Un-Islamic or intolerance? Debate on Sufi songs hits discordant notes
'Sufi songs that destroy the religion' was the most recent topic of discussion on Proof Point, the online platform of the Wisdom Islamic Organisation, where Salafi scholars talk on current issues.
The scholars asserted that many un-Islamic ideas are being smuggled into Sufi songs in the name of artistic expression. 'Organisations such as the Samastha and the Jama'at-e-Islami are promoting it by arranging special sessions at their programmes,' Shuraih Salafi said during the discussion.
He said Sufism is the tool developed by Shias to destroy Islam from within. They are promoting a spirituality that is prohibited in Islam and the Sufi claim that there is no difference between Allah and the individual amounts to 'shirk' (polytheism).
'The popularity of Sufi songs has seen the emergence of new musicians. They are being promoted as representatives of Islam because they appear in Islamic attire,' Salafi said. 'On the other side, youths are running after rappers. Thousands are jostling to listen to people who do gimmicks on stage, without even proper dress,' he said.
'They don't get the beauty...'
Speaking to TNIE, Sufi musician Nazar Malik said Salafis cannot understand the beauty of Islam because they practice a dry religion. 'I think the Wisdom group started their attack on Sufi music by playing one of my songs at their conference in 2022, without my consent. The song was on Imam Hussain, the beloved grandson of Prophet Muhammad. Salafis are intolerant even to the family of the Prophet,' Malik said.
'Karbala, where Imam Hussain was murdered, was the theme of many songs of the Muslim families of Kerala. Many virtues of traditional Islam have disappeared with the advent of the Salafis,' he said.
Malik said his music is his spiritual expression and no one has the right to oppose it. 'The Salafis attack us ideologically in places where they have no majority and no power. They would have done something else if they had power in Kerala. Even without power, they destroyed a dargah at Nadukani in Malappuram.'
He said Sufi musicians have done nothing harmful, unlike the Salafi preachers, whose irresponsible speeches have become an easy tool for those attacking Islam. 'On the one hand, you see the Sangh parivar coming out against Vedan, the rapper. Here, Salafis are jumping on us,' Malik added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Love is not penal': SC on minor couples in genuine romantic relationships
'Love is not penal, and it cannot become one,' the Supreme Court asserted on Tuesday, underlining that young couples, even those just short of attaining majority, must be 'left alone' if they have entered into genuine romantic relationships. The Supreme Court bench noted that there is a distinction between exploitative criminal conduct and 'romantic bonds' between teenagers. (HT Photo) A bench of justices BV Nagarathna and R Mahadevan made the remarks while hearing a batch of petitions that sought guidelines to prevent misuse of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act in cases where minors engage in consensual relationships. During the proceedings, the court also dismissed petitions by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) and the National Commission for Women (NCW) challenging Punjab and Haryana high court orders that recognised the validity of marriages of Muslim girls after attaining puberty. The bench said the commissions had 'no locus standi' in such matters, remarking: 'It is strange that NCPCR, which is for protecting children, has challenged an order protecting two children…Leave these couples alone.' ALSO READ | Rape FIR under POCSO can't be quashed based on compromise or marriage: Punjab and Haryana HC Personal laws in Islam allow a Muslim girl to enter into a contract of marriage after attaining puberty whereas a set of common civil and criminal laws in India proscribes the marriage of girls under 18 and further makes sexual intercourse with minors a penal offence. With the dismissal, a January 2023 order of the top court that the high court ruling should not be treated as precedent also came to an end. During the Tuesday hearing, the bench noted that while POCSO remains a vital tool to protect children against sexual abuse, there is a distinction between exploitative criminal conduct and 'romantic bonds' between teenagers. 'Can you say it is criminal to love?' Justice Nagarathna asked, cautioning that prosecuting adolescents for consensual relationships inflicted lasting trauma. Appearing for petitioner NGO Bachpan Bachao Andolan (BBA), senior advocate HS Phoolka pressed for safeguards to ensure that leniency in such cases is not abused, suggesting for instance that the age gap between minors in relationships be capped at three years. Phoolka also assailed a 2022 circular by the Tamil Nadu director general of Police directing the police officials to not show haste in effecting an arrest of the accused in consensual relationships, saying such mandates were prone to be misused and minors getting trafficked. But the bench was emphatic that investigators can look into the facts of each case. 'It has to be examined on a case-by-case basis. Why do you want to prosecute everyone? Every case is different, and police have to investigate, apply their mind, and segregate genuine cases from those that should be prosecuted,' the court said. ALSO READ | Adolescence, consent & the grey zone for Pocso The bench highlighted the misuse of POCSO provisions by parents who file cases when daughters elope, often citing 'honour' as the pretext. 'Many such cases are filed by the girls' parents to so-called protect their honour. There will be honour killings if we start treating all such cases as crimes,' it warned. 'Look at the trauma when a boy has to be lodged in jail or face prosecution despite having a consensual relationship with a girl who is on the verge of attaining majority…We have to keep the realities of society in mind,' said the court. The bench also reflected on the social realities of adolescent life: 'Girls and boys study together, spend time together. They can develop feelings for each other and have romantic relationships. Where there are genuine romantic relationships; where they want to get married or want to be together…why should they be stopped?' The same bench also refused to entertain different petitions filed by NCPCR and the National Commission for Women (NCW), which had challenged separate high court orders on the issue. In one case, the bodies had assailed a Punjab and Haryana high court judgment, which held that Muslim girls are legally old enough to marry once they reach puberty at the age of 15; in another, the high court had handed custody of a minor girl to her adult husband following a habeas corpus plea. The bench said that NCPCR or NCW had no locus (legal standing) to interfere in these personal matters. 'NCPCR has no locus standi to challenge such orders,' the bench held. It further remarked: 'It is strange that the NCPCR, which is for protecting the children, has challenged an order protecting two children. How can we set aside protection orders of a high court? Leave these couples alone.' With the NCPCR's petitions getting disposed of on Tuesday, a January 2023 order by a previous bench of the Supreme Court that the Punjab and Haryana high court judgment shall not be treated as a legal precedent also ends. The court's observations come against the backdrop of multiple pending pleas, including those filed by BBA and NCPCR, that grapple with whether the statutory age of consent at 18 under POCSO should be revisited. Senior advocate Rajshekhar Rao assisted the court as amicus curiae. In separate proceedings, the Union government last month adduced its submissions in the top court, opposing any move to lower the age of consent under POCSO or introduce exceptions for adolescent relationships. As reported first by HT on July 24, the government told the court that such dilution, 'even in the name of reform or adolescent autonomy,' would dismantle the statutory shield meant to safeguard minors and risk opening the door to child abuse. It added that the current threshold of 18 years must remain 'strictly and uniformly enforced' to maintain the integrity of child protection laws and uphold the best interests of minors. ALSO READ | Mutual acts of love between minor couple not sexual assault under POCSO, says HC HT's analysis of government data, presented as part of its written submissions, revealed a stark disparity between the number of juveniles and young adults charged under rape and child sexual abuse laws and the relatively small proportion who are eventually convicted, throwing focus on the ongoing debate over the age of consent and its unintended consequences. Between 2018 and 2022, only 468 juveniles aged 16-18 were convicted under Section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code, despite more than 4,900 being booked across the country in the same period , a conviction rate of just 9.55%. For charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, just 855 convictions were recorded out of 6,892 cases during the same period , a rate of only 12.4%. The corresponding numbers for young adults aged 18-22 tell a similar story. While 52,471 were arrested under these stringent laws during this period, only 6,093 were convicted under POCSO, a conviction rate of just 11.61%. Of 24,306 arrested between 2018 and 2022 for rape, only 2,585 young adults were convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, amounting to just 10.63%.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SC directs ASI supervision of Mehrauli monuments
The Supreme Court on Tuesday stepped in to protect two ancient monuments in Delhi's Mehrauli, directing the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to abide by the Archaeological Survey of India's (ASI) decision before taking any demolition action around them. The order assumes significance as neither of the two structures is a protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. The court's order came on a petition filed by Zameer Ahmed Jumlana, who sought protection of the structures -- Ashiq Allah Dargah and the Chillagah of Baba Farid -- from demolition drives. The petitioner argued that though the sites were of historic significance, DDA was treating them as encroachments while clearing illegal structures in the Mehrauli green belt. A bench of justices BV Nagarathna and R Mahadevan ruled that the monuments' repair and renovation, if required, must be carried out under ASI supervision. 'We dispose the appeals by observing that ASI should take under its consideration the supervision of the monuments in question in the matter of repair and renovation,' the order said. DDA told the court that its actions were not aimed at destroying the monuments but at removing unauthorised constructions -- pucca structures and extensions -- built around them. However, the bench relied on an ASI status report submitted earlier this year that confirmed the heritage value of the two sites. 'The counsel for DDA submits that the said authority is concerned only with demolition of unauthorised structures… We have perused the status report of ASI. The DDA would abide by the decision of ASI,' the bench said. According to ASI, the Ashiq Allah Dargah is the tomb of Shaikh Shahibuddin, an inscription on which states it was built in 1317 AD. Shaikh Shahibuddin, considered a saint, was a khadim (attendant) of the renowned Sufi master Qutubuddin Bakhtiyar Kaki. The tomb lies to the west of Ranjit Gate of the Citadel of Rai Pithoda, the fort of Prithviraj Chauhan, which is a centrally protected monument. The second site, the Chillagah of Baba Sheikh Fariduddin Shakar Ganj, marks the meditation grounds of the 12th-13th century Sufi saint, who was also the chief disciple of Qutubuddin. Chillagahs traditionally served as places of seclusion for saints seeking spiritual retreat. The order assumes significance as neither of the two structures is a protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. But it falls within the 200-metre regulated zone to the centrally protected monument of the citadel of Prithviraj Chauhan. Under the AMASR Act, any construction, repair, or renovation within this zone requires prior permission of the competent authority. The petition was filed in the top court challenging a February 8 order passed this year by the Delhi High Court in a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by one Himanshu Damle who apprehended demolition of protected or national monuments in Mehrauli citing demolition of an 800-year-old Akhunji Masjid in the same area. Advocates Nizam Pasha and Talha Abdul Rahman, appearing for the petitioner, told the top court that the HC did not find the structure ancient. However, the ASI report cemented this fact and DDA should give an undertaking that the monuments will not be demolished. The bench observed, 'In the guise of protecting the monument, you cannot seek protection of unauthorised construction. Our only concern is that the monument must be protected.' The ASI's December 2023 report observed that the sites carry 'some historical importance' with layers dating back to the 12th and 13th centuries, though many historical layers were missing due to alterations over the years. The report noted that the structures now bear a 'modern look with massive alteration of the original heritage fabric.' However, it noted that the structures are frequently visited by devotees who come to light lamps at the Ashiq dargah for fulfilment of wishes and visit Chillagah to get rid of evil spirits and bad omen.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
US tariffs will have least impact on India, says BJP
New Delhi: BJP on Tuesday emphasised that there will be minimal impact of the high tariffs imposed by the US on the Indian economy as it is largely domestic consumer driven. "Many kinds of talks are happening regarding tariffs, and it is being said that this will ruin the country's economy. But the truth is that the impact of tariffs on India will be the least, the reason being that domestic consumption contributes about 58% to India's GDP," BJP spokesman Syed Zafar Islam told media persons at a press briefing at the party office in New Delhi. Islam said the Modi government has taken steps such as rationalisation in GST, reduction in interest rates, and relief in income-tax to the middle class. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo "These measures have provided the economy with an additional stimulus of about 100 basis points. That is why, whatever external impact there may be, the pace of India's economy will not stop, rather it will accelerate further," he said. Islam emphasised that India's economy is not export-driven, unlike Indonesia, Malaysia, or Singapore. Taking a jibe on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi 's 'dead economy' remark, Islam said Gandhi has not understood this fact and should know that the economy is strong. Talking about the recently announced GST reforms , Islam said this will benefit people and further accelerate the country's economy. Live Events
