Embattled NSW Liberal committee undergoes major shake-up, as moderates reassert dominance whilst fending off unexpected bid from Tony Abbott
The federal executive met on Tuesday afternoon and voted 20 votes to one on the new leadership panel proposed by federal Liberal leader Sussan Ley and her NSW counterpart Mark Speakman.
The meeting concluded that the bruised division would remain in administration until next March with former NSW Premier Nick Greiner installed as the independent chair to oversee the seven-person state executive committee for the next nine months.
Ms Ley selected former state MP Peta Seaton as her delegate on the committee, while Mr Speakman appointed barrister and outspoken moderate Jane Buncle.
It is also understood that multiple members of the NSW right faction lobbied for former Prime Minister Tony Abbott to be appointed to the committee, however the move was resoundingly voted down by the executive.
The meeting's rejection of Abbott's bid resulted in a tense factional dispute between moderates and the right.
Numerous Liberal right figures labelled the new group the "committee of management" and attacked party bosses for establishing an executive stacked with staunch social moderates and soft-right forces led by factional leader federal MP Alex Hawke.
One anonymous conservative Liberal described the outcome as a "Hawke/Moderate intervention' and told The Daily Telegraph, 'their mission will be to prevent reform from happening.'
'If the rules of the party mean that Hawke and the Moderates are always in charge, what incentive do they have to change the rules?'
The new committee will include Mark Baillie who will serve as treasurer, James Owen, Peter O'Hanlon and Berenice Walker who is also the President of the NSW Women's Council.
The result means that Victorian Liberal elders Alan Stockdale and Richard Alston will be axed as interim administrators, after former federal Liberal leader Peter Dutton announced a 10-month takeover of the NSW branch and installed a three-person oversight panel due to the 2024 council nomination blunder.
Mr Stockdale's tenure was viewed as unsustainable by a myriad of NSW Liberal figures after the veteran politician stated at a gathering of the NSW Liberal Women's Council that women had become 'sufficiently assertive' and that reverse quotas for men were needed.
Multiple Liberal insiders told the Sydney Morning Herald Mr Stockdale was vocal in his opposition of Ms Walker being appointed to the committee.
Ms Walker had previously railed against the party's direction under Mr Stockdale's leadership, with the women's council passing a motion on May 25 conveying their 'firm and formal opposition to any extension of the federal intervention'.
Ms Seaton was the only member of the interim panel who survived the restructure.
The singular vote against Ley and Speakman's committee was Charlie Taylor, the brother of shadow defence minister Angus Taylor who recently lost the Liberal leadership ballot, Liberal sources told the Sydney Morning Herald.
A Liberal source told the Daily Telegraph that NSW members had 'reclaimed the party back from Victoria'.
'The Victorian division is sinking fast and we want nothing to do with that Titanic,' the unnamed source added.
The meeting also appointed former NSW state minister Pru Goward and former federal minister and factional powerbroker Nick Minchin to lead a review into the Liberal's thumping 2025 federal election defeat.
Ms Goward and Mr Minchin are set to investigate the Coalition's tumultuous election campaign and the last term of parliament under former opposition leader Peter Dutton and provide recommendations about how the party can best reclaim the litany of seats lost to both the Teals and the Labor Party.
They are also expected to scrutinise the centralised nature of Liberal campaign HQ in the lead-up to the election, of which numerous Coalition figures have spoken out against since the overwhelming defeat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Hidden issue fueling Aussie crisis
Jim Chalmers says it's 'not surprising' Australia's birth rate has slowed given the 'financial pressures' on families, however, he has rejected calls to bring back the Costello-era $3000 baby bonus in favour of 'better, more enduring ways to support parents'. The comments come ahead of Labor's highly anticipated Economic Reform Roundtable, which will bring business and unions groups to Canberra for three days of intensive discussions on how to lift Australia's sluggish productivity rate. 'It's not surprising that the birth rate has slowed given the pressures on people, including financial pressures,' he told NewsWire. 'We want to make it easier for them to make that choice. If they want to have more kids, we want to make it easier for them to do that, and that's what motivates a lot of our changes.' NED-14018-How-Australias-birth-rate-has-fallen However, as Australia struggles to boost the economy, and in turn raise wages and living standards, it's also contending with a sluggish birth rate of 1.5 births per woman, which is under the 2.1 figure needed to sustain population growth. Boosting productivity was also essential to ensuring that Australia's ageing population could weather economic headwinds, the Treasurer said. 'Now, the reason why the productivity challenge is important to this is because our society is ageing, and over time, there will be fewer workers for every person who's retired,' he said. 'We need to make sure that our economy is as productive as it can be, as strong as it can be to withstand that demographic change, which is going to be big and consequential.' Treasurer Jim Chalmers said boosting productivity was essential to help Australia weather an ageing population. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Chalmers also spurned calls from former Liberal prime minister John Howard to resurrect the $3000 baby bonus cash incentive bought in by his treasurer Peter Costello in 2004. The Queenslander's parliamentary colleagues have advocated for other measures to spur a baby boom, including Nationals senator Matt Canavan's proposed $100,000 loans for first-time parents to buy their first home. Parliament's maverick father of the house Bob Katter also proposed incoming splitting for parents so they paid less overall tax. For example, a household where two parents earn a combined income of $150,000 pays about $10,000 less tax than a household with a single worker pulling in $150,000. Instead, Mr Chalmers said Labor's supports were 'more enduring,' pointing to policies like guaranteeing three days of subsidised child care for families earning less than $533,280, increasing paid parental leave to 25 weeks, and paying super on government-funded parental leave to tackle the gender superannuation gap. The decline in birth rate. Source: Supplied Credit: Supplied 'That policy from a couple of decades ago was a one-off payment, and we found ways to support parents which is meaningful and enduring, not one off. That's the main difference,' he said. 'Our political opponents … haven't said how they would fund that, how they would pay for that, whereas we've been carefully budgeting all this help for parents in our budgets and providing that in an ongoing way. 'We're always in the market for ideas about ways to support families. We've got all this cost-of-living help rolling out, (like) all the childcare changes. All of that, I think, demonstrate a willingness on our part to support families (in making) decisions about whether they want to have kids or have more kids.' Mr Chalmers says the 'generational anxiety' plaguing Australia youth simultaneously contending with rising house prices and inflation will also be a touchstone ahead of the economic reform roundtable, which at one point was called the productivity roundtable before it was quietly changed. He concedes productivity can 'sound like a cold lifeless piece of economic jargon' but explains the metric is 'about efficiency' and 'about how we make our economy stronger to deliver for more people so that they can earn more and get ahead and be better off'. Australia's birthrate has fallen below the 2.1 births needed to sustain Australia's population. Jason Edwards/ NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Generational equality has also fuelled some of the roundtable's more controversial submissions, including the Australian Council of Trade Unions' call to limit negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions on just one property by the next five years, and teal Wentworth MP Allegra Spender's overhaul of the tax system that she says is overly reliant on income taxes. The ACTU has also reiterated calls for a four-day work week, while the Productivity Commission irked business bodies with calls for a new 5 per cent cash flow tax and a road user charge to ensure EV drivers, who skip the fuel excise, also contribute to road upgrades. How to best handle the opportunities posed by artificial intelligence, while mitigating the risks and job losses, will also be debated on day two; however, Mr Chalmers is quietly optimistic. 'I think one of the big challenges, broadly, but especially for young people, is how they adapt and adopt technology, so a big focus will be how do we skill people up to use artificial intelligence so that it's it works for them, not against them, particularly in the workplace,' he said. Mr Chalmers will use talks to create consensus on what he says is the 'most transformative influence on our economy and our lifetime', and while he doesn't want to pre-empt decisions, education settings and regulation will likely be immediate action points once talks end on Thursday. '(AI) has to change the way we think about skills and capabilities, and I'll work closely with colleagues in the education portfolios, the industry portfolio and elsewhere to make sure that we've got the settings right,' he said. 'Whether it's regulation, whether it's education, in a whole bunch of areas, governments have to catch up and keep up with the accelerating pace of technological change.'
The Age
4 hours ago
- The Age
Progress thwarted by educational inequities
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. WESTERN SUBURBS Re ″ Young tradies like Dylan and western suburbs professionals have this in common ″, 15/8. Congratulations to Dylan D'Emanuele for his perseverance and determination to enter a trade, assisted by Youth Projects. It certainly shouldn't be so hard for young people to gain a foothold in their own society. Two adverse factors have primary responsibility for this. First, the Victorian government lost the plot in closing around 120 technical secondary schools, expecting high schools to somehow cater for academic and non-academic students, and ″warehouse″ unemployed youth to keep them off the streets. I'd previously observed teachers in a now-closed technical school in the inner-west, witnessing how engaged students were in mechanical, construction and myriad other tasks, supplemented by classes in basic skills. The students who flourish in technical schools need those educational opportunities to learn skilled trades which can take them straight into work. The second major factor disadvantaging today's youth is the exportation of entry level work to cheaper labour countries. Those jobs used to go to school-leavers after Year 10. High levels of youth unemployment are inevitably detrimental to those young people and to the society as a whole. Barbara Chapman, South Yarra New insights needed Accolades to The Age for co-presenting the upcoming 'West of Melbourne Summit', and its continuing advocacy by their journalists for people living in the west side of Melbourne. The spoken word cannot be ignored. New insights are desperately needed. Both sides of Victorian parliament need to listen. Addressing the various needs of people choosing to live and raise their children in the west could address problems facing the inner city Melbourne congestion. Christine Baker, Rosanna Melbourne infrastructure delays have history My heart goes out to those folk in the west who pine for improved transport infrastructure. I can only hope they do better than their brethren in Doncaster. Soon after World War II ended, it was proposed to extend tram route 48 from North Balwyn to Doncaster, thereby servicing the residents of housing replacing the fast-disappearing orchards. Successive political parties seeking to retain or reclaim the state's treasury benches eagerly supported the proposal. As is the fate of certain current infrastructure proposals, once elected, assorted reasons for deferment were trotted out. The latest is that the hill to Doncaster Shoppingtown is too steep to enable disabled access. Any suggestion that the route be extended further to Box Hill via Tram Road, thereby looping the city with a significant chunk of the eastern suburbs, can only be described as a figment in the imagination of those living there. (By contrast, Australia's first electric tram service existed in Doncaster from 1889 to 1896 when Victoria was a colony!) Jim Lamborn, Doncaster THE FORUM Buried report As reported by The Age this week, the government has refused to make the outcome of the 2022 Property Market Review″ public. According to both Premier Jacinta Allan and Consumer Affairs Minister Nick Staikos, the review is 'a cabinet document from the last term of government' and therefore does not have to be made public. What nonsense! Like many others, I responded to a personal invitation to provide a written submission to the review. My comprehensive submission subsequently included, again by invitation, a one-hour presentation to the Nous Group who were commissioned to conduct the review for the government. My submission concentrated on the need for auction rules to be reformed to stamp out the insidious practice of underquoting. This can be achieved by introducing a simple, new, easily policed rule that would require agents to publish their vendors' reserve prices in all auction advertising. The REIV this week has finally agreed, after 20 years' resistance and following exposure of underquoting by The Age, that vendors' reserve prices should be advertised before auctions and it has also called for the review to be made public. There's something very concerning about why the review is not being made public. Why should anybody spend valuable hours of their time preparing well-researched submissions on important issues of wide public interest, only for their input to be buried? John Keating, real estate agent and auctioneer, Woodend Rebalance tax system The articles ' We've worked hard ... but it's not enough ' (14/8) and ' Spender calls for new income tax system ' (14/8), highlight the gross unfairness of our tax system. Work, not property investment, should be rewarded by governments. Current property investor tax breaks are inequitable and they elevate house prices, further disadvantaging prospective homeowners. It's time for Labor to rebalance our tax system and give younger generations a fair go. Lyn Shiells, Glen Iris Bendigo festival no-show Re: ″ Authors ditch Bendigo festival over freedom of speech concerns ″, (15/8). As a Bendigo resident, the Bendigo Writers Festival is an annual event on my calendar. Claire Wright, Jess Hill, Thomas Mayo and Randa Abdel-Fattah are the very writers and thinkers I would be attending to hear, in expectation of respectful, intelligent, informed and balanced perspectives. I congratulate them on taking such a principled stance in withdrawing from a public forum which curtails their ability to do this, even though it means no writers' festival in Bendigo for me this year. Michelle Goldsmith, Eaglehawk AI flooding zone Two years ago, I was offered a free trial for one of the artificial intelligence (AI) content generation platforms. I tried it and immediately cancelled my subscription. Even then, I could see the dangers of this technology. The information delivered by the platform on the topic I gave it was just good enough to provide a viable alternative mechanism for busy professionals to generate documents. But it also contained numerous errors and pieces of misinformation. My colleagues laughed at my concerns. 'People will check the content and correct any errors before they use it,' they told me. And perhaps, initially they did. My concern was that after a while, everyone would just assume the information is correct and not bother to check any more. The content is so quickly and easily produced, it would eventually 'flood the zone' and drown out the work produced through careful research and due consideration. Fast-forward two years and we read that defence lawyers filed error-filled AI-generated documents with the Victorian Supreme Court (15/8). The lawyers were too busy to check the materials before they filed them and the prosecutors didn't bother checking either. Heaven help us if AI is the future of our society. Donna Cohen, Southbank
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
‘Just wrong': State government seeks to draft public servants into WFH campaign
This masthead was provided the material by senior public servants who cannot comment publicly as a condition of their employment but privately expressed frustration they were being asked to promote government policy. Associate Professor William Partlett, an expert in public law at the Melbourne Law School, said the government was treating the public service as an extension of its political party work rather than a provider of independent advice. 'When I see this, I think cartel party,' Partlett said. 'This is part of a pattern, and it is one we should be concerned about. It reflects a broader problem concern – the erosion of Westminster principles and the centralisation of authority.' Loading A cartel party, a concept coined by the late Irish political scientist Peter Mair, is where a dominant political party co-opts the apparatus and resources of the state to cement its power. Dr Colleen Lewis, an honorary professor at the Australian Studies Institute at the Australian National University, was more blunt. 'It is just wrong,' she said. 'The public service is obliged to be non-partisan and governments should respect that requirement. The government should not be canvassing the public sector to support an idea that hasn't been through the parliamentary process.' Opposition spokesman for financial integrity and budget repair David Davis said he would refer the matter to Victoria's public service watchdog, the Public Sector Commission. Loading 'It is clear that the Allan Labor government and its senior officers have crossed the line politicising the consultation process of its WFH proposals through a highly political intervention and enlisting the public service to deliberately skew consultation,' Davis said. 'The public service is meant to give frank and fearless advice, not act a spruiker for the Allan Labor government.' Jiselle Hanna, the Victorian branch secretary of the Community and Public Sector Union, described the material provided to this masthead as 'problematic' and said it appeared the government was using public servants for its political objectives. Hanna said the requirement for public servants to remain apolitical was inconsistently applied in Victoria, with bureaucrats encouraged to promote the Voice referendum, same-sex marriage plebiscite and working-from-home rights, but gagged from commenting about the war in Gaza. 'Our obligation is to implement the government's agenda because they are the ones elected,' she said. 'This isn't what we are being asked to do in relation to working from home. What we are being asked to do is promote an idea to another person. I think it is a problematic development. 'Are we being used and our networks being used to do a bit of promotion for the government? It certainly looks like it.' This masthead provided questions to Allan and Victoria's public service chief, Department of Premier and Cabinet secretary Jeremi Moule. A department spokesperson said government surveys and consultations were regularly promoted between departments. 'The Victorian Public Service is one of the largest employers in Victoria and it is important they have an opportunity to participate in the working from home survey,' the spokesperson said. Working from home is widely accepted practice across the Victorian Public Service. Under the current enterprise agreement covering the public service, bureaucrats whose jobs can be done from home can do so a minimum of two days a week. Treasurer Jaclyn Symes this week confirmed the true rate of working from home across the public service was likely higher. Hanna said that as a workplace issue, work from home was settled across the public service. At June 30 last year, 57,345 people were employed in the Victorian Public Service. Pollster Jim Reed, the founder of the Resolve Political Monitor survey of voting intentions published by this masthead, examined the survey this week and said the results, if and when they are published, should be treated with caution. 'This sort of open survey form can be completed by anyone, and they might be a real Victorian answering honestly, or it might be others completing multiple responses to force a certain result,' Reed said. 'This is why we run statistically sampled polls of the population. It's only then you can be certain that you're getting a true picture, no matter how well the questions are designed.' Davis described the survey as a faux consultation. 'Labor is seeking to stack the results with favourable comments and few criticisms by sending material to special target audiences likely to support the government's view,' he said. 'We will refer this matter to the Public Sector Commission to ensure rules are obeyed and guidelines for neutrality are observed.'
