Gold tops 1-month high as Middle East tensions spur safe-haven demand
Gold prices climbed on Friday to their highest point in more than a month, on track for a weekly gain, as investors sought safe-haven assets after Israel's strike on Iran heightened Middle East tensions.
Spot gold was up 1.3% at $3,428.28 an ounce, as of 0134 GMT, after hitting its highest level since May 7 earlier in the session. Bullion has gained more than 3.5% so far this week.
U.S. gold futures gained 1.4% to $3,449.60.
Geopolitical tensions escalated after Israel struck Iran as tensions mounted over U.S. efforts to halt Iran's production of atomic bomb materials.
"This latest spike in hostilities in the Middle East has taken the focus off trade negotiations for now, with investors making a play towards safe-haven assets in response," said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade.
Israel declared a state of emergency, citing expected missile and drone attacks from Tehran, and the U.S. military is preparing for various contingencies in the Middle East, including potential assistance with evacuating American civilians, a U.S. official told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
"Gold surged past resistance around the $3400 on news of the airstrikes, and further upside could be in-store should the escalation continue," Waterer said.
Signaling a cooling U.S. labor market and subdued inflation pressures, the number of Americans filing new applications for unemployment benefits held at an eight-month high last week, while slowing domestic demand helped to restrain producer prices in May.
The data released a day after the Labor Department reported a moderate rise in consumer prices in May, bolstered expectations of an earlier rate cut.
Traders are now expecting a 55-basis-point rate cut by the year-end, starting in September rather than October as previously anticipated.
Elsewhere, spot silver edged down 0.1% at $36.33 per ounce, platinum fell 0.8% to $1,285.21, while palladium was steady at $1,055.21. All three metals were headed for weekly gain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AGL Energy (ASX:AGL) investors are sitting on a loss of 20% if they invested five years ago
In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But even the best stock picker will only win with some selections. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in AGL Energy Limited (ASX:AGL), since the last five years saw the share price fall 39%. So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. Looking back five years, both AGL Energy's share price and EPS declined; the latter at a rate of 25% per year. This fall in the EPS is worse than the 9% compound annual share price fall. So the market may previously have expected a drop, or else it expects the situation will improve. The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). This free interactive report on AGL Energy's earnings, revenue and cash flow is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further. As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for AGL Energy the TSR over the last 5 years was -20%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! AGL Energy shareholders gained a total return of 8.9% during the year. But that return falls short of the market. But at least that's still a gain! Over five years the TSR has been a reduction of 4% per year, over five years. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks, for example - AGL Energy has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of. If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of undervalued small caps that insiders are buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Australian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sombre Fundamentals Suggest General Mills Stock (GIS) is Stuck in a Value Trap
Not so long ago, General Mills (GIS) stock was synonymous with safety, defensiveness, and stability. The company consistently delivered results in line with market expectations, rewarding shareholders with a generous and growing dividend. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter The snacking category, once an exception among packaged food groups, seemed immune to changing eating habits and the rise of private-label brands. But things have taken a turn for the worse. Cereal and snack bar consumption has declined sharply due to growing structural headwinds, resulting in a contraction of General Mills' business. What remains solid, however, is the company's ability to generate value for shareholders above its cost of capital, which in theory still makes General Mills a defensive stock. Valuations at current levels also look attractive, offering some margin of safety. The problem is that the sustainability of these strengths is in question. When secular headwinds are at play, it doesn't matter much if fundamentals suggest a cushion or if valuations appear cheap—the stock is likely to continue drifting downward over time. That said, I see this as a potential value trap for investors hoping to be heroes with General Mills stock. For that reason, I hold a neutral view on GIS. U.S. consumers have been gradually changing their eating habits—and that's not just an opinion, it's a fact. The packaged foods sector has seen a decline in demand for snacks in recent years. A big part of this comes from the rapid rise in GLP-1 weight loss drugs and a new generation that's increasingly avoiding 'bad foods' in favor of a healthier lifestyle. Recent 2024 data shows that around 12% of American adults report having used a GLP-1 drug, with 6% currently using one. Some studies suggest that GLP-1 users significantly reduce their grocery store purchases by 6%, with a 11% drop in snack sales in the six months following adoption. This shift is already reflected in the financial results of packaged food companies, such as General Mills. Over the past three years, General Mills' revenue has grown at a CAGR of just 1.8%. While operating margins improved at a 4.9% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), free cash flow declined at an 8.7% CAGR, which is a concerning trend. In addition to these broad changes in consumer behavior, General Mills has been facing weak U.S. consumption trends due to market share losses in key categories, particularly to private-label brands from retailers such as Costco (COST) and Walmart (WMT). In its most recent earnings report, net sales totaled $4.8 billion, a 5% decline year over year, and fell short of analyst expectations. North American retail sales declined 7%, with a 6% drop in sales volume. Alongside softer demand, temporary pressures also played a role, including lower volumes in snacks and dry pet food. The pet segment declined 3% year over year, while international sales fell 4%, primarily due to foreign exchange headwinds and weaker results in key markets such as China and Brazil. As a result, General Mills revised its guidance for fiscal year 2025. The company now expects organic net sales to decline between 1.5% and 2%, compared to a previous forecast of flat to slightly positive growth (up to 1%). While General Mills' stock performance may appear underwhelming—hovering near the same levels it traded at over a decade ago—there are still compelling elements to its investment case. Despite a growth narrative that appears not just stalled but potentially in decline, the company continues to deliver strong returns on invested capital (ROIC). Over the past twelve months, General Mills generated $2.93 billion in NOPAT against $22.9 billion in invested capital, resulting in an ROIC of 12.8%. That figure aligns well with industry peers like Nestlé (NSRGY), Mondelez (MDLZ), and Kellogg's (KLG), and it comfortably exceeds the company's estimated cost of capital, highlighting efficient capital deployment even in a slow-growth environment. Assuming a cost of equity of 7.5% (given GIS's low beta and 10-year Treasury yields around 4.5%), and a 30% debt weighting, General Mills' weighted average cost of capital (WACC) would land around 6.8%. In other words, despite the recent headwinds, the company continues to create value for shareholders and allocate capital efficiently. That shows up in its dividend policy as well. General Mills currently offers a dividend yield of 4.4%, which is almost on par with the risk-free rate, all while maintaining a payout ratio of just 53%. Beyond General Mills' ability to generate returns above its cost of capital, the stock also appears attractively priced based on valuation. One particularly useful—and often underappreciated—metric for evaluating mature, capital-intensive companies like those in the consumer packaged goods sector is earnings yield, calculated as operating income divided by enterprise value. Over the past twelve months, General Mills reported $3.6 billion in operating income (EBIT) against an enterprise value of $43.5 billion, resulting in an earnings yield of 8.4%. Compared to a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 6.8%, this positive spread suggests the company is generating real value for shareholders—a potentially encouraging sign for long-term investors. However, the reliability of earnings yield as a valuation signal rests on the assumption that earnings will remain stable or improve. In General Mills' case, that assumption is under strain. The company recently lowered its fiscal 2025 guidance, now forecasting a 7% to 8% decline in adjusted operating profit, nearly twice the size of its earlier projections. In short, while the current valuation offers a degree of margin of safety, the growing uncertainty around future profitability raises meaningful concerns and tempers a more bullish outlook. Analyst sentiment on General Mills (GIS) remains mixed. Of the 13 analysts covering the stock, only one holds a bullish rating, ten are neutral, and one is bearish. The consensus stock price target for GIS stock is $57.67, representing an upside of approximately 6.7% over the coming year. General Mills checks many of the boxes for a classic value investment, consistently generating returns above its cost of capital while trading at what appears to be an attractive valuation. However, the company is contending with mounting structural headwinds—including evolving consumer eating habits, the rise of GLP-1 drugs, shifting retail dynamics, and increased competition from private-label brands. These challenges cast doubt on the long-term sustainability of its value creation, despite current metrics remaining solid. Given these concerns, General Mills currently leans more toward a value trap than a compelling value opportunity. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
1 in 4 job seekers in Hawaiʻi lie to gain employment: New report
HONOLULU (KHON2) — A new report has found that one in four job seekers admits to lying on their resume, in their cover letter and during the interview process. The lies range from inflated skills to fabricated experience. Some even stretch the truth about who they are, including disability status and ethnicity, to try to get hired. Hawaiʻi's highest paid college majors, jobs for recent graduates For some, it works. Four out of 10 say they got a job by being dishonest, and two-thirds believe the lie helped them succeed. But there is a cost. Once a lie is uncovered, trust erodes, and that's not something that's easy to rebuild. 'Lying during the hiring process can create long-term trust issues and damage one's professional reputation,' said Stacie Haller, an advisor on the survey. 'Once a lie is uncovered, it is not easily forgotten, and trust is difficult to rebuild.' Hawaiʻi's highest paying careers, professions Lying is more common than many people think. The survey found that 44% of Americans say they've lied in the hiring process. That includes 24% on resumes, 19% in interviews and 6% on cover letters. The most frequent lies are about years of experience, skills and job responsibilities. Here's what job seekers in Hawaiʻi need to know now: 8 takeaways from Hawaiʻi's top ranking for school lunches Amongst job seekers, around 24% have lied on their resume, which was identified by the study as making it the most common place for dishonesty. The most frequent resume lies the study found include: Years of experience (38%). Skills and abilities (34%). Lengths of positions held (32%).The survey found that Millennials are the most likely to lie on their resumes, with 29% reporting that they had lied in order to gain employment. Meanwhile, 20% of Gen Z'ers were found to have lied along with 27% of Gen Xers and 13% of Baby Boomers. Additionally, men were found to be more likely than women using lies on their resumes at a rate of 30% v. 20%. Lying in interviews is also widespread. The report found that 19% of job seekers admitted to dishonesty during an interview. The most common interview lies include: Skills and abilities (41%). Responsibilities at previous jobs (32%). Years of experience (31%). Once again, Millennials topped the lying pile with 24% of them saying they lie during the interview process. Baby Boomers were the least likely at 8%; and again, more men (23%) than women (16%) lie at the interview stage. Cover letters were found to have fewer lies with 6% of job seekers saying they have lied in their cover letters. And when they did, they most often misrepresented: Skills and abilities (45%). Responsibilities at previous jobs (38%). Years of experience (37%). You can click to read the full report. 'Dishonesty harms a worker's reputation, even if the consequences aren't immediately apparent,' explained Haller. 'If a candidate doesn't meet all the requirements for a specific position, honesty is still always the best approach. They should highlight their genuine strengths, the skills they bring, and why they are uniquely suited to succeed in the role.' Haller went on to explain further. Get news on the go with KHON 2GO, KHON's morning podcast, every morning at 8 'By presenting their qualifications truthfully, they demonstrate integrity and professionalism, qualities often as important as technical skills,' concluded Haller. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
