logo
Trump-Epstein timeline: What we know about US President Donald Trump, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein

Trump-Epstein timeline: What we know about US President Donald Trump, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein

West Australian2 days ago
By his own admission, US President Donald Trump was friendly for at least 15 years with Jeffrey Epstein, the multimillionaire financier and convicted sex offender who died in prison in 2019.
Their relationship is now under scrutiny after the Trump administration decided to withhold parts of the files from the sex trafficking investigation into Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell.
Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Mr Trump in May that his name appeared in the files, as part of a broader briefing on the reexamination of the case against Epstein. It was not clear in what context Mr Trump's name appeared.
Epstein had many connections to rich and powerful people that both the right and the left suspect of being involved in the financier's criminality. Ms Bondi agreed to release some materials, including flight logs from Epstein's private jets, but she held back others, including what officials described as child sexual abuse material.
The Department of Justice's review of the files 'revealed no incriminating 'client list,'' the department wrote in an unsigned July memo. 'There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.'
Facing continued pressure on the matter, Mr Trump directed Ms Bondi to seek the release in court of 'any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval' in the Epstein investigation, an order that fell short of the complete disclosure of material that the president's critics have demanded.
A federal judge in New York has denied the government's request to unseal grand jury transcripts from its investigation into Maxwell. A judge in Florida also denied a request by the government to release grand jury transcripts from an investigation into Epstein.
Mr Trump had previously instructed Ms Bondi to release only 'credible' information, and suggested he was concerned that innocent people could be unfairly smeared if the full files were released. He has condemned questions about his handling of the case as a 'hoax' perpetrated by Democrats and called Epstein a 'creep.'
Congress is also seeking the files. The House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena requesting that the Justice Department hand over its files related to Epstein by Aug. 19. The committee also sent subpoenas to 10 former Democratic and Republican government officials it said it was seeking to question.
Epstein was convicted of paying teenage girls money to perform sex acts. He hanged himself in his cell in 2019, according to local and federal authorities. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted in 2021 of conspiring with Epstein for nearly a decade to aid in his abuse.
Here's what we know about Trump and Epstein:
1980s to early 2000s: Trump and Epstein are friendly
According to Mr Trump's telling, he and Epstein were friends for more than a decade, beginning in the 1980s. Several women who said they interacted with both men during those years have come forward with accusations.
'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,' Mr Trump told New York magazine in 2002. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.'
Throughout those years, they were spotted together at parties.
In 1992, Mr Trump threw a raucous party with NFL cheerleaders at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. NBC's footage of the party shows Mr Trump socialising with Epstein.
At one point in the footage, Mr Trump can be seen dancing amid a crowd of young women. Later, he appears to be pointing at other women while whispering something in Epstein's ear, causing him to double over laughing.
Months later, when Mr Trump hosted a party at Mar-a-Lago for young women in a so-called calendar girl competition, Epstein was the only other guest, according to George Houraney, a Florida-based businessperson who arranged the event.
Houraney's girlfriend and business partner at the time, Jill Harth, later accused Mr Trump of sexual misconduct on the night of the party. In a lawsuit filed in 1997, Harth said that Mr Trump took her into a bedroom and forcibly kissed and fondled her. Harth dropped her suit after a related case filed by Houraney was settled by Mr Trump, who has denied her allegations.
In 1993, Epstein brought Stacey Williams, a model, to Trump Tower in Manhattan to greet Trump, according to Williams. As he and Epstein chatted, MrTrump groped her, she said. Mr Trump has denied her account.
In 1997, Mr Trump and Epstein attended a Victoria's Secret 'Angels' party together in New York.
The Wall Street Journal reported that in 2003, Mr Trump gave a letter with a birthday greeting to Epstein, including a sketch of a naked woman and a reference to secrets the two men shared.
Mr Trump denied writing the letter purportedly bearing his signature, and The New York Times has not reviewed it. The Times reported that his name appeared on a contributor list for a book compiling birthday greetings from Epstein's friends.
1993 to 1997: Trump flies on Epstein's private jets seven times
During the time they were friends, Mr Trump's name appeared seven times in Epstein's flight logs.
Mr Trump flew on Epstein's private jets four times in 1993; once in 1994; once in 1995; and once in 1997, according to flight logs released as evidence in Maxwell's trial. The flights were between Palm Beach and New York, including a stop in Washington, D.C.
The US president has acknowledged travelling on Epstein's plane but insisted he never accompanied him to his private island or engaged in any wrongdoing with the financier.
In fact, Mr Trump has accused other politicians of being more deeply associated with Epstein. Of former President Bill Clinton, Mr Trump said: 'Got a lot of problems coming up in my opinion with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein.'
Mr Trump's name and phone number were also included among the rich and powerful people written down in Epstein's 'little black book.'
2000: Mar-a-Lago plays a role in Epstein's case
Mar-a-Lago played a key role in allegations against Epstein and Maxwell.
Virginia Giuffre, a victim of Epstein's sex-trafficking ring who said she was 'passed around like a platter of fruit' as a teenager to rich and powerful predators, was recruited into Epstein's employment while at Mar-a-Lago, according to her account.
Giuffre, who was 16 at the time, said she was reading a massage therapy manual when she was approached by Maxwell and invited to become Epstein's traveling masseuse. She said the two of them then groomed her to perform sexual services for wealthy men.
Giuffre accused Epstein and Maxwell, a British socialite, of forcing her to have sex with Prince Andrew of Britain. He flatly denied the accusations, but he relinquished his royal duties in 2019.
A widely published photograph showed Prince Andrew with his hand around her waist. He said he had no memory of the occasion.
Giuffre died by suicide in April.
2004: Trump and Epstein have a 'falling out' over a property fight
Two years after Mr Trump called Epstein a 'terrific guy,' the two men became rivals over an oceanfront Palm Beach mansion that had fallen into foreclosure. In a power struggle detailed by The Washington Post, Mr Trump ultimately outbid Epstein for the property.
There is little public record of the two men interacting after that real estate battle. Mr Trump would later say in 2019 that he and Epstein had a 'falling out' and hadn't spoken in 15 years; the president declared himself 'not a fan' of his former friend.
Recently, Mr Trump said Epstein's hiring of Giuffre also played a role in the ending of their friendship.
Mr Trump said he ended the friendship because the financier had 'hired away' spa attendants at Mar-a-Lago.
Asked whether one of the women was Giuffre, Mr Trump said: 'I don't know. I think she worked at the spa. I think so. I think that was one of the people. He stole her. And by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know, none whatsoever.'
Not long after the property auction, police in Palm Beach fielded a tip that young women had been observed going in and out of Epstein's home.
A few months later, in March 2005, police received a more substantive complaint, from a woman who said her teenage stepdaughter had been paid by Epstein to give him a massage while she was undressed, according to a police report. That led to an investigation that later identified at least a dozen potential victims.
An FBI and Florida police investigation led to his indictment in 2006. Two years later, he pleaded guilty in state court to two felony charges, including soliciting a minor, in a deal that avoided federal charges that could have meant far more serious prison time.
2019: Epstein is charged with sex trafficking
The case against Epstein might have ended quietly there.
But The Miami Herald in 2018 unearthed new allegations against him and exposed the widespread nature of Epstein's crimes. The Herald detailed how he was able to manipulate the criminal justice system to shut down an FBI investigation and win immunity for any of his 'potential co-conspirators.'
The Herald identified about 80 women who say they were molested or otherwise sexually abused by Epstein from 2001 to 2006.
In 2019, Epstein was arrested by federal agents in the New York area, accused of trafficking girls, some as young as 14, and engaging in sex acts with them.
Facing decades in prison, local and federal authorities say he hanged himself in a jail cell while awaiting trial.
2019 and 2020: Trump urges an investigation but expresses sympathy for Maxwell
Over the years, Mr Trump at times seemed to promote the idea that rich and powerful people had engaged in nefarious behavior with Epstein, and might soon face justice.
'I want a full investigation, and that's what I absolutely am demanding,' Mr Trump said of the Epstein case in 2019.
But he also expressed sympathy for Maxwell, whom he knew socially.
'I do wish her well. I'm not looking for anything bad for her,' Mr Trump said in interview with Jonathan Swan, then of Axios, on HBO in 2020.
2024: Trump expresses mixed feelings about releasing files
While running for office in 2024, Mr Trump expressed mixed feelings about whether he would release files in the Epstein case.
'I guess I would,' he told Fox News, before beginning to back off that claim. 'I think that less so because you don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there, because it's a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would.'
2025: Trump lashes out at critics
Upon taking office, Mr Trump appointed leaders of the Justice Department and FBI who had promised right-wing base they would be getting to the bottom of the Epstein investigation.
But after leading on Mr Trump's base, the Justice Department and the FBI said that the Epstein files did not contain the kind of evidence that would justify investigating other people. The video recordings of child sexual abuse material found by investigators were not videos that Epstein recorded of crimes by himself or his friends, but material he downloaded, Ms Bondi said.
Still, Mr Trump has repeatedly lashed out at those who questioned him.
He rebuked his own supporters as 'weaklings' for continuing to talk about Epstein's case and accused them of falling for a 'scam' perpetrated by Democrats.
'I don't understand why they would be so interested,' Mr Trump told reporters. 'He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of life. I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is, I really don't.'
This article originally appeared in
The New York Times
.
© 2025 The New York Times Company
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs
Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs

Sydney Morning Herald

time10 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs

Washington: Australia must speak more clearly about the threats posed by China, including how it would respond to a regional conflict, or risk the AUKUS submarine agreement, Indo-Pacific experts in the United States are warning. John Bolton, who served as Donald Trump's national security adviser in his first term, and held senior roles in other Republican administrations, said policymakers in Washington had noted the Albanese government was 'less vocal about what the problem is' compared with its predecessors. 'It is a little hard to get used to,' Bolton said in an interview. 'In the Cold War days, Labour governments in Great Britain were just as anti-communist as the Conservatives. When you see a leftist government that's not willing to talk as openly about what the real threat is, it does make some people nervous. 'I would be less than fully candid if I said it didn't make me a little nervous. Why the hell are we worried about talking about what the threat is? The struggle is on, and we ought to be candid about it.' Naval operations expert Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute with close links to the administration, said the AUKUS review was about putting Australia on notice that the US expected Australia to use the submarines it bought. 'The Australians have been a little reticent to explicitly call out that they might use them against China,' he told this masthead. 'If you're not willing to say it in public, then you're not going to put the Chinese on notice. It has been privately conveyed in the past, but the US would like Australia to make it more public.' Clark noted – as have other prominent defence experts in Washington – that AUKUS represented a significant portion of the Australian defence budget, especially at the current level of defence spending. 'That's the concern in the US – that you're spending 10 to 20 per cent of your procurement budget on this one system, yet you're not talking about how you might use it,' he said.

Albanese is ignoring Trump's demands – it will change our place in the world
Albanese is ignoring Trump's demands – it will change our place in the world

Sydney Morning Herald

time10 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Albanese is ignoring Trump's demands – it will change our place in the world

When the world changes, it's folly not to change with it. Finding itself in an external environment that is in many respects full of shocks, the Albanese government is staking out a more independent – or at the very least, a less America-dependent – security and diplomatic stance for Australia. As is its way, rather than galloping in this direction, the government is crab walking. Anthony Albanese goes out of his way not to make a big deal of it and never wants to look like he's undermining Donald Trump. He continues to send the hefty cheques to America to keep AUKUS alive and has said several times this week that Trump is an enduring 'advocate for peace in the Middle East', which is what the US president likes to hear. But the signs of the shift are mounting. The AUKUS agreement was conceived chiefly to thwart China's territorial and defence ambitions in our larger region. Knowing that the future of AUKUS is being reconsidered by the Trump administration and that Trump is capricious and often punitive in the way he applies tariffs against those who don't dance to his tune, Australia under Albanese is nevertheless steadfastly building on a more accommodating approach towards China. The prime minister's reasoning is simple: China underpins our economy and it pays not to overtly antagonise it. Meanwhile, America remains fixated on viewing China as its great economic competitor and geopolitical rival. Albanese's point-blank rejection of a series of direct and indirect demands from Trump's Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and US government factotums to almost double its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP is perhaps the boldest stance he has taken as PM. Albanese's continued dismissals are truly getting up the US administration's nose; various underlings are now regularly briefing reporters against Australia. And this week Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong foreshadowed the recognition of a Palestinian state, comprehensively at odds with the stance of the US, which is the Netanyahu government's chief military supplier and diplomatic enabler. These positions are not without risk, given how deeply enmeshed Australia has become in its alliance with America, and how long Australia has regarded Israel as a friend. But given the twin shocks of Trump's rapid transformation of the US government and Benjamin Netanyahu's military strategy in response to Hamas' diabolical attacks in 2023, which has failed to return all of the hostages, laid waste to Gaza, killed tens of thousands of civilians and led to widespread starvation, it's difficult to see how a prudent government could not have taken this course. Loading The adjustments taking place in our relationships are in line with broader public sentiment in Australia. Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio has dismissed Palestinian recognition by countries including Australia as meaningless and driven by domestic politics. In a sense, he is right. Recognition is a mostly symbolic tactic designed to impose diplomatic pressure on Israel. It might not work and probably won't while America continues to physically support Netanyahu's every action. But is Trump's foreign America First policy not also driven by his domestic political intentions? This week his vice president JD Vance said the US government would no longer send arms to Ukraine because Americans were 'sick' of their government doing so. Instead, the US will sell arms to European countries who can give them to Ukraine. Australia's strategic positions should not chop and change, but they should develop over time and reflect the general sympathies and inclinations of the bulk of its people. Because of our geographical isolation and colonial past, with a nation-state built on immigration, Australia is an outward-looking country. Most Australians see Trump for what he is: a great disruptor. Trump bases all his decisions on his own self-interest. And because he is the president and is dedicated to accruing as much personal power as possible, to the extent that he is now ignoring his own courts and militarising policing in cities that don't vote for him, those decisions and actions are expressed ultimately as being in America's own best interests.

Albanese is ignoring Trump's demands – it will change our place in the world
Albanese is ignoring Trump's demands – it will change our place in the world

The Age

time10 minutes ago

  • The Age

Albanese is ignoring Trump's demands – it will change our place in the world

When the world changes, it's folly not to change with it. Finding itself in an external environment that is in many respects full of shocks, the Albanese government is staking out a more independent – or at the very least, a less America-dependent – security and diplomatic stance for Australia. As is its way, rather than galloping in this direction, the government is crab walking. Anthony Albanese goes out of his way not to make a big deal of it and never wants to look like he's undermining Donald Trump. He continues to send the hefty cheques to America to keep AUKUS alive and has said several times this week that Trump is an enduring 'advocate for peace in the Middle East', which is what the US president likes to hear. But the signs of the shift are mounting. The AUKUS agreement was conceived chiefly to thwart China's territorial and defence ambitions in our larger region. Knowing that the future of AUKUS is being reconsidered by the Trump administration and that Trump is capricious and often punitive in the way he applies tariffs against those who don't dance to his tune, Australia under Albanese is nevertheless steadfastly building on a more accommodating approach towards China. The prime minister's reasoning is simple: China underpins our economy and it pays not to overtly antagonise it. Meanwhile, America remains fixated on viewing China as its great economic competitor and geopolitical rival. Albanese's point-blank rejection of a series of direct and indirect demands from Trump's Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and US government factotums to almost double its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP is perhaps the boldest stance he has taken as PM. Albanese's continued dismissals are truly getting up the US administration's nose; various underlings are now regularly briefing reporters against Australia. And this week Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong foreshadowed the recognition of a Palestinian state, comprehensively at odds with the stance of the US, which is the Netanyahu government's chief military supplier and diplomatic enabler. These positions are not without risk, given how deeply enmeshed Australia has become in its alliance with America, and how long Australia has regarded Israel as a friend. But given the twin shocks of Trump's rapid transformation of the US government and Benjamin Netanyahu's military strategy in response to Hamas' diabolical attacks in 2023, which has failed to return all of the hostages, laid waste to Gaza, killed tens of thousands of civilians and led to widespread starvation, it's difficult to see how a prudent government could not have taken this course. Loading The adjustments taking place in our relationships are in line with broader public sentiment in Australia. Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio has dismissed Palestinian recognition by countries including Australia as meaningless and driven by domestic politics. In a sense, he is right. Recognition is a mostly symbolic tactic designed to impose diplomatic pressure on Israel. It might not work and probably won't while America continues to physically support Netanyahu's every action. But is Trump's foreign America First policy not also driven by his domestic political intentions? This week his vice president JD Vance said the US government would no longer send arms to Ukraine because Americans were 'sick' of their government doing so. Instead, the US will sell arms to European countries who can give them to Ukraine. Australia's strategic positions should not chop and change, but they should develop over time and reflect the general sympathies and inclinations of the bulk of its people. Because of our geographical isolation and colonial past, with a nation-state built on immigration, Australia is an outward-looking country. Most Australians see Trump for what he is: a great disruptor. Trump bases all his decisions on his own self-interest. And because he is the president and is dedicated to accruing as much personal power as possible, to the extent that he is now ignoring his own courts and militarising policing in cities that don't vote for him, those decisions and actions are expressed ultimately as being in America's own best interests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store