logo
Unemployment claims rise to 242,000, the highest in 3 months

Unemployment claims rise to 242,000, the highest in 3 months

CBS News27-02-2025

Applications for U.S. jobless benefits rose to a three-month high last week but remained within the same healthy range of the past three years.
The number of Americans filing for jobless benefits for the first time rose by 22,000 to 242,000 for the week ending Feb. 22, the Labor Department said Thursday. Analysts had projected that 220,000 new applications would be filed.
Weekly applications for jobless benefits are considered a proxy for layoffs.
The four-week average, which evens out some of the week-to-week volatility, climbed by 8,500 to 224,000.
Some analysts say they expect layoffs ordered by the Department of Government Efficiency to show up in the report in the coming weeks or months.
"While still far below recession level, this is the highest number of weekly claims yet this year, and that's a yellow caution light for the economy," Andrew Stettner, unemployment insurance (UI) expert at The Century Foundation and former Biden administration UI modernization director, said in a report. "What's more, these worrying indicators don't include hundreds of thousands of layoffs announced by the federal government."
On Wednesday, senior U.S. officials set the government downsizing in motion via a memo dramatically expanding President Donald Trump's efforts to scale back a workforce. Thousands of probationary employees have already been fired, and now the Republican administration is turning its attention to career officials with civil service protection.
Government agencies have been directed to submit by March 13 their plans for what is known as a reduction in force, which would not only lay off employees but eliminate positions altogether.
Despite showing signs of weakening during the past year, the labor market remains healthy.
Earlier this month, the Labor Department reported that U.S. employers added 143,000 jobs in January, significantly fewer than December's 256,000 job gains. However, the unemployment rate ticked down to an even 4%, signaling a still very healthy labor market.
Even so, some economists in their review of the latest jobless data see signs of a potential downturn.
"Today's figure is a big departure from the previous downtrend. It brings the level of claims back to where they were at the end of last summer, but going the other way this time," analysts with High Frequency Economics said in a report.
"HFE is already forecasting a sharp slowdown in GDP in the first quarter from the fourth to under 1%. We will mark that down further if [President Trump] goes ahead with 25% tariff barriers on the Northern and Southern borders," they added.
Continuing claims rise as well
Continuing claims in the week ending Feb. 15 were also up, noted Samuel Tombs, chief U.S. economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, in a note on the latest jobless claims data.
"Our final chart shows that continuing claims are closely correlated with the number of people unemployed for less than 26 weeks, said Tombs, adding that "the number of people who are unemployed but who have exhausted their 26-week entitlement to jobless benefits likely has continued to rise."
Late in January, the Federal Reserve left its benchmark lending rate alone after issuing three cuts late in 2024. Fed officials are closely monitoring inflation and the labor market for signs of a potentially weakening economy. They expect only two rate cuts this year, down from previous projections of four.
The most recent government consumer prices report that showed that inflation accelerated last month, creating some doubt about whether the Fed will be moved to cut rates at all this year.
The new jobless benefits claims data shows that inflation has remained stubbornly above the Fed's 2% target for roughly the past six months after it fell steadily for about a year and a half.
The consumer price index increased 3% in January from a year ago, up from a 3 1/2 year low of 2.4% in September. According to the CPI report, egg prices, which continue to soar, jumped more than 15% in January from a year ago, to approximately $4.95 a dozen. In 2019, consumers could pick up a dozen eggs for around $1.54, but by last year the price had soared to $4.15 — a 170% increase, according to CBS News' price tracker of everyday goods.
Overall, while layoffs remain low by historical standards, some high-profile companies have announced job cuts already this year.
Workday, Dow, CNN, Starbucks, Southwest Airlines and Facebook parent company Meta have all trimmed their workforces already in 2025. Late in 2024, GM, Boeing, Cargill and Stellantis announced layoffs.
The total number of Americans receiving unemployment benefits for the week of Feb. 15 fell by 5,000 to 1.86 million.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can Trump Tackle US 'Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In
Can Trump Tackle US 'Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In

Newsweek

time24 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Can Trump Tackle US 'Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vow to "Make America Healthy Again" could fall short when it comes to chronic disease, experts have warned. When the MAHA Commission report on chronic disease came out in May, President Donald Trump made it clear his administration was committed to tackling the epidemic "We will not stop until we defeat the chronic disease epidemic in America, we're going to get it done for the first time ever," said Trump during a MAHA event at the White House on May . In a statement included in the press release accompanying the report, Kennedy Jr. said: "We will end the childhood chronic disease crisis by attacking its root causes head-on—not just managing its symptoms." Nearly 130 million Americans are estimated to have at least one form of chronic disease, which could be heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity or hypertension, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Experts told Newsweek that, while the Trump administration's ambition to "defeat" the "epidemic" is clear, whether its policies will help or hinder chronic-disease patients remains to be seen. On one hand, Kennedy Jr.'s recent MAHA report, which detailed what the administration believed to be the leading causes of chronic disease in children, indicated the aim was to reduce the prevalence of chronic conditions through public education and research. On the other hand, the proposed cuts to Medicaid funding and work requirements for eligibility to the benefits, which are set to come as part of the broader GOP budget bill, could leave many with chronic disease without access to vital care. As many as three in four adults enrolled in Medicaid report having one or more chronic conditions, and many are unable to work the hours needed to meet the new eligibility requirements, according to nonprofit health policy research and news organization, KFF. So, while some may be medically exempt, others will lose their health coverage, meaning their conditions could worsen without access to care. Newsweek has contacted the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) via email on Tuesday. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva Tackling Chronic Disease Since he became health secretary, Kennedy Jr. has promised to increase research in the root causes of illness and ensure the American diet is full of high-quality foods, while limiting access to ultra-processed food and certain chemicals, which he believes are contributors to chronic disease. The report states that consumption of ultra-processed foods "has gone up at an exponential rate as share of the American diet." Earlier in the year, Kennedy, had described products from companies like Kellogg's and McDonald's as "mass poison to children." Prioritizing research on the issue is crucial, Kenneth E. Thorpe, a professor of health policy at Emory University, Georgia, and honorary chair of the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease (PFCD), told Newsweek. "Renewed focus on chronic disease and the impact that the U.S. diet has on it—focusing on artificial or chemical ingredients in food, particularly the impact of ultra processed foods—is important," he said. He added that this was because of the fact diet has "a direct impact on the growing rates of chronic conditions like obesity and obesity-related comorbidities such diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancers and many more." "I applaud the Trump administration's focus on addressing the number one cause of death and disability in the U.S.—chronic, non-communicable disease," said Thorpe, who has been an advocate of chronic disease prevention in the U.S. for over 30 years. "We have more people with more chronic diseases, with just 5 percent of the population accounting for 50 percent of the costs in health care." He added that it is estimated that from 2016 to 2030 the cost of chronic disease will be in excess of $42 trillion. "The time is now to focus on the prevention and better management of chronic disease," Thorpe added. What Should the Trump Administration Do While it's too early to tell if the Trump administration is heading down the right path to lower chronic disease prevalence, Dr. Adrian Hernandez, director of the Duke Clinical Research Institute at the Duke University School of Medicine, told Newsweek that "leading indicators appear to be going the wrong way." He said this was partly because of the changes being proposed to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). A proposal for the HHS, most of which was reported on in April, reduces by almost 40 percent its budget for 2026 and reveals major funding cuts for the NIH, according to CNN. Newsweek has contacted the NIH via email on Tuesday. Hernandez added that changes, such as the proposed cuts in federal funding, to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) were also going down the wrong path. Rather than cuts to these federal health agencies, Hernandez said tackling chronic disease will require "an investment" in science and health. He said that the same was needed for health care delivery models like Medicaid and Medicare—rather than making cuts to the programs, the administration should "invest in preventative health." The GOP budget bill, which is progressing through the legislative ranks, instructs the committee to reduce the Department of Health and Human Services budget by $880 billion over 10 years, which would include cuts to Medicaid alongside other measures such as implementing work requirements. Ross Brownson, director of the Prevention Research Center at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, told Newsweek that Medicaid cuts would "likely have a detrimental effect on chronic disease risk among the most vulnerable populations," adding Medicaid-enrolled adults have significantly higher rates of chronic disease than individuals privately insured. "The drive to defeat chronic disease stalls if Medicaid patients are placed in the backseat," Thorpe said. "Today, the federal program is far from perfect, but it is a lifeline for those who need it," Thorpe added, saying it was "often the only pathway to care" for many with chronic disease. 'A Long-Term Challenge' Experts insist that chronic disease is a deeply complex issue that requires long-term solutions and attention. Brownson noted that there has been "sparse attention to physical inactivity and tobacco use," as major risk factors for chronic disease. "This is a two-edged sword," Brownson told Newsweek. He said that while "on one hand, labeling this issue a crisis implies a sense of urgency and may mobilize action." Ultimately "the jury is still out on whether they will solve the chronic disease crisis." "We often have a short attention span and with this crisis label, policy makers may think the problem can be solved quickly and then move on to a new issue. We need to think of this as a long-term challenge in need of attention," he added.

MacShane decides against another term on Frederick City Council
MacShane decides against another term on Frederick City Council

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MacShane decides against another term on Frederick City Council

Frederick City Council Member Ben MacShane said he is not running for reelection this year, but is not ruling out running for a third term on the council or another public office in the future. MacShane said he wants the council to have fresh perspectives. Nine people are currently running for seven City Council positions and two are running for mayor. The filing deadline for candidates for mayor and City Council is July 1. Council Member Donna Kuzemchak has also said she is not running. The council is set to expand this year to seven members from its current five. Candidates The candidates for Frederick City Council, with links to their profiles. This means the council would have at least four new members following the general election in November. Currently, all five members of the City Council represent the city at large. However, after elections there will be seven council members. Five will represent districts and two will be at large representatives. This is due to the then-Board of Aldermen approving a new charter in September 2024. Mayor Michael O'Connor has filed to run for a third term. He is challenged by fellow Democrat Ron Beattie, a former city planning commissioner. District 1 encompasses an area in the west part of the city, north of the Golden Mile area. Only current City Council President Katie Nash, a Democrat, has filed to run in District 1. District 2 is the area around the Golden Mile in the southwest portion of the city. Only immigrant advocate César Díaz, a Democrat, has filed to run in the district. District 3 is made up mostly of the downtown area. Peter Brehm, the treasurer for The Frederick Center, which serves the LGBTQ+ communities, and Wag's Restaurant co-owner Dave Schmidt — both Democrats — have both filed to run in the district. District 4 contains the northern part of downtown and the northeastern portion of the city. Only Joe Adkins, a former deputy director of the Frederick Planning Department, has filed for the district. Adkins is currently the only Republican to have filed. District 5 includes the northwestern part of the city. Sculptor Sarah Hempel Irani, a Democrat, is the lone candidate who has filed for the district. Incumbents Derek Shackelford and Kelly Russell and Medicaid policy analyst Libby Taylor — all Democrats — have all filed to run for the council's two at-large seats. The primary election is scheduled for Sept. 9 and the general election is scheduled for Nov. 4.

Newark mayor sues N.J. DA over being arrested last month
Newark mayor sues N.J. DA over being arrested last month

UPI

time38 minutes ago

  • UPI

Newark mayor sues N.J. DA over being arrested last month

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka has filed a lawsuit against New Jersey District Attorney Alina Habba over his arrest last month. Photo by Justin Lane/UPI | License Photo June 4 (UPI) -- The Democratic mayor of Newark, Ras Baraka, has sued the Republican U.S. district attorney of New Jersey over his arrest last month outside of a prison being transformed into a detention facility to hold migrants arrested in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. The lawsuit, announced Tuesday, accuses District Attorney Alina Habba and Special Agent in Charge Ricky Patel of the Newark Division of Homeland Security Investigations of violating Baraka's rights by arresting him without cause, initiating a malicious prosecution and committing defamation. "They abused their power to violently arrest me at Delaney Hall despite being invited inside," Baraka said in a statement Tuesday. "No one is above the law." Baraka was arrested on May 9 outside Delaney Hall, a Newark prison owned by GEO Group, which in February signed a contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to house migrants at the 1,000-bed center for 15 years. Habba accused Baraka of trespassing at the facility and claimed he was arrested after allegedly "ignored multiple warnings from Homeland Security Investigations to remove himself from the ICE detention center. "He has willingly chosen to disregard the law," she said on X following Baraka's arrest. "That will not stand in this state." Habba -- formerly a lawyer for President Donald Trump, who appointed her to her current position in New Jersey -- announced last month she was dropping the charges against Baraka "for the sake of moving forward." According to the lawsuit, Baraka was at the prison at the invitation of Rep. LaMonica McIver, one of three Democratic New Jersey House representatives visiting Delaney Hall that day to inspect it. Baraka arrived at Delaney Hall at about 1:42 p.m. EDT and spoke with members of the public protesting the Trump administration's immigration policies. At 1:50 p.m. a GEO Group guard invited Baraka to enter the inner gate of Delaney Hall, which the mayor did. He waited there for about 40 minutes, apparently for the Democratic lawmakers inside the facility. According to the lawsuit, Patel confronted Baraka at 2:33 p.m., and told him to leave. Baraka argued he was invited in by the guard, which Patel disputed, the court documents state. Minutes later, the members of Congress exited the facility after witnessing the confrontation between the two and informed Patel that they had wanted Baraka there. "After the members of Congress conveyed their thoughts, Defendant Patel threatened to arrest the Mayor," the lawsuit states. "In response, the Mayor said: 'I'm leaving now.'" Baraka was arrested by about 20 DHS agents, some masked, about 5 minutes after he left the GEO Group property, according to the filing. "Egged on by Defendant Patel, who ordered the DHS agents to 'take him down' (meaning violently tackle the Mayor of Newark) the agents pushed, shoved and assaulted the Mayor's security team and members of Congress before violently pulling Mayor Baraka's arms and arresting him without probable cause," the lawsuit states. "The DHS agents handcuffed the Mayor behind his back in an effort to effect maximum humiliation for what Defendant Habba's office later admitted was an alleged 'petty offense.'" The lawsuit, which is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, also accuses Habba of having a political agenda to forward Trump's immigration policies and to help Republicans in the state. When Habba told the court she was ending the prosecution of Baraka, federal Judge Andre Espinosa admonished the district attorney. "The hasty arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, followed swiftly by the dismissal of the trespassing charges a mere 13 days later, suggests a worrisome misstep by your office," Espinosa said. "An arrest, particularly of a public figure, is not a preliminary investigative tool. It is a severe action, carrying significant reputational and personal consequences, and it should only be undertaken after a thorough, dispassionate evaluation of credible evidence." On Monday, after learning of Baraka's intention to sue her, Habba retorted: "My advice to the mayor -- feel free to join me in prioritizing violent crime and public safety. Far better use of time for the great citizens of New Jersey." Habba later last month filed charges of assaulting law enforcement against McIver in connection with Baraka's arrest. Baraka has voiced solidarity with McIver, and McIver described the charges against her as "purely political."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store