Caitlin Clark's Boyfriend Quietly Honors Former Player After Sudden Death
The college football world was rocked over the weekend by the sudden passing of former Minnesota defensive back Charles 'Ace' Rogers, who collapsed during the Brooklyn Half Marathon. Rogers, just 31 years old, went into cardiac arrest near Ocean Parkway and 18th Avenue after completing roughly eight miles of the race as reported by the New York Post. Emergency medical personnel responded swiftly, but he was later pronounced dead at Maimonides Medical Center.
The news hit hard for former Iowa Hawkeye's — including Caitlin Clark's boyfriend, Connor McCaffery.
Advertisement
On Sunday, McCaffery took to Instagram with a tribute to Rogers. He didn't share a caption, emoji, or written statement. Instead, he simply reposted an image of Rogers in his Minnesota uniform, alongside the dates '1994–2025.' It was a gesture that spoke volumes without saying a word.
Butler Bulldogs assistant coach Connor McCaffery gives a thumbs up to players on Monday, Nov. 4, 2024© Grace Hollars/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Rogers bounced around College Football
Rogers had a winding college football career that spanned Iowa State, Iowa Western, Minnesota, and Lindenwood. His athleticism was matched by resilience, overcoming injuries and continuing to chase the game he loved. His story, and sudden passing, have left a void in the football community.
Lindenwood Football issued a heartfelt message mourning Rogers and extending prayers to his wife, Sydney, and his parents. Rogers' legacy as a multi-sport standout — including state titles in track — has made his loss all the more heartbreaking.
Advertisement
McCaffery's silent tribute adds to the wave of quiet respect being shown across sports for this tragic loss. Sometimes, silence is the most powerful way to say everything.
Related: Jay Bilas Throws Cold Water on Trump's College Sports Plan
Related: Emmanuel Acho Doesn't Hold Back About Angel Reese's Reaction to Caitlin Clark
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Former Eagles Star Claps Back at Coach's Comments
For the second time in a few years, the Philadelphia Eagles are facing backlash from their former star safety, CJ Gardner-Johnson. The veteran safety recently voiced his frustrations on social media after hearing his former defensive coordinator discuss the offseason trade that sent shockwaves across Philly. Eagles defensive coordinator Vic Fangio told reporters he was "fine" with the reasoning behind the trade. According to Fangio, Eagles general manager Howie Roseman moved Gardner-Johnson for salary cap purposes. On Wednesday, Gardner-Johnson took to social media to clap back. Clearly, the veteran safety feels like there was another reason behind the deal-and he's not a fan of the public messaging. "I was a test dummy for them," Gardner-Johnson wrote on Instagram. "So, now they can be like my 'scheme' work, or did my skill set make it work?" I had zero issues. [People] had issues with me. So, yeah, let the salary cap be the 'excuse.'" Since his first stint in Philadelphia, Gardner-Johnson was recognized as one of the most outspoken players in the organization. When the Eagles landed Gardner-Johnson the first time around, he was traded by the New Orleans Saints after spending his first three seasons there. Gardner-Johnson appeared in 12 games in 2022, registering a career-high 67 tackles and leading the league with six interceptions. The veteran safety was a helping hand in getting the Eagles to the Super Bowl in 2023. During that offseason, Gardner-Johnson hit the free agency market and inked a one-year deal to join the Detroit Lions. When he left the Eagles for the Lions, Gardner-Johnson publicly made it clear that he wanted to return to Philadelphia, but contract discussions did not go as he had hoped. After one season in Detroit, Gardner-Johnson made his way back to Philadelphia. He signed a three-year deal with the Eagles. The deal was for a reported $27 million, with $10 million guaranteed. Despite signing a long-term deal with the Eagles, Gardner-Johnson's stint in Philly will be capped at one season again. After helping a successful secondary win the Super Bowl, Johnson found himself included in a deal that sent him to the Houston Texans. The Eagles received the lineman Kenyon Green, along with a 2025 fifth-round pick. It's unclear what truly went into the decision to move off of Gardner-Johnson for the second time in three years. Both sides have a different perspective. Either way, Gardner-Johnson has made it clear that he was fond of his time in Philadelphia, even though he seems frustrated with the way it ended once again. Related Articles Philadelphia Eagles Defensive Backs Ranked Among NFL's Top DuosEx-Eagles WR Gets Honest on Carson Wentz DramaSaquon Barkley Joins Exclusive Eagles Company Amid Latest Madden FeatEagles' Saquon Barkley Makes Major Statement on Potential Early Retirement 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Becoming Caitlin Clark: How the Fever Star Shifted the WNBA Landscape
This excerpt from Becoming Caitlin Clark: The Unknown Origin Story of a Modern Basketball Superstar by Howard Megdal is reprinted with the permission of Triumph Books. For more information and to order a copy, please Caitlin Clark broke women's basketball. In the best possible way here. But also, in ways that are deeply confounding to Clark and those around here. Because Sheila Johnson, co-owner of the WNBA's Washington Mystics, appeared on CNN and slammed Time Magazine for featuring Caitlin Clark as its athlete of the year. No, really. That happened. "We read Time Magazine where Caitlin Clark was named Athlete of the Year," Johnson said on Dec. 13. "Why couldn't they have put the whole WNBA on that cover and said the WNBA is the League of the Year because of all the talent that we have? Because when you just keep singling out one player, it creates hard feelings." Where to start? This is, of course, sports. There are winners and losers every year, every day, in individual awards, in team accolades. The concept of fairness dictating any man in sports history being honored as Athlete of the Year simply would not be a matter of even basic debate. But this is part of the calibration problem - there have been, as Johnson correctly noted, "so many talented players who have been unrecognized." There have been, as Risa Isard and Nicole Melton documented in their landmark September 2021 study of race in WNBA coverage by ESPN, CBS Sports, Sports Illustrated and as exhibited in WNBA team and league press releases, a disproportionate number of stories about white players compared to the majority Black makeup of the league during the 2020 season. That study did not, however, include Caitlin Clark, nor does it even study the time period in which Clark has been playing college basketball or in the WNBA. It speaks to a truth that is absolutely accepted by a broad base of experts on the subject - that the WNBA's best players have been undercovered historically, and that overwhelmingly the WNBA's best players, just as a majority of all its players, have been Black. Simple reasoning has been assigned in so many of the loudest, least-illuminating conversations about exactly why Caitlin Clark is so prominent in the larger American sports culture now, and what it means about both what came before her and the future of women's basketball. The more singular the explanation, the less useful it is. Even worse are the simple motivations assigned to those on both sides of this discussion - for reference, a significant number of people, particularly those with the most invested in the space, such as players, coaches and executives, don't even view this discussion as one with "opposing sides." But for many of the harshest critics of Clark, it was easy to hear the undercurrent of fear, that the full appreciation for the women's game had come too late for them, the money which follows such fandom simply not trickling down into the sport's remarkable and compelling past. The WNBA has existed as a safe space for marginalized people for nearly three decades because broader American culture so often ignored it. That tradeoff is felt in ways, large and small, that fill the league's players, coaches, executives and long-tenured fans with ambivalence. Everyone with a stake in the league's success is living in that gray area, and not only is the money too good to approach it any other way, with it the chance to finally see what a fully-vested WNBA looks like, but the momentum is so overwhelming the league and its stakeholders couldn't stop this train if they wished to do so. And for the countless, often anonymous newcomers to the women's basketball space who saw Clark being tested like all rookies but only clocked it through the race of the players in the majority Black league doing it, discounting all the incredible stories and women who created the scaffolding of possibility for Caitlin Clark engendered bitterness, fear and anger. And everyone involved in this oversimplification suffered from a failure not just of understanding the racial, gender, historical and competitive context, but so often a failure to understanding that when Caitlin Clark had opened these doors to the broader audience, it represented a chance for others to follow. Caitlin Clark did it first, but is doing it in a way that is precisely designed for the opposite of Clark existing as a one-off phenomenon. She is a beginning, not a culmination. And none of this means that Caitlin Clark is being overcovered now. If it is true that Sue Bird, for instance, received disparate media coverage relative to her greatness, or compared to, say, Sylvia Fowles - the former I'd argue is debatable, the latter is not, with the final seasons of the league's best-ever point guard in Bird and best-ever center in Fowles receiving deeply unequal treatment across television broadcasts and column inches alike - it did not lead to, in the case of Fowles or Bird, the kind of dramatic leaps in audience we have seen from Caitlin Clark in 2024. Clark is different. And there is no counterfactual in the current game: we cannot know what would have happened if Caitlin Clark, but Black, had built her fan base and audience at Iowa, then taken her precision passing and 30-footers to the WNBA. But we do have a historical comp. Frequently, the comparison is made between Clark and her rivalry with Angel Reese and the elevation of the NBA during Magic Johnson and Larry Bird's ascension from college basketball to the pros. After all, more than 35 million people watched the Michigan State-Indiana State national championship game in 1979 featuring the two stars, and the NBA reached a dramatic new level of popularity by the end of their careers. The problem is that, unlike with Clark, it didn't happen anything like right away. (There are other problems with this comparison, too: Magic and Bird were both immediate stars of contending teams, Bird's Celtics winning 61 games, Magic's Lakers winning it all, while Reese's stardom did not translate into a playoff appearance for the Chicago Sky.) The NBA Finals remained on tape-delay broadcast several seasons into both of their pro careers - the clinching win by Johnson's Lakers in the 1980 NBA Finals was preempted by many CBS Network affiliates in favor of The Incredible Hulk, The Dukes of Hazzard and Dallas. By 1984, CBS showed just ten NBA games, nationally, all regular season long. But the actual comp here for Clark also entered the league in 1984, coinciding with TBS purchasing the rights to a national TV cable package: Michael Jordan. Within two years, a dramatic expansion of games, even the slam dunk contest - biggest attraction, Michael Jordan - helped a rising tide of NBA ratings, Jordan's Bulls helping to lead the way, not quite by as much of a lead over the Celtics, Lakers and other teams as Clark just experienced, but notable just the same. To this day, the four most-watched NBA Finals of all time took place in the 1990s, and all featured Jordan's Chicago Bulls. Those ratings fell after Jordan retired, only starting to approach them once more when LeBron James reached the apex of his rivalry with Steph Curry in 2016 and 2017. James was honored with the Time 2020 Athlete of the Year. The apex of these viewership trends correlate not to a generic rising tide. It is when deeply compelling stars make games must-watch. That is the company Clark finds herself in after a single season. The audience tells us so. Time has only been naming an Athlete of the Year since 2019, but Sports Illustrated has honored someone in this way since 1954. In 1991? It was Michael Jordan. If there are any contemporaneous accounts of anyone suggesting the entire NBA should have received the award instead of Jordan in 1991 or James in 2020, I was unable to find them. I'd further note that when Sheila Johnson's Mystics won the WNBA title in 2019, playing home games in a sold-out but entirely-too-small 4,200-seat Entertainment and Sports Arena, she celebrated her team with, among other things, a massive championship ring. Only the Mystics, the team that won the title, received this ring. Not the entire WNBA. And in 2024, the Mystics moved four home games from ESA to Capital One Arena, where the NBA's Washington Wizards play. One of those games, with Angel Reese's Chicago Sky, drew 10,000 fans. Another, with Diana Taurasi and Brittney Griner's Phoenix Mercury, drew 12,586. The other two, against Caitlin Clark and the Fever, drew 20,333 and 20,711. Put another way: Clark's two visits to play the Mystics in 2024 drew 41,044 fans, almost half of what Washington's entire 2023 home slate drew: 87,813 fans. "There were so many times where it felt like if a call was made against the other team, people were cheering, which typically in an away environment, you're not getting positive feedback from the crowd," Clark's Fever teammate, Lexie Hull, told me. "But this year, that happened several places, so feel very fortunate about that." But how does one reconcile it all? It's complicated, and evaluating the ways in which race has held the league back and acting and appreciating the progress that has followed through that prism is not the same thing as pretending it isn't happening at all or that the league as a whole is not benefiting from Caitlin Clark's ability to maximize this moment made possible by pioneers in her home state and trailblazers in the WNBA alike. Knowing bad-faith actors have entered the WNBA space intent on using Caitlin Clark's presence to attack Black women of the league while at the same time embracing how many new fans have arrived to love and appreciate her and so many others in the WNBA. And the extra pressure on her opponents, who are forced to simultaneously answer a disproportionate amount of questions about a player who isn't even on their own team in most cases, who are competing at the demanding level asked of anyone in the WNBA, but if that effort leads to a foul deemed unnecessary by Clark's vociferous fan base - with the ugliest manifestations of that passion curdled by racism - players were subjected to cruel, inhuman taunts, even death threats. Every bit of that discordant mix is something Caitlin Clark is hyper-aware of, the calm in this sea of madness, able to hold two disparate ideas in her head at the same time in ways that so many who are paid to analyze failed at verbalizing all year long, each of these failures from someone with a megaphone only further complicating the degree of difficulty for Clark, her teammates and her opponents alike, ratcheting up the tension further. This article was originally published on as Becoming Caitlin Clark: How the Fever Star Shifted the WNBA Landscape . Copyright ABG-SI LLC. SPORTS ILLUSTRATED is a registered trademark of ABG-SI LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ahead of primetime Fever-Sky rematch, Indiana and Chicago face different kinds of uncertainty: 'We have our work cut out for us'
The first time they clashed, Indiana's 'perfect opening day' swiftly became Chicago's living nightmare from which it couldn't wake. The Eastern Conference teams' season debuts further delineated their differing timelines. What a difference three weeks make in the WNBA. Advertisement The second of five meetings this season between the Indiana Fever and Chicago Sky, set to make history on Saturday for its location at Chicago's United Center and tip-off on CBS in primetime, will look mightily different than the first. The rivalry rematch that counts in the Commissioner's Cup standings will be the fourth game missed by Caitlin Clark, the MVP-contending point guard nursing a quad injury that's thrown the Fever in flux. They lost two of the previous three despite being in a lighter portion of the schedule . And the injury bug dug deeper, decimating their guard depth when Sophie Cunningham (ankle) and Sydney Colson (left leg) exited a loss to the previously winless Sun. Cunningham remains on the availability report. The Fever have gone 1-2 with Caitlin Clark out of the lineup. (Photo by Brian Spurlock/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) (Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) It's that type of injury unknown that first-year head coach Stephanie White had in mind every time she said this preseason the Fever were title contenders 'on paper,' a reminder that it's about more than acquiring talent. They need a smattering of luck in health, and time to build chemistry with so many new pieces flying around the court expected to stay ready for Clark's visionary assists takes more than a short preseason. Advertisement With the growing chemistry on pause, Indiana is fighting to find footing it hopes will help in the long run . 'They've been really resilient,' Clark told reporters on Thursday. 'It's hard when your point guard goes out that controls a lot of the game. And people have kind of had to step into positions that maybe they haven't had.' The championship aspirations feel more fragile now, particularly given the Finals rematch collision course the undefeated Liberty and Lynx seem to be on. Three weeks in, the Fever (3-4) are far from panicked, but also still a long way from approaching perfect. Facing the Sky (2-4) is an opportunity to stack wins and keep pace with New York in the Cup standings ahead of Clark's potential return in time for a grueling stretch of the league's best. Clark told reporters on Thursday she will be reevaluated this weekend and could play on Tuesday in Atlanta, but isn't going to push it if the training staff doesn't think she's ready. A few hours north in Chicago, there remains a level of dismay that's only slowly evaporating. The Sky were outscored by 60 points in their first two games, putting a chill on Angel Reese's preseason claim that the Sky would 'shock a lot of people. ' That's the result of facing the Fever and reigning champion Liberty, a tough scheduling break out of the gates. Losing to the Sparks and Mercury by a combined 18 quelled the ugly net rating and showcased a melding roster. Advertisement 'There was some jumps and strides that we made positively from those games,' Sky first-time head coach Tyler Marsh said. 'And obviously for it to culminate in two wins against Dallas was really great for our locker room and moving forward. But we understand we enjoyed it while we could and now it's time to move on and focus on Indiana.' Their back-to-back wins over the Wings following a 0-4 start are stepping stones, lagging far behind the pack. No one should be excitedly writing home about beating 1-7 Dallas right now. And to further concern, center Kamilla Cardoso was restricted in practice on Tuesday while dealing with a 'lingering' shoulder injury, Marsh said. He told reporters on Thursday that Cardoso — their most efficient scorer whom he wants to get more involved offensively — is expected to play on Saturday. The injuries roiling the league as a whole put a slight damper on the significance of Saturday's matchup. The game will be the first WNBA contest on broadcast TV in primetime when it airs on CBS at 8 p.m. ET. It's no surprise Fever-Sky took that window as the most-watched regular season series of the 2024 season. And it is the first WNBA game to be played at United Center, home of the NBA's Chicago Bulls, and could break attendance records. The Sky record is 16,444 and the WNBA record is 20,711, set by the Fever vs. Mystics last year at Capital One Arena. The United Center, also home to the July 27 matchup, holds 20,923 for basketball. The schedule makers spaced out the must-watch rivalry matchups , placing one each month of the season (and all on weekends), a welcome change from the three-in-three-weeks overload of a year ago. It not only gives the rivalry room to breathe — and given fan fervor, it desperately needs it — but provides a benchmark on the path to the playoffs. Advertisement The Fever, a realistic Finals contender deadset on a championship , have yet to reach the pace and offensive flow of their season opener, nor come close to the 64.4 defensive rating. In four of the six games since, it's ballooned to triple digits. They can reset the defensive intensity with the Sky, a matchup in which they notched 13 steals and 10 blocks last outing. Aari McDonald, the Fever's emergency hardship signing for falling below 10 game-eligible players, will be a key cog off the bench. She set the tone defensively upon entry in the win over the Mystics, plus added five assists and zero turnovers after one practice and one shootaround with the team. 'I could tell before her first practice she definitely watched some film,' Clark, who knows McDonald's defensive mindset well , said. 'She knew what we were doing on offense, she knew defense, but also that just speaks to her time in the league and understanding how you play in this league. She's competitive, she's aggressive, she's physical.' And then there's the obvious. Advertisement 'They're still extremely formidable,' Marsh told reporters on Thursday. 'Aliyah Boston is still a load inside and Kelsey Mitchell is still being Kelsey Mitchell. So we have our work cut out for us.' The Sky are in a rebuild, despite their addition of veteran talents in the free agent pool, and are hopeful contenders for a playoff berth. Chicago ranks last in turnover percentage (allowing opponents an average of 18.2 points per game), and struggles to connect a cohesive offensive game. Though they rebound the ball well and average 15.6 second-chance points per game, they aren't doing enough to stop opponents from scoring 11.3 of their own (11th). The roster is still struggling to hit outside shots (30.6% from 3-point range), and Reese, working on expanding her range, is less efficient from the restricted area (31.1%). Like White, Marsh has preached time and patience in developing chemistry and cohesion. 'I think we've seen glimpses throughout the year so far, but I think the last two games we've really seen an improvement on what it can look like,' he said. How much of a difference can three weeks make? We're about to find out.
