logo
Despite RBI's rate cuts, Indian G-Sec yields remain range-bound due to US yield pressures, says Rajkumar Subramanian

Despite RBI's rate cuts, Indian G-Sec yields remain range-bound due to US yield pressures, says Rajkumar Subramanian

Time of India3 days ago
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
Despite a cumulative 100 basis points of rate cuts by the Reserve Bank of India between February and June 2025, Indian government bond yields have remained surprisingly stable.According to Rajkumar Subramanian , Head – Product & Family Office at PL Wealth, the benchmark 10-year G-Sec yield has stayed range-bound between 6.25% and 6.45% from April to July, reflecting muted monetary transmission.He attributes this rigidity largely to external pressures, particularly elevated U.S. Treasury yields driven by fiscal concerns and the Federal Reserve's ongoing balance sheet tightening.These global headwinds, he notes, are outweighing domestic policy easing, forcing investors to reassess duration risk and shift toward safer, shorter-term instruments. Edited Excerpts –A) India's corporate bond market has evolved into a substantial segment of the broader financial ecosystem, with outstanding issuances valued at over ₹53.6 lakh crore, representing nearly a quarter of the country's total bond market as per RBI's June 2025 data.While this reflects impressive growth in absolute terms, the market's depth remains limited. Institutional investors—mutual funds, insurance companies, banks, and pension funds—dominate with over 95% of holdings.Retail participation is minimal, constrained by historical barriers such as high minimum investment thresholds and restricted access to transparent pricing. Despite a robust primary issuance environment, the secondary market remains thin, with average monthly turnover hovering below 4% of outstanding volumes.Over-the-counter trades continue to dominate, limiting liquidity and price discovery. While structural foundations are in place, enhanced transparency, broader investor inclusion, and deeper secondary activity are essential to transform the market into a more vibrant and inclusive capital-raising avenue.A) Several converging factors have propelled corporate bond issuance in 2025 to unprecedented levels, with total fund-raising nearing ₹10 trillion.This marks a significant shift in corporate funding dynamics. Lower interest rates—following 100 basis points of cumulative rate cuts by the RBI—created an attractive window for issuers to tap long-term capital at competitive costs.At the same time, narrowing spreads and abundant liquidity in the system further incentivized bond market access. Corporates have also displayed strong intent to finance capex and refinance high-cost legacy debt.Non-financial corporate capital expenditure has seen double-digit growth, underpinned by rising business confidence and stronger balance sheets. Issuers increasingly favour private placements, which offer streamlined execution.Notably, shorter-duration issuances (<5 years) have seen a sharp uptick, reflecting both issuer and investor preferences amid interest rate volatility. Institutions such as mutual funds and insurers, seeking yields above traditional deposits, have remained active participants, supporting this supply glut.Together, these factors signal a more mature borrowing environment—where strategic capital planning, investor appetite, and regulatory headroom are converging in favour of bond financing.A) The growing fiscal strain in the U.S.—driven by rising deficits and mounting concerns over debt sustainability—is increasingly influencing global bond markets.Recent Federal Reserve minutes highlight a cautious policy stance, with rates held steady and balance sheet normalization continuing through quantitative tightening.This has kept long-end U.S. Treasury yields elevated, setting a higher benchmark for global sovereign and corporate yields. The steepening yield curve and elevated term premiums are prompting global investors to reassess duration risk and tighten allocations, particularly in emerging markets.In India, despite a cumulative 100 basis points of policy rate cuts by the RBI between February and June 2025, the benchmark 10-year G-Sec yield has remained range-bound at 6.25%–6.45% from April through July—signalling muted monetary transmission.This divergence underscores the influence of external headwinds, including sustained U.S. rate pressures, geopolitical uncertainties, and risk-averse investor sentiment, which are outweighing the impact of domestic policy easing.As confidence in fiscal prudence erodes, investors are increasingly reallocating towards gold, shorter-duration debt, and high-grade corporate instruments.In effect, the U.S. fiscal trajectory is no longer a local issue—it is reshaping global capital flows and repricing risk across markets.A) The reduction in ultra-long-term U.S. Treasury issuance is driven by a complex interplay of market sentiment, fiscal optics, and evolving policy priorities. Investor appetite for long-duration paper has waned amidst persistently high term premiums and volatile demand at recent auctions.As yields on 30-year Treasuries edge closer to 5%, the risk-reward dynamic has become less favourable — particularly in a climate of uncertain inflation trajectory and geopolitical tensions. Fed communications have also reflected concerns around the balance sheet runoff's impact on market liquidity.Although the central bank continues to unwind its holdings, reinvestment preferences now lean toward shorter maturities, indirectly weighing on the long-end segment.In parallel, the U.S. Treasury appears to be recalibrating its issuance strategy—emphasizing short- and medium-tenor securities to manage rollover risks, reduce interest costs, and retain flexibility amid fiscal headwinds.Until demand normalizes and policy direction stabilizes, ultra-long bond issuance is likely to remain subdued.A) To unlock the full potential of India's corporate bond market, a combination of regulatory, structural, and operational reforms is essential.First, broadening participation through lower issuance thresholds and flexible investment norms—especially for pension and insurance funds—can catalyse demand and supply. CRISIL estimates such measures could enable ₹4–7 lakh crore in additional issuance capacity.Second, aligning the tax treatment of debt mutual funds with other asset classes—by restoring indexation benefits and revisiting long-term capital gains taxation—can improve their competitiveness and encourage greater retail and institutional participation in the bond market.Third, recent initiatives like SEBI's 'Bond Central' platform are encouraging steps toward improving transparency, standardizing disclosures, and lowering the investment minimums to ₹10,000. This could meaningfully widen the retail investor base. Deepening the secondary market is equally critical. Encouraging market-making, credit default swap usage by funds, and establishing robust buyback frameworks will help address liquidity constraints.Finally, supporting securitization, especially for stressed assets, can develop a diversified risk-return spectrum within the fixed-income space. These reforms, implemented in tandem, can transform the current institutional-heavy landscape into a more inclusive, liquid, and dynamic market.(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Best of BS Opinion: FTA with UK a clear shift in India's stance on trade
Best of BS Opinion: FTA with UK a clear shift in India's stance on trade

Business Standard

time22 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Best of BS Opinion: FTA with UK a clear shift in India's stance on trade

India and the UK last week signed on to free trade agreement that promises to be the most expansive the former has had in a few years. But more importantly, says our first editorial, it marks a shift in India's thinking on trade. How far that will carry remains to be seen, especially in the ongoing talks with the European Union, where India might have to concede some more ground in return for the outsize opportunities it can get from the European bloc. India hasn't raised any hackles domestically with the UK FTA, but the real challenge will come when it's time to finalise a similar deal with the US, with which it runs a significant surplus, where both sides are seemingly locked in a staring contest. Our second editorial welcomes the Reserve Bank of India's financial inclusion index, which shows the country is doing better in providing access to financial services. However, more needs to be done in terms of transparency of the diverse data points, which would help make better policy easier. Since the central bank hasn't released a sub-indice-wise score, it is hard to tell where it is lagging, making it harder to target specific areas of concern. It also does not offer much by way of regional disparity, masking continuing financial exclusion of those in underserved regions. More granular data, our editorial says, would go a long way in formulating meaningful policy interventions. It is clear that US President Donald Trump truly believes that high tariffs are a must if America is to succeed, whatever that might mean. Meanwhile, the Yale Budget Lab estimates that US buyers will have to pay at least 20 per cent more at the till - the highest tariff rate in more than a hundred years. While developing nations are likely to face the brunt of these trade deals (Exhibit A: Philippines @ 19% export tariffs, zero on US imports), they are hedging that they will be better off than their peers, notes Mihir S Sharma. But does the US really want to bring some of these low-end manufacturing jobs back home again? Sharma points out that young Americans likely do not want the same jobs that the Greatest Generation or even the Boomers did; it certainly would not bode well either for their weekly cheques or for the US' productivity. L'affaire Jane Street lays bare structural flaws in India's derivatives market, writes Debashis Basu, as he identifies two key issues. The first, he argues, is that the indices used for the futures and options (F&O) markets themselves are flawed. The second is that the claim that derivatives markets enable efficient price discovery and helps investors manage risk is incorrect because the large volumes are limited to just two indices - the Nifty50 and the Bank Nifty (and a bit to FinNifty). To elaborate on his proposition, he considers index construction and the efficiency of the F&O market. The former, Basu writes, is lopsided because of skewed weightages, while the latter has nothing to do with the cash market, making price discovery illusory, liquidity superficial, and hedging merely theoretical, all because the F&O market is limited to two indices, despite the NSE having launched over a dozen other indices. In her review of Sugata Srinivasaraju's The Conscience Network: A Chronicle of Resistance to a Dictatorship, Aditi Phadnis is struck by the author's meticulous research, nuance, and restrained elegance. The book, as she notes, approaches one of the most seminal moments of Indian democracy - the imposition of Emergency - from an angle not many are aware of: the resistance provided by Indians/Indian-Americans living in the United States. These men and women fought against the curtailment of democratic norms and civil rights, inspired by both American values as well as by Mahatma Gandhi and Jayaprakash Narayan, better known as 'JP'. Coincidentally, American democracy had just gone through its own wrenching democratic upheavals - the Vietnam War and Watergate - which helped Indians there find space to voice their protests.

Buy or sell: Vaishali Parekh recommends three stocks to buy today — 28 July 2025
Buy or sell: Vaishali Parekh recommends three stocks to buy today — 28 July 2025

Mint

time22 minutes ago

  • Mint

Buy or sell: Vaishali Parekh recommends three stocks to buy today — 28 July 2025

Buy or sell stocks: The week from 28 July to 01 August 2025 is packed with key economic events across the United States, India, and China, which could significantly influence global market sentiments, including the Indian stock market. In the US, attention will be on the US Federal Reserve's FOMC rate decision scheduled for 30 July, which could shape expectations around interest rate policy amidst persistent inflation concerns. The GDP Annualised QoQ and ADP Employment Change data will also be released on the same day, offering a glimpse into the economic growth trajectory and private sector hiring trends. On 31 July, the Initial Jobless Claims report will provide further clarity on the labour market's health. The week will culminate on 01 August with a series of important US releases, including Nonfarm Payrolls, ISM Manufacturing PMI, S&P Global US Manufacturing PMI, and the Unemployment Rate—all of which will collectively paint a comprehensive picture of employment dynamics and manufacturing sector performance. Vaishali Parekh, Vice President — Technical Research at Prabhudas Lilladher, believes the Indian stock market sentiment has weakened as the Nifty 50 index has slipped below the 50-DEMA support of 24,900. The key benchmark index may try to test the 24,700 to 24,650 levels. However, the next crucial support for the 50-stock index is 24,500. On the upper side, 25,050 may act as a critical hurdle. Speaking on the outlook of the Nifty 50 today, Vaishali Parekh said, "The Nifty 50 index witnessed heavy profit booking in the last two sessions from the crucial hurdle of 25,050 zone and has slipped below the important 50-DEMA zone at 24,950 level to weaken the bias having next near-term support visible near 24,670-24,750 zone and the crucial important support positioned near the 24,500 level. The index has arrived at the base of the ascending channel pattern on the daily chart at the 24,800 zone, and a revival from the current rate will improve the bias once again if it decisively breaches above the 25,000 zone in the coming sessions." "The Bank Nifty index continued with the slide with a weak candle indication on the daily chart, and once again is on the way to retest the important 50-DEMA zone near the 56,000 level, which is the crucial support. The index needs to sustain the 50-DEMA zone to keep the bias intact; otherwise, it can trigger a fresh downward slide in the coming sessions. At the same time, on the upside, Parekh added that the tough resistance barrier near the 57,300 zone needs to be breached decisively to expect fresh upward movement and strengthen the trend," Parekh added. Parekh said that the Nifty 50 index's support is 24,700, while the resistance is 25,000. The BankNifty's daily range would be 56,000 to 57,000. Regarding stocks to buy today, Vaishali Parekh recommended these three buy-or-sell stocks: Lupin, Bodal Chemicals, and Anupam Rasayan India. 1] Bodal Chemicals: Buy at ₹ 74.40, Target ₹ 78, Stop Loss ₹ 72; 2] Lupin: Buy at ₹ 1952, Target ₹ 2050, Stop Loss ₹ 1920; and 3] Anupam Rasayan India: Buy at ₹ 1145, Target ₹ 1180, Stop Loss ₹ 1120. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or brokerage companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

‘Easy as I settled India-Pak': Trump claims ended Thailand-Cambodia clash using trade pressure
‘Easy as I settled India-Pak': Trump claims ended Thailand-Cambodia clash using trade pressure

First Post

time22 minutes ago

  • First Post

‘Easy as I settled India-Pak': Trump claims ended Thailand-Cambodia clash using trade pressure

Trump has once again claimed credit for helping end hostilities between India and Pakistan, this time while discussing rising tensions between Thailand and Cambodia. Drawing a comparison, Trump said he used trade pressure to de-escalate both situations read more US President Donald Trump on Sunday once again reiterated his claim of helping broker a ceasefire between India and Pakistan by using trade pressure—this time while drawing a parallel with the ongoing tensions between Thailand and Cambodia. Speaking about Southeast Asia, Trump said the United States maintains strong trade ties with both Thailand and Cambodia. He claimed he personally called the prime ministers of both countries and warned them that no trade deal would move forward unless they de-escalated their conflict. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We do a lot of trade with Thailand and Cambodia. Yet I'm reading that they're killing each other,' Trump said. 'I say this should be an easy one for me because I settled India and Pakistan. I called the Prime Ministers of each (Thailand and Cambodia) and I said, 'We're not going to make a trade deal unless you settle the war.' By the time I got off the phone, I think they want to settle now.' #WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "We do a lot of trade with Thailand and Cambodia. Yet I'm reading that they're killing each other... I say this should be an easy one for me because I settled India and Pakistan... I called the Prime Ministers of each (Thailand and… — ANI (@ANI) July 27, 2025 He went on to reference the India-Pakistan standoff, saying 'India and Pakistan were really getting ready to go at it. So getting those things settled—and if I can use trade to do that—then it's my honour.' Trump's constant claims of de-escalating the conflict Trump has made similar claims before, crediting himself for de-escalating the India-Pakistan conflict by instructing his administration to cancel all trade deals with both nations. He believes that pressure forced both sides to back down. 'We did some great work—India and Pakistan. That was close to being nuclear. We handled it. We did a lot,' Trump had told reporters earlier at the White House. 'I don't know if any president has done more.' Earlier, Trump also cited a similar approach in other global flashpoints. 'Serbia and Kosovo were going to go at it. I said, 'You go at it, there's no trade with the United States.' That's what happened with India and Pakistan. I told (Treasury Secretary) Scott (Bessent) and (Commerce Secretary) Howard (Lutnick), 'Cancel all deals with India and Pakistan. They're not trading with us while they're at war.'' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, India has consistently rejected Trump's assertions. According to Indian officials, the ceasefire agreement reached on May 10—after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes—was the result of direct military-to-military communication between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of both nations. Officials also clarified that the dialogue was initiated at Pakistan's request. In a recent phone conversation with Trump, Prime Minister Narendra Modi reiterated India's long-standing position that all matters with Pakistan are strictly bilateral and that New Delhi does not and will never accept third-party mediation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store