Mel Gibson, Trump 'Special Ambassador', & Italian Producer Andrea Iervolino Propose U.S.-Italy Co-Production Treaty
The filmmakers are proposing that:
More from Deadline
Mel Gibson's Gun Rights Restored Following Justice Department Attorney's Firing
'The Resurrection Of The Christ:' Mel Gibson To Begin Shooting Sequel This Summer, Says Rome's Cinecittà Studios Boss
John Oliver Takes Jab At Mel Gibson Following Justice Dept. Attorney Firing: "Best Known For His Work In Screaming"
•Italian producers are incentivized to make Italian films in the USA, involving American stars and therefore investing in the U.S.;
•The Italian government launches support programs for productions that strengthen cultural ties between Italy and the United States.
We understand from sources that Iervolino and Gibson met recently and agreed on the proposal. According to reports, Gibson is due to begin filming his Passion Of The Christ sequel The Resurrection Of The Christ in Italy this summer.
The main benefits of the agreement would be that it would 'allow Italian producers to develop and co-produce international films between Italy and the United States, thus opening new markets; and that it will offer the USA the opportunity to attract new foreign investments, supporting the goals of the Trump agenda'.
Iervolino, who as we recently revealed is working on a Trump biopic, estimates the value of such a pact could be as much as $10BN annually in direct investments in the US, thereby encouraging local American production while also giving future participating countries the opportunity to internationalize their local film industries. No word yet whether Gibson has floated the proposal with the U.S. government.
The goal, Iervolino says, is to officially sign the agreement during the 2025 Venice Film Festival, a cornerstone of both the Italian and international film industry. The aim is to involve 'authoritative representatives' of both industries and both governments.
An Italian-US co-production treaty has been an ambition of Italian industry for a little while. Last year there were reports that Cinecittà's Roberto Stabile was working on a similar pact with Washington but the scent went cold. Japan currently has a similar co-production treaty with the U.S.
Iervolino stated: 'The world must recognize that the American entertainment industry has always been the leading one globally: it remains the main point of reference, capable of setting the rules of the industry worldwide. Meanwhile, many countries have established incentive programs to attract foreign productions and have signed bilateral agreements with various nations — but never with the United States. This has essentially left a crucial cultural bridge unresolved. It is therefore essential to initiate a win-win agreement between the USA and the rest of the world. Mel Gibson and I are actively working in this direction, using this initial agreement with Italy as inspiration for the rest of the world.'
A draft version of fellow 'special ambassador' Jon Voight's plan for Hollywood was recently revealed by Deadline and included a 10% federal tax incentive for film and TV production and an American 'cultural test' akin to the rules in the UK. Voight, Gibson and Sylvester Stallone were appointed 'special ambassadors' by Trump earlier this year.
The background here is that the industry has been scrambled by Trump's announcement last week of tariffs on U.S. projects that shoot overseas.
Best of Deadline
Everything We Know About Ari Aster's 'Eddington' So Far
Everything We Know About 'Nobody Wants This' Season 2 So Far
List Of Hollywood & Media Layoffs From Paramount To Warner Bros Discovery To CNN & More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
17 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump leaves his mark on the Kennedy Center Honors
And Trump said Wednesday he personally approved of each nominee: 'I would say I was about 98 percent involved. They all went through me,' he said. 'I turned down plenty. I had a couple of wokesters.' Trump in his first term had chafed at the Kennedy Center Honors ceremony. He skipped the ceremony repeatedly, with some artists pledging to boycott if he attended. It was White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, Trump said Wednesday, who convinced him to host the honors this year. 'I said I'm the president of the United States. Are you fools asking me to do that?' Trump said from the Kennedy Center. Despite his original criticism of the performing arts center, Trump on Wednesday said he had always wanted to be one of the honorees. 'Since 1978, the Kennedy Center honors have been among the most prestigious awards in the performing arts. I wanted one, was never able to get one,' he said. 'I would have taken it. I waited and waited and waited and I said 'to hell with it, I'll become chairman.' I will give myself an honor. Next year we'll honor Trump, okay?' Trump also announced the Kennedy Center will be undergoing renovations under his leadership. 'In a few short months since I became chairman of the board of the Kennedy Center, we've completely reversed the decline of this cherished national institution,' he said. 'In the coming months we'll fully renovate the dated — and really the entire infrastructure of the building — and make the Kennedy Center a crown jewel of American arts and culture once again,' Trump said.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The New Movie 'Weapons' Is All About the Dark-Suburbia Aesthetic
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Weapons is not a very scary horror film. It is, however, a fascinating movie about the suburbs and the way the architecture of family life supports silence and complicity. Horror movies often utilize the suburbs to interrogate the seedy underbelly of American promise. Whether exploring fear, ennui, racial tensions, or Satanic Panic, suburban horror films are about control—who has power and who desperately wants it. Weapons is Zach Cregger's sophomore feature, and it considers similar thematics to his first. If Barbarian was about gentrification and white flight, Weapons is about the fall-out of isolation, the way the suburban McMansion radiates dread. Weapons builds on a wave of recent creepy-past-inspired films like Longlegs, I Saw the TV Glow, and Talk to Me by considering how isolating the insulated, ostentatious Tuscan kitchen really is. Behind every manicured lawn is a secret, waiting for revelation. It's best to go into Weapons without knowing too much, so be warned, as some spoilers lie ahead. The basic plot of the film is deceptively simple. Opening with a child's voiceover, we discover that 17 kids vanished at 2:17 a.m. in a suburban neighborhood. Everyone suspects their teacher, the troubled Ms. Gandy (Julia Garner). From there, the film begins to shift perspectives, zooming in and out on different key players like Archer (Josh Brolin), one of the missing kid's dads, who is in the process of building a McMansion. The parents and school officials are desperate for someone to blame. The first to be deposed are the town drug addict and the slutty, alcoholic Ms. Gandy. Someone even paints 'WITCH' on the promiscuous teacher's car. Cregger, a graduate of the comedy sketch show The Whitest Kids U' Know, often uses humor to underscore the escalating tension. 'I'm phobic!' One kid yells at a pivotal moment. Sometimes, these excited utterances undercut the horror. 'What the fuck' is a common refrain throughout the movie. The image of a large, nearly empty house also recurs during Weapons. Of course, the economics of house ownership have been on a grim downward spiral. Since about 2008, suburban opulence has continued to feel more and more out of reach for younger generations. A recent book titled What Happened to Millennials? by Charlie Wells ties the emotional complications of that generation with its increasingly dismal economic options. Millennials have a lower home-ownership rate compared to Boomers or Gen X, and many claim they will be renting for the rest of their lives, according to Self. Their bank accounts are trapped under the shadow of 9/11 and the 2008 financial crash. Currently, millennials make up the largest renting population. Perhaps it makes sense that younger generations continue to glamorize a period in time when big, beautiful homes were the norm–even if those who grew up in them have a different story to tell. This frenzied panic—a lack of access to a stable future—may be reflected in nostalgia porn, the TikTok clips and architectural walk-throughs in praise of the McMansion that glamorize the hallowed halls of Tony Soprano's house. Few will ever achieve such architectural bliss. Still, nostalgic envy for the McMansion may not be the sole motivator for such TikTok trends. It's true that the suburbs offer a seductive fairy tale, but younger generations know how fairy tales go. Rarely do they end well for everyone involved. Horror movies, like neighborhoods, often rely on the tropes of fairy tales. The illusion of safety is evasive. Suburbia needs us to believe that its fortified walls are safe, that your neighbor is your friend—the traditional American mythology. But younger generations know that gated communities have failed to keep the danger out there. The kids have seen violence both at home and abroad, from sexual abuse to school shootings. Films like Weapons remind us that evil is often more familiar than strange. The concept of specific generations sometimes feels like astrology for policy wonks, but it does seem like Gen Z has a higher tolerance for irony and ambivalence. Its fascination with architectural trends may not be entirely sincere. While weathering a flood of memes, seven-second skits, and 9/11 jokes, younger generations may not see the need to distinguish between authenticity and artificiality. Certainly not in the same way Boomers desire clear, succinct definitions. Vibes are the new truth. The suburbs offer a vibe ripe for remixing, reinterpreting, and reinscribing. In Weapons, amber light filters through the hallways and landings of large two-story homes, capturing a familiar aesthetic. The film recalls the terrifying late-night walk in the dark to the bathroom. Slightly askew camera angles frame long corridors like menacing tunnels. At night, the blue light of the TV is the only illumination for miles, and security cameras can capture only so much. In a Cregger film, the basement is a horrible chamber, meant as a kind of prison. Trauma, he suggests, makes weapons of us all. For most of the film, he teases us regarding what exactly the weapon of mass destruction will be. Cue a shot of an AK-47 glowing in the sky. The real weapon, however, is the specter of child abuse. Ms. Gandy seems the easiest target for parents to accuse of being a predator. A groomer, the film silently implies. Then a more grim picture emerges. The call is coming from inside the house. A witch has hexed the small suburban town, threatening a child with the death of his parents. Unlike this summer's earlier horror blockbuster Bring Her Back, however, the kids in Weapons are ultimately able to escape the violent spell of their abuser. Their triumphant moment of liberation, crashing through the windows, fences, and lawns of giant homes, is one of the film's most cathartic moments. The silent complicity of the suburbs will not stand. In the daylight, what was once a neighborhood of sinister empty homes becomes a playground for destruction. The gleefully violent appetite of children's liberation ravages their palatial excess. Watching the glass shatter and fences fall feels not unlike apocalypse porn—the inverse of suburban envy. If you can't have it, you can at least enjoy watching it be demolished by children avenging their stolen youth. Fairy tales often end up this way: Ding dong, the witch is dead. Still, it takes a long time to achieve victory. In the suburbs, no one does anything when they hear you scream. They wait for someone else to deal with it. You Might Also Like 4 Investment-Worthy Skincare Finds From Sephora The 17 Best Retinol Creams Worth Adding to Your Skin Care Routine Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
On James Baldwin and the power of love
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Boggs conveys the sense that Baldwin believed so strongly in love because if he hadn't he would have gone mad. As it was he occasionally went mad anyway (or at least fell into some deep, dark places), in ways that often seemed inseparable from his creative process. 'Art without suffering seemed to be increasingly impossible for him,' Boggs writes of the time in which Baldwin was both gradually separating from Happersberger and writing his 1956 novel ' Related : Advertisement Boggs grew enthralled with Baldwin in 1996 when he came upon ' Advertisement His timing is excellent. 'Baldwin: A Love Story' arrives a year late for the Baldwin centennial and attendant media coverage, but the current cultural climate makes it hard not to view Baldwin as a much needed and sadly accurate prophet for these times. As Boggs writes, Baldwin was concerned with 'the dangers of the myth of American innocence,' and 'the pernicious effects of white American masculinity.' He consistently observed that intolerance destroys the souls of the racist and intolerant. He was acutely, painfully aware of racism's insanity. Related : He had no blinders, and he was no stranger to anger. But as time went on he increasingly proposed an antidote. That, of course, was love, expressed eloquently, practiced radically. And yet Boggs has no interest in depicting his subject as Saint Jimmy. You didn't want to lend money to the Baldwin of these pages, especially when he was young; you would probably never see it again. Baldwin famously took down on one of his mentors, Richard Wright, with the essay 'Everybody's Protest Novel' (and, later and more gently, 'Alas, Poor Richard'); Baldwin would admit that 'he had used [Wright's] work as a kind of springboard for my own.' But the dynamic between Baldwin and Wright was complicated, and Boggs treats it as such. Baldwin saw Wright's novel ' Advertisement If Baldwin fervently believed in love, he also desperately sought it, across continents — New York, Paris, Switzerland, Istanbul — and decades, largely chasing what he had once had with Happersberger, who married and had a child (Baldwin had a habit of falling for unavailable men). Not all of the pivotal relationships in his life were sexual; the painter Beauford Delaney was an early mentor and a sort of platonic soul mate who was there for Baldwin in the crucial years after he moved away from being a boy preacher in Harlem and toward a life of letters. The process of writing his first two novels, ' Boggs comes about as close as anyone has to wrapping his arms around Baldwin, embracing him, if you will, in his entirety. This 'Love Story' is a reminder that we could really use James Baldwin right now, and his instinct for cutting through nonsense like a lithe, sharp sword — wielded, of course, with love. Advertisement BALDWIN: A LOVE STORY By Nicholas Boggs Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 720 pages, $36 Chris Vognar is TV and pop culture critic at The Boston Globe. Chris Vognar can be reached at
