logo
Japan's minority gov't faces election setback over inflation, immigration

Japan's minority gov't faces election setback over inflation, immigration

Al Jazeera6 days ago
Japan's shaky minority government looks poised for another setback in a crucial upper house vote this weekend, in the first national election since Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba took office last year.
Half of the 248 seats in Japan's Upper House of Parliament will be contested on Sunday. Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), along with its longtime junior coalition partner Komeito, need to win 50 of its 66 seats up for re-election to hold on to its majority.
But polling suggests the coalition will fail to do so, in a potential repeat of October's disastrous election, when the LDP-Komeito coalition lost its parliamentary majority in Japan's more powerful lower house – the worst result since briefly losing power in 2009.
The LDP has ruled Japan for almost all of the country's post-war history.
Inflation has been a killer issue for Ishiba, with the price of rice – which has doubled since last year due to poor harvests and government policies – becoming a lightning rod for voter discontent.
In response, opposition parties have promised tax cuts and welfare spending to soften the blow of Japan's long-running economic stagnation.
While locals face a rising cost of living, the country's weak Yen has attracted significant numbers of foreign tourists. Concerns about over-tourism and a lack of respect for local customs have fed local discontent, which has been capitalised on by upstart populist party Sanseito.
Initially launched on YouTube by streamer Kazuya Kyoumoto, politician Sohei Kamiya, and political analyst Yuuya Watase in 2019, the party rose to prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic as it peddled conspiracy theories and far-right talking points.
In the years since, Sanseito has successfully appealed to a small but growing section of Japan's electorate with its 'Japanese First' campaign and anti-immigration stance, rallying against what it describes as a 'silent invasion' of immigrants.
While foreigners still only make up a small fraction of Japan's population, at about 3 percent, the country has taken in about a million immigrant workers over the past three years to fill jobs left vacant by its ageing population.
Kamiya, the party's 47-year-old leader, said Sanseito is forcing the government to address growing concerns about foreigners in Japan, as it drags rhetoric once confined to the political fringe into the mainstream.
'In the past, anyone who brought up immigration would be attacked by the left. We are getting bashed too, but are also gaining support,' Kamiya told the Reuters news agency this week.
'The LDP and Komeito can't stay silent if they want to keep their support,' Kamiya added.
While polls show Sanseito may only secure 10 to 15 of the 125 seats up for grabs in this vote, each loss is crucial for Prime Minister Ishiba's shaky minority government – increasingly beholden to opposition parties to cling to power.
Should the LDP's seat share be eroded, as expected, Ishiba will almost certainly seek to broaden his coalition or strike informal deals with opposition parties.
But doing so with Sanseito could prove problematic for the LDP, which owes much of its longevity to its broad appeal and centrist image.
'If the party [LDP] goes too far right, it loses the centrists,' Tsuneo Watanabe, a senior fellow at the Sasakawa Peace Foundation think tank in Tokyo, told Reuters.
In a worst-case election outcome for the LDP, David Boling, director for Japan and Asian trade at political risk consultancy Eurasia Group, says he believes Ishiba may be forced out of office.
'If he had an overwhelming loss, I think he would have to resign,' Boling said.
But a move such as that would unleash political turmoil, at a time when Japan is frantically seeking to secure a reprieve from Donald Trump's proposed 25 percent tariffs before an August 1 deadline touted by the US president.
Illustrating the urgency of the issue, on Friday Ishiba took a break from campaigning to urge Washington's chief tariff negotiator and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to continue talks with Japan's top tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa.
Following his meeting with Ishiba, Bessent said 'a good deal is more important than a rushed deal.
'A mutually beneficial trade agreement between the United States and Japan remains within the realm of possibility,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact check: Could Trump's trade tariffs pay off the US deficit?
Fact check: Could Trump's trade tariffs pay off the US deficit?

Al Jazeera

time15 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Fact check: Could Trump's trade tariffs pay off the US deficit?

One of the Trump administration's biggest tariff boosters, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, recently said tariffs will not only energise the industrial sector in the United States but also help the government's finances. During a July 20 interview on CBS's Face the Nation, Lutnick told host Margaret Brennan that the US is collecting close to $30bn a month in tariffs. 'You got to remember – this is going to pay off our deficit. This is going to make America stronger,' he said. But the maths falls short. Multiplying the most recent month of US tariff collections by a full decade would not cover the 10-year costs of President Donald Trump's new tax-and-spending legislation, much less all federal deficits during that decade. The current tariffs are slated to increase on August 1, including levies ranging from 20 percent to 40 percent for 21 countries, based on what the Trump administration has said. An analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) – Congress's nonpartisan number-crunching arm – also projects that 10 years of tariff revenue increases under Trump will not pay for the added deficits from his bill or the cumulative deficits over the next decade. The projected added deficit from the bill is $3.4 trillion, on top of the existing projected deficit over the next decade of $21.8 trillion. 'I can't envision a scenario where the tariff revenues eliminate the deficit,' said Steve Ellis, president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a group that tracks the federal budget. The White House did not respond to a request for comment for this story. How much is the US collecting from Trump tariffs? The federal government has been taking in higher tariff revenues under Trump's more aggressive tariff policies. Currently, the tariffs are a baseline 10 percent for all countries, plus additional tariffs on some products such as steel. Economists say consumers will ultimately swallow much of the tariff increases. Federal tariff revenue tracked by the Penn-Wharton Budget Model shows that, up to July 11, the federal government had collected about $100bn in tariffs so far this year. During the same period in 2024, before Trump took office, the federal government had collected less than $48bn in tariff revenue. In June 2025, the most recent monthly data available, the federal government took in $27bn in tariffs, according to the Treasury Department. A year earlier, that figure was $6bn. That's an increase of $21bn a month because of Trump's trade policies. If the government were to continue collecting tariff revenue at the June 2025 pace for a full decade – 120 months – that would produce $2.52 trillion in tariff revenue. That is in the ballpark of what the CBO published in June. Taking into account the potential economic shrinkage from higher tariffs, such as higher consumer prices, CBO projected that the boost in tariff revenue would reduce total federal deficits by $2.8 trillion over 10 years. How does this tariff revenue compare with the federal deficit? Without adding in the deficits from the bill Trump just signed, CBO's baseline projection for the cumulative deficits over the next 10 years is almost $21.8 trillion. That is about seven times the size of the CBO's projected tariff revenues over the same period. And the projected tariff revenue under Trump would not fully cover the added deficits just from the 'megabill' Trump signed. According to CBO estimates, the law Trump signed on July 4 will raise deficits by $3.4 trillion beyond their previous trajectory over the next 10 years, which exceeds CBO's tariff revenue projection. There is uncertainty about how much tariff revenue Trump's policies will generate, because he has frequently announced and then paused higher tariffs. 'It is hard to know what the end game is,' Ellis said. 'Is it high tariffs to generate revenue, which would reduce economic activity, or is it to rebalance the trade and eventually lower tariffs', and thus their revenue? The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a fiscally hawkish group, has noted that Trump's tariff policies have been challenged in court, and the initial ruling by the Court of International Trade went against the administration. If the initial ruling is upheld on appeal, then Trump would lose his power to unilaterally enact many of the tariffs he has been imposing, and the new tariff revenues now being generated would largely dry up. And even if Trump's tariff powers are upheld on appeal, Trump's successor could reverse them by executive order, meaning any tariff revenues would cover the next four years, not the next 10 years. Our ruling Lutnick said tariffs are 'going to pay off our deficit'. Trump's on-again, off-again pattern for implementing tariffs makes estimates tricky. But two projections show that the Trump administration's tariff revenues would not cover the next 10 years of projected deficits. The CBO said it expects tariff revenues to reach $2.8 trillion over the next 10 years, while a back-of-the-envelope calculation based on the tariffs collected in June 2025 would reach $2.52 trillion. Both sums are only a fraction of the nearly $22 trillion in cumulative deficits projected over the next 10 years. We rate the statement False.

Trump admin leans into unsubstantiated claims Obama committed ‘treason'
Trump admin leans into unsubstantiated claims Obama committed ‘treason'

Al Jazeera

timea day ago

  • Al Jazeera

Trump admin leans into unsubstantiated claims Obama committed ‘treason'

The administration of United States President Donald Trump has again pushed unsubstantiated claims that former President Barack Obama committed treason by falsely tying him to Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election. Speaking at the White House on Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said that Obama and key allies had misled the public and manipulated intelligence to undermine Trump. Asked if she believed Obama had committed treason, Gabbard said it was up to the Department of Justice to bring criminal charges, but said that the actions of Obama and his allies could 'only be described as a years-long coup and a treasonous conspiracy against the American people, our republic, and an effort to undermine President Trump's administration'. Trump has frequently pushed baseless claims about his political rivals and threatened them with persecution. He has also remained fixated on past grievances, promoting allegations that he has been undermined by murky forces and repeating the false claim that he was the true winner of the 2020 election. His administration has recently come under increased pressure from members of his own right-wing base, some of whom have been disappointed with his administration's handling of information about disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Trump has said that he wants Obama, who served as president before Trump's first term in office, to face 'accountability'. 'It's there; he's guilty. This was treason,' Trump said on Tuesday, pushing accusations widely denounced as baseless. 'They tried to steal the election, they tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever imagined, even in other countries.' Asked about those comments on Wednesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt did not specify what actions Trump would like to see. 'It's in the Department of Justice's hands and we trust them to move the ball forward,' she said. During her remarks on Wednesday, Gabbard also named several figures from the Obama administration, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, and former CIA Director John Brennan. A spokesperson for Obama has previously said that Trump's 'bizarre' claims of treason are 'ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction'. Trump faced allegations of attempting to overturn his loss in 2020 through anti-democratic means after a mob of his supporters stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, to prevent the certification of the election results based on false claims pushed by Trump that the election had been 'stolen' through massive fraud.

Video: Iran's president says country won't abandon its nuclear programme
Video: Iran's president says country won't abandon its nuclear programme

Al Jazeera

time2 days ago

  • Al Jazeera

Video: Iran's president says country won't abandon its nuclear programme

Iran's president says country won't abandon its nuclear programme NewsFeed Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian has told Al Jazeera his country is committed to continuing its nuclear program for peaceful purposes, after the 12-day assault by Israel supported by the US. Video Duration 03 minutes 18 seconds 03:18 Video Duration 00 minutes 40 seconds 00:40 Video Duration 03 minutes 00 seconds 03:00 Video Duration 01 minutes 39 seconds 01:39 Video Duration 01 minutes 47 seconds 01:47 Video Duration 02 minutes 57 seconds 02:57 Video Duration 00 minutes 46 seconds 00:46

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store