Mitsubishi boss slams federal emissions regulations, "naivety" around EVs
Designed to incentivise manufacturers to reduce CO2 emissions across their vehicle lineups, the NVES commenced on January 1, 2025. If automakers exceed an average carbon emissions target on the vehicles they sell each year, they'll be penalised $100 per g/km of CO2 for every vehicle which exceeds the target.
Speaking at the recent local launch for the updated Mitsubishi Outlander, Mr Westcott addressed the issue of NVES by telling CarExpert he agreed with its fundamental motives.
'It's important that people understand that I personally, and as a company, we are very concerned about sustainability and the environment, and we think that the world should be doing something to reduce emissions,' he said.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
'That's not just for our industry, it's for everything. We need to be looking at reducing significant emissions to protect our planet for the future.'
The NVES sets out to do just that. Put simply, manufacturers are now subject to CO2 limits for new cars, which are 141g/km for passenger cars and 210g/km for light commercial vehicles and heavy-duty SUVs. These limits will reduce every year until 2029, forcing manufacturers to sell increasingly efficient vehicles.
Among the ways to get around this and continue to sell 'dirtier' vehicles is to sell more zero- and low-emission cars like EVs and hybrids, but Mr Westcott doesn't expect government regulations to reverse recent trends in EV demand.
'I think there's a degree of naivety that thinks that if you just penalise us as [manufacturers], all of us, that somehow that's miraculously going to change the market,' he said.
ABOVE: Australia's four best-selling EVs.
'And the reality is, as we sit here today, at last count, and I'm losing count, there are [more than 85] battery EV options available in the Australian market. There is no shortage of choice, and yet battery-electric vehicles are still in [low demand].
'That's not because of penalties or a lack of penalties. We've got plenty of those, but they're not going to change the equation, because there are other pieces in the puzzle that are missing.
'Any solid, rational person will understand that you need to address, and whether it's mathematics or accounting, you've got to balance the equation.
'We, as a [manufacturer], cannot force you or [anyone] to buy an EV, and you can penalise us to death. I still am not going to force you to buy an EV.'
Mitsubishi's current focus is firmly on plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs), though it does have plans to launch an EV co-developed with Foxtron in the second half of 2026. Fringe benefits tax (FBT) exemptions for PHEVs recently came to an end though, a move Mr Westcott has previously labelled a mistake.
In the first half of 2025, 25,613 PHEVs were delivered across Australia, a significant increase on the 8223 delivered in the same period last year.
EVs, meanwhile, have notched 47,145 deliveries in the first half of 2025, but that number is down on the 50,905 delivered in the first half of 2024.
'We need to understand the reasons that people aren't buying EVs, and that includes, among other things – there's a few things – but one of them is primarily infrastructure. Where do I charge this car?,' Mr Westcott said.
'And if I'm a tradie and I've got five jobs to do, and the current technology doesn't allow me to tow a trailer that weighs 3.5 tonnes full of tools or cement or tiles for eight hours of the day, so I can get to the five jobs that I need to do without spending an hour or two hours charging my car every two hours, then I'm going to make no money, mate. I'm not going to make a living.
'There's a practicality, there's common sense, maybe, but just some practicality that's missing in what's happened with NVES. The ambition is right, but there's a gap between ambition and reality.
'And I don't see anybody that's talking about how we're going to fix those gaps that exist between ambition and reality. Just penalising us is not going to force people to buy cars.
'We can't force people to buy cars. We are a democratic country, and people have free choice.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
7 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The move that has killed off Friday-night drinks
Gather round, young workers. Let me tell you a story of what work was like in the olden days. It might sound strange, but once upon a time people across the city would descend upon a central location at the same time, toiling away from Monday to Friday in a common space together. Then, on the final afternoon of the last workday, a small ritual would occur in many workplaces. In some of them, platters laden with 'chips and dips' would materialise on a large table near the kitchen. In others, a drinks cart would be wheeled between cubicles, offering cold drinks to weary workers. And, more often than not, a colleague would appear at your desk to invite you to the pub to digest the week's events and swap upcoming plans for the weekend. These historic vignettes are not from decades in the past, you only need to rewind your memory back to 2019 to remember them. For countless generations, workers celebrated the end of the week by heading to the local watering hole. Today, however, thanks in part to changing ways of working, WFH is killing Friday night drinks. Loading According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, about 40 per cent of Australian employees now spend some of their week under hybrid arrangements, and it's caused a drastic change to how we socialise. The most common days to be in the office? Tuesday to Thursday. And the most likely days to work from home? Mondays and Fridays. But it's not all the fault of WFH, as there's a perfect storm of trends that has led us to this moment. The first is a long-term shift of younger Australians away from alcohol.
The Age
7 minutes ago
- The Age
The move that has killed off Friday-night drinks
Gather round, young workers. Let me tell you a story of what work was like in the olden days. It might sound strange, but once upon a time people across the city would descend upon a central location at the same time, toiling away from Monday to Friday in a common space together. Then, on the final afternoon of the last workday, a small ritual would occur in many workplaces. In some of them, platters laden with 'chips and dips' would materialise on a large table near the kitchen. In others, a drinks cart would be wheeled between cubicles, offering cold drinks to weary workers. And, more often than not, a colleague would appear at your desk to invite you to the pub to digest the week's events and swap upcoming plans for the weekend. These historic vignettes are not from decades in the past, you only need to rewind your memory back to 2019 to remember them. For countless generations, workers celebrated the end of the week by heading to the local watering hole. Today, however, thanks in part to changing ways of working, WFH is killing Friday night drinks. Loading According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, about 40 per cent of Australian employees now spend some of their week under hybrid arrangements, and it's caused a drastic change to how we socialise. The most common days to be in the office? Tuesday to Thursday. And the most likely days to work from home? Mondays and Fridays. But it's not all the fault of WFH, as there's a perfect storm of trends that has led us to this moment. The first is a long-term shift of younger Australians away from alcohol.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
APRA's refusal to revise the 3 per cent stress test keeps Aussies locked in mortgage prison
ANALYSIS If you're in mortgage prison, you just had a parole hearing. And the result? Parole denied. That was the outcome when the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced recently that it would be keeping the 3 per cent mortgage repayment 'stress test' buffer in place. That's right, we're not being prudent enough! And we must be regulated. The buffer dictates that anyone applying for a home loan is 'stress tested' at a loan repayment rate 3 per cent higher than what they will actually be paying if successful in their loan application. So, if you want to borrow money at 6 per cent, the bank will check your income and financial habits to make sure you could make repayments at 9 per cent interest. You know, just in case there is a series of rate rises. They don't want you to default and lose that dream home. Only problem is, for a lot of people, the rule is stopping them getting a home at all. Let's be real here. Interest rates are coming down. They are not going to go up 3 per cent in the near term. The stress buffer started out at 2 per cent in 2014. It went to 2.5 per cent in 2019 on the back of a growth cycle that left many borrowers overexposed to the risk of a market correction. It was rightly increased to 3 per cent in October 2021 when the official cash rate was at 0.1 per cent and there were variable rate home loans with interest rates below 2 per cent. The only way was up at that time. Now is a completely different story. We have seen a cost of living crisis, stagnant wages, and rising house prices, yet someone who has somehow managed to scrape a deposit together needs to be able to show they can make repayments at a level not seen from variable interest rates since before the 2008 GFC. This is especially difficult for young people, as noted by my colleague Jonathan Chancellor in his Sydney Weekend column, who quoted Michael Sukkar, the Coalition's shadow housing minster during the 2025 election campaign, criticising APRA's 'one size fits all' rule as preventing nearly 40 per cent of first home buyers from getting a loan. That type of outcome is disastrous for future generations. But possibly the most absurd thing is that some people already with a mortgage who are struggling to make repayments might see a loan out there with a lower interest rate, but they won't be able to refinance to it because they don't pass the stress test. They might be paying 6 per cent currently, but if they wanted to pay 5.5 per cent, they'd have to prove they can pay 8.5 per cent. Just that 0.5 per cent difference would save you more than $300 a month on a $1 million mortgage and $114,000 over 30 years. Granted, there is a workaround for some lenders, who are able to use discretion to assess some borrowers at 1 or 2 per cent buffers, but for those who don't qualify? They are stuck in mortgage prison. And it's looking like APRA hasn't just left the keys in its 'other pants', but has thrown them away altogether. The 3 per cent buffer stayed in place even when the cash rate was at 4.35 per cent and there were borrowers being assessed at 10 per cent in order to get a 7 per cent home loan. Now that the cash rate and variable rates are both on the way down, adjusting the buffer is becoming less urgent, so expect more borrowers to miss out as APRA stays firm.
