logo
The million dollar question: are diamonds losing their sparkle?

The million dollar question: are diamonds losing their sparkle?

Times18 hours ago
It takes three billion years, volcano-like pressure and 1000C-plus temperatures to form 'natural' diamonds that are mined and polished before being lovingly placed on the third finger of the left hand of millions of women across the world.
Technological advances mean, however, that engagement ring sized-diamonds are increasingly being made in vast laboratories, predominantly in China, in as little as a week. These lab-grown diamonds, chemically and visually identical to mined diamonds, are much cheaper to produce than the cost of extracting real diamonds from deep below the earth's surface in Russia, Canada and southern Africa.
Boyfriends and fiancés can now pick up lab-grown diamonds for less than a tenth of the price of similarly sized natural diamonds and their prices are falling sharply as the technology improves further and lab production increases.
• Diamonds in the rough: struggling industry's fight against the lab-grown fake
'Man-made diamonds have captured about a 25 per cent share of global diamond demand by value spent,' Paul Zimnisky, founder of Diamond Analytics, said. 'This is up from nil ten years ago.'
He said that although some consumers were drawn to the lower prices of lab-grown diamonds he did not expect them to replace the allure of natural diamonds.
'Lab diamonds are a manufactured product that can be produced at will so they are not rare, and this is reflected in the price,' he said. 'Natural diamonds are still one of the most valuable things you can own on a value to size and weight ratio. Humans have valued rare and precious metals and gems since the beginning of time. I don't think this will change anytime soon.'
The spectacular growth of lab-grown diamonds has, however, helped to send the price of natural diamonds reeling and plunged the traditional diamond mining industry into crisis.
The price of a one carat natural diamond, roughly the size of an average engagement ring, has fallen about a third from a peak of $6,819 (£5,030) in May 2022, according to the jewellery analyst firm Tenoris.
The wider Bloomberg polished diamond index, which takes in prices across the '4Cs' of diamonds — cut, colour, clarity and carat weight — has fallen 53 per cent from a peak of 6,270 in March 2022.
Prices had spiked after the pandemic as weddings put on hold by Covid finally took place and consumers had lockdown savings to burn.
Olya Linde, a partner at Bain & Company, who specialises in natural resources, said: 'The million dollar question everyone in the diamond industry is asking is: is this bottom?'
She thinks it might be, as the price of both polished and rough diamonds showed slight signs of growth in the first two quarters of this year. 'It gives a lot of hope for the industry that the worst might be over and the market will stabilise,' she said. 'But there is a lot of inventory for people to work through.'
The traditional diamond industry has hugely cut back production in order to try to reduce that stockpile and recreate some of diamonds' original allure: scarcity. De Beers, the diamond miner founded by Cecil Rhodes in 1888, which coined the slogan 'a diamond is forever', has cut its 2025 production expectation from 30 to 33 million carats to 20 to 23 million. Its owner, Anglo American, has put De Beers up for sale with a price tag of about $4 billion, about half its 2023 valuation.
London-listed Gem Diamonds announced plans this week to cut a fifth of its workforce and temporarily cut executives' salaries to try to 'protect shareholder value'. The company's market value has collapsed to £7.9 million from £550 million when it floated in 2007.
Linde is confident that natural diamond prices will not fall much lower but she warned that they were unlikely to return to anywhere near their peak. In order to achieve some price growth she said natural diamonds needed to be 'returned to their position as a luxury product' and consumers needed to have faith in a growing world economy.
Ben Davis, head of European mining research at RBC Capital Markets, said it was entirely possible that natural diamond prices could return to recent highs but it 'would require significant curtailment of both mining and synthetic supply and heavy and length investment in marketing'.
The tariff trade war is also distorting the market, he said, by 'incentivising destocking further' and damaging consumer confidence to buy such expensive luxury items.
Davis and Linde agreed that a huge advertising campaign was needed to remind people of the luxury and scarcity of natural diamonds.
'We know it has been done before and it can be done again,' Linde said. 'There needs to be buy-in not just from the miners but throughout the value chain.'
Yoram Dvash, president of the World Federation of Diamond Bourses, called for the industry to unite to protect the natural diamond industry's value from the threat of lab-grown diamonds. 'The diamond industry is currently at a critical juncture,' he said. 'The meteoric rise in the penetration of synthetic diamonds into the market, which began as a marginal phenomenon, has become an unprecedented flood that threatens the value, image and future of the natural diamond.'
He warned that consumers were 'already having difficulty distinguishing between a natural diamond and a lab-grown imitation' and said a considerable marketing campaign was needed to protect natural diamonds' integrity.
'This trend is not just about sales, it demonstrates changes in values and culture,' he said. 'It is about the loss of the sense of intrinsic worth, wonder and uniqueness that have underpinned the natural diamond for generations.'
Robert Wake-Walker, co-founder of WWW International Diamond Consultants, said it was not just the growth of synthetic diamonds that had hit the prices of natural diamonds.
'The primary reason for the growth of synthetic diamonds over the last three years is that people have fundamentally been hit on all sides by macroeconomic pressures: mortgages are higher, childcare costs are higher, everyone's essential outgoings have increased,' he said. 'In that context, spending £2,000 to 5,000 on a purely discretionary product becomes a huge challenge to most. There needs to be a situation where people can aspire to buy these luxury products for each other again.'
Another industry analyst said lab-grown diamonds were 'an alternative that allows people to purchase something that does the same thing, but they can afford to buy. You'll have people saying to their girlfriend, 'We have this pot of money: we could buy a natural diamond or if we go for a lab-grown diamond we will have a bit left to go into the kids' college fund.' '
• Gemfields' Bruce Cleaver: 'We're like De Beers was 30 years ago'
Wake-Walker added that many lab-grown diamonds were being sold to people who would not have bought natural diamonds. 'It is bringing more people into the broader jewellery market, people who would never have considered diamonds before but when you can get a pair of diamond earrings at Accessorize for £50 for a night out, why not?'
He said the two industries could co-exist and warned that hostile attacks on each other damaged the public's perceptions of the whole industry.
Not all agree with this approach. At the International Gold and Diamond Conference in New York last week Stuart Samuels, president of the diamond jewellery manufacturer Premier Gem Corp, described the lab-grown diamond industry as 'parasites' when asked if the two industries could work together. 'The parasite always likes to co-exist with the host,' he said. 'It's the host that doesn't want the parasite. So it's very nice to say let's co-exist but you're looking to replace me, to kill me off.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China calls for global AI cooperation days after Trump administration unveils low-regulation strategy
China calls for global AI cooperation days after Trump administration unveils low-regulation strategy

The Guardian

time14 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

China calls for global AI cooperation days after Trump administration unveils low-regulation strategy

Chinese premier Li Qiang has proposed establishing an organisation to foster global cooperation on artificial intelligence, calling on countries to coordinate on the development and security of the fast-evolving technology, days after the US unveiled plans to deregulate the industry. Speaking at the annual World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai, Li called AI a new engine for growth, adding that governance is fragmented and emphasising the need for more coordination between countries to form a globally recognised framework for AI. Li warned Saturday that artificial intelligence development must be weighed against the security risks, saying global consensus was urgently needed. His remarks came just days after US president Donald Trump unveiled an aggressive low-regulation strategy aimed at cementing US dominance in the fast-moving field. One executive order targeted what the White House described as 'woke' artificial intelligence models. Opening the World AI Conference, Li emphasised the need for governance and open-source development. 'The risks and challenges brought by artificial intelligence have drawn widespread attention … How to find a balance between development and security urgently requires further consensus from the entire society,' the premier said. Li said China would 'actively promote' the development of open-source AI, adding Beijing was willing to share advances with other countries, particularly developing ones in the global south. The three-day event brings together industry leaders and policymakers at a time of escalating technological competition between China and the United States – the world's two largest economies – with AI emerging as a key battleground. Washington has imposed export restrictions on advanced technology to China, including the most high-end AI chips made by companies such as Nvidia and chipmaking equipment, citing concerns that the technology could enhance China's military capabilities. Li did not name the United States in his speech, but he warned that AI could become an 'exclusive game' for a few countries and companies, and said challenges included an insufficient supply of AI chips and restrictions on talent exchange. At a time when AI is being integrated across virtually all industries, its uses have raised major ethical questions, from the spread of misinformation to its impact on employment, or the potential loss of technological control. Earlier this week, news companies were warned of a 'devastating impact' on online audiences as search results are replaced by AI summaries, after a new study claimed it caused up to 80% fewer clickthroughs. The World AI Conference is an annual government-sponsored event in Shanghai that typically attracts major industry players, government officials, researchers and investors. Saturday's speakers included Anne Bouverot, the French president's special envoy for AI, computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton, known as 'the godfather of AI', and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who has in past years regularly appeared at the opening ceremony both in-person and via video, did not speak this year. The exhibition features predominantly Chinese companies, including tech companies Huawei and Alibaba and startups such as humanoid robot maker Unitree. Western participants include Tesla, Alphabet and Amazon. With Reuters and Agence France-Presse

US-China trade talks: Can China reduce its export dependence?
US-China trade talks: Can China reduce its export dependence?

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

US-China trade talks: Can China reduce its export dependence?

China's high dependence on exports will likely be a key focus of a new round of U.S.- China trade talks this coming week in Stockholm, but a trade deal would not necessarily help Beijing to rebalance its economy. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said he hopes the negotiations can take up this issue, along with China's purchases of oil from Russia and Iran, which undercut American sanctions on those two countries. Hopes rose for a breakthrough in talks after U.S. President Donald Trump announced deals with Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines this week. The U.S. wants China to do two things: Reduce what both the U.S. and the European Union see as excess production capacity in many industries, including steel and electric vehicles. And secondly, to take steps to increase spending by Chinese consumers so the economy relies more on domestic demand and less on exports. 'We could also discuss the elephant in the room, which is this great rebalancing that the Chinese need to do,' Bessent told financial news network CNBC. He said China's share of global manufacturing exports at nearly 30%, 'can't get any bigger, and it should probably shrink.' China is tackling the same issues — for domestic reasons The issues are not new, and China has been working to address them for years, more for domestic reasons than to reduce its trade surpluses with the U.S. and other countries. Bessent's predecessor as treasury secretary, Janet Yellen, made industrial policy a focus of a trip to China last year. She blamed government subsidies for flooding the global market with 'artificially cheap Chinese products.' The European Union, whose top leaders met their Chinese counterparts in Beijing on Thursday, has cited subsidies to justify EU tariffs on electric vehicles made in China. In the 1980s, the U.S. pressured Japan to boost consumer spending when American manufacturing was overwhelmed by exports from the likes of Toyota and Sony. Economists have long argued that China likewise needs to transform into a more consumer-driven economy. Consumer spending accounts for less than 40% of China's economy, versus close to 70% in the United States and about 54% in Japan. Chinese leaders have spoken about both factory overcapacity and weak consumer spending as long-term problems and have sought over the past 20 years to find ways to rebalance the economy away from export manufacturing and massive investments in dams, roads, railways and other infrastructure. Fierce price wars have prompted critical reports in official media saying that companies are 'racing to the bottom,' skimping on quality and even safety to reduce costs. With strong government support, they've also expanded overseas, where they can charge higher prices but still undercut local competitors, creating a political backlash. Economists say China needs a consumer-driven economy All that competition and price cutting has left China battling deflation, or falling prices. When companies receive less for their products, they tend to invest less. That can lead to job cuts and lower wages, sapping business activity and spending power — contrary to the long-term goal of increasing the share of consumer spending in driving overall growth. To counter that, the government is spending billions on rebates and subsidies for people who trade in their cars or appliances for new ones. But acknowledging a problem and solving it are two different things. Economists say more fundamental changes are needed to boost consumption and rein in overcapacity. Such changes can only come incrementally over time. Private Chinese companies and foreign-invested companies create the most jobs, but they've suffered from swings in policy and pressures from the trade war, especially since the pandemic. Demographic changes are another challenge as China's population shrinks and ages. Many experts advocate expanding China's social safety net, health insurance, pensions and other support systems, so that people would feel freer to spend rather than save for a medical emergency or retirement. Yan Se, an economist at Peking University's Guanghua School of Management, warned at a recent forum that deflation will become a long-term issue if China doesn't step up its welfare benefits. 'Chinese people deserve a better life," he said. Facing external threats, China wants to be more self-reliant One possibility, put forward at the same forum by Liu Qiao, the dean of the business school, would be to change incentives for local government officials, rewarding them for raising consumption or household incomes instead of meeting an economic growth target. He doesn't see that happening nationwide but said it could be tested in a province. 'That would send out a message that China needs a different approach,' he said. Chinese leader Xi Jinping has made transforming the country into a technology superpower a top priority. It's a goal that has gained urgency as the U.S. has tightened restrictions on China's access to high-end semiconductors and other advanced knowhow. Output in high-tech manufacturing is growing quickly, adding to potential overcapacity, just as what happened with the government's encouragement of 'green' technologies such as solar panels and wind turbines. Various industries, including EV makers, have pledged to address the issue, but some local governments are striving to keep money-losing enterprises afloat, reluctant to lose tax revenues and jobs, or to fail to meet economic growth targets. Going forward, the government is calling for more coordination of economic development polices in fields such as artificial intelligence so that not every province champions the same industry. But government moves to counter the impact of higher tariffs tend to support sectors already in overcapacity, and the share of consumption in the economy has fallen in recent years. 'A sustained improvement in household consumption will require greater reform ambition,' the World Bank said in its most recent update on China's economy." ___

China's Premier Li proposes global AI cooperation organisation
China's Premier Li proposes global AI cooperation organisation

Reuters

time4 hours ago

  • Reuters

China's Premier Li proposes global AI cooperation organisation

SHANGHAI, July 26 (Reuters) - Chinese Premier Li Qiang proposed on Saturday establishing a world artificial intelligence cooperation organisation, calling on countries to coordinate development and security of the fast-evolving technology. Speaking at the opening of the annual World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, Li called AI a new engine for growth but said governance is fragmented and emphasised the need to step up coordination between countries to form a globally recognised framework for AI. The three-day event brings together industry leaders and policymakers at a time of escalating technological competition between China and the U.S., with AI emerging as a key battleground between the world's two largest economies. Washington has imposed export restrictions on advanced technology to China, including AI chips and chipmaking equipment, citing concerns the technology could enhance China's military capabilities. Despite these restrictions, China has continued making AI breakthroughs that have drawn close scrutiny from U.S. officials. Li said AI technologies were rapidly evolving but that there were constraints, such as the lack of high-end computing chips and restrictions on talent exchange. He called for breaking through bottlenecks for open and coordinated innovation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store