RHONJ Alum Siggy Flicker Appointed to Holocaust Museum Board by POTUS
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Real Housewives of New Jersey alum Siggy Flicker departed the series after Season 8. After fighting about cake and her co-stars being less intelligent, she was done. Siggy also left New Jersey in the rearview and moved to Florida. And now she has a new position, courtesy of President Donald Trump.
Siggy Flicker Appointed to US Holocaust Memorial Council along with other members
The podcaster, POTUS supporter, and member of his Mar-a-Lago Club, has a new position. The Washington Post reported that President Trump added five members to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, including Siggy. These appointments will also replace the members who were fired on April 29, 2025. Those previous appointees were all appointed by former President Joe Biden.
Consequently, President Trump announced the news in a Truth Social post on Monday night. 'They are all strong supporters of Israel, and will ensure we NEVER FORGET,' he wrote. 'Congratulations to all!'
Of course, Siggy responded to the president's message via her Instagram. 'Thank you for the privilege & honor to represent and never forget,' she wrote. Further, her profile pic shows her with the president, holding an Israeli flag.
However, Siggy's stepson was involved in some controversy. Tyler Campanella was arrested and charged with five misdemeanors relating to the January 6th riot. Additionally, the FBI mentioned one of Siggy's Instagram posts, which showed Tyler inside the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The photo was captioned, 'I love patriots so much. Stay safe Tyler. We love you.'
Trump's decision to remove Biden's appointees has raised some alarms. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) told the Washington Post that Trump's decision, 'Can only be seen as a profoundly divisive measure against a truly important institution.'
No word yet on how Siggy's former RHONJ co-stars reacted to the news. She had a famously rocky relationship with Margaret Josephs. I can't wait to hear Marge's hot take.
The Real Housewives of New Jersey is streaming on Peacock and Hayu in the UK and Ireland.
TELL US – WHAT DO YOU THINK OF SIGGY'S APPOINTMENT? HOW WILL HER FORMER CO-STARS REACT?
The post RHONJ Alum Siggy Flicker Appointed to Holocaust Museum Board by POTUS appeared first on Reality Tea.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
These key US allies are set to recognize Palestinian state
About three-quarters of countries in the United Nations (UN) recognize the Palestinian state, which holds a 'Permanent Observer State' status within the intergovernmental body — allowing it to be part of the proceedings, but unable to vote on resolutions. Three more countries — close U.S. allies — have joined the tally in the last week. Last week, France said that it would recognize Palestinian statehood, with President Emmanuel Macron stating the move is part of a commitment to a 'just and lasting peace' in the Middle East. France became the first nation within the Group of Seven (G7) to do so. The announcement came shortly after negotiations over a ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas broke down, with the Jewish State and the U.S. pulling their negotiators from Qatar. President Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff pinned the blame on Hamas and argued that the officials will consider 'alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza.' Israel's ambassador to the U.N., Danny Danon, said last week that 'neither international conferences disconnected from reality nor unilateral statements at the UN will lead to peace.' Then this week, as the international outrage over the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip has continued, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom was ready to recognize Palestine's statehood if Israel does not manage to take action of ending the war with Hamas, a conflict that has been ongoing since the Palestinian militant group's terrorist attack on the Jewish State on Oct. 7, 2023. Starmer set the deadline for the UN's General Assembly in September, calling for an uptick in aid being delivered into the war-torn enclave and for Hamas to release the remaining hostages. 'I've always said that we will recognize a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution, with that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act,' Starmer said. Canada became the third close U.S. ally this week to announce it would recognize the Palestinian state. Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney said Ottawa would provide recognition of the state in September at the UN's General Assembly, a decision that would entail the Palestinian Authority 'holding general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarize the Palestinian state.' Trump said on Truth Social that Canada's decision would make it hard for the U.S. to reach a trade agreement with Ottawa. On Monday, the president said that the U.S. would set up 'food centers' in Gaza as food distribution in the enclave has come under intense scrutiny and deaths of Gazans from starvation. Trump also acknowledged that there is starvation among the roughly 2.1 million population in Gaza, sharing a different view from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said that no one is starving in the enclave. The White House said on Thursday that Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee would be in Gaza on Friday to 'inspect the current distribution sites and secure a plan to deliver more food and meet with local Gazans to hear first-hand about this dire situation on the ground.'
Boston Globe
20 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
‘Shameful': Students, alumni say Brown deal with Trump administration disrespects trans students
Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up 'To have made an agreement on the backs of our queer and trans friends is really shameful,' said Talia Reiss, co-president of Planned Parenthood Advocates at Brown, a student club that advocates for reproductive rights and gender-affirming care. Advertisement 'Students want to feel like their identities are supported by the university,' Reiss said. Related : Reiss and co-president Cara Hutton, who are both studying public health, said the group was not 'immediately concerned' about Brown's promise, as part of the agreement, to not provide gender-affirming surgery or puberty blockers to minors, since few students at the university are under 18. Advertisement Brown has never performed such surgeries, and said it would refer those students to outside medical care; the agreement does not affect 'I'm not naive to the fact that Brown is a business and they need that money,' Hutton said. 'It just seems like some really hard trade-offs for that money.' Peter Swope, a 2024 graduate, said he saw the concession on gender as likely 'symbolic,' but concerning nonetheless. 'While the practical impacts may be fairly limited, I'm disappointed in Brown equivocating at all on trans rights,' Swope said. He questioned how the adoption of Trump's definition of biological sex would apply to housing, for example, noting that a friend who identifies as a transgender woman had lived in single-gender housing on campus. 'Single-gender under the Trump administration's definition means exclusively cis people, and not trans people,' Swope said. According to President Christina Paxson was not available for an interview Thursday. But in a letter to students and faculty Wednesday Paxson wrote that Brown 'agreed to abide by Title IX and NCAA eligibility rules regarding the participation of transgender athletes in intercollegiate sports,' and said the university will 'continue to provide housing and restroom access in a way that allows for gender-inclusive, women-only and men-only options." Advertisement It is not clear if there are currently any transgender student athletes at the university. James Kraemer, a 2008 Brown graduate who studied biophysics, said he was 'shocked and upset' when he read the agreement. He and other alumni to help the university defend itself against Trump's demands. 'I think they're really doing a disservice to marginalized members of the community,' Kraemer said. 'It's really throwing non-cis-gender people to the wolves.' He said that when he attended the university, Brown was at the forefront of progressive gender studies. 'For the university, which has championed the study of this for decades to then say, 'OK, we're going to agree to that,' is truly shameful and hurtful,' Kraemer said. 'It pains me to see the university ceding moral ground to this administration in exchange for research funding,' said Dylan Spaulding, a senior scientist in the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists who graduated from Brown in 2004. 'Brown is throwing people under the bus in exchange for staying out of the cross-hairs, which is a cowardly betrayal of its principles.' A Brown spokesperson, Brian Clark, said housing assignments for first-year students 'will continue to be based on sex assigned at birth, with the ability for students to opt into gender-inclusive housing as they wish.' 'We remain fully committed to serving the health needs of all Brown students in a manner consistent with our long-established policy of nondiscrimination, which includes sex, gender identity and gender expression,' Clark said. Advertisement Christina Paxson, the president of Brown University, struck a deal with the Trump administration on Wednesday to restore federal funding. Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff While the gender-related concessions drew the loudest reaction, Brown also agreed to provide data to the federal government to prove race is not a factor in admissions. The university also agreed not to have any programs with 'race-based outcomes' or 'diversity targets,' nor will the university 'promote unlawful DEI goals.' The agreement says Brown will maintain its academic freedom and the federal government will not interfere with what its professors teach. The Ivy League university agreed to provide $50 million to state workforce development efforts, and will not pay anything to the federal government, unlike Columbia University, which It is unclear whether Brown's agreement will influence those Education Secretary Linda McMahon celebrated the reversal of what she called the 'decades-long woke-capture' of higher education. 'Aspiring students will be judged solely on their merits, not their race or sex,' McMahon said. A pro-Palestinian encampment at Brown University in Providence on April 24, 2024. PHILIP KEITH/NYT Rhode Island political and civic leaders offered split views on the settlement. Providence Mayor Brett Smiley's office said he was 'glad' Brown was able to preserve its 'critical funding,' while Attorney General Peter Neronha expressed disappointment the school made a deal of any kind with Trump. 'I think he's a blackmailer, frankly,' Neronha said. 'My overall view is to fight, not give in, even if it requires sacrifice.' Advertisement Meanwhile, Adam Greenman, president of the Jewish Alliance of Rhode Island, praised the agreement, saying it 'reaffirms the commitment that we have seen from President Paxson to ensure a thriving Jewish life on Brown's campus.' But Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg, who 'I think this agreement will engender profound resentment towards Jewish students, and will draw a greater wedge between Jews and other communities with whom we have been in solidarity,' Ruttenberg said. Steph Machado can be reached at
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Europe's preening appeasers will recognize a fantasy — not ‘Palestine'
French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced this week that their countries would unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state. The first problem with that is 'Palestine' is a fictional place. There never was any such thing. And diplomatic recognition of it no more changes this reality than if Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided to recognize the archipelago of Islamic banlieues on the outskirts of Paris as an independent nation. But what exactly are Britain and France recognizing? Mahmoud Abbas, the dictator of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, is now 89 years old. What do Macron and Starmer think will happen when he finally dies? The best-case scenario, I suppose, is for another corrupt strongman to take over an independent 'Palestine.' Will these Western European leaders back an autocracy? What happens when a civil war breaks out? Because the prospects are quite high. Since the Oslo Accords, the Palestinian Authority has relied heavily on Israel's security apparatus to stay in power. It would almost certainly implode without it. The French and Brits should recall that the first thing Gazans did when handed a protostate in 2005 was to destroy over 3,000 greenhouses and modern farming systems that American Jews had purchased for $14 million and handed them, gratis. The second thing they did, though, was put Hamas in charge. So, will France and Britain support open elections in this new nation? What if Hamas, or some other iteration of that organization, wins those elections? Will France and Britain recognize such a state? 'Hamas does not represent the Palestinian people,' Macron claimed during a visit to Ramallah with Abbas in 2023. This is Western elitist twaddle: The unpleasant truth is that Islamists far better represent the people than the 'moderate' Fatah party, which is propped up with billions of Western dollars and Israeli assistance. In 2006, Hamas not only won the Gaza elections, but also won a majority of the parliamentary seats in the PA, which it still holds. In 2024, Hamas and Fatah signed the Beijing Declaration, brokered by Communist China, agreeing to form an 'interim national reconciliation government.' Will the French and British 'recognize' a similar arrangement in the future? Is Macron going to send French troops into Jenin to root out Islamist militants firing Iranian- or Qatari-funded missiles into Jerusalem? Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Whether the French could even win such a war, I suppose, is the better question. And what will 'Palestine' look like? Not once in the dozens of attempts to give Palestinians a state have they accepted any arrangement that didn't include 'a right to return' into Israel proper. 'Nakba' itself — Palestinians' bitter term for what they see as the 'catastrophe' of Israel's founding — was the result of a war that was launched by local Arabs and their allies who rejected a Jewish state. Even if a deal could be struck, what makes Macron and Starmer believe Palestinians can run their own nation, anyway? Palestinians in Gaza are unwilling to build the basic infrastructure necessary for themselves. despite receiving hundreds of millions in yearly aid. Every Israeli restriction on Palestinians in Gaza has been put in place to mitigate violence. When you send Gaza concrete, they build tunnels and military installations under hospitals, not schools or businesses. If you build them infrastructure, they dig up water pipes to make casements for rockets. When you allow shipments of necessities, they smuggle in explosives. When you send food, they give it to the terrorist army before the children. Unless, of course, those children have been recruited to the Islamist cause. Will France and Britain send in their citizens to administer this new state and its borders to ensure that the same doesn't happen again? Or will Israel just be forced to invade once more? Now, of course, Macron says Hamas must be 'disarmed' and that Gaza needs to be rebuilt. But the French and British recognition of 'Palestine' incentivizes the opposite. What do they think Israel has been trying to do? Is France or Britain going to disarm Hamas? Is France or Britain going to bring back the more than 50 hostages still being held and tortured in Gaza? Macron and Starmer, like so many apologists for Palestinian violence, lose nothing with this cynical moral preening meant to mollify their domestic Islamists. The real world is a lot more complicated. David Harsanyi is a senior writer at the Washington Examiner. Twitter @davidharsanyi
