Tesla insurance has always been pricey. Will vandalism make it higher?
But experts say that while an extended run of vandalism could end up raising insurance premiums, it's too early – and insurance is too complicated – to tell what will happen.
'It isn't something drivers need to be worried about happening today,' Bankrate insurance expert Shannon Martin said. 'But it is something they need to keep their eye on in the future, especially potential Tesla owners.'
Insurance for Teslas has always been pricier than similar classes of cars, either gasoline- or electric-powered. That's because Teslas' advanced technology and pricey batteries cost more to repair, according to Insurify, a company that compares American insurance rates for consumers. A damaged Tesla costs about $1,300 more to repair than a gasoline –powered car, according to Insurify – and those pricey repairs factor into how much insurers charge Tesla drivers for their premiums.
According to Bankrate data from this month, the average premium for full coverage of a Tesla Model 3 sedan is $3,495 per year, a premium for a Tesla Model Y SUV is $3,771, and the full-size Model X SUV is $5,459. The electric Ford F-150 Lighting pickup truck, in comparison, costs an average of $2,942 to similarly insure, which is slightly higher than the national average of $2,678 for all cars.
Out of the 50 most popular cars in the United States, the top four most expensive to insure are all Teslas, according to Insurify.
Premiums could go up if there are more claims filed for vandalism. However, it would take a lot more vandalism incidents to get to the point of higher insurance rates or even being denied coverage. Right now, the incidents are sporadic and anecdotal – with documented vandalism in the Pacific Northwest, the Northeast and around the country – but drivers who had their vehicles vandalized will be impacted first.
Many factors go into the price of a car insurance premium, from the make and model of the vehicle to whether it's regularly parked outside. Vandalism does contribute to car insurance rates, but collisions and personal driving history usually matter more to insurance companies, Matt Brannon, data journalist at Insurify, told CNN.
Vandalism shouldn't affect third-party coverage or collision coverage since it doesn't involve another vehicle. If anything would go up, it would be the comprehensive coverage.
The first thing insurers could do if they could see sustained or increased rates of vandalism is to decline to offer new policies to Tesla drivers, especially in areas where vandalism happens frequently, said Brannon.
'They either resume writing those policies once vandalism has declined, or they can raise their rates to equate with the heightened risk that is being attributed to this vandalism,' Brannon said.
Mark Friedlander, media relations director at the Insurance Information Institute, an industry association, said he isn't aware of any insurers that have so far stopped issuing policies to Teslas.
Tesla also offers its own insurance, but those rates aren't made public, and it's only available in 12 states. Most car insurance is renewed in six-month chunks, which is when an insurer could choose to renew the policy or change the premium.
The last time, and the only time in recent history, a similar situation arose was due to a social media trend. A TikTok challenge showed how to steal Hyundai and Kia cars; between early 2020 and the first half of 2023, thefts of Hyundai and Kia models rose more than 1,000%. Though the companies released anti-theft software updates, many insurers refused to cover the vehicles.
Bankrate's Martin said that different insurers responded differently – while one would say it wouldn't insure the affected cars, others said they just wouldn't add comprehensive collision to a vehicle that didn't already have it. The first step most insurers took, Brannon said, was to stop writing policies for the affected vehicles.
CNN has reached out to Tesla, Geico, Allstate and State Farm for comment on Tesla insurance rates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elevance Health (NYSE:ELV) Is Reinvesting At Lower Rates Of Return
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Having said that, from a first glance at Elevance Health (NYSE:ELV) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)? For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Elevance Health, this is the formula: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.11 = US$8.7b ÷ (US$122b - US$44b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2025). So, Elevance Health has an ROCE of 11%. By itself that's a normal return on capital and it's in line with the industry's average returns of 11%. See our latest analysis for Elevance Health In the above chart we have measured Elevance Health's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Elevance Health for free. What Does the ROCE Trend For Elevance Health Tell Us? In terms of Elevance Health's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 14%, but since then they've fallen to 11%. Although, given both revenue and the amount of assets employed in the business have increased, it could suggest the company is investing in growth, and the extra capital has led to a short-term reduction in ROCE. And if the increased capital generates additional returns, the business, and thus shareholders, will benefit in the long run. The Bottom Line While returns have fallen for Elevance Health in recent times, we're encouraged to see that sales are growing and that the business is reinvesting in its operations. These trends are starting to be recognized by investors since the stock has delivered a 16% gain to shareholders who've held over the last five years. Therefore we'd recommend looking further into this stock to confirm if it has the makings of a good investment. Elevance Health could be trading at an attractive price in other respects, so you might find our on our platform quite valuable. For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Waymo's former CEO is not impressed with Tesla's Robotaxi
John Krafcik, the man who led Waymo's path from a research project to a commercial autonomous ride-hailing business, is skeptical about Tesla's Robotaxi. Business Insider sought the former Waymo CEO's thoughts on Tesla's Robotaxi Bay Area launch. Krafcik led Waymo from 2015 to 2021. He now sits on the board for Rivian, a Tesla rival in the electric vehicle space. "If they were striving to re-create today's Bay Area Uber experience," he told Business Insider over email, "looks like they've absolutely nailed it." Tesla rolled out a ride-hailing service in the San Francisco Bay Area in July, about a month after it began its pilot of Robotaxi. A human safety monitor sits behind the steering wheel since Tesla has yet to apply for permits that would allow the company to test and deploy fully driverless taxis in California. The service remains invite-only. CEO Elon Musk said on August 10 that Tesla's Robotaxi will be "open access" by next month. In Austin, where rules around autonomous vehicle deployment are less stringent, a human safety monitor sits in the front passenger seat of the Model Y. For Krafcik, the presence of an employee inside the car is proof that Tesla has yet to show off a real robotaxi service. "Please let me know when Tesla launches a robotaxi — I'm still waiting," he told Business Insider. "It's (rather obviously) not a robotaxi if there's an employee inside the car." Krafcik told Business Insider he has no interest in trying Tesla's Robotaxi. Waymo's initial rollout in 2017 shared a few similarities to Tesla's Robotaxi launch. At the time, Waymo began what it called an " early rider program" in Arizona, allowing a select group of people to try the company's service. Safety drivers were present in the cars, and riders were temporarily put under a nondisclosure agreement. While there's no industry standard definition of a robot taxi, the Society of Automotive Engineers outlines six levels of autonomous driving, ranging from 0 to 6. The SAE taxonomy defines Level 4 and Level 5 as autonomous driving that does not require a human to physically take over the wheel when requested. Business Insider reported in May that Tesla has yet to use a permit that allows testing for cars that are Level 3 and above. It's not yet clear if Tesla's Robotaxi in the Bay Area would be considered Level 3, which only requires a driver to take over the vehicle when the autonomous driving system requests an intervention. Waymo began offering fully driverless paid rides in Phoenix near the end of 2020 and has since expanded the service in several US cities, including SF, Los Angeles, and Austin, with more than 1,500 robotaxis on the road. In 2019, when Waymo had a program that allowed select members of the public to try the service with a safety driver in the car, two riders told Business Insider at the time that the rides were nearly flawless but encountered several situations where the safety driver had to intervene.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Even at 1%, new tax will burden African immigrants who send money back home
A new remittance tax set to begin in the new year has one university student reeling from the implications it will have for her family in Nigeria. Edidiong Chrys, a second-generation Nigerian American, said she thinks the 1% tax passed as part of President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill ' would directly affect the financial lifeline she sends overseas. This tax will be applied to anyone in the U.S. who sends money abroad. 'We regularly send money home to support loved ones, including our elders, children in school, newborns and others in need,' she said. Chrys, 38, said some of the funds sent home have gone to new parents in her family, helping ease the cost of food and traveling to doctors' appointments. The funds also help her uncle, who has a job but also must pay for his five daughters, who are all in school. He and his wife work, but it's still not enough 'to accommodate all the things that need to hold the household down,' Chrys said. And then there's Chrys' 80-year-old grandmother, who was weathering back pain when Chrys visited in January. 'We are paying for the live-in nurse to help her during the week,' she said. 'That's an additional expense that we need to have for her so that she's not bending over.' The tax applies to anyone in the U.S. who sends remittances to their home countries. In 2023, remittances from the U.S. totaled $98 billion, according to the World Bank. Chrys contributes to the $56 billion in remittances sub-Saharan Africa received from people around the world last year. In fact, she said she regularly remits cash — more than 50 times a year — to family and friends. The Center for Global Development, a nonpartisan think tank that focuses on reducing global poverty through economic research, published an analysis last month that listed the tax as yet another financial setback for many nations, given the recent reduction in American aid. Liberia is highly dependent on foreign aid as well as remittances. In 2023, the U.S. accounted for a quarter of the country's foreign aid, and remittances surpassed Liberia's bilateral foreign aid by three times, according to the report. The African Union's outgoing ambassador to the United States, Hilda Suka-Mafudze, said hindering such funding 'threatens to reverse gains in financial inclusion and development across the continent of Africa.' Witney Schneidman, a nonresident senior fellow with the Africa Growth Initiative at the Brookings Institution's Global Economy and Development program, said, 'To put this tax on is just a further constraint on the U.S. effort to work with our partners on the continent.' 'It's not transformational. ... It's just another obstacle to partnership, and it's another obstacle to development,' he said. Schneidman, who also served as deputy assistant secretary of state for African affairs in the Clinton administration, condemned the Trump administration for building barriers and not bridges. 'When you add it up with the visa blockages, with the end of the [African Growth and Opportunity Act] AGOA, with the end of USAID, it's just building a wall,' he said. 'The U.S. is building a wall between itself and the world and certainly between itself and Africa.' Suka-Mafudze, whose focus will turn toward the Southern African Development Community region, said that beyond hurting diplomatic ties, blocking remittances is also 'a human issue, because diaspora remittances are lifelines for millions of African families and these remittances often cover essentials, which are food, school fees, medical care and a lot of things. And to impose a tax on that is deeply unjust.' Chrys said the financial burden of sending money home is already heavy, with some stretching limited resources to make ends meet. 'Some people are not making as much to be able to try to support their family back home,' Chrys said. 'When I do get a chance to send money home, sometimes I'm spending it from my refund check.' Democratic Reps. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick of Florida and Jonathan L. Jackson of Illinois introduced new legislation called the African Diaspora Investment and Development Act, or AIDA, aimed at reversing the tax's impact. It would also create more transparency in money transfers, among other things. Suka-Mafudze backs the legislation, warning the new tax 'could push people toward informal or unregulated channels, making transactions riskier and less transparent.' Cherfilus-McCormick, the only Haitian American member of Congress right now, warns that a remittance tax would unfairly burden families already struggling to support their loved ones overseas. 'I strongly oppose any effort to tax remittances and will continue fighting for policies that protect immigrant and diaspora communities,' she said in a statement. 'H.R.4586 — AIDA intends to reverse course and instead focus on incentivizing and leveraging on the nearly 100 billion of dollars that Haitian, African and Caribbean Americans send home each year to build sustainable partnerships and strengthen economic development.' Schneidman said the tax has the potential to impact education, health care and families because the bulk of the remittances are family-to-family. That reality is felt most by those sending the money, who see firsthand how even small amounts can make a big difference. 'In the U.S., it might feel like, 'Oh, that's nothing.'' Chrys said. But in Nigeria, 'It's everything because every little money counts.'
