeccably diplomatic answer did little to quell the excitement of those who spend their hours musing on the state of competition between WWE and AEW. Of course, here at Uncrowned, we have much less reason to mince our words on these things. So here's an analysis of the status of the battle between the two big promotions. The valuation gap Before making any kind of comparison between the two promotions, you need to acknowledge the 10-ton elephant that squats over this topic. Whatever you make of the rival products, WWE is objectively a much larger company than AEW in terms of money in the bank (no pun intended). Advertisement Even the most flattering estimates value AEW at around $2 billion, which is still less than a quarter of what TKO paid for WWE two years ago. And that latter number was before WWE finalized its massive Netflix deal, which has helped add some billions to TKO's overall market cap in the past year. None of this means there aren't specific areas where the numbers are closer (television viewing figures, for example), but it would be silly to pretend WWE doesn't have a massive edge due to its size and history. Media rights and viewing figures For all the focus on live shows, the modern pro-wrestling game is a television business: Both WWE and AEW make most of their money by selling their product to television and streaming networks. Advertisement For a rough comparison, WWE's various deals (Netflix, Peacock, NBCUniversal, etc.) bring in somewhere in the region of $1 billion per year. By contrast, AEW's recent media deal with Warner Bros. Discovery is valued at around $185 million per year — so less than a fifth of what WWE brings in. The big prize here is the Netflix deal, which was rightly hailed as a bit of a game-changer for wrestling when it was confirmed last year. The slight wrinkle on that front is WWE's Netflix viewing figures haven't been as huge as some expected, prompting some whispers about whether the streaming giant paid too much. As for viewership, AEW's U.S. television audience is around half of WWE's. 'AEW Collision' typically draws around 600,000 viewers in the U.S., compared to 1.2 million for 'WWE SmackDown.' That said, AEW's numbers have dipped over the past year or so, but now appear to be stabilizing. (Hat tip to the excellent Wrestlenomics, who publish detailed numbers on this.) The verdict: Advantage WWE John Cena and CM Punk face off during "WWE Raw." (Craig Ambrosio/WWE via Getty Images) (WWE via Getty Images) Live shows and ticket gates As much as we get tired of TKO's obsession with announcing all these record gates at every PLE, there's no denying WWE's audience revenue is seriously impressive at the moment. It just did $3 million for 'WWE Raw' in London, for example. Advertisement On top of that, TKO's current focus is persuading cities to pay hefty 'site fees' for the right to host bigger events — like New Jersey paying $7 million to host this year's WWE SummerSlam double-header. That's almost certainly a big factor in why WrestleMania is heading back to Las Vegas in 2026. On the other hand, AEW's gate revenue is much lower. Double or Nothing made $600,000 last month, for example. That said, their overseas events are still big league: All In at London's Wembley Stadium made $9 million and $6 million in 2023 and 2024, respectively. Gate revenues are one thing, but what about the crowds? On average, AEW's weekly shows draw around one quarter of the WWE audience (around 3,000 compared to 11,000 fans) — a ratio that has gotten steeper in WWE's favor over the past two years. AEW's bigger shows are still drawing decent crowds (in the 10,000 range) that are on par with the smaller WWE PLEs. At the end of the day, though, there's one wrestling promotion that can fill giant American stadiums like Allegiant in Las Vegas or MetLife in New Jersey — and it isn't Khan's. Advertisement The verdict: Advantage WWE The talent Defining a great wrestler is always going to involve subjective judgments. But on a business level, I'd argue that it usually boils down to one particular metric: the strength of the personal brand in terms of drawing viewers. If we're taking stock of the two promotions, there's no question both have some massive talents. But does AEW really have anyone who matches the Hollywood-level star power of The Rock, John Cena and Rhea Ripley? I'd venture not. It's that kind of clout that allows WWE to poach talent from its rival when it wants to. Just look at Mariah May and Jade Cargill, for example. Both had plenty of momentum in AEW and were likely making decent wages, but when the bigger brand came knocking, they were happy to make the jump. Advertisement That said, we shouldn't fully discount AEW's tagline of being 'where the best wrestle.' It's a good insight into how Khan sees his brand — and plenty of wrestling aficionados would agree that he's doing a great job on that front. Just look at the rave reaction to 2025's Double or Nothing show, for example. The verdict: Advantage WWE Kenny Omega's return has bolstered AEW's roster. () (Etsuo Hara via Getty Images) The product In many ways, this is the big question: Is the product any good? Television deals, gate revenue and site fees might bring in the bacon, but, at the end of the day, they're all downstream from the quality of the product. So how do the promotions compare right now? Let's start with WWE. Going into 2025, the company was widely regarded to be on fire — particularly with the Netflix deal incoming and the anticipation of John Cena's retirement tour. But there's a growing sense the product has been losing steam over the past few months. Advertisement Perhaps the success of the Bloodline/Cody Rhodes era gave us unrealistic expectations, or maybe we're all overreacting to the anticlimactic payoff to this year's WrestleMania. But it doesn't change the fact there's been a significant vibe shift from the fan base. And what of AEW? It's had some rough moments, for sure, but the most recent shows have begun to turn a corner. Double or Nothing was an absolute slam dunk and seems to be setting things up nicely for their biggest show of the year with July's All In. On a long-term view, though, the fundamentals haven't changed: WWE is still the granddaddy of pro wrestling. But if we're talking strictly about momentum — i.e. where things are moving right now — then AEW's lines are pointing in the right direction, while WWE's are floundering slightly. The verdict: (Slight) advantage AEW
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jury dispute triggers mistrial on Harvey Weinstein rape charge
The judge in the Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial declared a mistrial on the outstanding rape charge against the movie producer Thursday, after the jury foreperson refused to return to deliberate the count amid a jury room feud. "Deliberations became heated to such a degree I am obligated to declare a mistrial on the one count on which you didn't reach a verdict," judge Curtis Farber told the jury panel. On Wednesday, the jury convicted Weinstein for sexual assault on Miriam Haley, and acquitted the fallen movie mogul for allegedly sexually assaulting Kaja Sokola. They were unable to reach a verdict on the charge that Weinstein raped Jessica Mann, and a retrial on that count will follow at a future date. Weinstein is already in jail for a 16-year term after he was convicted in a separate California case of raping a European actress more than a decade ago. Proceedings in New York have been dogged by personal issues between jurors, two of whom have privately complained to the judge about the conduct of fellow panelists. The foreman had told the judge Curtis Farber he could not continue after facing threats. "One other juror made comments to the effect 'I'll meet you outside one day'," the judge said Wednesday quoting the foreman, adding there was yelling between jurors. After Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala demanded a mistrial over the jury rupture, Weinstein himself addressed the court, deploying a commanding voice reminiscent of the heyday of his Hollywood power. - 'Threats, violence, intimidation' - "We've heard threats, violence, intimidation -- this is not right for me... the person who is on trial here," he said. The Oscar-winner's conviction on the Haley charge is a vindication for Haley whose complaint in part led to the initial guilty verdict in 2020. That landmark case helped spur the "MeToo" movement that saw an outpouring of allegations from prominent women who were abused by men. Weinstein underwent a spectacular fall from his position at the top of the world of Hollywood and show business in 2017 when allegations against him exploded into public. The movement upended the film industry, exposing systemic exploitation of young women seeking to work in entertainment, and provoking a reckoning on how to end the toxic culture. More than 80 women accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct in the wake of the global backlash against men abusing positions of power. Weinstein's original 2020 conviction, and the resulting 23-year prison term, was thrown out last year after an appeals court found irregularities in the way witnesses were presented. gw/bgs
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dakota Johnson Went 'Crazy' Over Sandra Bullock's Message After Worst Actress Win
Dakota Johnson recently joined a special club of sorts after her Marvel superhero movie, 'Madame Web,' was panned by critics and audiences alike. Johnson ended up winning a Razzie for Worst Actress for her role in the flop earlier this year. But luckily, she had an A-list pal to help her through the embarrassment. 'Recently, I actually exchanged texts — well, I got a voice note — from Sandra Bullock. I know, because I don't know if you know, but I won the Razzie for Worst Actress,' Johnson said during an appearance on Amy Poehler's new podcast, 'Good Hang.' 'Oh, my God, you did? Congrats!' Poehler said, adding, 'There's a lot of good people that have won that.' Johnson joked that she won the award for 'this really good movie, called 'Madame Web.'' 'I asked if they'd send [the Razzie] to me,' Johnson said of winning the award. 'But Sandra Bullock sent me a voice note being like, 'I heard you are in the Razzie club and we should have brunch ― we should have, like, a monthly brunch.' Because I guess she won that the year that she won the Oscar as well. It was in the same year, I think.' (Bullock won her Razzie in 2010 for the movie, 'All About Steve' and then, within days, won the Oscar for Best Actress for her role in 'The Blind Side.') 'But I freaked out getting this message from her because she's so iconic to me, as like, a movie star,' Johnson explained. 'I was like, 'Oh, my God.' I was just crazy.' Johnson talked navigating successes and failures in her line of work and shared that most people in the business 'don't have control over how something turns out anymore.' 'I've signed on to a movie that is, by the end of shooting it, a completely different script than what I attached to, and that is a wild thing ― like a crazy journey to go on as an artist,' she said. ''Cause you're like, 'OK, I'm doing something with my actual body and my actual mind and my heart and my emotions' ... and it's just being taken and fucked with, but you can't do anything about it,' the actress added. 'Like, what am I going to do, fucking cry about 'Madame Web'? No. I'm gonna laugh about it.' Johnson recently opened up about 'Madame Web' flopping in an interview with the Los Angeles Times. The 'Fifty Shades of Grey' actor said the lack of success 'wasn't my fault' and shifted the blame to 'people who don't have a creative bone in their body.' 'It's really hard to make art that way. Or to make something entertaining that way,' she explained. 'And I think unfortunately with 'Madame Web,' it started out as something and turned into something else. And I was just sort of along for the ride at that point. But that happens. Bigger-budget movies fail all the time.' Dakota Johnson Shocks With Blunt Response To 'Today' Show Question
