logo
Sorry, Russell Findlay: your Dirty Harry act won't wash

Sorry, Russell Findlay: your Dirty Harry act won't wash

My question is this: what on earth gave him the idea that such a leader would be a good fit for Scotland's problems?
Be it drug-related mortality, burgeoning mental illness, alcoholism, deaths of despair, etc: is Clint Eastwood the man for the job to sort that lot out?
Perhaps his strategy is that desperate times call for desperate measures. And therein lies the obvious title for his own subsequent and inevitable misery memoir: Desperate.
Frankly, I won't be buying Desperate either, as I have little patience for the catalogue of lame excuses found in political obituaries.
Archie Beaton, Inverness.
Referendum was on devolution
Martin Redfern from the 'almost in England' town of Melrose denies Pete Wishart's claim that Yes nearly won the 2014 referendum (Letters, June 15). Oh, how memories fade.
Running into the vote it was generally accepted that Yes was winning. The unionist parties panicked big time, 'swallowed the wasp' and came together to buy off some of the 'fearties' (those who may fall victim to the numerous Projects Fear) in Scotland with yet more deplorable devolution. Has Mr Redfern forgotten 'the Vow'? The Smith Commission?
In the end the question unofficially changed from Yes or No to Scottish independence to one of more 'buy-off' devolution. There was never a vote on independence whether or not the Queen 'purred'.
Frank Cannon, Glasgow.
Simple questions
Alan Ritchie's "simple question for the taxman" (Letters, June 15) raises various questions, such as (a) why should well-off pensioners like me receive the winter fuel payment, and (b) why shouldn't parents have to pay for their offspring's education, given that parenthood is a lifestyle choice?
George Morton, Rosyth.
Read more letters
Rob quangos to pay schools
Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth has published the Scottish Government's national guidance on how to tackle escalating levels of bad behaviour and classroom violence. Teachers have been asking for help for far too many years but were ignored by the SNP-dominated Scottish Government.
Disruptive pupils should not be allowed to affect the education of others and hinder them achieving their full potential in life. Those causing disruption need to be taken out of class and put into specialist facilities with specialist staff.
This will require additional finance. Where will this come from? Easy, the Scottish Government needs to stop spending money on its army of spin doctors, special advisors, equality, diversity and inclusion staff, climate change committees, quangos and lots more and spend it on education.
A report last month revealed that the Scottish Government spends an estimated £6.6 billion funding quangos every year. The SNP always talks a good game but always fails abysmally in practice.
Clark Cross, Linlithgow.
Slash the boats
Illegal immigrants gathering in northern France are reported to be fighting each other, with crimes committed by them against French men and women. Unlike legal migrants we do not know their provenance or status. It's the duty of government to defend the realm and the citizens within it. Illegal migration across the Channel in inflatables must be stopped for the safety of the public.
The weak point of the gangs is their use of inflatables. Deflate them and it's no-go. What is required is the use of the army. Platoons of well-briefed men should cross the Channel by air or sea at dawn and disable every inflatable they can find by the simple expedient of slashing them. The process could be repeated daily until the migrant gang masters give up. Alas the Government seems more concerned about protecting far-off countries rather than our own borders.
William Loneskie, Lauder.
Repression in Hong Kong
I was interested to read this week that in Hong Kong, the China Labour Bulletin has been forced to close its doors. It was founded in 1994 by Han Dongfang, a Chinese railway worker originally from Shanxi who founded the gōngzìlián, a federation of workers autonomous from the "official unions", in the days of Tiananmen Square in Beijing.
Affected by the repression of June 4, 1989, he had spent 22 months in prison, where he had contracted tuberculosis. Expatriated to the United States for treatment, he was not allowed to return to Beijing and in 1993 he arrived in Hong Kong as an exile. The following year, Han Dongfang created the China Labour Bulletin precisely to support labour movements in China with the aim of making trade unions truly representative and providing accurate information on Chinese workers' activism.
In addition to commentary and research, the CLB website monitored strikes and industrial accidents across the country. At its headquarters in Cheung Sha Wan, the China Labour Bulletin employed more than a dozen full-time employees and initially received grants from a range of government or quasi-government entities, as well as trade unions and private foundations. Now Hong Kong's new rules have made it a "threat to national security" to also receive subsidies from abroad to carry out activities of this type.
The voice that relaunched the battles of simple workers who are victims of injustice in China is extinguished. Since Beijing imposed a security law on Hong Kong in 2020, about 60 civil society groups have disbanded or been forced to stop their activities. The West, as usual, never makes a fuss when money is involved and so rich dictatorships like China and Saudi Arabia do whatever they want.
B McKenna, Dumbarton.
Are Super Off-Peak fares in danger? (Image: Colin Mearns)
Beware threat to Super Off-Peak
ScotRail's upcoming scrapping of peak fares is good news, but (here's the proviso), only as long as scrapping of peak will not (unlike last year's trial on ScotRail), be accompanied by the quietly-slipped-in abolition of Super Off-Peak. Super Off-Peak needs to be protected.
The 12-month trial on ScotRail in 2023/2024 abolishing peak fares actually increased travelling costs for many trips and round-trips. This is because the very many journeys which would never have been taken during peak time anyway (weekend and bank holiday travel are examples) no longer had the advantage of the Super Off-Peak discount which they had had before the implementation of the trial. The abolition of peak was completely unnecessarily accompanied by the abolition of Super Off-Peak. Simplification does not necessarily mean better.
Elsewhere in Great Britain, the quietly-slipped-in abolition of Super Off-Peak as part of fare restructuring which is (allegedly) intended to decrease travelling costs has actually resulted in an increase.
People and groups should always check if any proposals for changes to fares structures include the abolition of Super Off-Peak. (The word "simpler" and the word "better" are not synonyms).
As happened with the 2023/2024 ScotRail scheme abolishing peak fares; as has happened with fares changes on LNER, changes to public transport fares and ticketing are often used as an opportunity to quietly slip in an abolition of Super Off-Peak, so actually often increasing travelling costs.
Super Off-Peak is a valuable resource for the travelling public. Don't let Super Off-Peak on Great Britain's railway network be killed off.
Russ Underhill, Burnt Oak, London.
Fight the benefit cuts
People with arthritis are at risk of being hardest hit if the UK Government's planned cuts to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) go ahead.
The devastating impact of the proposed welfare changes could see 77% of people living with arthritis who claim PIP – Adult Disability Payment in Scotland – lose this vital support altogether.
We need to speak out against them – and urgently.
Life costs more for disabled people. Benefits like the Adult Disability Payment can help with the extra costs of everyday tasks or getting around. It's a lifeline.
Pushing thousands into poverty due to proposed changes to these proposed changes will make life even harder for people already struggling to pay for care, cover their bills or heat their homes.
We have a chance to stop the cuts. MPs could be voting on these plans this month, so we need your readers to act now and share their concerns with their constituency MP.
Versus Arthritis is urging anyone who is concerned about these proposed changes to disability benefits to contact their MP and ask them to protect people with arthritis now and vote against the cuts.
Your readers can contact their MP direct by post or email them by visiting the Versus Arthritis website and entering their postcode.
Deborah Alsina, Chief Executive, Versus Arthritis, London.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scottish government minister says UK welfare reforms should be abandoned
Scottish government minister says UK welfare reforms should be abandoned

Powys County Times

time2 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Scottish government minister says UK welfare reforms should be abandoned

The UK Government must abandon its 'unfair' welfare reforms in the wake of its late climbdown on a key plank of the proposals, Scotland's Social Justice Secretary has said. Shirley-Anne Somerville was commenting after the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill passed its first legislative hurdle at Westminster. Ahead of the crunch vote, Sir Keir Starmer ditched a mainstay of his welfare reform agenda as he battled to get the draft laws through the House of Commons. In a major concession as MPs prepared to vote, the Prime Minister shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. Under Scotland's devolved social security system, Pip is currently being replaced by the Adult Disability Payment. Reacting to events at Westminster, Ms Somerville reiterated the Scottish Government's pledge not to cut that benefit. 'Despite the panicked, last-minute concessions they have made, if the UK Government presses ahead with cuts to disability support they will plunge more people into poverty,' said the SNP MSP. 'That is unconscionable. 'Their approach also risks creating a deeply unfair two-tier system, pushing the impact of cuts onto future applicants for disability benefits. 'The UK Government needs to stop balancing the books on the backs of some of the most vulnerable people in society. 'They need to properly listen to the overwhelming criticism their proposals have generated and do the right thing by disabled people by abandoning this bill entirely. 'I want to reassure disabled people in Scotland, that the Scottish Government will not cut Scotland's Adult Disability Payment, we will not let disabled people down as the UK Government has done.' The decision to remove the Pip changes from the Bill was announced just 90 minutes before MPs voted. The legislation passed by 335 votes to 260, majority 75.

Scottish government minister says UK welfare reforms should be abandoned
Scottish government minister says UK welfare reforms should be abandoned

Rhyl Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Scottish government minister says UK welfare reforms should be abandoned

Shirley-Anne Somerville was commenting after the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill passed its first legislative hurdle at Westminster. Ahead of the crunch vote, Sir Keir Starmer ditched a mainstay of his welfare reform agenda as he battled to get the draft laws through the House of Commons. In a major concession as MPs prepared to vote, the Prime Minister shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. Under Scotland's devolved social security system, Pip is currently being replaced by the Adult Disability Payment. Reacting to events at Westminster, Ms Somerville reiterated the Scottish Government's pledge not to cut that benefit. 'Despite the panicked, last-minute concessions they have made, if the UK Government presses ahead with cuts to disability support they will plunge more people into poverty,' said the SNP MSP. 'That is unconscionable. 'Their approach also risks creating a deeply unfair two-tier system, pushing the impact of cuts onto future applicants for disability benefits. 'The UK Government needs to stop balancing the books on the backs of some of the most vulnerable people in society. 'They need to properly listen to the overwhelming criticism their proposals have generated and do the right thing by disabled people by abandoning this bill entirely. 'I want to reassure disabled people in Scotland, that the Scottish Government will not cut Scotland's Adult Disability Payment, we will not let disabled people down as the UK Government has done.' The decision to remove the Pip changes from the Bill was announced just 90 minutes before MPs voted. The legislation passed by 335 votes to 260, majority 75. Despite the late concession, there were 49 Labour rebels, the largest revolt so far of Sir Keir's premiership.

Charity ‘feared funding cut' over links with gender-critical academic
Charity ‘feared funding cut' over links with gender-critical academic

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Charity ‘feared funding cut' over links with gender-critical academic

​A Scottish academic has claimed she was compelled to step down from a charity over fears that Scottish government funding would be cut due to its association with her. Professor Sarah Pedersen​, dean of the graduate school at Robert Gordon University​, said the charity's Edinburgh head office ​told her it was ​a​nxious that funding would be pulled because of her gender-critical views. She declined to identify the charity. ​A​fter ​a​ppearing at​ an Edinburgh University​ event on trans rights, Pedersen said she endured non-platforming and aggression from students who allegedly compiled a 'dossier' of 'evil things' she was alleged to have done, including retweeting a social media post from Johann Lamont, the gender-critical former Scottish Labour leader. The ​l​ecturer has now called for John Swinney, the first minister, to show immediate leadership on the issue of sex and gender in Scotland. • Times view: Kirk fiasco shows SNP must stop dragging its feet on single-sex spaces Pedersen is one of a handful of UK academics who put their name to a UK government-commissioned report by Professor Alice Sullivan, a companion piece of research to a report earlier this year that found health boards, rape crisis services and police in Scotland had failed to record accurate data on sex and gender. They gave evidence that those who have challenged the theory that sex is always less important than gender identity have been bullied, harassed and blocked from career progression. The report, 'Barriers to research on sex and gender', features personal accounts from UK academics, including those from the University of Edinburgh and Robert Gordon University. In what is described as the most extensive research of its kind conducted in the UK, Sullivan has collected and analysed evidence on the impact of a 'hostile culture' that has developed in university campuses over the past decade. Pedersen said she was taken aback by the number of research participants who wished to remain anonymous, demonstrating the 'chilling effect' of discrimination against gender critical academics. Pedersen thought 'long and hard' about whether or not to go on the record​ but said she was supported by Robert Gordon University, which had encouraged 'academic freedom throughout'. The report contains other accounts of the personal and professional impact of universities tolerating and encouraging the behaviour of a small minority of staff. Campaigns were often co-ordinated through LGBT+ networks, which were embedded in management EDI (equality, diversity and inclusion) structures, it found. One of the most difficult experiences involved Pedersen being invited to step down from the charity she chaired. The organisation's umbrella body in Edinburgh said that Scottish government funding might be pulled due to the charity's association with her. 'I'm not sure how credible a concern that was in reality but I think the fact that it was the head office in Edinburgh that told our committee this made it credible,' she said. • Keir Starmer says trans ruling must be enacted 'as soon as possible' 'It certainly made me feel that I could not continue in my role, because if we didn't get funding, and if the charity had to close or reduce its services, then I would feel tremendously guilty.' Sullivan has made 20 recommendations to the government and academic institutions to defend high-quality research and protect individual academics from professional and personal attack. One of the routes to improvement, Pedersen believes, would be a sense of leadership on the issue from the Scottish government. 'Keir Starmer came out firmly with a position a couple of days ago, but we've not had that lead from John Swinney,' she said. 'And I think that until that happens, things will continue to stall.' The Scottish government has been contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store