DeWine signs budget giving $600M for Browns' new stadium
Why it matters: The state funding is roughly half of the total public contribution the Haslams sought for their $2.4 billion project.
Locking it down sets the table for the team's relocation after the current lease expires in 2028.
The latest: The Browns formally purchased the $76 million, 175-acre site last week in Brook Park, where they intend to construct the new stadium.
Yes, but: The mechanism by which state lawmakers chose to fund the project has generated controversy.
Zoom in: The legislature decided to tap a $4.8 billion pot of "unclaimed funds" — generally small sums that Ohio residents have not yet collected from old bank accounts, uncashed checks and security deposits.
The budget sets aside $1.7 billion of these funds to create a new reserve for Ohio's pro sports facilities. The Browns will be the first recipient, but the Cincinnati Bengals are next in line.
Between the lines: DeWine's preferred funding method was doubling a tax on sports betting operators, but he did not veto the measure.
The other side: Cleveland-area elected officials have sharply criticized the proposal, part of the unanimous Democratic opposition to a budget they say prioritizes billionaires at the expense of Ohio's working and middle classes.
The budget also includes a tax cut for wealthy earners.
What they're saying:"Ohioans' private property should not be taken without due process, and certainly not to subsidize billionaire developers," said State Rep. Tristan Rader (D-Lakewood) in a recent statement.
"This isn't economic development, it's a constitutional red flag."
Between the lines: Two former Democratic state lawmakers plan to file a lawsuit in Franklin County over the unclaimed funds' reallocation, which they call a "classic, unconstitutional taking of people's property."
What's next: County Executive Chris Ronayne has affirmed the county will not issue additional bonds for the project and still believes that by holding out, the Haslams may ultimately choose to return to a renovated lakefront facility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Browns' Shedeur Sanders set for surprise preseason opportunity
Browns' Shedeur Sanders set for surprise preseason opportunity originally appeared on The Sporting News The Shedeur Sanders era in Cleveland is set to begin in an unconventional way. Sanders' NFL journey hasn't exactly followed a smooth path. After sliding to the fifth round of the draft, he entered camp with something to prove. And now, after a solid showing in OTAs and training camp, he's getting his first unofficial shot. According to insider Mary Kay Cabot, Sanders is expected to start Friday night's preseason opener on the road against the Panthers. With Kenny Pickett and Dillon Gabriel both sidelined by hamstring injuries, the opportunity has fallen to Sanders. It's not the way most quarterbacks get their start—but it's a chance Sanders has been waiting for since being drafted by the Browns. Head coach Kevin Stefanski has kept the quarterback competition wide open, with veteran Joe Flacco, Pickett, Gabriel, and Sanders all in the mix. And while Sanders has mostly worked with the third and fourth-team units, he's made the most of those reps—flashing the arm talent, athleticism, and confidence that made him a star at Colorado. Friday's game won't just be a test of Sanders' mechanics—it'll be a look at how quickly he can process plays, manage a huddle, and handle pressure at the NFL level. He's expected to get extended run, and with other quarterbacks nursing injuries, a strong outing could fast-track his place in the pecking order. 📲 Follow The Sporting News on WhatsApp For Sanders, this is more than just filling in—it's an early audition for something bigger. Coaches have reportedly taken notice of his poise and work ethic. Now he'll have the stage to show it under the lights. It may just be preseason, but for Sanders, this moment means everything. It's a real shot to change the narrative—and it starts Friday night.
Politico
8 minutes ago
- Politico
Elon Musk and X notch court win against California deepfake law
The first law would have blocked online platforms from hosting deceptive, AI-generated content related to an election in the run-up to the vote. It came amid heightened concerns about the rapid advancement and accessibility of artificial intelligence, allowing everyday users to quickly create more realistic images and videos, and the potential political impacts. But opponents of the measures, like Musk, also argued the restrictions could infringe upon freedom of expression. The original challenge was filed by the creator of the video, Christopher Kohls, on First Amendment grounds, with X later joining the case after Musk said the measures were 'designed to make computer-generated parody illegal.' The satirical right-wing news website the Babylon Bee and conservative social media site Rumble also joined the suit. The Harris video had depicted her describing herself as the 'ultimate diversity hire.' Mendez said the first law, penned by Democratic state Assemblymember Marc Berman, conflicted with the oft-cited Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act, which shields online platforms from liability for what third parties post on their sites. 'They don't have anything to do with these videos that the state is objecting to,' Mendez said of sites like X that host deepfakes. But the judge did not address the First Amendment claims made by Kohls, saying it was not necessary in order to strike down the law on Section 230 grounds. 'I'm simply not reaching that issue,' Mendez told the plaintiffs' attorneys. Neither Newsom's office nor the office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta immediately responded to requests for comment. Berman's office declined to comment and the office of Assemblymember Gail Pellerin, the Democrat who authored the second law, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
NBC News
8 minutes ago
- NBC News
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott sues to remove state House Democratic Caucus chair in redistricting standoff
Gov. Greg Abbott filed an emergency petition Tuesday with the Texas Supreme Court to remove state Rep. Gene Wu from office after Wu and other Democrats left the state in an effort to delay Republican efforts to redraw congressional district lines. The lawsuit from the Republican governor argues that Wu, the Texas House Democratic Caucus chair, violated the state Constitution and that his absence amounted to abandoning office. With their absence, Democratic state lawmakers have denied Republicans the legislative quorum needed to move forward with plans to redraw congressional boundaries and give the GOP five more House seats in Congress. The suit argues that quorum provisions make attendance in the state House 'an affirmative constitutional obligation.' 'Representative Wu has openly renounced these constitutional mandates by fleeing the State of Texas to break quorum, obstruct legislative proceedings, and paralyze the Texas House of Representatives,' the lawsuit states. 'Absconding from the State during a constitutionally mandated session, not for lawful cause, but for the very purpose of subverting the Legislature's ability to function, constitutes a flagrant violation of Wu's oath and is an intentional abandonment of his constitutional duty,' it adds. Wu did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday evening. In a social media post Sunday, from Illinois, Wu said he was "On the ground in Chicago… Fighting for the rights of Texans and all Americans." Abbott said in a statement that Wu and more than 50 other Democrats who left the state had failed to meet quorum requirements in refusing to return. 'Texas House Democrats abandoned their duty to Texans, and there must be consequences,' Abbott said. The Republican governor had warned in a statement Sunday that he would seek Democrats' removal if they weren't present when the House convened the following day. During the the Democratic lawmakers' absence Monday, he ordered the state's Department of Public Safety to arrest them following a vote by the Texas House to compel the sergeant-at-arms to 'send for' the return of the lawmakers 'under warrant of arrest, if necessary.' Asked whether the FBI and federal government should get involved in locating and arresting the lawmakers, President Donald Trump told reporters earlier on Tuesday that they "may have to." 'A lot of people have demanded they come back. You can't just sit it out. You have to go back. You have to fight it out. That's what elections are all about,' Trump said.
