
Watch: Rohit Sharma flaunts his stunning new Lamborghini on Mumbai roads
However, with the next World Cup two years away, there have been discussions around their future in the format. A BCCI source recently revealed that the board is not focused on their future at the moment as Asia Cup and the T20 World Cup remain its priority."Obviously, if they (Rohit and Kohli) have something in mind, they would tell the BCCI brass like they did before the England Test tour. But from an Indian team's perspective, the next big assignment is the T20 World Cup in February and preparations before that. The immediate focus will be on sending the best team for the Asia Cup T20 tournament, hoping all players are fit and available," a BCCI source privy to the developments told PTI on conditions of anonymity.The last tournament that they played was the Champions Trophy in Dubai, where Kohli scored a hundred in a successful chase against Pakistan at the group league stage and also scored a match-winning 84 vs Australia in the semi-final. On the other hand, Rohit starred with a sublime 76 (83) in the final to set up a four-wicket win.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
" Khoon Aur Paani Ek Saath...": Harbhajan Singh Slams Team India For Playing vs Pakistan In Asia Cup
Asia Cup 2025 is all set to begin from September 9 in the UAE. This is going to be a memorable tournament as India will be facing Pakistan for the first time, since the Pahalgam terror attack in April this year. Innocent people lost their lives during the attack, which prompted a war-like situation between the two nations. Following this, any kind of relation with Pakistan was avoided from the Indian side and playing the match against the neighbours was also criticised. As the Asia Cup approaches, former India spinner Harbhajan Singh also stated that Team India should avoid playing against Pakistan as it makes a mockery of the soldiers, who lost their lives. "They need to understand what is important and what is not. This is as simple as that. For me, the soldier who stands on the border, whose family often doesn't get to see him, who sometimes sacrifices his life and never returns home - their sacrifice is so immense for all of us. Compared to that, this is a very small thing, that we can't skip playing one cricket match. It's a very small matter," Harbhajan said on Times of India. "Our government has the same stance, 'Khoon aur paani ek saath nahi beh sakte.' (blood and sweat cannot co-exist). It cannot be the case that there's fighting on the border, tensions between the two nations, and we go to play cricket. Until these big issues are resolved, cricket is a very small matter. The nation always comes first," he added. The former spinner also stated that nothing is bigger than the nation and the Indian players should respect that. "Whatever our identity is, it's because of this country. Whether you are a player, an actor, or anyone else, no one is bigger than the nation. The country comes first, and the duties we owe to it must be fulfilled," said Harbhajan. "Cricket match na khelna bahut maamuli si cheez hai desh ke saamne (Not playing a cricket match is nothing compared to the importance of the nation)," he added.


NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
Irfan Pathan Breaks Silence On Why He Was Sacked From IPL Commentary, Talks In Details About 3 Superstars
Irfan Pathan is not only a T20 World Cup-winning cricketer but he is also known for his elocution in the commentary box. Over the last few years he has been working with top broadcasters during important series. So, it came as a surprise when he was not in the panel for commentary during IPL 2025 opening mach. According to a report in TOI then, Irfan was snubbed from the panel as the "broadcasters were not happy with him bringing in personal grudges on-air and even on his social media handle." However, in recent times, he has done commentary during important series including the India vs England contest. Irfan Pathan has finally broken his silence on being replaced in the commentary panel. "See, I believe that as a broadcaster, when the commentary is going on and the fans are watching the match, you have to go ahead of the visuals and speak about what's happening. The broadcaster and commentator's work is - what is happening and why it is happening. What can happen and how? If a player is doing exceptionally well, you praise him, and if they are not performing well, then criticize him. The commentators' responsibility is towards the fans, not players,' he said on Lallantop. He was then specifically asked about three players Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and Hardik Pandya. "If you look at my social media, there was Virat Kohli's slump in 2019-20. At that time, it was said that it was the time of COVID, and he wasn't getting inspiration. I thought that when a player of big stature undergoes their first slump, then they should be backed. If you look at my social media, I backed him a lot. One, he deserved it, and won a lot of matches. If the slump continues for five years, then it's not right,' Pathan said. 'Rohit Sharma is an amazing player in white-ball cricket, but his average in Test cricket that year was 6, so we said that if he was not the captain, he would not have had a place in the team, and this is true. 'People say that we supported Rohit Sharma more than necessary. Of course, when someone comes to interview on your broadcasting channel, you will not misbehave with them, right? You have invited him, so you will behave politely. When Rohit came to interview, we were, of course, polite, and we had to show that, because he was our guest. So that was connected and said we were supporting him, but it was we who had said that he should keep fighting, but that said, he should not have had a place in the playing XI. If he was not the captain of the team, he would have been dropped.' Then, the anchor expressed his 'Hardik ichha' to know about the issue. No player's name was taken but the hint was clear that the player in question was Hardik Pandya. Pathan replied: "You expressed 'Hardik iccha' to know aboutt he There are 14 matches in IPL. If I have criticised 7 times, then I have gone soft 7 times. You (Hardik) have made a mistake 14 times, I have shown you seven times. This is our job." During the IPL 2024, Pandya had gone from Gujarat Titans to Mumbai Indians, replacing Rohit Sharma as captain. Pathan said he always supported Pandya in this phase when asked if there was a rivalry between him and the star allrounder. "There is no rivalry. All the players of Baroda who have come up, be it Deepak Hooda, Swapnil Singh, Hardik-Krunal. None of them can say that Irfan Pathan and Yusuf Pathan did not support us. Be it his early days or some other time. No one could have done this even two years ago," Pathan said. "We helped them in every way, from sponsorship to shoes. We talked to people to give opportunities to these players. No one can question us. Some time ago VVS Laxman said this on Star Sports, 'I admit that I did not listen to Irfan. If I had listened to him in 2012, Hardik would have played for Sunrisers Hyderabad.' "The people who run it run any story. Today every player has PR. Everyone has their own story. But I say that if any player has played even a single match for India, I respect and support him completely. As a broadcaster, the responsibility is not towards the players but towards the viewers. "I used a soft hand seven times because it is important to control your emotions in broadcasting. You know he is also a human being. I also opposed the derogatory words used for Hardik. I said if you want to criticize, criticize the players. As long as cricketers play, they will be criticized. Sachin was criticized, Gavaskar was criticized. These words are not right. You should not use such words. I said this live. But an atmosphere was created over other small things."


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Shubman Gill or Yashasvi Jaiswal for spot in Asia Cup squad? Ex-India player makes his argument
Former India cricketer Aakash Chopra feels has a stronger case than for a spot in India's squad for the upcoming Asia Cup, highlighting that the left-hander's game is better aligned with the demands of T20 cricket. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The Ajit Agarkar-led selection panel is expected to meet on August 19 to finalise the squad for the tournament, scheduled from September 9 to 28 in the UAE. With Abhishek Sharma and Sanju Samson having established themselves as the preferred opening combination, the selectors face a tough call on whether to add another opener, and if so, who that should be. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! EXCLUSIVE | Harbhajan Singh on Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli, Shubman Gill, India vs Pakistan and more Chopra argued that Jaiswal's style suits India's T20 template. 'As per T20 figures, Yashasvi is little ahead of Shubman. The way he plays T20 and the DNA of the team, he also marries that style,' he said on his YouTube channel on Saturday. He also pointed out the challenge of accommodating Gill without disrupting the balance of the playing XI. 'Sometimes it also happens that if you pick Shubman as the third opener, who is your Test captain, the ODI vice-captain, now you have him on the bench in T20Is, that will not look very nice. So the selectors will be thinking that if we are going to select Shubman, then we will have to give him a place in the eleven. Though picking Shubman is tempting, but I feel Yashasvi should be slightly ahead in this race. ' With India's top order looking settled, Chopra questioned how either Gill or Jaiswal could fit in without shaking the line-up. 'But if that third opener is Shubman, do you want him to sit on the bench? If you don't make him sit and play in the eleven, who will he come in for? If that player's name is Sanju Samson, who will keep wickets?' Poll Is Yashasvi Jaiswal's aggressive style more suited for T20 cricket compared to Shubman Gill? Yes No He further explained why Samson's role complicated matters. 'That is the problem because we don't see Sanju Samson playing in the middle order. You would want him at the top. Tilak and Surya will play at number three and four. So, Sanju at fifth? That won't be a good story,' Chopra added.