
Some people live for chitchat. Others hate it. Service workers have two seconds to figure out which camp a customer is in
Scotty Ross, who lives in Chandler, Arizona, and drives for Uber, starts with, 'How's your day going?' And then, 'I kind of catch the vibe from there,' he says. (When he's a passenger and doesn't feel like talking, he gives polite one-word answers. 'It feels like one of those 'Seinfeld' episode situations,' he says.)
Customers who respond harshly to friendly overtures may not realise that at some businesses, small talk is a requirement for workers, not a personal choice. When Lawrence trains new workers, she suggests a few phrases, like, 'Hey, how's it going?' or, 'Good to see you, what can I get started?' At some places, she says, workers can get written up for skipping this step.
'It is kind of our job to give a 'wow' experience,' says William, a Trader Joe's employee in Seattle who asked to withhold his last name to speak freely about his workplace. 'Hey, how's it going?' is William's only prepared line. 'From there, if they seem like they want to talk, I'll ask more questions. If not, I'll let it be, I just ring them out and bag them and let them go.'
Shoppers tell him about their ongoing chemotherapy and the death of their beloved cats. This kind of thing didn't happen when he worked at Costco, William says. During morning shifts at Trader Joe's, elderly people come in wanting someone to talk to.
But the conversations aren't always pleasant. Customers have yelled at his co-workers for not engaging in sufficient conversation, he says. According to the American Psychological Association's 2023 Work in America Survey, nearly a third of respondents who worked in person with customers or patients said they had experienced verbal abuse in the past year, compared with 22% of office workers.
For some service workers, small talk makes business sense. 'I would say most riders don't tip, and they're more likely to tip if they get into a conversation,' says Ross. When Ross started driving for Uber in 2016, he remembers keeping 80% of each fare. Now, he says Uber gives him only 30 to 50% of what each rider pays. Tips can make the difference, he pointed out, between making around minimum wage in Arizona (before the cost of gas, car maintenance and taxes) and making double that. Lawrence also sees a correlation between conversation and tips. 'The more of an experience or a show that I'm able to curate for the customer, potentially that results in higher tips,' she says.
Anthropologist Bronislaw Malinowski is credited with first describing 'a type of speech in which ties of union are created by a mere exchange of words'. In 1923, he described these exchanges, which he called 'phatic communication,' as 'purposeless expressions of preference or aversions, accounts of irrelevant happenings, comments on what is perfectly obvious'. Like, say, exchanging observations about the weather with a stranger before making them an oat milk latte. Malinowski's definition hints at why small talk can be strangely polarising – it is by design both meaningless and crucial. 'It is your turn to say something now, Mr Darcy,' Elizabeth Bennet demands, when her dance partner refuses to make small talk. 'I talked about the dance, and you ought to make some kind of remark on the size of the room, or the number of couples.' The European marketers might say that Elizabeth is more 'communally oriented' and Darcy is more 'exchange-oriented'.
Ella Fuller, a server in Iowa City, says that these exchanges are a part of the job she enjoys. 'If there's a place in between small talk and overshare, I've always really liked that part of service,' she said. Fuller works at a bar and cafe and had previous gigs at a barbecue spot and an Italian restaurant. At each of these jobs, she says, she had experiences where instances of small talk devolved into customers making inappropriate comments about her body. At the barbecue spot, she told those customers to knock it off. But at the Italian restaurant, she felt obligated to smile through all customer behaviour. She eventually brought the issue to management and was supported. The idea that the customer is always right, writes researcher Dana Yagil, 'implies, for customers as well as for service providers, that customers are entitled to misbehave, while service providers are expected to put up with such misbehaviours'.
A shift, as of late, is that service workers are responding to customers with their own complaints and screeds. On TikTok, nearly 6 million followers tune in to watch actor and longtime server Drew Talbert dramatise restaurant behaviour from a server's perspective. Bartenders go viral for satirising pushy customers. Lawrence, who does stand-up comedy, makes videos re-enacting interactions with customers who inexplicably demand made-up coffee drinks. Servers have taken to TikTok to imitate the 'Gen Z stare', a reference to the way some young adults stare coldly at servers, as if rebuking them for the question, 'Hi, what can I help you with today?'
Finding the right balance of small talk is a customer-facing worker's struggle. 'I don't know why – I can't stop myself – I talk too much,' moans Willy Loman in Death of a Salesman, comparing himself to more successful colleagues. Ross advises other Uber drivers to let customers do 80% of the talking. 'Try not to interrupt them and tell your own stories,' he cautions. 'Basically, be an interviewer.' He notices that he gets his best tips when he's drinking an energy drink and feels cheerful and energised. That service-oriented self isn't always accessible, and that affects his income. 'The first week after my dad died I don't think I got any tips because I was in a bad mood, but I still needed to make some money,' he says. 'You never really know what someone's going through,' he notes – whether driver or rider.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Family's Lincoln scholarship back
A Cricklewood farming family's commitment to agricultural studies has seen scholarship applications open for a second year. The O'Sullivan Family Scholarship Fund is available to support a South Canterbury student in pursuing an agricultural degree. Working alongside the Aoraki Foundation, the O'Sullivan family created the fund to help a student achieve an agricultural degree from Lincoln University. The family has a long-standing connection to Lincoln University that spans five decades, beginning with William (Dermott) O'Sullivan who graduated in 1973. All four of his sons — Ryan, Brett, Tim, and Chris — followed in his academic footsteps, creating a generational bond with the university. After starting his career with Lands and Survey in Timaru, Mr O'Sullivan and his wife Bronwen built a farming legacy in Cricklewood, expanding Glenire Farm into a 500ha dairy operation. All four sons returned to help in 2007 — shortly before Mrs O'Sullivan's death later that year. Mr O'Sullivan said the family was now giving back in a way that reflected their gratitude and commitment to the region's future. "Lincoln University, we believe, has played a major part in our family's success in getting us to where we are today. We would like to give something back, and one way is to support a student from South Canterbury in pursuing an agricultural degree," Mr O'Sullivan said. Mr O'Sullivan established a named endowment with the Aoraki Foundation to provide the scholarship annually. "The foundation staff have been great to work with, and we were stoked to get nine applications from South Canterbury students in our first year, thanks to the great promotion work they did in conjunction with Lincoln." The inaugural scholarship was awarded in 2024 to Jack Neal, a former Timaru Boys' High School student now studying for a BLPM at Lincoln University, with a focus on rural valuation and agricultural management. Mr O'Sullivan said he firmly believed an agricultural degree not only helped address the nationwide shortage of rural valuers, but also equipped students with versatile skills that opened doors across the agricultural industry. He said the family also believed that a strong foundation in education could build legacies that served both the land and the community for generations, and that a good education could shape both their personal and professional lives. Applications for the scholarship fund can be made to Lincoln University and close on October 31. — Allied Media


NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Driverless cars from China expanding into Europe next year through ride-hailing companies
Momenta will soon provide assisted driving technology to Chinese company IM Motors for its cars sold in Britain. While Momenta has not specified the model Uber will be using, it has already signalled it will choose a Chinese model. In China, 'the pace of development and the pressure to deliver at scale push companies to improve quickly,' said Gerhard Steiger, the chair of Momenta Europe. A worker on an electric car assembly line at Jiangling Motors factory in Nanchang, China. The factory will make the RT6 for Baidu and Lyft to use in Europe. Photo / Keith Bradsher, The New York Times China's state-controlled banking system has been lending money at low interest rates to the country's electric car industry in a bid for global leadership. Chinese driverless cars are starting to move into other markets as well. Baidu and Uber announced last month that they would start offering their self-driving cars this year in Asia outside China and in the Middle East. Automakers in China have not yet tried to offer driverless cars in the United States. That is partly because of concerns about the high costs of personal injury lawsuits and the 100% tariffs imposed last year on electric cars imported from China. In addition, the US, citing security, severely limited in January the use of Chinese assisted-driving systems. For navigation, the cars use cameras that take dozens of high-resolution images per second of the road and roadside areas. Automakers and software companies have said that very little information from these photos is uploaded or stored. But collection of the data has raised concerns among US policymakers and companies. China also has stringent restrictions on driving-related data. Elon Musk, chief executive of Tesla, began offering driverless cars in Austin, Texas, in June. Waymo, formerly known as the Google self-driving car project, also has driverless cars in Austin as well as Los Angeles, San Francisco, Phoenix and Atlanta. In Europe, Volkswagen has said it is developing a driverless version of its electric ID. Buzz minivan. But automakers outside China face very high costs for radars, cameras, and other technology required for so-called robotaxis. The price of the electric cars themselves is also higher. An ID. Buzz, without self-driving gear, retails for US$62,000 to US$72,000. The somewhat smaller Jiangling RT6 is less than US$30,000 ($51,000). Self-driving car experiments are already under way in more than a dozen Chinese cities and are being conducted by at least 19 automakers. Last year, Baidu turned its experiment in Wuhan, a city in central China, into the world's largest. A driverless Baidu robotaxi on a road with other vehicles in Wuhan, China. Photo / Qilai Shen, The New York Times The Chinese Government has backed the technology. The government sets demands on the safety of driverless technology and has used censorship to suppress online discussion of crashes and other safety incidents. And China's legal system makes it difficult to win large verdicts from car manufacturers. As a result, Chinese companies are accumulating databases of real-world driving they can use to train their autonomous driving models. Momenta and Baidu trained their driverless car systems in China. In the US, personal injury lawyers have begun focusing on the industry. Last week, a jury in Florida found that flaws in Tesla's self-driving software bore one-third of the responsibility for a crash in 2019 that killed a 22-year-old woman and severely injured her boyfriend. The jury verdict, if upheld on appeal, would require Tesla to pay as much as US$243 million in punitive and compensatory damages to the woman's parents and to her boyfriend. Driverless technology works better with electric cars than with fuel-powered cars. This is because computers can vary the power going to the wheels in an electric car extremely quickly. China is the world's main producer of electric cars. Expanding robotaxi services to new cities, not to mention new countries, is not easy. While the individual cars do not have drivers, they typically require one controller for every several cars to handle difficulties and answer questions from users. And the cars often need to be specially programmed for traffic conditions unique to each city. Lyft and Baidu nonetheless said they had plans for 'the fleet scaling to thousands of vehicles across Europe in the following years'. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Keith Bradsher Photographs by: Qilai Shen, Keith Bradsher, ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES


NZ Herald
7 days ago
- NZ Herald
China dominates the global market for electric vehicles, batteries and solar panels - all invented in the US
Electric vehicles Once, it looked like America's roads would be filled with electric cars. The US inventor William Morrison developed the first successful electric car in 1890, and interested urbanites soon began converting stables to charging ports. By the early 1900s, about one-third of all vehicles on the road were electric. In New York City, a cab company called the Electric Vehicle Company operated electric vehicles with exchangeable batteries, like an early form of Uber or Lyft. At the time, however, many rural areas still lacked reliable electricity: it wasn't until the 1930s that widespread electrification got under way. Oil companies, though, had already created a network to distribute fuel across the country. 'A lot of rural America was still using gasoline for stoves and kerosene for home lighting,' said David Kirsch, a professor of management and entrepreneurship at the University of Maryland. 'You could buy it at many, many general stores across the country.' That made fuel engines more convenient for consumers. The internal combustion engine was improving much faster than battery technology. The Ford assembly line allowed the new fuel cars, like the Model T, to be produced more quickly. By the 1930s, there were only a tiny number of EVs on the road. More than 50 years later, the country had another chance. California said it would require automakers to sell a certain amount of electric vehicles. General Motors built the EV1, a small two-seater sedan that became quickly popular in the state. But when the California regulators backed off the plan in the mid-1990s, GM quietly repossessed the vehicles and discarded them. The US would continue to focus on fuel cars. It was that dominance in fuel-powered cars that initially motivated China to move into EVs more than a decade ago. Around 2010, China's Minister of Science and Technology, Wan Gang, began pushing the country to branch out into electric cars. American companies were already dominating combustion engines, and the country was looking for technologies that its companies could dominate over the next few decades. Between 2010 and 2023, China rolled out a huge bank of subsidies to encourage EV adoption. Interested buyers could get a rebate on an EV of up to 60,000 yuan, or roughly US$8000 ($13,600) – a huge benefit in a country where the average new car costs just US$23,000. EV owners also were exempt from sales tax and received a special coloured licence plate (green instead of blue) that allowed them to bypass the years-long wait for a licence. Manufacturers also received boosts, including tax breaks and faster permitting and siting for factories that produced EVs and batteries. According to one estimate from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, the Chinese Government poured around US$231 billion into EV adoption – and that's likely an underestimate. The investments paid off. In 2010, both China and the US were selling just over 1000 EVs a year. Last year, the US sold 1.2 million – while China sold 6.4 million. And as Congress cuts EV incentives, the divide is likely to widen. 'There's a real danger of the US becoming more technologically isolated in the automotive sector,' said Ilaria Mazzocco, deputy director and senior fellow in Chinese business and economics at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Lithium-ion batteries Batteries followed a similar trajectory to electric vehicles. In the early 1970s, M. Stanley Whittingham, then a scientist at Exxon, created the first functional lithium-ion battery – a design that was later improved upon by John Goodenough at the University of Oxford and the Japanese scientist Akira Yoshino at Asahi Kasei Corp. Initially, the new technology became popular in the 1990s in electronics such as early laptops and cellphones – they were compact and reliable. By the early 2000s, the batteries began making their way into a new generation of electric cars. An American company called A123 was an early manufacturer of lithium iron phosphate batteries with enough capacity to power a car. In 2009, the Department of Energy gave the company hundreds of millions of dollars in a grant under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. But the US wasn't boosting the sales of EVs, and early battery companies struggled to find a toehold in a market dominated by fuel-powered cars and trucks. A123 went bankrupt and was later purchased by a Chinese company. By the early 2010s, as China boosted its sales of EVs, the country was also pouring billions of dollars into battery technology and battery manufacturing. At the same time, the country invested in processing critical minerals like cobalt, nickel and graphite – adding stability to the complex battery supply chain. In 2021, the technology got another boost: China began to require that companies add 10 to 30% battery storage to the grid for each gigawatt of wind or solar coming online. Battery production surged. 'It just exploded,' said Iola Hughes, head of research at Rho Motion, a battery research firm and part of the consulting firm Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. Today, China boasts 85% of the world's global capacity for battery cell manufacturing. For EV batteries, the picture is even starker: China holds 94% of the market share for producing lithium iron phosphate batteries. Solar panels For decades, solar panels were a distinctly American creation. In 1954, scientists at Bell Labs created the world's first commercially viable solar cell, which converted 6% of incoming light into electricity. By the 1970s, solar was booming in the US. The country was in the midst of an oil crisis, and the federal Government directed millions of dollars into research and development of solar. Scientists and engineers from around the world flooded into the US to develop solar technologies. President Jimmy Carter had 32 panels installed on the roof of the White House. According to one estimate, 95% of the world's solar industry in 1978 was based in the US. But in the 1980s, everything changed. President Ronald Reagan slashed funding for renewables and research and development into solar power. 'It was really ideological,' said Greg Nemet, professor of public affairs at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. 'They cut the solar budget by 85% within a couple of years.' Germany and Japan filled the vacuum left by American leadership, gobbling up experienced engineers and scientists. Then, in the early 2000s, European countries began offering huge subsidies for installations of wind and solar. Chinese companies saw an opportunity – and started building millions of panels. 'There was a lot of growing demand in the early to mid-2000s, thanks to all these incentives in Europe, and a lot of entrepreneurs in China just set up factories to serve that demand,' Mazzocco said. After the 2008 financial crisis, Europe shut down those subsidies as the continent shifted towards austerity. But unlike the US decades before, China decided to continue to support the development of solar power. 'The Chinese Government stepped in,' Mazzocco said. So far, China has invested US$50b in new solar power production, and the country now accounts for about 80% of the global solar supply chain. Today, eight of the top 10 solar panel manufacturers are based in China. The other two are in India and Singapore. Experts say that the country's success is based on two things: reliable policy and a push to adopt the new technologies. 'I look across the period from say '69 to the present – what strikes me is how inconsistent we have been with policy,' said Kirsch. 'The Chinese have just cleaned our clock by having consistent policy.' At the same time, China pushed consumers to adopt the technologies even as they encouraged manufacturers to build them. 'Technologies succeed when you combine a technological opportunity with a market opportunity,' said Nemet. Despite all of the US inventions, Nemet says, the country never focused on making sure there was enough domestic demand for those technologies. 'The US was really good at creating these technological opportunities – but we just weren't supporting the market side enough,' he said.