logo
Bill Author Removed From California Child Sex Trafficking Bill

Bill Author Removed From California Child Sex Trafficking Bill

Epoch Times03-05-2025
California Democratic Assemblywoman Maggy Krell from Sacramento was removed as author of her own bill on May 1 after she joined Republicans in a renewed attempt to strengthen penalties for buying 16- and 17-year-olds for sex.
The state Assembly voted 55–21 to reject a provision of
Krell's name as bill author was replaced by two of her Democratic colleagues, Assembly Public Safety Chair Nick Schultz from Burbank and Assemblymember Stephanie Nguyen from Elk Grove.
In
'Minors of any age in the state of California that are contacted for a sexual purpose, that is punishable by a felony already,' said Schultz, a former deputy attorney general with the California Department of Justice (DOJ).
In response, Krell, who is also a former deputy attorney general for the California DOJ, said there is still a loophole in California law that fails to clarify that purchasing sex with a minor is rape.
Related Stories
4/30/2025
5/1/2025
'The problem with [the law], which my colleague from Burbank referenced, is it includes a whole host of statutes for contacting a minor, but there's one that's missing: prostitution,' she said.
She said she didn't care whether her name was on the bill, but she said she was concerned that the bill no longer treats 16- and 17-year-olds as victims.
'We need to say loud and clear that if you're under 18, a child, a minor ... that the person who's buying that person should be charged with a felony. It's plain and simple,' she said.
The legislation advanced on April 29 after the provision was removed in a 7–0 vote in the public safety committee.
Democratic Assemblymembers Mia Bonta and LaShae Sharp-Collins abstained from the committee vote. They did not reply to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.
At the time, Schultz
'As we've heard today and outside of this chamber, there are Californians who are concerned about unintended consequences on young adults and LGBTQIA+ Californians, should it be a felony for 16- and 17-year-olds,' Schultz said before the vote.
The Epoch Times reached out to Schultz and Krell for comment.
California state Sen. Scott Wiener, who pushed for the same provision to be removed in a similar bill last year,
Newsom Criticizes Removal of Provision
In response to the committee vote, California Gov. Gavin Newsom spoke out against members of his own party for removing the provision from the bill.
'The law should treat all sex predators who solicit minors the same—as a felony, regardless of the intended victim's age. Full stop,' the governor's office said in an emailed statement to The Epoch Times on April 30.
The governor's office says Newsom has been consistent on this issue, pointing to a bill he signed in 2023, Senate Bill 14, that made sex trafficking of minors a
In 2024, the governor signed into law Senate Bill 1414, also authored by Grove, which
Back then, amendments also excluded 16- and 17-year-olds, which Grove said was disappointing. This year, she co-authored AB 379 with Krell to fix this loophole, along with implementing penalties for loitering to purchase sex and funding survivor support.
Democratic committee leaders again removed the provisions that would have made purchasing older minors a felony.
'They did that to my bill last year,' Grove told The Epoch Times on May 1. 'They excluded 16- and 17-year-olds from the felony provisions, treating them like adults, which is completely absurd.'
Republican Assemblyman Juan Alanis, vice chair of the public safety committee, who co-authored the sex trafficking bills both this year and last year, said he had 'never been more angry and disturbed by actions taken on the Assembly Floor' on May 1.
'Purchasing or trafficking any minor of any age for sex should be a felony. Period,' he said in an emailed statement.
The public safety committee plans to schedule an informational hearing in the fall to discuss the felony provision, according to Schultz.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

7 in 10 say false information online ‘major threat' to US: Survey
7 in 10 say false information online ‘major threat' to US: Survey

The Hill

time6 minutes ago

  • The Hill

7 in 10 say false information online ‘major threat' to US: Survey

The large majority of Americans think that the spread of false information online is a 'major threat' to the U.S., topping terrorism, the state of the global economy and climate change, according to a new survey. The Pew Research Center survey, which was published on Tuesday, found that 70 percent of U.S. adults view the spread of false information online as a 'major threat' to the country. Another 24 percent said it is a 'minor threat,' while 5 percent argued it is not a threat. Many Americans also see terrorism (61 percent), the condition of the global economy (60 percent), climate change (51 percent) and the spread of infectious diseases (50 percent) as major threats to the country, the poll showed. The perception of these threats depends on the respondent's age and personal politics, pollsters found. The majority of self-identified Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents see all five issues as a major threat to the U.S., while Republicans and GOP-leaning voters do not have as much concern about the issues, apart from terrorism, according to the poll. The stark divide is on climate change, where 78 percent of Democrats say it is a major threat to the country, compared to just 24 percent of Republicans. Democrats are more likely to argue that the spread of infectious diseases, false information online and the condition of the economy are major threats to the nation compared to GOP respondents. When it comes to terrorism, Republicans are more likely to say that it is a major threat to the U.S. (69 percent to 53 percent). Americans ages 65 and older are more likely to say that the spread of false information online, infectious diseases and terrorism are major threats to the country, compared to those under the age of 30, according to the survey. The poll was conducted from March 24-30 among 3,605 U.S. adults.

Have US citizens been caught up in Trump immigration crackdown? What poll found
Have US citizens been caught up in Trump immigration crackdown? What poll found

Miami Herald

time6 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Have US citizens been caught up in Trump immigration crackdown? What poll found

Many Americans have concerns about President Donald Trump's nationwide crackdown on illegal immigration, according to new polling. In the latest YouGov survey, a majority of respondents said that U.S. citizens have been unjustly detained in immigration detention sites. Most respondents also described Trump's approach to immigration as too harsh and said they opposed the opening of 'Alligator Alcatraz.' The poll, conducted July 16-18, sampled 2,156 U.S. adults and has a margin of error of about 3 percentage points. About two-thirds of respondents said they believe many U.S. citizens (40%) or a few citizens (24%) have been wrongfully detained in immigration detention centers. Meanwhile, 18% said they believe no American citizens have been unfairly detained, and 18% said they were not sure. The results diverged widely based on partisan affiliation. The vast majority of Democrats, 92%, said at least some citizens had been caught in Trump's immigration dragnet. Sixty-five percent of independents and 35% of Republicans said the same. In recent months, news reports have highlighted several cases of American citizens being detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. For example, Andrea Velez, a U.S. citizen, was detained by ICE in Los Angeles during immigration operations in June, according to NBC News. She said that while detained, she was not provided water for 24 hours. She was accused of interfering with an arrest, but her case was later dismissed. Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, previously acknowledged that ICE agents have detained some 'collaterals,' according to CBS News. A majority of respondents, 53%, also described Trump's approach to immigration policy as too harsh. Meanwhile, 36% said it was about right and 6% said it was too soft. Here, again, there were major differences across the political spectrum. Most Democrats and independents — 92% and 56%, respectively — said the president's tactics were too harsh, while 76% of Republicans said they were about right. Since taking office in January, Trump has made combating illegal immigration one of his administration's top priorities. He oversaw a dramatic reduction in southern border crossings, ramped up deportations and is planning to construct new migrant detention facilities. One such facility opened in Florida has been dubbed Alligator Alcatraz. Trump visited the newly built site — which can house up to 3,000 migrants — in July. In the poll, a majority of respondents, 53%, said they opposed the opening of Alligator Alcatraz. Meanwhile, 35% said they approved of it, and 12% said they were not sure. The overwhelming majority of Democrats, 86%, said they're against the site, while 68% of Republicans said they're in favor. Some detainees have described the Florida detention center as 'unlivable' due to unsanitary conditions, lack of food, constant lights and mosquitoes, according to NBC News. Trump officials have vehemently denied these claims. 'Nearly every single day, my office responds to media questions on FALSE allegations about Alligator Alcatraz,' Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. 'Here are the facts: Alligator Alcatraz does meet federal detention standards. All detainee facilities are clean. Any allegations of inhumane conditions are FALSE.'

Trump calls Netanyahu a ‘war hero' and adds: ‘I guess I am too'
Trump calls Netanyahu a ‘war hero' and adds: ‘I guess I am too'

Boston Globe

time6 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump calls Netanyahu a ‘war hero' and adds: ‘I guess I am too'

Israel in mid-June launched waves of airstrikes against Iran, hitting important nuclear facilities in Natanz and Isfahan. It killed much of the country's military chain of command along with several nuclear scientists. Then, on June 22, the United States used large bombs to strike the Iranian nuclear site at Fordo, which is buried under a mountain. A recent U.S. assessment described Fordo as badly damaged, although it is difficult to precisely gauge the extent without access to the site. Advertisement During the interview, Trump also took credit for the return of hostages held in the Gaza Strip who have been freed since his election victory in November. Hamas freed around 30 hostages during a ceasefire that began just before Trump's inauguration in January, and another captive was released in May on the eve of the president's visit to the Middle East. They were among 240 hostages taken during the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, that set off the war in Gaza. About 105 hostages were freed during an earlier ceasefire, while Joe Biden was president. Advertisement 'I'm the one that got all the hostages back,' Trump said. The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, Israel's former defense minister, in November 2024, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. Israel has rejected the accusations, and the State Department in June imposed sanctions on four of the court's judges in response to the warrants. Since taking office in January, Trump has frequently taken credit for resolving conflicts including those between Rwanda and Congo, between India and Pakistan, and between Thailand and Cambodia. He also announced the ceasefire between Iran and Israel that ended the nearly two weeks of back-and-forth strikes in June. In the interview with Levin, Trump said: 'I've settled six wars, and we did Iran, and I wiped out their total nuclear capability, which they would have used against Israel in two seconds if they had the chance.' He compared that record favorably with those of his Democratic predecessors. Iran has long said that its nuclear program is intended for peaceful purposes. Though its ability to enrich uranium, which is needed for a nuclear weapon, was set back significantly by the U.S. and Israeli attacks, some experts believe Iran could eventually resume enrichment at other sites. In response to the interview, Iran's Tasnim news agency, which is affiliated with the country's Revolutionary Guard, on Wednesday described Trump's remarks on Iran as 'incoherent.' This article originally appeared in .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store