
Rosneft-backed Nayara Energy withdraws case against Microsoft from Delhi HC after restoration of services
Rosneft-backed Nayara Energy
on Wednesday withdrew its case against Microsoft from the Delhi High Court after the US tech giant resumed its critical services to it.
The services, including outlook email accounts and Microsoft Teams were suspended, last week in view of the European Union sanctioning Nayara Energy, a major buyer of Russian Oil.
Nayara Energy, formerly known as Essar Oil, had then moved the court seeking resumption of services by Microsoft to safeguard its rights and ensure continued access to essential digital infrastructure.
Accusing Microsoft of 'corporate overreach,' the Indian oil refiner claimed that the US firm was not bound by EU sanctions and the abrupt suspension of licensed Microsoft tools and services had impacted its critical business operations
"Microsoft is currently restricting Nayara Energy's access to its own data, proprietary tools, and products, despite these being acquired under fully paid-up licenses," senior counsel Rajiv Nayyar and Dayan Krishnan, appearing for Nayara, argued, adding that Microsoft's unilateral decision was based solely on interpretation of recent European Union sanctions against Russia.
'While the sanctions originate exclusively from the EU, Microsoft--a US-headquartered corporation—has chosen to withdraw services from Nayara without any legal requirement to do so under US or Indian law," they argued, adding that Microsoft had acted without any notice
'At least they should give 3–4 days' notice before terminating. There can't be an abrupt shutting,' the lawyers told the court.
However, Microsoft's senior counsel Sandeep Sethi informed the court that the company had restored all suspended services to Nayara but no assurances could be given for the future. 'They (Nayara) are a sanctioned entity by the EU. We have restored today, but I can't make these statements for the future,' he submitted.
Taking note of this, a bench led by Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav allowed Nayara to withdraw the petition, granting it liberty to approach the court again should similar grievances arise.
'Earlier, without notice, they had shut their services. You came to court. Now they have restored it. The grievance stands mitigated. In the future, we believe they would not do the same exercise, and as and when they intend to, they will perhaps give you notice. If they don't, you (Nayara) can come back to court,' the court said.
Nayara operates a major refinery in Gujarat and controls over 6,000 retail fuel outlets across India,
On July 18, the European Union had imposed a new set of sanctions targeting Russian interests, including an Indian entity Nayara Energy for the first time. The sanctions by the European Union were part of its continuing efforts to exert economic pressure on Russia over its war in Ukraine.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘No formal talks on F-35 jets yet': India clarifies after Trump tariff announcement
The Indian government on Friday clarified that there have been no formal discussions yet on the potential sale of F-35 fighter jets to India, despite a reference in the India-US joint statement earlier this year. In a written response to a question in the Lok Sabha, Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh said: 'The US will undertake a review of its policy on releasing fifth-generation fighters (such as the F-35) and undersea systems to India. No formal discussions have been held as yet on this issue.' This statement comes in the backdrop of PM Narendra Modi's February visit to US, during which the two sides elevated defence and strategic cooperation, but without finalising key hardware acquisitions like the F-35. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) was also asked whether any proposal had been made by the US regarding the F-35, and about the role of American diplomats in reducing tensions between India and Pakistan in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Singh noted that diplomatic conversations were held with various countries, including the US, between April 22 and May 10. 'All our interlocutors were given a common message that India's approach was focused, measured and non-escalatory,' Singh said. He added that on May 9, India had conveyed its position clearly to US Vice President J D Vance. 'With specific reference to the United States, it was conveyed to Vice President J D Vance on May 9 that India would appropriately respond if Pakistan launched a major attack.' Singh clarified that the decision to cease military action was taken bilaterally between India and Pakistan. 'The discussion to cease military action took place directly between India and Pakistan through the existing channels of communication between the two-armed forces, and it was initiated at Pakistan's request.' Responding to a question on third-party mediation, Singh reiterated New Delhi's long-standing policy: 'As regards any proposal for third-party mediation, our longstanding position remains that any outstanding issue with Pakistan will be discussed only bilaterally. This has been made clear to all nations, including by the Prime Minister to the US President.' He emphasised that the India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership is underpinned by mutual trust and respect for sovereignty: 'The India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership is anchored in mutual trust, shared interests, goodwill and robust engagement between our citizens. The partnership has also benefited from growing strategic convergence and cooperation.' Singh also reaffirmed that India remains committed to strategic autonomy despite deepening ties with Washington. 'The Government of India closely evaluates all its external partnerships, including those in the defence and strategic domains, through the prism of India's national interest and commitment to strategic autonomy.'
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Turkish, Italian, Libyan leaders discuss joint strategy to curb migration and support Libyan unity
Oil-rich Libya plunged into chaos after a NATO-backed uprising toppled and killed longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi in 2011. In the disarray that followed, the country split into rival administrations in the east and west, each backed by rogue militias and foreign governments read more Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, center, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, left, and Libyan Prime Minister Abdul-Hamid Dbeibah, pose for photos before their meeting in Istanbul, Turkey. AP On Friday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan hosted a conference in Istanbul with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Libyan Prime Minister Abdul-Hamid Dbeibah to discuss migration, collaboration, and Libya's political stability. According to a statement published by Meloni's office after the closed-door meeting, the three leaders addressed boosting collaboration in the Mediterranean region, beginning with migration management. Meloni applauded the 'excellent results achieved' through partnership with Turkey on migration control, stating that the lessons learnt should be applied to strengthen the Libyan Government of National Unity's migration efforts, according to a statement released by her office. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to a statement released by Erdogan's office, 'long-term and sustainable' solutions were required to eliminate the root cause of migration. Libya is a major transit hub for migrants escaping war and poverty in Africa and the Middle East. Drownings along the country's shore have been prevalent. In December, at least 61 migrants, including women and children, drowned off Zuwara on Libya's western coast. The Italian prime minister also underlined Italy's commitment 'to Libya's stability, unity, and independence,' as well as its support for a political process led by Libya and assisted by the United Nations that would lead to elections. According to the Turkish presidential statement, the three leaders will meet again to assess their conclusions after lower-level technical meetings. Oil-rich Libya plunged into chaos after a NATO-backed uprising toppled and killed longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi in 2011. In the disarray that followed, the country split into rival administrations in the east and west, each backed by rogue militias and foreign governments. Turkey has been allied with the Tripoli-based government in the west, but has recently taken steps to improve ties with the eastern-based government as well. In 2019, Turkey reached an agreement with the Tripoli-based government which delineated maritime boundaries between Libya and Turkey, angering Greece and Cyprus which say the agreement infringes on their rights. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Just in case these foolish statements are...': Trump orders nuclear sub deployment after Medvedev's 'provocative' remarks
'Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev…, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump posted on Truth Social read more A day after former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned US President Donald Trump about Moscow's Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities following Trump's remark telling him to 'watch his words', the US President on Friday said he had ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines in response to what he called 'highly provocative' comments by the Russian leader. 'Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' he added. Trump did not clarify the exact location or nature—nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed—of the submarines he said were deployed in response to remarks by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. The escalating exchange between the two leaders began after Trump labelled Medvedev the 'failed former President of Russia.' Trump, after announcing a new tariff on India and a penalty for its trade relations with Russia, said, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World.' He added, 'Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way, and tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!' Medvedev responded on Thursday via Telegram, writing, 'If a few words from the former president of Russia can provoke such a jittery reaction from the mighty president of the United States, then Russia must be completely in the right.' 'We'll keep moving forward on our own path,' Reuters quoted him as saying. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Mocking Trump's 'dead economies' remark, Medvedev referenced Russia's Cold War-era nuclear deterrent system: 'As for 'dead economies' and 'dangerous territory,' maybe he should rewatch his favorite zombie movies and remember just how dangerous the so-called 'Dead Hand,' which doesn't even exist, can be.' While Trump did not specify what exactly triggered his nuclear warning, Medvedev had earlier in the week criticised Trump's push for more sanctions, accusing him of escalating tensions. 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' Medvedev wrote on X. With inputs from agencies