This is world's most expensive credit card, celebrities and businessmen use it, its shocking spending limit is...
World's Most Expensive Credit Card: Nowadays, credit cards are very popular among people, especially among office goers. Several people carry more than one credit card and use them regularly. People love using credit cards because of the benefits it offers such as movie tickets, reward points, and airport lounge access. From these rewards, users indirectly save money. But if not used properly and smartly, credit cards can be a headache as well. But do you know about the credit card which is the most expensive in the world? It is the costliest credit card in the entire globe and getting it is also not a piece of cake. Let's know about the world's costliest credit card and what makes it so special. What's The Name Of The World's Most Expensive Credit Card?
We all use credit cards from different companies. Various banks issue them with different interest rates and benefits. Banks also issue lifetime free cards for selected customers. However, there is a credit card that is considered the most expensive in the world, and it is issued to only 1 lakh people globally. As per media sources, the card was also launched in India in 2013, but about 200 people in the country have it.
The credit card we are talking about is The American Express Centurion Card also known as the Amex Black Card. Why Is the American Express Centurion Card So Special?
Launched in 2013, the Amex Black Card is an exclusive card. It is not available for everyone, and people can get it through a special invitation. The invitation is obviously sent only to super-rich people. What Benefits Do American Express Centurion Card Users Get?
This premium card offers its holders access to exclusive experiences, including fine dining, luxury accommodations, and private air travel options, with expedited services at over 1400 airports across 140 countries. What Is A Spending Limit Of American Express Centurion Card?
Getting this exclusive credit card is not everyone's cup of tea. American Express Bank sends special invitations to only selected people. The bank sends invitations only to very rich people, whose spending limit is up to Rs 10 crore.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Thai and Cambodian PMs to meet today after Trump steps in to broker peace deal
Thai and Cambodian leaders are expected to meet on Monday in a bid to end the most intense border violence between their countries in more than ten years. The talks come after President Donald Trump intervened by threatening trade tariffs to push for a ceasefire. Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet will hold the meeting in Kuala Lumpur at 3 p.m. local time, Thai government spokesperson Jirayu Houngsub said. The discussions will take place at the office of Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who is hosting the talks in his role as chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The first talks since clashes began on July 24 come within 48 hours of Trump saying Thai and Cambodian leaders had agreed to 'quickly work out a ceasefire.' After separate calls with Phumtham and Hun Manet on Saturday, Trump had threatened that Washington will not do a trade deal with either country as long as the fighting continued. The threat set off a flurry of diplomatic activities on Sunday with Anwar eventually getting the two sides to agree to meet. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also spoke to the foreign ministers of Thailand and Cambodia and urged them to immediately de-escalate tensions while offering US help in future talks. Speaking to reporters just before meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday, Trump acknowledged the phone calls with the two leaders. 'I called the prime ministers of each and I said, 'We're not going to make a trade deal unless you settle the war.' A lot of people killed,' Trump said. 'And I think by the time I got off, I think they want to settle now.' With Trump's Aug. 1 tariff deadline looming, trade-reliant Thailand wants to avoid antagonizing the US president, especially as its officials have been holding talks to lower the steep 36% planned levy on its exports. Trump has claimed credit for helping halt border clashes earlier this year between India and Pakistan by leveraging trade measures, and is now applying similar pressure in Southeast Asia. 'When all is done, and Peace is at hand, I look forward to concluding our Trading Agreements with both!,' Trump said on Truth Social after speaking to Thai and Cambodian leaders Saturday. Thailand's trade talks with the US have included offering expanded access for American goods in an effort to narrow a $46 billion trade surplus with Washington. Neighboring Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam have already secured trade deals with the US in recent weeks. Thailand and Cambodia shouldn't have needed the pressure from Trump, and should have turned to Asean as a natural middle ground to mediate the conflict well before US intervention, said Fuadi Pitsuwan, a lecturer in international relations at Thammasat University in Bangkok. 'In the end, Trump will likely frame the situation as a win: he enforced a ceasefire while securing leverage' to impose punitive tariff rates, he said. Despite the economic stakes, Thailand has taken a firm stance ahead of Monday's talks. Officials say any ceasefire must be tied to bilateral resolution of the dispute, the withdrawal of troops, and a halt to the use of lethal weapons. Cambodia, by contrast, has said it is open to an unconditional cessation of hostilities. The talks are 'intended to listen to all proposals that could contribute to restoring peace,' spokesman Jirayu said. 'The Thai government remains committed to defending the nation's sovereignty and territorial integrity. Every square inch of it.' The conflict, which escalated from months of simmering border tension, has killed more than 30 people and displaced over 150,000 civilians on both sides. Thailand has reported 22 fatalities, including eight soldiers, while Cambodia has confirmed 13 deaths, including five military personnel. Heavy artillery fire continued on Sunday across the countries' 800-kilometer (500-mile) shared border. Both sides accused each other of targeting civilian areas with rockets and artillery. Thailand has responded by deploying F-16s and Swedish-made Gripen fighter jets to strike Cambodian military positions. Thailand and Cambodia share a history of border disputes, though relations have remained largely stable since a deadly 2011 clash that left dozens dead. The last major flare-up centered on the Preah Vihear temple, a historic flashpoint rooted in colonial-era disagreements. Much of the current dispute stems from maps drawn on differing interpretations of early 20th-century Franco-Siamese treaties, which defined the border between Thailand and Cambodia, then part of French Indochina.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Trump-Xi to meet? US, China resume tariff talks to extend truce
Top negotiators from the United States and China met in Stockholm on Monday to resume trade talks aimed at resolving long-standing economic disputes. The meeting comes days before an August 12 deadline to reach a deal and avoid a sharp increase in tariffs that could further disrupt global Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng led the talks. The meeting follows a temporary trade truce in mid-May and a draft deal in June, which helped ease tension between the two if no long-term solution is reached by the August 12 deadline, both sides may impose retaliatory tariffs of over 100% on certain goods. While President Donald Trump secured a major breakthrough in trade deal with the European Union during his visit to Scotland. As part of that agreement, the EU accepted a 15% tariff on exports to the US and promised $600 billion in investments, along with large purchases of US energy and military no similar breakthrough is expected with China, reports claimed that both sides may agree to extend the current truce for another 90 days. This would give negotiators more time to work out a broader agreement and could set the stage for a possible meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later this KEEP TENSIONS HIGHAccording to the South China Morning Post, both sides are likely to hold off on new tariffs for another 90 days."We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," President Trump the current talks focus mainly on tariffs and halted exports like rare earth minerals and US-made AI chips, deeper economic issues remain unresolved. The US has been criticising China's state-backed economic system, which it says floods global markets with cheap goods. Meanwhile, China argues that US export controls are unfairly targeting its tech TRUMP AND XI MEET?There is speculation that President Trump may visit China later this year. A successful round of talks in Stockholm has opened the door to that possibility, according to Wendy Cutler of the Asia Society Policy has stated that he wants to extend the current tariff truce past August 12 to avoid a surge in import duties — which could jump to 145% on the US is also likely to ask the US to lower the 55% average tariffs it currently faces and ease restrictions on buying American high-tech goods. Beijing argues that buying more from the US could help reduce the trade deficit, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
The great ice debate: Why Americans pile it on while Europeans keep it chill
A debate sparks between America and Europe over ice in water. Americans expect ice, while Europeans often don't serve it. This difference reflects cultural norms and historical habits. The US embraced ice commercially, while Europe values tap water quality. The debate highlights differing preferences and environmental considerations. Travelers should understand these customs. It is all about tradition and personal choice. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The humble ice cube—a hero at the bottom of an American glass, a rare sight in Europe 's cafés—has ignited a cross-continental controversy that's far more than a culinary afterthought. Every summer, as American tourists clutch tepid water in Paris or Rome, social media inflates with incredulity, memes, and gentle mockery under the hashtag #IceWaterDebate. But what lies beneath the surface of the cube? Authors and experts see more than a trivial travel squabble: the ice divide is a window into culture, climate, and even people have traced this chilly divide as deeply as Amy Brady, author of Ice: From Mixed Drinks to Skating Rinks - A Cool History of a Hot Commodity. Brady recounts how America's love affair with ice began in the 19th century, when Boston's 'Ice King,' Frederick Tudor, pioneered the mass harvesting and global shipping of New England lake ice. 'The US became the first nation to make ice a household staple,' Brady writes, describing how, by the early 20th century, 'no respectable American home or hotel would serve drinks without it.'American travelers to Europe have expressed surprise and sometimes frustration at the European tendency to serve drinks, especially water, without ice. On platforms like TikTok , US tourists share clips highlighting the scarcity or outright absence of ice cubes in European beverages, a stark contrast to US customs where ice is often generously added to drinks. This has led to a viral, humorous, and sometimes bewildered conversation dubbed the " Ice Water Debate " between the two the European perspective, serving drinks without ice is common and tied to local preferences and historical habits. Europeans, particularly in northern countries, often drink tap water straight or with minimal chilling, as they trust the quality and prefer the natural flavor unaltered by melting ice. For example, Scandinavian countries consider access to clean tap water so reliable that ice is not deemed necessary for hydration. Europeans also point out that many public places and hotels offer free water refills and emphasize hydration through readily available tap American habit of filling glasses with large amounts of ice stems partly from a preference for extremely cold drinks and the use of ice to dilute the drink slightly as it melts. This habit dates back to commercial ice availability and cultural norms that celebrate chilled beverages, especially in warm climates or fast-paced lifestyles where refreshing coolness is prized. The debate touches on dietary and environmental considerations as well, with some Europeans noting that the US consumption of ice might contribute to higher energy and water on water consumption habits also highlight the differences. Studies indicate that water intake in some European countries is below recommended levels compared to the US, though accessibility to clean water is widespread in Europe. This paradox is partly due to differing drinking patterns and social customs around hydration versus beverage suggest this debate is largely about what individuals are accustomed to rather than objective advantages of one approach. European residents emphasize that the absence of ice does not reflect a lack of hydration but a cultural norm where water quality and drinking practices differ. American travelers are encouraged to adapt to local customs and understand the reasons behind these differences, which ultimately relate to each region's infrastructure, climate, and if you're parched in Provence or sweating in Seville and the server delivers a cool—but never cold—glass, you're not being shortchanged. You're sipping on centuries of tradition, personal preference, and maybe a pinch of passive-aggressive iced or not.
