logo
‘Vogue' Editor Who Trump Has Raged at Spotted at White House

‘Vogue' Editor Who Trump Has Raged at Spotted at White House

Yahoo2 days ago

A fashion icon was spotted at the White House this week—putting ICE Barbie Kristi Noem to shame.
Anna Wintour, the world-famous Vogue editor, rolled up to the South Lawn sporting her perfectly sleek bob and equipped with a mission: to discuss the impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs on the fashion industry.
She was not, however, there to end the feud between her and First Lady Melania Trump and finally give her a spot on the cover.
Wintour was flanked by two other industry legends: Steven Kolb, CEO of the Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA), and Stephen Lamar, president and CEO of the American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA).
The Trumps opened their home for the party, even though Wintour has famously snubbed the pair on more than one occasion.
Melania and Wintour share a host of similarities: both are foreign-born, cold and commanding figures who have an affection for Italian designers. For a while, the two seemed to get along fine: before his presidential run, Trump and his wife were routinely invited to the Met Gala and other Vogue events. Melania even graced the cover of Vogue in 2005 wearing her wedding dress.
But things changed once Trump was elected. In October 2017, Wintour vowed she would 'never' invite Trump back to the Met Gala. And unlike former First Ladies Jill Biden and Michelle Obama, Wintour pointedly chose not to put Melania on the cover of Vogue.
Wintour arrived in Washington, D.C. to meet with Susie Wiles, Trump's chief of staff, in the hopes of finding relief for the heavily tariffed, $500 billion fashion industry. The industry, which supports 10 million jobs nationwide, has borne a large brunt of Trump's attacks.
Right now, the average tax on fashion items is nearly 13 percent. And even though the products only make up approximately 5 percent of what the U.S. imports, they are responsible for over a quarter of the total tariffs collected. Since the fashion industry is already so heavily taxed, the three industry leaders told Wiles the extra tariffs would only put the fashion industry at a disproportionate disadvantage.
Wintour, a proud Democrat, was there to say her piece—and butter up to the Trump administration—despite the ongoing feud with Melania. According to Wintour's biographer, Amy Odell, Vogue twice tried to photograph Melania during Trump's first term. She declined both times when she learned it would not guarantee her a cover feature.
Immediately after Melania posed for her first White House official portrait, wearing a black Dolce & Gabbana business suit, Vogue published a scathing article saying that the outfit made Melania appear 'more like a freelance magician than a public servant.'
'Trump looked more like she was guest-starring on an episode of The Apprentice than assuming the role of First Lady of the United States,' wrote Vogue's Hannah Jackson.
Republicans fell in line to support Melania.
Melania's friend, Bill White, wrote on X: 'We cherish and support [Melania]. We've decided to cancel all our subscriptions to Condé NASTY. I urge everyone who loves America to join us in this action.'
Melania's former confidante, Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, wrote a book that shone a light on the depth of the rivalry: 'I don't give a f--- about Vogue or any other magazine," Melania allegedly said. 'They would never put me on the cover. All these people are so mad.'
The drama extends to the president, too. According to Odell, when Wintour came to visit Trump in New York in 2016, after he won the election, he reportedly felt 'offended' that nobody told him ahead of time. He was so upset he 'didn't even say hello.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

People lit on fire in ‘targeted terror attack' in Colorado
People lit on fire in ‘targeted terror attack' in Colorado

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

People lit on fire in ‘targeted terror attack' in Colorado

A view of the Boulder County Courthouse on the Pearl Street Mall in downtown Boulder on Aug. 14, 2021. (Quentin Young/Colorado Newsline) Multiple people were injured Sunday in downtown Boulder when a man reportedly lit them on fire, according to local police. Eight victims ranging in age from 52 to 88 years old were transported to hospitals in the region, police said. One was described as being in critical condition, with other victims' injuries ranging from serious to minor. The suspect, 45-year-old Mohamed Sabry Saliman, was taken into custody by police and was treated for minor injuries at a hospital, Mark D. Michalek, special agent in charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Denver field office, said during a Sunday evening press conference. 'Witnesses are reporting that the subject used a makeshift flamethrower and threw an incendiary device into the crowd,' Michalek said. The attack took place near the Boulder County Courthouse on the Pearl Street Mall, an area in the heart of the city that typically attracts hundreds of people on the weekend. The first calls about the attack came at 1:26 p.m., Boulder Police Chief Stephen Redfearn said earlier Sunday. 'The initial callers indicated that there was a man with a weapon and that people were being set on fire,' he said. 'When we arrived, we encountered multiple victims that were injured with injuries consistent with burns and other injuries.' Participants in the Boulder branch of Run For Their Lives, which organizes events calling for the immediate release of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza, were the apparent target of the attack. Michalek said the suspect was 'heard to yell 'Free Palestine' during the attack.' He called it a 'targeted act of violence' and said the FBI was investigating it as an act of terrorism. Kash Patel, director of the FBI, earlier on Sunday called the incident a 'targeted terror attack,' and Colorado Gov. Jared Polis said it was a 'heinous act of terror.' The Anti-Defamation League said on social media it was 'monitoring the situation in Colorado.' Joe Neguse, a Democrat who represents Boulder in the U.S. House, characterized the attack as targeting Jewish people. 'I am horrified by the heinous act of terror that took place in downtown Boulder this afternoon,' he said in a statement. 'Tonight, as many prepare to mark the Shavuot holiday, our Jewish community has been subjected to yet another brutal and horrific act of violence. The scourge of antisemitism has metastasized across our country, and we must do more — now — to stop this hatred and violence.' Phil Weiser, Colorado's attorney general, also indicated the group was targeted. 'From what we know, this attack appears to be a hate crime given the group that was targeted,' Weiser said in a statement. 'People may have differing views about world events and the Israeli-Hamas conflict, but violence is never the answer to settling differences. Hate has no place in Colorado.' Chase Woodruff contributed to this report. Like the SC Daily Gazette, Colorado Newsline is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Colorado Newsline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Quentin Young for questions: info@

Supreme Court agrees to hear absentee ballot appeal from Illinois congressman
Supreme Court agrees to hear absentee ballot appeal from Illinois congressman

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court agrees to hear absentee ballot appeal from Illinois congressman

The Supreme Court said Monday that it will hear an appeal from Illinois Rep. Mike Bost who wants to challenge the state's decision to count absentee ballots after Election Day. At issue is a lower court ruling that found the Republican and two presidential elector nominees did not have standing to sue. The Supreme Court will likely hear arguments in the case in the fall. Bost sued in 2022, claiming that an Illinois law allowing mail-in ballots to arrive up to two weeks after Election Day ran afoul federal law that sets a uniform day for federal elections. As in other states, the mail-in ballots at issue must be postmarked on or before the election. President Donald Trump has attacked the practice with an executive order that pressures states to abandon their post-election deadlines for mail-in ballots to arrive at election offices. His directives are subject to litigation as well. Roughly 20 other states and jurisdictions count ballots that arrive after Election Day. Republicans are pursuing litigation in multiple courts attempting to roll back the expansion of mail-in voting. A federal appeals court in Louisiana last year ruled that Mississippi was violating federal law by counting mail ballots that arrive after Election Day, but stopped short of blocking the policy before the November election. Lower courts never considered Bost's underlying claim. A federal district court ruled that Bost and the other plaintiffs were not injured by the state ballot law and so they did not have standing to sue. A divided 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision and Bost appealed the technical question of standing to the high court. Bost, first elected in 2014, tried to argue that his campaign was required to pay for an additional two weeks of staff to monitor ballot counting. But the 7th Circuit noted that Bost won reelection in his Southern Illinois district by a healthy margin and that he chose to spend resources to avoid a hypothetical future harm. 'Plaintiffs cannot manufacture standing by choosing to spend money to mitigate such conjectural risks,' the court wrote. The three-judge panel included one judge nominated by Trump and another named by President Joe Biden. US Circuit Judge Michael Scudder, who was also nominated by Trump, dissented. 'As a sitting member of Congress in the midst of an ongoing reelection campaign, he is nothing close to a 'mere bystander' to the upcoming election or the allegation at the heart of this lawsuit,' Scudder wrote.

Democrats begin the long 2028 campaign in South Carolina, 'for whatever reason'
Democrats begin the long 2028 campaign in South Carolina, 'for whatever reason'

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats begin the long 2028 campaign in South Carolina, 'for whatever reason'

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Over the weekend, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Maryland Gov. Wes Moore quoted Martin Luther King Jr., ate fried fish with hot sauce, and thanked the Democratic voters – most of them black – whose primacy in Democratic politics is part of Joe Biden's ambiguous legacy to his party. But while Biden's Democratic National Committee put South Carolina first in part to shut down any possible challenge to the aging president, the state may not fight to keep the privilege. 'We had nothing to do with being number one,' Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) told Semafor at his 'world-famous fish fry,' flanked by Moore and Walz in matching CLYBURN t-shirts. 'That's something that Joe Biden decided to do, for whatever reason.' Democrats won't set their next calendar for more than a year, but the move to put South Carolina first had been pitched as a tribute to black voters. Moore and Walz were embraced by party activists, most getting their first in-person look at one of the country's first black governors, and at the Minnesotan who shared a ticket with their first black female nominee. 'Even if you have no moral courage in your body at all, if you want to see us survive economically, you're damn sure we've got to start investing in black communities,' Walz told delegates at the party's convention on Saturday. But Democrats weren't sure that the state needed to stay first on their calendar, a source of internal friction during Biden's presidency. Moore said he 'hadn't put enough thought into it,' while Walz said it was 'important' to keep South Carolina at the front. 'I don't know why we would move it,' state party chair Christale Spain told Semafor. 'If we're serious about keeping our base, why wouldn't we keep the primary that we moved up because of our base?' South Carolina, which has not voted for a Democratic president since Jimmy Carter, has played a powerful role in picking its nominees. Clyburn was part of that, lobbying to ensure that the state got one of the 'first four' primaries in 2008 along with Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada. For Republicans, the 'first in the south' primary empowered conservatives and evangelical Christians, canceling out the New Hampshire independents who liked to boost more liberal candidates. For Democrats, it empowered black voters who tended to be less ideologically progressive than Iowa caucus-goers, and more loyal to the party than white New Englanders. 'We haven't heard from the most committed constituents in the Democratic Party, the African-American community,' Biden said at a rally here the night of the 2020 New Hampshire primary, betting correctly that a South Carolina win would vault him to the nomination. 'Ninety-nine-point-nine percent – that's the percentage of African-American voters who haven't had the chance to vote in America.' Jaime Harrison, a former state party chair here who presided over the schedule change as DNC chair, recalled how Biden fought for it. At an early meeting over the primary calendar in 2021, when DNC leaders briefly brought up South Carolina, Biden chimed in and said it deserved a bigger role. 'I go all over the country, and I meet black folks in this state or that state, but they all have family in South Carolina,' said Biden, according to Harrison. During his last days in office, when Biden flew Air Force One to Charleston to thank black voters and Clyburn for their loyalty, he told Harrison that the new schedule should stay in place. 'He said to me: Listen, I'm proud that we chose to put South Carolina first,' said Harrison. 'He said, that's gonna be a part of my legacy, and I'm gonna fight like hell to make sure it works.' Harrison, like many Democrats here, believed that some of the party's post-2024 problems could be fixed in South Carolina. Harris lagged recent Democratic nominees with black men, and Trump made gains with working class voters of all races. Campaigning in South Carolina would put candidates right in front of them. 'Who is really the influential bloc here?' he said. 'It is older, middle-aged, African-American folks who've been through something in life, who've not always had everything that they wanted, but have worked hard to provide for themselves and their family. They take that pragmatism, that seasoning that they've gotten from life, and they apply that to looking at who can actually win. Not who delivers the fanciest speeches.' In South Carolina, those voters are also used to losing. Democrats have not elected a governor here since 1998 – Jim Hodges, who Walz shouted out from the stage at Friday night's fundraising dinner. Republican-drawn maps have locked Democrats into one safe House seat, Clyburn's, and Donald Trump's coattails reinforced the GOP supermajority in Columbia. The state's largest cities, which had Democratic mayors when Biden took office, are now led by Republicans. Walz and Moore framed all this as a temporary setback, and a reason for Democrats to fight harder and act faster. They put special emphasis on the needs and histories of black voters and poor people. 'Right now, the Trump administration is actively divesting in black communities, actively dismantling our minority business programs, and actively banning books about our history,' said Moore. 'If Trump can do so much bad in such a small amount of time, why can't we do so much good? Now is the time for us to be impatient, too.' Moore's speech was boycotted by a black state legislator, John King, angered by Moore's veto of a bill to study reparations for the descendants of slaves. In an interview, Moore ticked off programs that he'd already expanded to help black Marylanders. 'This would be the fifth study in 25 years. What are we studying?' said Moore. 'We have got to stop being the party of bureaucracy and multi-year studies on things that we know the answers to, and be the party of action.' It would be a while before Democrats decided that the voters who heard this message would get the first vote on their 2028 nominee, or a later vote. Clyburn was less concerned about that than Biden had been. 'The most important hitter on a baseball team is a clean-up hitter,' Clyburn said on Friday, 'and he comes in fourth place.' To riff on Harrison's remark, the modern role of South Carolina's primary has been a Democratic gut check. White liberals get their say in Iowa, secular white moderates vet the candidates in New Hampshire, and multi-racial progressive unions set their terms in Nevada. When Biden won the primary, black voters made up 56% of the electorate, and 83% of all voters said they attended church at least once a week, compared to 48% in New Hampshire. Half of the electorate called itself 'moderate,' or 'conservative,' groups that were in the deep minority in Iowa and New Hampshire. Biden thrived once he got away from protesters asking about Medicare-for-All and deportation moratoriums. That wasn't Biden's stated reason for rewarding that state. He cited its debt to black voters, and other Democrats cite its rich, painful civil rights history, as Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Ca.) did after he saw chatter about South Carolina moving down the calendar. But the remarks Moore and Walz gave, and the receptions they got, demonstrated why Democrats like campaigning here. They talked almost entirely about economic results and messaging and how their party would build out the safety net — the sweet spot that Republicans and protesters knock them off of. They did not talk about Biden, whose legacy here is complicated. 'The one thing about black voters that you should understand: They're pragmatic and they're loyal,' Harrison told me. No Democrat would benefit from criticizing Biden here, and the ongoing media/GOP study of the former president's choice to run again was seen as pure distraction. Still: Biden described his choice to put South Carolina first as a legacy project. His defeat strengthens the negotiating power of New Hampshire Democrats, who expect to vote first again, and other state parties that want to bid for an early calendar spot. In Politico, Brakkton Booker to Democrats who worry that the Biden hangover might give another southern state the plum primary spot: 'Some people just need to get over themselves and whatever issues they have with Joe Biden.' For CNN, Arit John and Jeff Simon South Carolina Democrats what they really want from the next candidate: 'I think South Carolina is looking for a person of the people, that can speak to the people without lowering and debasing themselves, like the current administration seems to be doing.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store