
Justin Bieber suffers embarrassing moment as his pants fall off exposing his underwear
In new footage, captured by Pop Faction, the Canadian pop star, 31, could be seen struggling with his pants, before they dropped down past his knees while he spoke to a group of friends backstage.
Despite the embarrassing moment at the Bird Street Club in West Hollywood, the father-of-one seemed unfazed as he quickly pulled his bottoms back up.
The Baby hitmaker, who is married to beauty mogul Hailey Bieber, is often seen in baggy, low-slung trousers, so low they frequently expose his underwear.
Fans of the performer expressed concern and confusion in the comments section of the now-viral video circulating on social media..
'How can you actually have any comfort walking around with your pants down your legs. How?' one asked.
Another commented: 'I use to be a big fan. But it's time that we grow up and have a reality check. I hope he gets back to the great musicians that he can be.'
'At what point does it become public indecency?' a third wrote.
A fourth quipped: 'I still don't get it how it could be -- let so called -- style. More than malfunctioning in purpose.. but for unclear reason. Is that called fashion??'
Despite some sharing worry over Justin's mental health, others reminded fellow social media users that his pants have been falling down since the early 2010s.
Throughout the party, Justin appeared to have a great time as he entertained the crowd, sipped a beer, danced to his own music and hit golf balls.
On Saturday, the two-time Grammy winner shared a slideshow of behind-the-scenes photos from the event, including a picture of him kissing Hailey.
Other celebrities in attendance included John Mayer, Madison Beer, The Kid Laroi and former Disney Channel star Kyle Massey, according to TMZ.
Following its release on July 11, 2025, Swag debuted at No. 2 on the Billboard 200.
His seventh record earned praise from Billboard, which commended him for using music to take control over 'the present narrative' and 'his and his family's future.'
The publication's deputy editor Lyndsey Havens also pointed to one song as a sign of Bieber's maturity when it comes to his much-speculated marriage.
'Walking Away is a goosebump-raising confessional about why Bieber isn't 'walking away' from his marriage — no matter how tough it gets. 'We better stop before we say some s–t, we've been testing our patience,' he admits, before declaring, 'Baby, I ain't walking away."
'This song functions like a refreshingly honest vow renewal, as Bieber recalls giving Hailey her ring and promising to change.'
He also appears to reference Hailey in Go Baby, giving her a shoutout.
'That's my baby, she's iconic/ iPhone case, lip gloss on it,' sings Bieber, speaking of his wife Hailey and her Rhode beauty empire, which recently sold to Elf Beauty in $1 billion deal.
'Sure, things may not always be perfect — but isn't that the beauty of having a partner to celebrate the good and brave the bad with? And for the Biebers, they have to live their highs and lows out loud. 'Go Baby' proves that there's no love lost — rather, they're one another's biggest fans when they need it most,' Havens writes.
Swag marks Bieber's follow-up to 2021's Justice, which spawned hits like Hold On, Peaches, and Lonely, and led to a world tour that was cut short in 2022 after Bieber announced he was stepping back to prioritize his health.
Since then, the singer has made headlines for everything but music — welcoming his first child, Jack Blues Bieber, with wife Hailey in August 2024, while also facing mounting speculation over his mental health, cryptic online behavior, and rumored tension in his marriage.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
17 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘Nobody wants this!' scream Love Island fans as controversial challenge returns and viewers threaten to ‘switch off'
THE iconic baby challenge is making a comeback to Love Island tonight but fans are feeling far from ready. In the coming episodes, viewers will witness the Love Islanders coupled up and doing their best to take care of a screaming baby doll. 4 4 The Love Island challenge is supposed to truly test all of the sets of couples to see if they can keep their cool and successfully look after a little one. For some, the challenge will bring them closer. But others may leave thinking twice about whether they wish to have children in the future. Fans of the show are far from happy to hear the news though, taking to social media to express their disappointment in seeing the challenge return. 'We wanted the tweet challenge back!! No one cares about some f*** ass baby dolls,' said one user. A second shared: 'I actually hate the baby doll challenge. Lol this is when I stop watching'. A third agrees: 'There is nothing I hate more than the baby challenge, actively skip it everytime.' The ITV2 show made the decision to axe the baby challenge after nine seasons back in 2023 to allow space to welcome new tasks and challenges to the show. A sports day event was instead switched in place that year, and saw the Islanders competed in various athletic and silly games. At the time, fans were sad to see the baby challenge go, deeming the replacement as 'boring and dull'. One Twitter user shared: 'All I wanted was Tyrella in the baby challenge. Was that too much to ask for???'. But this year it seems that viewers feel the opposite way. Lasting love has been found in the villa for ex-Islanders, including Molly-Mae Hague, 26, and Tommy Fury, 26, who made it through the baby challenge in 2019. The couple, who briefly split in August last year, welcomed their first child, daughter Bambi, back in 2023. With tensions already high between many of the duos in this year's lineup, including Dejon and Meg, it's going to be interesting seeing what unfolds. Love Island continues tonight at 9pm on ITV2. 4 4


The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Spotify used to seem like a necessary evil for musicians. Now it just seems evil
Being an independent musician comes with plenty of challenges, but it also comes with privileges, and one of them is that you're free to speak your mind. You can live by your beliefs. When necessary, you can kick against the pricks. Today, I am joining a growing number of musicians kicking against one prick in particular. I have decided to remove my music from Spotify. Don't get me wrong. I appreciate the positive side of streaming. It's convenient, like having your own radio station. If you're in a car and you want to hear Beasley Street by John Cooper Clarke – which I often do – it's there for you. This ease of access is a great thing for the listener. And it can be a good thing for the artist too, if, after hearing a song on a streaming platform, the listener then buys the album or pays to see the artist in concert. But it's not so great if streaming is the listener's only engagement. Because that accessibility means fewer people now purchase music via digital download, vinyl or CD – which would be fine, if streaming royalty rates weren't atrocious. Spotify pays artists between $0.003 and $0.005 per stream. For independent artists – especially those from the Pacific and First Nations communities, and artists without the machinery of major labels – this is insulting and completely unsustainable. A royalty model that is not sustainable for artists leads to a situation where only the independently wealthy can create music – an outcome that is neither culturally healthy nor desirable. Of course, that's assuming the independently wealthy musicians are able to fight off the AI-generated music currently crowding onto the streaming platforms. Don't think this situation has come about because times are hard for everybody. The music industry is making as much revenue as it did at its 1990s peak, but little of that money is making it through to those who play the instruments or sing the tunes. As musicians, we have been left with little choice but to hold out our begging bowls and tell ourselves that something is better than nothing. But leaving Spotify is about more than the money. Spotify CEO Daniel Ek recently lead a €600m ($1.07bn) investment in a German defence company called Helsing, which specialises in AI-driven autonomous weapon systems, through his investment firm Prima Materia. Ek is also the chairman of Helsing, having joined the board in 2021 when his investment fund Prima Materia put €100m into the then-startup. Ek isn't paid a salary by Spotify – he takes a share of its stock, last year alone cashing out a reported $345m. So here we are, artists helping to build algorithms to sell our music – and the success of that algorithm determines the flow of wealth to a man who invests in building machines that could kill people. In recent years, we've witnessed the horror of AI drone wars in Ukraine and Gaza – children killed and hospitals destroyed with the press of the space bar. Ek is investing in technology that can cause suffering and death. Spotify used to seem like a necessary evil. By association, it now just seems evil. So I have decided to remove my music from the platform. Many other artists have done the same thing. The removal of my works won't make any significant dent in the company's profits. It won't change my earnings much either, but I can no longer be complicit. I don't want my songs – some written with survivors of conflict – to enrich a man who helps to fund weapons. And I am urging everyone else to quit Spotify. There are alternatives. These platforms (what a soulless word) are not perfect, but at least they aren't owned by individuals who align themselves with the arms race. If you're an artist, I ask you to think hard about where your music lives. If you're a listener, consider where your money goes. And as a music industry, let's think hard about who we take sponsorship from. We can't keep handing our creativity, our loyalty and our cash to amoral tech giants who see music as content and war as business. I'd rather earn nothing than profit from destruction. As Deerhoof succinctly put it in their statement on leaving Spotify: 'If the price of 'discoverability' is letting oligarchs fill the globe with computerised weaponry, we're going to pass on the supposed benefit.' David Bridie is an independent musician, producer and installation artist. Across four decades as a band member, solo artist and composer of film and TV soundtracks, he has released more than 30 albums. He is also the founder and artistic director of Wantok Musik Foundation, a not-for-profit music label that records, releases and promotes culturally infused music from Indigenous Australia, Melanesia and Oceania


Glasgow Times
37 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Spotify age verification checks could see accounts deleted
New laws are now in place that are intended to protect young people on the internet, particularly on sites that have pornographic content. It means that the Online Safety Act could put users accounts at risk of being deleted if they fail to verify their age. Will Spotify require age verification? The music streaming app announced in partnership with Yoti, a digital identity company, that age verification will be carried out via facial recognition or the use of ID documents. Your Spotify account is getting deleted unless you do age verification — Calgie (@christiancalgie) July 30, 2025 Those who chose not to disclose their age via this process will have their accounts deactivated, with the option of reinstating their account within 90 days by completing the process via a link sent to their email. Spotify says: 'You may be presented with an age check when you try to access certain age restricted content, like music videos tagged 18+. Some users will be asked to perform an age check when accessing certain age restricted content. 'You can do this by going through our facial age check. If this shows inaccurate results, you can always correct that with an ID verification. 'If you cannot confirm you're old enough to use Spotify, your account will be deactivated and eventually deleted.' How do I confirm my age on Spotify? In the UK, Spotify users must be 13 or over. If the age verification checks confirm the user is under 13, they will have their account deleted. Spotify, which has a staggering 696 million users worldwide, has stressed Yoti will delete users' data once the verification process is complete. What have people said online about the new age checks? Disgruntled Spotify users took to social media to share their thoughts. One said on X: 'The time for quitting Spotify is now. Who's with me?' 'Age verification on Spotify is insane - time to leave,' another said. While a third added: 'Age verification for pornographic material is what it was sold as. 'It's turned into age verification for Spotify, Xbox…it's got nothing to do with protecting children.' Others also felt that now was the time to re-visit old iPods and CDs for music, instead of streaming apps, with one person commenting: 'Age verification on Spotify?!? Time to buy physical music again!' Does Xbox have age restrictions? Xbox have said that they are also 'investing in technologies and tools to ensure players have age-appropriate experiences on their platform', while sending notifications to UK users to verify their age. Via a statement on their website, the gaming brand said that from the beginning of next year, age verification will be required to have 'full access' to the console's social features, such as voice or text communication and game invites. Tips to Spot Fake Online Reviews Recommended Reading: Does the UK require age verification? Age verification under the Online Safety Act came into force in the UK on July 25. Since then, websites face being fined up to £18million if they do not check users are aged over 18 before letting them access potentially 'harmful' material.